Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Philosophy of community policing
Problem-oriented policing compared to other policing strategies
Philosophy of community policing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Philosophy of community policing
The article, Community Policing: Elements and Effects by Gary W. Cordner presents an understanding into the implementation and philosophy behind community-police partnerships; together with the article, Problem-Oriented Policing by John D. Reitzel, Nicole Leeper Piquero, & Alex R. Piquero, in which describes the beginning of a movement towards a different style of policing that calls for officers to become more proactive in the prevention of crime; the two articles emphasize how law enforcement organizations of today are becoming more focused, proactive, and community sensitive in an effort to achieve the ultimate goal of the prevention of crime before it occurs.
Community policing is an integral part of improving the quality of life in our communities. Core components of community policing include partnering with the community; problem solving; and transforming police agencies to support and empower front-line officers, decentralize command and encourage innovative problem solving. (csueastbay.edu) Cordner has identified four major dimensions for viewing community policing, they are: the philosophical dimension, the strategic dimension, the tactical dimension, and the organizational dimension.
The
…show more content…
first dimension described by Cordner is the philosophical dimension which includes the central ideas and beliefs underlying community policing. (Dunham and Alpert p.482) The most important elements of this dimension are citizen input, which is based on the idea that police departments should seek and carefully consider citizen input when making policies and decisions that affect the community; broad police function, which refers to a broad view of the police function instead of focusing only on crime fighting and law enforcement; and personal service, which is the idea of tailored policing based on local norms and values as well as individual needs. The second dimension described by Cordner is the strategic dimension which includes the key operational concepts that translate philosophy into action. (Dunham and Alpert p.484) Elements of this dimension include re-oriented operations, which encourages the police to rely less on the patrol car and more on face to-face interactions with citizens; geographic focus, which recommends that the police emphasize geographic location instead of time of day for police assignment and responsibility for example, patrol officers should be assigned to the same areas for extended periods of time to increase their familiarity with the community; and prevention emphasis, which focuses on a more proactive and preventive orientation rather than a reactive one. The third dimension described by Cordner is the tactical dimension which translates ideas, philosophies, and strategies into concrete programs, practices and beliefs. (Dunham and Alpert p.488) Three elements of this dimension are positive interaction which encourages officers to interact in a positive way with citizens as much as possible; partnerships, which emphasize that the police seek cooperation from citizens in identifying community problems and solicits citizen input and participation; and problem solving, which calls police attention to solving underlying problems and conditions. The final dimension described by Cordner is the organizational dimension which is where, in order to facilitate community policing, police departments often consider a variety of changes in organization, administration, management and supervision.
(Dunham and Alpert p.491) Again, there are three important elements, starting with structure, which is the restructuring of police agencies in order to facilitate and support implementation of the philosophies and tactical elements described above; management which, is associated with styles of leadership, management, and supervision and gives more emphasis to organizational culture and values; and information, which emphasizes the need for information systems that aid in identifying and analyzing community-level
problems. Although the effectiveness of community policing practices has not been clearly documented, it is widely believed that it can have a positive effect on community attitudes such as fear of crime and neighborhood satisfaction (Cordner, 1999). As concerns were raised regarding police effectiveness, police-community relations, police discretion, and police management and organization, problem-oriented policing originated as a non-traditional approach to law enforcement, a style that calls for officers to become more proactive in the prevention of crime by identifying the underlying conditions that result in repeated response calls. Incorporated into community policing in the 1990’s, an effective problem-solving strategy known by the acronym SARA was introduced to meet the goal of utilizing a problem-solving approach that solves the underlying problems or conditions. The SARA process stands for a four- stage procedure; scanning, analysis, response, and assessment.
Once chief Robin Richardson was in command she made the decision to change the organizational structure within the police department. MPD chief Richardson made the decision the change the police department 's centralized organization structure to a more decentralized structure that relies on employees to communicate information to make decisions and recommend changes” ( Textbook, Chapter 10). MPD chief Richardson decisions to change the “organizational structure was to accommodate the dramatic shift in performance culture”( Textbook Chapter). MPD chief Richardson felt that the traditional functional organization structure under the vertical hierarchy has lost sight of MPD organization mission. Chief Richardson wanted to create an organizational structure that provides certain levels of autonomy, that allows employees to make decisions based on their individuals discretions. MPD chief Robin Richardson considered a “divisional organization a design structure that groups processes and jobs based on clearly defined market segments or geography”( Textbook Chapter 10). Chief Richardson considered “divisional organization structure that allows decision making to take place at the divisional level by managers, and differences of opinion would be resolved without depending on the chief. Chief Richardson felt that this design was leaning more toward what she visualized for the MPD: a centralized, horizontal organization” (Textbook chapter 10). According to the text, chief Robin Richardson “finally decision was to create a matrix organization, a design structure that facilitates horizontal integration and collaboration. A matrix model combines elements of both the functional and the divisional organizations, has dual lines of authority, and is designed to encourage the sharing of information. Robin felt that by using this model, the reporting line would shift
Policing is a very difficult, complex and dynamic field of endeavor that is always evolves as hard lessons teach us what we need to know about what works and what don’t work. There are three different Era’s in America’s policing: The Political Era, The Reform Era, and The Community Problem Solving Era. A lot has changed in the way that policing works over the years in the United States.
