Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The most dangerous game character analysis
How is survival portrayed in the hunger games
The most dangerous game character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The most dangerous game character analysis
In the popular stories The Hunger Games and “The Most Dangerous Game” the main characters are skilled hunters that are partaking in games where they have to hunt while being hunted. They both show main traits of “true survivors”, including using their hunting knowledge to survive, using resources and building traps, and standing up to their fear or being able to turn it around.
Katniss and Rainsford both used their hunting knowledge to survive their challenges. Examples include when Katniss was looking for Peeta and found blood on the ground that could have easily been missed. When Katniss was at home she would look for the faint tracks of animals to hunt for food and applying these to the game helped her in finding Peeta. Rainsford also
…show more content…
knew how to track animals and what would make it harder, even for the best hunters. He used his knowledge of “Fox lore” to overlap and loop his tracks around each other. He did not manage to outsmart Zaroff with his confusing tracks but it was important for him to know what Zaroff was capable of. Both Katniss and Rainsford were skilled in climbing trees and knew that having the high ground was important in these sort of situations. Rainsford used the high ground to watch Zaroff from a distance safely and Katniss used it to be out of sight and have a safe place to rest without fear of being hunted. The two hunters knew how to build effective traps and use their resources to scare the others.
In The Hunger Games, Katniss was shown the nest of tracker jackers above where Cato and his group of people were camping out. The group was waiting for Katniss to come into sight after hiding in a tree but she cut the branch the nest was lying on and the tracker jackers caused the group extreme pain and even a death as everyone ran. Katniss scared the group away and retrieved a bow from one of them. There was a great chance of her being dead if there was no nest. In “The Most Dangerous Game”, Rainsford built a trap called a Malay man-catcher. He built it of trees that he found and hoped that General Zaroff would set it off. He did but unfortunately only his shoulder was hurt, but Rainsford did not give up on his traps. He next built a Burmese tiger-pit out of digging a hole and then using sticks, leaves, and other brush to hide the sharp stakes he had placed in the hole. This trap was again not lethal to Zaroff but this time one of his best dogs was lost. The General realized that he could no longer take Rainsford on by himself and had to bring the rest of his pack of dogs to try to hunt Rainsford. This can be used as an example of fear because Zaroff has only needed to use the dogs once before while hunting and he also had to bring Ivan with. Zaroff could not handle that he had a possibility of losing a hunt and Rainsford made him understand that not everything could be
won. Rainsford and Katniss both stood up to their fear of the people trying to control them. In The Hunger Games, Katniss and the other tributes had no choice but to fight for their lives. Some had volunteered for their districts but there was no doubt that 23 would die so one could survive. President Snow and Seneca had complete control over the games. Katniss was terrified when she was on the pedestal and at the beginning of the games but she stood up to that fear and used it for the better. When she and Peeta were the only two tributes left they were going to eat poisonous berries together so there would be no winner in spite of the unfair rule change set by President Snow. The government in the Capitol were scared because they needed a victor for hope and to try to make the games seem fair but they could end up without one. Katniss and Peeta won together by turning their fear of their own death into the Capitol’s fear of their death. Rainsford also turned his fear and discomfort around while Zaroff was hunting him. In “The Most Dangerous Game” Rainsford had been found yet ignored by Zaroff. “The general was saving him for another days sport! The Cossack was the cat; he was the mouse. Then it was that Rainsford knew the full meaning of terror,” (Connell, 18). Rainsford had never felt such terror but he was able to use it as a motive. In the end of the story, Rainsford jumps into the sea and Zaroff assumes he is dead. Once he returned to his home for dinner he was upset and could not stop thinking about how he could not kill Rainsford. When he finally started to relax and get ready to sleep, Rainsford was hiding in the curtain somehow from the sea. This caught General Zaroff off guard and terrified him causing Rainsford to be able to send him to his demise. Rainsford turned his fear of death to Zaroff by catching him at a time where he was most vulnerable. A true survivor knows how to overcome their challenges and use their knowledge to stay alive. Katniss Everdeen of The Hunger Games and Rainsford of “The Most Dangerous Game” show these skills in multiple different areas, including using their strengths in knowledge, using resources for trapping, and using fear in a different way. They have earned the titles of true survivors.
