Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Greek myths femininity
Greek myths femininity
Women's role in greek mythology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Greek myths femininity
The Greek myth of Orpheus and Eurydice embodies a contrast between how man acts and how man is expected to act. An interpretation of the mythological characters Orpheus and Eurydice disprove male gender expectations, while the biblical figures of Lot and his wife affirm female gender expectations. In the story of Orpheus and Eurydice, Orpheus is the one that looks back before instructed to, and in the story of Sodom and Gommorah, Lot’s wife looks back but both actions led to extreme consequences. With gender expectations in mind, homosexuality is introduced as well.Throughout the years, it is evident that gender expectations have been disrupted, and mankind’s judgements on homosexuality is more lenient. Orpheus is madly in love with his …show more content…
The angels have originally decided to spend the night in the square, but Lot insists that they stay the night at his house. Lot treats them generously and prepares a meal for them. They had just finished eating dinner, and before going to bed, they hear men from all parts of the city of Sodom surround the house and yell to Lot ““Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we can get to know them” . In those times, those actions of homosexuality were absurd and a consequence was to be put for those kinds of actions. “Bring them out to us so that we may get to know them.” There is some debate about the ‘to know’ here. Most scholars would agree that is has the sexual meaning here-but it is very clear that we are talking about homosexual rape, a violent act of aggression-and clearly something we would all condemn and deem worthy of God’s punishment” (Robinson web). Lot is flabbergasted and informs the men that he has two daughters, and they can do whatever they insist with them instead of taking the men. The men from the city of Sodom did not want anything to do with the daughters. As the city mean reached forward to break down the down the door, the angels pulled Lot back into the house, shut the door, and struck the city men with blindness so that they were unable to the find the door. The angels asked Lot if he had anyone else in the city who belongs to him like a …show more content…
Gender stereotyping is also implemented in both stories. “We also found that the “gender stereotyping” was used without the indication of whether gender stereotypes were assessed in terms of personal stereotypes beliefs, knowledge of cultural stereotypes, stereotyped judgements, or the enactment of stereotype consistent behaviors” (Zosuls web). This supports the evident gender stereotyping of expecting Lot’s wife to look back since a female is the weaker sex. But, the myth of Orpheus and Eurydice disproves gender stereotyping because of Orpheus giving it his all to gain Eurydice back and when he looks back at her too soon. Those actions diminish his masculinity as well as when he turns his love for women into a love for young boys. During the times when Orpheus and Eurydice and Sodom and Gomorrah occurred, someone being homosexual is not as obvious as to how it is now. “The gay men in these media rehearse both what we already ‘know’ about gay men while simultaneously reinforcing received notions about what is to be ‘a homosexual’ that is, particular looks, movements, patterns of voice, manner of dressing, lifestyle choices and consumption patterns which are coded as homosexual are offered up as evidence of a character’s homosexulaity” (McLelland web). Over time, homosexuality has become more accepted to our society with
Though easier to consider The Aeneid as a work which clearly defines the roles of man and woman, with men upholding traits of stability, rationality, and containment of oneself, with the women acting irrational and without jurisdiction, this is not quite the case. Gender is not quite the cookie cutter structure one is accustomed to, instead it acts as a much more complicated force within the interactions of the characters. The masculine and feminine become combined within individuals, blended to the point where perhaps sometimes understanding a character is far more complicated than knowing whether it is a 'he' or 'she'.
How much control do women have over their emotions in the Aeneid? In his poem, Virgil frequently shows women in situations where irrational thoughts lead to harmful choices. Specifically, Virgil presents women as being easily influenced by their emotions. Consequently, these characters make decisions that harm both themselves and those around them. Throughout Aeneas’s journey, divinities such as Juno and Venus are seen taking advantage of the emotions of different women, influencing these characters to act in ways that ignore important priorities. Not only does Virgil present women as completely vulnerable to their emotions, but he also shows the problems that arise when these women engage in decisions where they put their own feelings ahead of their people. Virgil explicitly shows women neglecting important responsibilities when he describes passages concerned with Dido’s affair and her death, the Trojan women burning their own ships, Queen Amata’s opposition to Latinus’s proposal and her tragic death.