“community policing is a philosophy of full service personalized policing, where the same officer patrols and works in the same area on a permanent basis, from a decentralized place, working in a proactive partnership with citizens to identify and solve problems.”
Kerley K. and Benson M. (2000). Does Community- Oriented Policing Help Build Stronger Communities? Police Quarterly: 3 (1)
Community policing stresses the entire cooperation between members of the police force and the community. It necessitates that everyone in the police force, including both civilian officers and sworn personnel, understands that the focus is on resolving community problems, and in doing so, may challenge the everyday policing norms.
Oliver, William. (1998). Community-Oriented Policing: A Systemic Approach to Policing (Second edition 2001). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
This concept, however, is not new. Problem-solving justice programs can trace their roots to several innovations in policing including community and problem-oriented policing. This was the basis for replacing law enforcement’s traditional role of responding, identifying patterns of crime, mitigating the underlying conditions, and engaging the community (Wolf, Prinicples of Problem-Solving Justice, 2007). New p...
Community policing is a strategy used by various departments in order to create and maintain a relationship between the law enforcement agency and the community being patrolled. Community policing is composed of three critical components, community partnerships, organizational transformation, and problem solving (Gardiner, 154, 2016). Community partnerships are pivotal in community policing since they increase public trust and create am improved relationship in law enforcement agencies better serving the community (Gardiner, 87, 2016). These partnerships not only offer public input but also encourage the public to cooperate with law enforcement agencies in order to minimize crime within the community (Gardiner, 88, 2016). Unlike, the traditional strategies of policing, community orientated policing has been adopted by two-thirds of agencies in order to improve public safety and control crime. (Gardiner, 148, 2016).
There are many different ways of policing in the 21st century and all address and apply different theories and ideas to try and control the crime this day in age. One of these methods is called community policing and many law enforcement agencies around our country and the world use it as a model for policing and interacting with communities. Community policing is based on the belief that policing agencies should partner with communities with the goals to prevent or reduce the amount of crime in those areas (Pollock, 2012 p. 99). There are 3 main aspects of community policing that I will talk about in this paper and they are community partnerships, organizational transformation, and problem solving. After hearing about the
Community based policing can best be defined as, 'a collaborative effort between the police and the community that identifies problems of crime and disorder and involves all elements of the community in the search for solutions to these problems' (Sykes). Community based policing is the idea that the role of the police is not that of catching 'bad guys,' but more that of serving the public. In order for community based policing to have an effect, the presence of crime isn?t needed, in fact it?s often more effective without the involvement of crime, ?Modern police departments are frequently called upon to help citizens resolve a vast array of personal problems--many of which involve no law-breaking activity? (Schmalleger). The role of the police officer in community based policing, is to have an active part in the community. This can be something as simple as stopping in at a school just to talk to the kids, or...
Community oriented policing has been around for over 30 years, and promotes and supports organizational strategies to address the causes, and reduce the fear of crime and social disorder through problem solving tactics. The way community policing works is it requires the police and citizens to work together to increase safety for the public. Each community policing program is different depending on the needs of the community. There have been five consistent key elements of an effective community oriented policing program: Adopting community service as the overarching philosophy of the organization, making an institutional commitment to community policing that is internalized throughout the command structure, emphasizing geographically decentralized models of policing that stress services tailored to the needs of individual communities rather than a one-size-fits-all approach for the entire jurisdiction, empowering citizens to act in partnership with the police on issues of crime and more broadly defined social problems, for example, quality-of-life issues, and using problem-oriented or problem-solving approaches involving police personnel working with community members. Community oriented policing has improved the public’s perception of the police in a huge way. Community policing builds more relationships with the
From this Community Police Consortium, the BJA put together a report titled Understanding Community Policing, A Framework for Action, which focused on developing a conceptual framework for community policing and assisting agencies in implementing community policing. The basis for this consortium was much more direct than the previous efforts set forth by Presidential Commissions during the 1960’s and 1970’s, and led to what became known as the Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS, Title 1 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994). The core components outlined in the BJA report listed the two complementary core components to community policing: community partnership and problem solving. The report further stated that effective community policing depends on positive contact between patrol officers and community members, establishing and maintaining mutual trust as the primary goal of a community partnership, and police and community must join together to encourage and preserve peace and prosperity. While these are just a few of the recommendations listed in the report, there were many more that set forth the framework for community policing, but these were the core components.
Community policing is the philosophy that promotes strategies that support the use of partnerships and problem- solving techniques that are proactively address conditions to rise public safety issues like fear of crime, social disorder, and crime. There are three components to community policing, they are community partnerships, organizational transformation, and problem solving. The four elements of community policing are community involvement, problem solving, a community base, and redefined goals for the police.
Community policing is a policy and a strategy aimed at achieving more effective and efficient crime control, reduced fear of crime, improved quality of life, improved police services and police legitimacy, through a proactive reliance on community resources that seeks to change crime causing conditions. This assumes a need for greater accountability of police, greater public share in decision-making and greater concern for civil rights and liberties.
Community policing is a law enforcement strategy that encourages interactive partnerships between law enforcement agencies and the people they serve (Berlin, Michael M. "Encyclopedia of Community Policing and Problem Solving.") These partnerships help communities find solutions to problems with collaborative problem solving and improved public trust. Through this model, the public plays a role in prioritizing public safety problems (Berlin, Michael M. "Encyclopedia of Community Policing and Problem Solving.")