In both books they share some traits, even though they may not look anything alike they are. both of these novels are dystopian novels and many characters share similarity’s.
The two story High Noon and "The Most Dangerous Game" are alike in some ways, but very different in many other ways also. High Noon is a story about an honest man named will khan; Who is a Marshall that has sent a prisoner to jail named frank Miller. Who has now come out of jail to get revenge on will. When will needs the towns people of hadleyville for help to defeat frank when he comes after will no one helps. In the other hand "The Most Dangerous Game" is about two very skilled hunter between Rainsford who get trapped on Ship-Trap island by Zaroff who owns the island. When Rainsford realizes what Zaroff hunts in his island he must leave as soon as possible. Zaroff tells Rainsford he could either hunt with him or against him.
In both film and story, Rainsford expresses his lack of sympathy for his prey. Similar to the story, Rainsford meets Ivan first and can’t get through to him and then, he’s greeted by Zaroff. In the film, Zaroff knows that Rainsford is a famous hunter and has read his books, just like in the story. Moreover, Zaroff reveals that a cape buffalo gave him the scar on his head. In the same manner, Zaroff tells Rainsford how he stocks his island with human prey. Just as the film showed Zaroff has a room filled with human heads, and that’s also mentioned in the story. Furthermore, Rainsford uses the same traps (Malay Mancatcher, Burmese Tiger Pit, and a native Uganda Trick) in the film as he did in the story. In addition, Rainsford kills Ivan with the same native Uganda trick. Both film and movie, unveils that Rainsford kills
“I hunt more dangerous game….” Similarities and differences can appear anywhere, especially in the short story and the movie called The Most Dangerous Game. They have similar, yet different expositions, characters, and plots with conflicts. Many people say that books or short stories are better than movies because of the similarities and differences that are found. Books or short stories are usually more descriptive, informative, and do not stray too far from the central idea or main theme, while movies only fall into one or two of these categories. Movies hardly ever fall into all three categories, however if they do the movies become better. This is not the case with The Most Dangerous Game. One place where movies and short stories have major similarities and differences is at the beginning of the story or the exposition.
Many books around throughout time have had two characters that are very similar and can be compared and contrasted. One book, The Hunger Games, introduces the characters of Katniss and Peeta in way so that they may be analyzed quite easily. Katniss and Peeta are both willing to get through the test of the Hunger Games and they both want to keep living for the sake of another person. But, at the same time they are also very different. Katniss has a more masculine personality because she enjoys hunting and scavenging, while Peeta is more reserved because he is just a dough boy and works in a bakery. While The Hunger Games has two great characters to compare and contrast, so does the classic frame narrative, Frankenstein. In Frankenstein, Mary
In the story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell the protagonist, Sanger Rainsford, is a very resourceful person. When Rainsford is thrown overboard his ship he finds himself in a rather odd predicament. He meets a man who he discovers hunts humans for sport. He quickly learns that he will be the next quarry of this man. While on the run he must use his survival skills to stay alive. “With fingers flying he wove a rough carpet of weeds and branches and then he covered the mouth of the pit” (Connell 56). Rainsford is able to use his hunting and wilderness knowledge by creating a trap for his hunter. This example shows that Rainsford is able use what's around him to stay
In Richard Connell’s The Most Dangerous Game Rainsford’s motivations changed from wanting to be a great hunter to trying to stay alive. As Whitney and Rainsford are headed to Rio to hunt they are talking about the great sport itself, hunting. Rainsford agrees with Whitney and says that hunting is, “The best sport in the world” (Connell 1). This shows he enjoys hunting by saying that it’s is the best and most enjoyable sport in the world. If you are passionate about something it can motivate you to try new things and in his case, hunting new animals. After Rainsford falls off the yacht and wanders to the island he then finds a home and knocks on the door. Ivan answers and General Zaroff soon approached Rainsford and saluted him. After allowing
Did you know even though nature can be beautiful it can sometimes be deadly.In The Most Dangerous Game, Rainsford begins to see the awe-instilling power of nature and how it can hurt us.