This can be read in two ways. One sees this as an act of pandering his daughters out. This calls into question Lot’s values. His good treatment of the angels, and God’s subsequent protection of Lot, shows him to be righteous, so this must not be the case. I choose to go with the chain of thought that this is meant to be an example of the Sodomites’ lack of interest in women. They ignore the offer and try to attack Lot and his household.
In The Bacchae, I believe that Euripides uses the relationship of male and female to explore the alluring concept of feminine empowerment in a patriarchal society and to demonstrate the cost this empowerment subsequently has on ordered civilization. In this paper, I will argue that Euripides uses the conflictual relation between the genders to criticize the role of women in Greek society while also showing the consequences of a total feminine revolt. Through developing this conflict, Euripides is demonstrating how the path to the most successful civilization is through a balance of masculine rationality and feminine emotional freedom. I will prove this by analyzing the positions of Pentheus, the Bacchants, and Dionysus throughout the play. The character Pentheus
In the year of 100AD in the desert, the town Sodom and Gomorrah stood. Sodom and Gomorrah is a place full of evilness and sin-stricken where their motto is “Everything that gives pleasure is good.” However, beneath the presence of darkness in the town a small but great light of hope with blue eyes, brown maple skin, strong build, and dark coiled hair glimmered. Her name is Faith.
The characters in the movie, Black Orpheus, are significantly altered from the Greek myth. In the myth, Orpheus and Eurydice are together from the beginning and are completely in love. Everyone is happy for their love and the only thing that stands in their way is death. In the movie, however, this is notably changed. Orpheus begins as a streetcar conductor that was engaged to Mira, giving the idea that Orpheus was in love with another woman. We quickly see that this is not the case as Orpheus is always very curt and rude with his fiancée. They are slated to get married, but there is an eerie feeling in the air that something is about to go wrong.
The myth of Eurydice is a sad story in which two lovers are separated by death. After his love dies, Orpheus journeys into the underworld to retrieve her, but instead loses her for good. Playwright Sarah Ruhl takes the myth of Eurydice and attempts to transform this sad tale into a more light-hearted story. However, despite humorous lines and actions throughout the play, the melancholy situation of the actual tale overwhelms any comicality present. Although meant to be funny, Sarah Ruhl's “Eurydice” can be seen as a modernized tragedy about two lovers who are separated forever by a twist of fate.
The contrast between two sex scenes demonstrates Milton’s condemnation for the latter and advocacy for a solemn approach to sexual intercourse under blessing of the divine. Milton’s language for describing both incidents of sex accurately depicts the postlapsarian sex as on unforgivable, selfish and repulsive act. Although the couple sought to accomplish goals such as assuaging feelings of guilt, ignoring the mental anguish, and filling a spiritual absence, they realize that becoming physically involved will not be able to redeem the trust they have lost from God. Perhaps, the postlapsarian sex symbolizes the making up of the love, consolation, for the loss of love from God.
One can hardly deny that in Euripides’ plays women are often portrayed as weak, uncertain, and torn between what they must do and what they can bring themselves to do. Other women appear to be the root of grave evils, or simply perpetrators of heinous crimes. In a day when analysis of characters and plot had yet to be invented, it is easy to see why he might have been thought to be very much against women. However, when looking back with current understanding of what Euripides was doing at the time, armed with knowledge of plot devices and Socratic philosophy, this argument simply does not hold up. In fact, a very strong argument can be made to the opposite, that Euripides was in fact very much in support of women’s rights, and thought they were treated unfairly.
