Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of women in literature
Gender roles and literature
Role of women in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
While some themes of The Once and Future King include maturity and knighthood, another prominent theme in the novel is gender roles, specifically female roles. Curiously, in many biographies of T.H. White’s life, it is stated that he did not have the “capacity for love,” and never married. This means that while gender inequality is prominent in White’s novel, he never had a close relationship with a female in his personal life. In the novel, The Once and Future King, many female figures are written to be stereotypical, mean women. Through his use of gender roles in The Once and Future King, T.H. White demonstrates the belief that women’s rights in the 1940-60s should mirror those of Medieval times.
Women’s rights in the early 1900s were
…show more content…
flexible, and allowed women to be more independent than in previous eras. Due in part to the beginning of World War Once in 1914. Able-bodied men were drafted to be soldiers, while women were forced to take on a new role in the workplace while continuing their traditional role of caring for the home and children.
As England recovered from the effects of the war, America’s stock market crashed in 1929, causing world trade and commerce to plummet. World War 2 began in 1939, causing more death, panic, and financial issues for twentieth century England (British Library). Due to these events, women’s roles changed from rearing children and taking care of the household to working outside the home, to not only support their families but the war effort as well. Carol Harris states that "During World War One, women volunteered for essential work in order for men to join the armed forces. Some 25 years later, as World War Two loomed, campaigns emphasized the need for women to volunteer in similar fashion." In other words, women were able to take jobs that were previously were reserved for men. Women openly adopting male jobs was crucial to the survival of early twentieth century England, because their economy would have crashed without an active workforce, as there would have been little to no English production. Next, Harris agrees when she writes, "With the onset of war, everything changed. Fathers perhaps joined the armed …show more content…
forces, or were sent away to do vital civilian work, so mothers often ran the home alone - and had to get used to going out to work, as well. Young single women, often away from home for the first time, might be billeted miles.” Harris uses phrases like “Fathers perhaps joined the armed forces” and “mothers often ran the home alone…” to establish the fact that women had to take full responsibility over their families and essentially stepped into men's roles and therefore possess freedom rights. Women being introduced into the workplace was necessary because women needed to support their families, so they independently found jobs and ran the house while husbands, brothers, and fathers left to fight in the war. In contrast to the freedom experienced by women in the early twentieth century, women living in Medieval England did not have many rights, and the rights they had were confining and rigid. The Bubonic Plague (also known as the Black Death) began to spread in 1348, and lasted for about two years, until 1350. The Black Death wiped out more than one third of England’s population. While one might think this would force more of the population to work, patriarchal structures were incredibly rigid, and women still did not have freedom. Sandy Bardsley agrees when she writes, "Women's status after the Black Death… was more confined by patriarchal structures... The number and sex of workers varied significantly from year to year. In five years out of ten, no female workers were employed..." The words “confined” and the phrase “In five years out of ten, no female workers were employed” constitute that Medieval women were not able to get jobs as easily as men could. Despite the Crusades war taking place around this time, women had their own standards to uphold. Not to mention that it was not “of a woman’s role” to work, the main focus for women during the Medieval period was to have children (preferably boys) and to be a pious and obedient wife. Working women did exist, but they were rare, and mainly lived in the lower classes. Later, Beardsley writes, "Women continued to work in the lowest-paid occupations, to occupy the lowest ranks within industries such as brewing, and to be excluded from full and equal membership of guilds." Bardsley’s point is that in the few instances that women could work, they worked low paid, miserable jobs. Female workers could not access the “full and equal membership of guilds.” (Meaning full access to certain wages, and social class that comes with working.) Not only were women prevented from the freedom to choose to work, they did not earn an equitable wage nor were their jobs pleasant. In The Once and Future King, White portrays Morgause and Guenever to be cruel and stereotypical females. The novel tells a tale about Wart-- later known as Arthur, the future king of England-- and outlines the entirety of his life. Within the four sections of the book, White describes Arthur’s education, his path to becoming royalty, and his life to death as a king. Curiously, White focuses mostly on male characters. The female characters that he does include on are portrayed as stereotypical women, and are overbearing, vicious, and overall morally bad. To begin, Guenever is portrayed to be a very cliche woman. White writes about how she is beautiful, but tries to stay that way as she ages-- shown by her excessive use of makeup. One major stereotyped quality of women is that they are very self absorbed and vain. She is also very narrow-minded,self-centered, materialistic, and greedy. Guenever is also involved in a love triangle between Lancelot and Arthur, proving that White also depicts female characters to be morally bad. Having an affair was frowned upon in the Medieval period, so Guenever was described to be of poor moral character. Women’s roles in The Once and Future King are very different than those of TH White’s time. The roles of women while White was alive were becoming more open and less restricted, and the roles of Medieval women were strict and did not allow women much freedom at all. This leads readers to ask the question: “Why did White portray women’s roles as they were in the Medieval period instead of portraying them as they were in the twentieth century?” Was White simply trying to accurately capture Medieval gender roles or was he trying to hint at a bigger picture? White portrays women’s roles in The Once and Future King to be so different from those of the twentieth century because White obviously wanted twentieth century gender roles to mirror those of the Medieval time period.
