Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on the tell tale heart by edgar allan poe
The plot analysis of The Most Dangerous Game by Richard Connell
Analysis of the dangerous game by Connell
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on the tell tale heart by edgar allan poe
“Whenever it fell upon me, my blood ran cold; and so by degrees — very gradually — I made up my mind to take the life of the old man, and thus rid myself of the eye forever” ( Poe, 1843 ). The Tell Tale Heart by Edgar Allan Poe depicts the sanity of an anonymous person who end the life of an old man to rid to of his “evil eye”. The Most Dangerous Game by Richard Connell also questions the morality and sanity of General Zaroff and Sanger Rainsford as the hunter and the hunted. Rainsford slipped of the ship during the middle of the night in the pitch-black and boundless Caribbean Sea after hearing a gunshot followed by a horrifying and skin crawling shriek of an animal. The next morning, Rainsford walked skeptically deep into the heart of the …show more content…
However, his facade is flawed and he exhibits maniacal behaviors that the thought of hunting man pleasures him. Hunting animals that are one of the most dangerous species on Earth such as cape buffalos or lions or tigers is no longer an amusement to General Zaroff. Instead, he create a new game for his hunt which proclaims “courage, cunning, and, above all, it must be able to reason” ( Connell, 224 ). General Zaroff can not distinguish between man and animals and think that his new game brings him pleasure and delightment. He is numb to the feeling of pain and sympathy that is locked up with a steel key that is forever lost. General Zaroff maniacal actions is the effect of the time when he first shot his father’s prized turkey at five years old. Surprisingly, his father did not punish him for shooting his prized turkey but instead complemented General Zaroff of his marksmanship and his father was the one who gave him a gun when he was five years old ( Connell, 223 ). Ever since on, General Zaroff have hunted infinite number of animals. The hands of General Zaroff is accounted for boundless innocent lives which he blindly killed for his amusement. General Zaroff’s life was always involving lives of an an animal and person to such lengths that he can’t distinguish between a man and an animal; and his mind and thoughts is filled about hunting which in turn cause him to …show more content…
General Zaroff pleasure is by inflicting fear and pain and suffering to his “hide and seek” captive. Only a beast with no feelings or not clear state of mind will inflict pain, fear, or suffering to someone of the same species. Rainsford, who is an experienced animal hunter, admitted to General Zaroff at the dinner table that “the Cape buffalo is the most dangerous of all big game” ( Connell, 222 ). And yet, General Zaroff displays the head of a Cape buffalo he had hunted which hurled him against a tree and fractured his skull but he wins the challenge against the “most dangerous of all big game”. General Zaroff is a beast that wins the battle against the most powerful beast and therefore, he now hunt men after battles with tigers and cape buffalo bores him. When he hunted all of his prey; he use a channel—that with a firm touch of a button—the channel opens up and giant rocks with razor sharp edges emerges from the bottom of the ocean to the vast ocean—positioned like a shark with a wide open jaw; ready to devour its prey in any second. Another option of capturing preys is by shooting at it with open fire ( Connell, 226 ). General Zaroff let his prey decides on how they want to meet one’s death. One is an exciting and thrilling death or two, an agonizing and excruciating death. One or the other nonetheless, reveal General Zaroff’s true ferocious and bloodthirsty
In both film and story, Rainsford expresses his lack of sympathy for his prey. Similar to the story, Rainsford meets Ivan first and can’t get through to him and then, he’s greeted by Zaroff. In the film, Zaroff knows that Rainsford is a famous hunter and has read his books, just like in the story. Moreover, Zaroff reveals that a cape buffalo gave him the scar on his head. In the same manner, Zaroff tells Rainsford how he stocks his island with human prey. Just as the film showed Zaroff has a room filled with human heads, and that’s also mentioned in the story. Furthermore, Rainsford uses the same traps (Malay Mancatcher, Burmese Tiger Pit, and a native Uganda Trick) in the film as he did in the story. In addition, Rainsford kills Ivan with the same native Uganda trick. Both film and movie, unveils that Rainsford kills
Zaroff is extremely pleased when he gets to host Rainsford at his house, as if it's an honor to host this world renowned hunter in his home. He is so pleased when he has the chance to tell Rainsford about his new hunting style. “Dear me. Again with that unpleasant word. But I think I can show you that your scruples are quite ill founded” (26). Zaroff believes that he can change Rainsfords view on his hunting style when he reacts immediatly with great disgust.