For centuries women have fought to obtain basic civil rights and today, they are still fighting to obtain equal rights. From the right to vote to their right to birth control, women have always been trying to assert their own independence in order to expand their freedom. While much progress has been made, there is still room for improvement. However, the evolution of women’s rights and the role of women is mirrored in literature and can be used to illustrate the progression throughout history. Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex is no different. Through the character Jocasta, Sophocles creates a counterpart to Oedipus and uses her to reveal the oppression of women by contrasting her and Oedipus’ relationships and reactions to the prophecy. Throughout the play Oedipus Rex, Sophocles illustrates Jocasta’s vulnerability and supportive nature in order to women as fragile, doting, and obedient wives and mothers to facilitate the necessity of self-assertion.
Women were often subjects of intense focus in ancient literary works. In Sarah Pomeroy’s introduction of her text Goddesses, Whores, Wives, and Slaves, she writes, “Women pervade nearly every genre of classical literature, yet often the bias of the author distorts the information” (x). It is evident in literature that the social roles of women were more restricted than the roles of men. And since the majority of early literature was written by men, misogyny tends to taint much of it. The female characters are usually given negative traits of deception, temptation, selfishness, and seduction. Women were controlled, contained, and exploited. In early literature, women are seen as objects of possession, forces deadly to men, cunning, passive, shameful, and often less honorable than men. Literature reflects the societal beliefs and attitudes of an era and the consistency of these beliefs and attitudes toward women and the roles women play has endured through the centuries in literature. Women begin at a disadvantage according to these societal definitions. In a world run by competing men, women were viewed as property—prizes of contests, booty of battle and the more power men had over these possessions the more prestigious the man. When reading ancient literature one finds that women are often not only prizes, but they were responsible for luring or seducing men into damnation by using their feminine traits.
Centuries of traditions has enabled men and women to define gender roles in society. Although some critics declare gender roles do not exist today, others believe they do. In society, men and women are defined by gender roles throughout their activities and emotions. A doctor is typically portrayed by a male while women rear the children and cook for the men. However, although still in existence, today these roles are less obvious but tend to have similar meaning when compared to the past. In ancient Greece, women suffered great hardships. Currently, females work, vote, and run for office. In comparison to ancient Greece, these activities are a phenomenal leap from being under the direct supervision of a male husband.
Euripides’ The Bacchae is the story of the punishment of Pentheus, the king of Thebes, and the city of Thebes by the god Dionysus. This psychologically invigorating narrative explores the complexities of femininity through the apparent liberations of the women in the play and Dionysus himself. Euripides challenges the Athenian norms surrounding power and democracy by challenging Athenian perceptions of equality through gender. At the beginning of the play Dionysus has come to Thebes in disguise in order to take revenge on his mother’s sisters for saying that she lied about Dionysus’s immortal conception and to “show [Pentheus] and all of Thebes” (Euripides, page 231) that he is actually a god.
Oedipus Rex and Gender Switching Mark Edward M. Gonzales SOPHOCLES’ CLASSIC TRAGEDY Oedipus Rex (Oedipus the King), the first of his so-called Theban plays, presents to us the timelessly haunting story of Oedipus as he unknowingly fulfills the prophecy that he would murder his own father and marry his own mother. In this analysis, we reimagine the plot given a gender switch—Oedipus conceived as a female, and Jocasta conceived as Laius (and the other way around). Feminist Criticism of Oedipus Rex Before proceeding to the gender switch per se, it is important to understand (1) the role of women in ancient Greek society and (2) its repercussion to the two eminent female characters in the play: Jocasta and the Sphinx. The role of women in ancient
In the early ages of drama, women were portrayed as anything but equal to men. The plays during the c. 496 – c. 406 BCE diminished the value of women, while these plays helped shape the idea of empowering men. In the tragedy of Oedipus Rex, Sophocles tells the story of Oedipus, the king of Thebes, who has been told a mortifying prophecy that he will be the one to kill his own father and marry his biological mother. In the idea of saving his family, he then proceeds to run away from home only to run into the fate of the blind seer Tierisas. In Dulcitius, Hrosvitha tells the story about Governor Dulcitius and the three virgins named Agape, Chionia, and Hirena who Dulcitius is infatuated with but has no respect for the beautiful women.