It is cited in many sources that White led a lonely life and was homosexual. Sadie Stein even states this in her biography of TH White when she says "Townsend Warner speculates that White was “a homosexual and a sado-masochist,” ...In any case, he was profoundly alone; Townsend Warner wrote, “Notably free from fearing God, he was basically afraid of the human race.”" (Stein, The Paris review). Stein uses terms such as “homosexual,” and “basically afraid of the human race” to establish the fact that White was indeed very isolated and did not have many relations, especially those concerning women. Andrew Liptak adds in his article concerning TH White’s childhood, that White grew up with an “emotionally distant mother.” Growing up with no prominent female figure, and living an incredibly isolated life, White did not have much experience with women. This could explain why he tends to characterize women to be so harsh and stereotypical. Did White have some sort of animosity towards women? Because his mother was so distant, White grew up with a bad connotation of women. This could be the reason he illustrates so many women in the novel to be so
harsh. The use of tone and mood when TH White describes various female characters proves that he believes twentieth century women’s roles should mimic those of the Medieval period. White tends to darken his tone when he talks about female characters. There are many instances when White’s tone in a section changes from confident and peaceful, to hostile and manipulative. These changes typically occur when a female is introduced in a scene. One example of this tone change would be when White describes Morgause’s house. While the beginning of this section is not negative, it remains serious and dark throughout the reading. White uses phrases like “curiously uncomfortable,” and “nuisance” to describe the space. (White 213) White also writes that “The year of their happiness ended with Arthur’s return-- and almost immediately collapsed in ruin, but not on account of the king… Elaine of Corbin had given birth to a fine son” (White 384). The tone at the beginning of the sentence is hopeful, as it says that Arthur has arrived home. However, the tone becomes almost angry, and increasingly dark as the narrator discusses Elaine's new baby. By using this harsh, gloomy language, White manages to give the reader a grim feeling when he/she is reading about female characters in the book. He probably used this bleak language to characterize the female characters and prove that they were not good people in his eyes. By depicting female characters to be so bad, white is able to stereotype the females he writes about. By stereotyping women in his books, White is able to illustrate his point that gender roles of the medieval period should mirror those of the twentieth century. Although the topic of reducing women’s rights and de-modernizing women’s roles may seem trivial, it is in fact crucial to recognize the errors of the idea in terms of today’s society. This is because women that have overcome the barriers of gender stereotypes are incredibly important to today’s society and help it work as a well-oiled system. While powerful figures, like the author, TH White, can portray the idea of suppressing women’s roles in a much stronger way, society today should learn from this bad idea. Community should learn that women are a crucial aspect to today’s life and culture.
She discusses both her reactions at the time to the atrocities and the lingering fear of the outdoors that still haunted her as an adult. By discussing the tragic incidents of racial prejudice from her past, White allows the reader to see the world from her perspective. She even draws comparisons between herself and her fellow faculty and students by showing how eager they were to explore the environment, while she was stuck in her cabin paralyzed by the fear of the wilderness. It is important to note that White doesn't fear nature itself but rather is terrified by the vulnerability she would have in the open rural areas. The main reason she brings up the two very brutal consequences of racial prejudice from her childhood is to show how in rural areas black people often become targets.