Hunting big game animals for sport was a popular pastime with the wealthy classes following World War I. The morality of killing for sport was not questioned in reality, but in this short story the author does question it by taking it a step further and having the protagonist, Sangor Rainsford, hunted by the antagonist, General Zaroff.In a short story full of irony, one of the greatest ironies of Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” is that General Zaroff repeatedly tells Rainsford that he maintains a sense of civilization on his island.
In “The Most Dangerous Game” the author creates two strikingly similar characters that blur the line of ethics. Rainsford, the protagonist, meets his adversary and leader of an exotic tribe, Zaroff, after falling off of a yacht and swimming to the nearest island. The short story then explores the events that transpires between the strangers – focusing on Zaroff's bloodthirsty hunt against Rainsford. Yet even with the two men on opposite sides of a loaded gun, they both share many common interests and views pertaining to their similar backgrounds, hunting methods, and desired end result.
General Zaroff was a war general who escaped to the caribbeans. He found pleasure in killing others as a sport. In WW1 the Russians were killing the Germans and Austrians. This could have triggered why Zaroff likes and thinks killing others is okay. “So I bought this island, built this house, and here I do my hunting. The island is perfect for my purposes—there are jungles with a maze of traits in them, hills, swamps […]". During this time no one owned the Caribbean's so for him this was a good place to live and continue his killing streak. There are many ways to trap victims in the jungle like dead-ends, pouncing, and booby traps. In WW1 they used many of these techniques and more like a pit of spears or gun traps. This story was an insight of what the narrator and Zaroff saw during
In Richard Connell’s The Most Dangerous Game Rainsford’s motivations changed from wanting to be a great hunter to trying to stay alive. As Whitney and Rainsford are headed to Rio to hunt they are talking about the great sport itself, hunting. Rainsford agrees with Whitney and says that hunting is, “The best sport in the world” (Connell 1). This shows he enjoys hunting by saying that it’s is the best and most enjoyable sport in the world. If you are passionate about something it can motivate you to try new things and in his case, hunting new animals. After Rainsford falls off the yacht and wanders to the island he then finds a home and knocks on the door. Ivan answers and General Zaroff soon approached Rainsford and saluted him. After allowing
“…seeing the creature [Leopard Man] there in a perfectly animal attitude, with the light gleaming in its eyes, and its imperfectly human dace distorted with terror, I realized again the fact of its humanity. In another moment other of its pursuers would see it, and it would be overpowered and captured, to experience once more the horrible tortures of the enclosure. Abruptly I slipped out my revolver, aimed between his terror-struck eyes and fired” (Wells 72-73).
Sanger Rainsford is a dynamic character, and the protagonist of Richard Connell’s short story “The Most Dangerous Game.” (rpt. In Thomas R. Arp, Perrine’s Literature, Sound, and Sense, 12th ed. [Bostson: Wadsworth, 2015] 487-501). Rainsford is a celebrated American big game hunter, and he has written several books on the sport of hunting. The most famous book he wrote is about hunting snow leopards in Tibet. He falls overboard on a trip to Rio De Janeiro, and ends up on Ship-Trap island. It is there that becomes the prey of General Zaroff. In addition to being a hunter, he is also a World War I veteran. Throughout the story, Rainsford shows characteristics of being a realist, being resourceful, and being a dynamic character.
When Rainsford is playing The Most Dangerous Game with the general he realizes something major. Connell writes,”I have played the fox, now I must play the cat of the fable”(Connell 32). Connell illustrates the irony of this phrase because he has always “played the fox” (the hunter), but now that he is playing the most dangerous game with the general the tides have turned. Redford now must “play the cat of the fable”(the hunted). This Redford an insight into the animal 's perspective and it helps him to realize the hardships animals have to face when they are being hunted by a human.
Richard Connell, the author, does an incredible job of portraying the insane, however experienced hunter, General Zaroff as a man who hunts man for fun. The portrayal of a sophisticated, educated, cultured man with psychopathic tendencies was evident in many different instances. Interesting enough, I discovered that paintballing was actually inspired in part by the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Most_Dangerous_Game), which leaves us to think “Man is the cruelest animal.” (Friedrich Nietzsche).