When Rainsford falls off of the boat, he has to try his best to stay afloat until he can find something to latch on to. He swims vigorously until he reaches Ship-Trap Island. "Jagged crags appeared to jut up into the opaqueness... dense jungle came down to the very edge of the cliffs." It is midday and he is just searching for a place to rest when he runs into Ivan, the astonishingly large guard of the island. Zaroff, the owner of the island, joins in on their conversation about hunting. The conversation is interesting to say the least. Zaroff says, "You'll find this game worth playing…your brain against mine. Your woodcraft against mine. Your strength and stamina against mine. Outdoor chess! And the stake is not without value, eh?" Zaroff is trying to point out that he finds interest in hunting humans, and he wants to know if Rainsford will rise to the challenge. Rainsford is left with a choice to make; will he fight Zaroff, or will he decline and get killed by Ivan. The choice in this situation is pretty self- evident.
The hunger games and Animal farm sharing a lot of the same qualities including betrayal, propaganda and dictatorship, make the two similar and comparable. Both films/books show how abuse of power can change the whole configuration of a community. The distinction between the higher and lower class is also underlined.
Which is better, the ‘Classic’ or the ‘Modern’ novel? After reading the classic novel, ‘Lord of the flies’ and the Modern novel, The Hunger Games, it is clear that the classic novel won the battle between old and new. Lord of the Flies, written by William Goulding is a novel about a young group of school boys who’s plane was shot down over a deserted island and they must try to survive. The boys are free from the rules of society and the instinct to work toward civilisation and order slowly defends into savagery, violence and chaos. The Novel, The Hunger Games by Susanne Collins is an action packed story of Katniss Everdeen who is forced to take police in the violent Hunger Games. Katniss must endure many deadly situations, learn to control how she is perceived and manage complex relationships in order to survive in the games. The major theme of innocence and the main characters of these novels where compared in order to justify which novel was better.
In the short story The Most Dangerous Game by Richard Connell, Rainsford is a selfish man that thinks animals feel no pain and that they are only good for hunting. This is until he becomes the one that is being hunted within the story. In the short story, Connell uses the setting to add an eerie mood to the text. The use of imagery adds suspense within the settings of the yacht, the chateau, and the jungle.
From a structural perspective, movies and novels appear as polar opposites. A film uses actors, scripts, and a set in order to create a visual that can grab and keep the attention of their viewers. However, an author strives to incorporate deeper meaning into their books. Despite these differences in media, 1984 and The Hunger Games present unique, yet similar ideas.
When reading the title of the story, it would typically be linked to the game (or hunt) that takes place between General Zaroff and Sanger Rainsford. General Zaroff describes the game as, “A game worth playing. Your brain against mine. Your woodcraft against mine. Your strength and stamina against mine. Outdoor chess!” Game can be defined as the hunt, but it can also be defined as the animal being hunted. Humans such as Rainsford are Zaroff’s idea of the most dangerous game. Rainsford is classified as dangerous game because with his advanced knowledge of hunting, he kills General Zaroff’s servant, his top hound and eventually General Zaroff
Imagine being in a game where everyone dies except for one victor, and you have to risk your life to save your little sister’s life. Also imagine not being able to speak freely in your own home. These are some examples of how dystopian governments take control of the people in the societies in dystopian novels. The governments of 1984 and The Hunger Games share the dystopian goal of dehumanizing their citizens in order to maintain and win control over the citizens. The Party and the Capitol are after power, and whoever has control of the people in a society has has all the power.