When American officially entered World War II in 1941 changes occurred for many people. The draft was enacted forcing men to do their duty and fight for their country. Women were asked to hold down the home front in many ways, ranging from rationing, volunteering, saving bacon grease and making the most of their commodities they currently had. There was also a hard push for women to take war production jobs outside the home. Before the depression, just a few years before the war, it was not uncommon for a woman to work for wages, but as the depression set in, married women were at risk of losing their jobs. Numerous women were fired or asked to resign in order to make room for a man who had lost his job. Many citizens felt it was unfair for a family to have two wage earners when some families had none. (Kessler-Harris) Previously, the average workforce of women was young and single. However, when the war started, couples were married at a younger age, putting the typical worker in short supply. This led to a rapid increase in older married women going to work outside the home. “During the depression, 80 percent of Americans objected to wives working outside the home, by 1942, only 13 percent still objected.” (May) By the end of the war, 25 percent of married women were employed. (May) Although women had worked outside the home prior to World War II, their entrance into the war production labor force created change in the typical gender roles and provided an exciting and yet difficult time for many women who were gaining their independence.
In T.H. White's Once and Future King, fate plays a very important role in Arthur's life when he meets Merlyn and Merlyn becomes his mentor. When they first met, Arthur was confused as to why Merlyn was going all the way home with him until Merlyn said, "Why not? How else can I be your tutor?" (37) Arthur realizes he had been on a quest to find his tutor. This quote is important to the theme because it was Arthur's first quest on his journey towards king. This reason this quote is so important is because Merlyn is preparing Arthur to become a great leader. After all of Arthur's training with Merlyn, Merlyn tells Arthur that he might not know it yet but he will be, "Hic jacet Arthutus Rex quandum Rexque futurus... The Once and Future King." (287) This quote foreshadows that Arthur, will in fact, become the great leader. If it were not for training with Merlyn, he would not be the great leader he developed into throughout the book.
World War I and industrialization both brought greater economic autonomy to American women. With immigration curtailed and hundreds of thousands of men needed for the armed forces, women’s labor became a wartime necessity. About 1.5 million women worked in paying jobs during the war, with many more employed as volunteers or secretaries and yeomen for the Army, Navy, and Marines (James and Wells, 66). Women retained few of those 1.5 million jobs after men returned from war, but the United States’ industrialized postwar economy soon provided enough work for men and women alike. Once confined to nursing, social work, teaching, or secretarial jobs, women began to find employment in new fields. According to Allen, “They ...
The 1920’s was a period of extremely economic growth and personal wealth. America was a striving nation and the American people had the potential to access products never manufactured before. Automobile were being made on an assembly line and were priced so that not just the rich had access to these vehicles, as well as, payment plans were made which gave the American people to purchase over time if they couldn't pay it all up front. Women during the First World War went to work in place of the men who went off to fight. When the men return the women did not give up their positions in the work force.
The start of the war era came on the heels of a decade when women had seemingly taken a step backward in social and economic progress. The depression of the 1930's had devastated the American economy. Women, especially married women, had bore the largest share of the burden. To help male workers get back on the job, national leaders called for married women in two-income families to give up their jobs. Several states had passed laws barring women from holding state jobs.
	A southern white female slave owner only saw black women as another slave, or worse. White women needed to do this in order to keep themselves from feeling that they were of higher status than every one else except for their husband. White women as, Gwin describes, always proved that they had complete control and black women needed to bow to them. Gwin’s book discusses that the white male slave owners brought this onto the black women on the plantation. They would rape black women, and then instead of the white women dealing with their husbands. They would go after the black women only since the wives had no power over the husbands, but they maintained total control of the slaves, the white women would attack the black women and make their lives very diffucult. The white women would make sure that the black women understood that the white women completely hated the black women for being raped and wanted only pain for the them. This is how the black women of that time got the stereotypes of being very sexual beings and hated by there oppressors. You can see evidence of this when Gwin discussed the realities of such hatred in the book Absalom, Absalom by William Faulkner. The main character, Clytie, sexual assaults by her male master upsets her because she doesn’t desire to be involved with him, but her female master feels that she should be punished for it. So the white female slave owner...
The 1940s provided a drastic change in women’s employment rates and society’s view of women. With the end of the Depression and the United States’ entrance into World War II, the number of jobs available to women significantly increased. As men were being drafted into military service, the United States needed more workers to fill the jobs left vacant by men going to war. Women entered the workforce during World War II due to the economic need of the country. The use of Patriotic rhetoric in government propaganda initiated and encouraged women to change their role in society.