General Zaroff used hunting tactics when they were eating “the last supper” at Zaroff’s house. Every time Rainsford looked up, he said, “he found him studying him, appraising him narrowly” (Connell 66). By this, the reader can tell that Zaroff is trying to notice Rainsford’s tendencies. Knowing these can make hunting him easier. Also at dinner, Zaroff explains to Rainsford that “God made him a hunter” and how his father believed that “his hand was made for the trigger” since he was ten (Connell 85). Zaroff sharing this with Rainsford is proof that this man is a talented hunter and has been for a long time. Rainsford is quite the hunter himself. So much so, that Zaroff knew who he was when he arrived. The General stated, “It is a very great pleasure and honor to welcome Mr. Sanger Rainsford, the celebrated hunter, to my home” (Connell 52). Also during the hunt when Rainsford set up the Burmese tiger pit and claiming one of Zaroff’s dogs, Zaroff tells him, “You’ve done well, Rainsford” (Connell 194). If his enemy believes that he is a great hunter, then he must be. Especially because Zaroff thinks so highly of himself. Going back to when Rainsford was
In The Hunger Games, Katniss was shown the nest of tracker jackers above where Cato and his group of people were camping out. The group was waiting for Katniss to come into sight after hiding in a tree but she cut the branch the nest was lying on and the tracker jackers caused the group extreme pain and even a death as everyone ran. Katniss scared the group away and retrieved a bow from one of them. There was a great chance of her being dead if there was no nest. In “The Most Dangerous Game”, Rainsford built a trap called a Malay man-catcher. He built it of trees that he found and hoped that General Zaroff would set it off. He did but unfortunately only his shoulder was hurt, but Rainsford did not give up on his traps. He next built a Burmese tiger-pit out of digging a hole and then using sticks, leaves, and other brush to hide the sharp stakes he had placed in the hole. This trap was again not lethal to Zaroff but this time one of his best dogs was lost. The General realized that he could no longer take Rainsford on by himself and had to bring the rest of his pack of dogs to try to hunt Rainsford. This can be used as an example of fear because Zaroff has only needed to use the dogs once before while hunting and he also had to bring Ivan with. Zaroff could not handle that he had a possibility of losing a hunt and Rainsford made him understand that not everything could be
What internally drives a terrorist’s motivation varies from subject to subject. While the average American citizen would likely be quick to point terrorists hate the western way of life and what it represents, the issue is far more complex. Simon Cottee’s article “What Motivates Terrorists?” (2015), looks at various levels of motivation. Prior definitions of terrorism looked at the defining cause as possibly psychological abnormalities within in the individual (Cottee, 2015). As studies have evolved, the focus has shifted to the environment in which the terrorist is surrounded. While certainly there is cases in which a person who is mentally unstable could be an ideal target for terrorist propaganda, the number of cases involving mental
In the story The Most Dangerous Game a character named General Zaroff has a passion for hunting. He has been hunting since he was born. He has hunted every animal known to man, but, then he gets tried of hunting the same animal over and over. So he discovers a new animal human flesh. General Zaroff is person of bad character because he is cruel, cowardly, and untrustworthy.
Connell's use of foreshadowing creates an atmosphere of mystery and a hesitant feeling of not knowing what events will occur. For instance, Zaroff "has ceased [hunting]'; because all the animals "had become too easy'; to chase; but one animal has a certain characteristic of being "able to reason'; which rekindles his passion for the thrill of the hunt (68). The vague statement at which Zaroff makes at Rainsford obviously hints toward humans as being the animal of reason because referring to the statement Rainsford makes in the early stages of the story, he asserts that animals do not feel or think. Now that Rainsford conceives the idea that Zaroff hunts humans, it provides Rainsford with a frustrating mental reaction of fear and anger because Zaroff openly declares that he poaches humans for amusement and yet Rainsford feels the anxiety of dying in his sick game. Equally important, while Zaroff hunts strategically, "[his] brain against [Rainsford]'; (71), "it sent a shudder of cold horror'; in the flowing veins of Rainsford because of the fear that he will "lose [his] nerve'; (73). Immediately, when Rainsford enters the repulsive jungle, he knows that the strategy for staying alive becomes not only physically, but by remaining mentally strong and not losing his nerves. For this reason, by staying on objective and visualizing his goal of achieving victory over Zaroff; Rainsford will not have to worry about weakness from hunger because he will be full of hope and optimism for the rest of his life. Connell utilizes foreshadowing in a way that other authors do not compare because when he uses an event that contains foreshadowing, he does not state it candidly but blends foreshadowing into story like the ...