During America’s involvement in World War Two, which spanned from 1941 until 1945, many men went off to fight overseas. This left a gap in the defense plants that built wartime materials, such as tanks and other machines for battle. As a result, women began to enter the workforce at astonishing rates, filling the roles left behind by the men. As stated by Cynthia Harrison, “By March of [1944], almost one-third of all women over the age of fourteen were in the labor force, and the numbers of women in industry had increased almost 500 percent. For the first time in history, women were in the exact same place as their male counterparts had been, even working the same jobs. The women were not dependent upon men, as the men were overseas and far from influence upon their wives.
While neither Machiavelli’s The Prince nor Shakespeare’s Henry V focus explicitly on gender roles, they both make assumptions and implications sufficient to illustrate their opinions about the nature and place of women in relation to men. In Machiavelli’s The Prince, men and women are depicted in traditional gender roles with women as tricky and unreliable, but ultimately yielding to men who are portrayed as tough and immovable. Shakespeare’s Henry V acknowledges these ideas, but also portrays women as able to influence events within the small domain they are given.
Throughout the twentieth century, both World War I and World War II significantly impacted American society in several ways. From 1917 to 1918, the United States’ involvement in World War I began an increase in the number of women in the workplace that would steadily continue throughout much of the twentieth century. The United States once again played a major role in World War II from 1941 to 1945, and this war is actually seen as a turning point for women in the workplace. During the two world wars, women workers were impacted by discrimination, the danger of the work they completed, and the portrayal of women in propaganda during both world wars, and yet the different time periods of the two world wars led to differences in how women were impacted in the workplace. Although there are several similarities and differences in how World War I and World War II impacted women in the workplace throughout the 20th century, both world wars played a role in challenging the accepted role of women in society.
The 1940’s was an interesting and critical time for the United States of America. World War II began in the late 1930’s and moved on into the 1940’s. The United States Army joined in 1941 and “when the United States entered World War II, every aspect of life in America was affected by the conflict” (The 1940’s). New opportunities arose for women because of all the men out at war, so women had the chance to show off their skills and capabilities. They operated machines in factories and worked with heavy artillery. If a person did not fight the war for their country, they made weapons for the brave soldiers. This caused a drastic increase in the growth of the economy in the United States.
“The War led to a dramatic rise in the number of women working in the United States; from 10.8 million in March, 1941, to more than 18 million in August, 1944…” (Miller). Although the United States couldn’t have been as successful in the war without their efforts, most of
Throughout the historical literary periods, many writers underrepresented and undervalued the role of women in society, even more, they did not choose to yield the benefits of the numerous uses of the female character concerning the roles which women could accomplish as plot devices and literary tools. William Shakespeare was one playwright who found several uses for female characters in his works. Despite the fact that in Shakespeare's history play, Richard II, he did not use women in order to implement the facts regarding the historical events. Instead, he focused the use of women roles by making it clear that female characters significantly enriched the literary and theatrical facets of his work. Furthermore in Shakespeare’s history play, King Richard II, many critics have debated the role that women play, especially the queen. One of the arguments is that Shakespeare uses the queen’s role as every women’s role to show domestic life and emotion. Jo McMurtry explains the role of all women in his book, Understanding Shakespeare’s England A Companion for the American Reader, he states, “Women were seen, legally and socially, as wives. Marriage was a permanent state” (5). McMurtry argues that every woman’s role in the Elizabethan society is understood to be a legal permanent state that is socially correct as wives and mothers. Other critics believe that the role of the queen was to soften King Richard II’s personality for the nobles and commoners opinion of him. Shakespeare gives the queen only a few speaking scenes with limited lines in Acts two, four, and five through-out the play. Also, she is mentioned only a few times by several other of the characters of the play and is in multiple scenes wit...
In Hamlet, gender plays a huge role in the assumed capability of people. Queen Gertrude had to remarry instead of rule the kingdom by herself. If she wouldn’t have gotten remarried, it would have been likely that her kingdom would have been usurped by a chauvinist male ruler; who felt that women couldn’t rule a kingdom.