Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Religion and gender inequality
Religion in sociological perspective
Religion and gender inequality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Religion and gender inequality
Garhard Lenksi’s idea of sociocultural evolution corresponds to religion in various different ways. As a society evolves from one stage to another, that society’s values also change. This leads to new types of religions as well as changes in the amount religious inequality. The types of values that exists in a certain sociocultural stage determines the type of religion that the society will have during that stage.
In a hunter-gatherer society, people are dependent on nature for survival. Thus, they believe in nature gods. Since the people are also nomadic, there is very little religious inequality. Thus, women and men both can have the same religious positions. This means that people are allowed to believe in any god.
In a pastoral society, people use animals for major sources to make food and clothing. Thus, animal domestication becomes very important in society. This causes the pantheon to consist mostly of animal gods. People are still nomadic and this means that religious inequality has changed slightly. “Women now are typically not shamans or religious leaders” (Alvarez, 2014). However, goddesses have been created to reflect the importance of women.
…show more content…
In an early agrarian society, people depend on farming for survival.
Thus, a majority of gods in the pantheon is related to agriculture. Furthermore, people also start to live in a specific place instead of continuing to be nomadic. Eventually, women were treated as property so they began to lose their influence on religion.
The mid-agrarian stage is very similar to the early-agrarian stage. However, theocracy begins to occur. Thus, “a class of religious ruling authorities [begins] to develop.” (Alvarez, 2014). Theocracy causes the level of social inequality begins to significantly
increase. During the late agrarian stage, people began to care more about conquering territories. “This expansionist tendency is reflected in the development of salvation religions” (Alvarez, 2014). They refuse to follow other type of religions. They were also monotheistic. In an industrial society, there is less farming and more industrialization. Education starts to become more important and religious democracy begins to occur. Eventually, industrial societies become post-industrial. In a post-industrial society, there is more religious democracy. For example, “women begin to be involved in religious leadership positions again” (Alvarez, 2014).The main difference between these two societies is secularism, “the growth of non-religious aspects of social life” (Alvarez, 2014). This growth is found more in post-industrial societies. The relationship between Lenski’s idea and religion can be used to create the implication that there will be a greater diversity of religions in the future. This is due to the fact that new values can be created. For example, “immigration from many [countries] …and the increasing popularity of fundamentalist organizations should increase as well as diversify [religious character]” (Macionis, 565). Immigration and the spread of ideas will eventually lead to new types of religions. Religions are closely related to sociocultural evolutionary stages, because they reflect the values of the society that they are found in. These stages can also be related to religious inequality, because the amount of inequality that a society has is determined by the type of lifestyle the people have. Since more religions are created as people develop new values, there is the possibility that there will be more types of religions in the future.
Ancient Greek mythology has made its way into public conscience and knowledge. So much so that any person on the street would be able to name at least one deity from their pantheon. From this public knowledge, much is known about the religions including its stories and mythologies. But less is known about a person’s role in Ancient Greek religion and even less about a woman roles in their religion. What roles the Ancient Greek people did play can be gathered from the Greek stories and myths. But more specifically what roles did Ancient Greek women play in their religion. The Ancient Greek myths and stories tell of priestess and women who remained virgins as a way of worshipping their gods. But more questions come from these, why did these women become priestess and what rituals did they perform? Both the reasons behind these motives and the process one goes through to become a priestess must be explored to better a woman’s role in Ancient Greek religion.
Every culture has some form of higher being, to be a model for their behaviour, as well as to look up to. In Greek times, these were the gods and goddesses who made their home on Mount Olympus. Women identified with the goddesses because they shared some feminine attributes. Goddesses were a “symbol of motherhood and fertility, but also of strength, wisdom, caring, nuturing, temperance, chastity, cunning, trickery, jealousy, and lasciviousness” (Clarke, 1999). However, not all of the goddesses possessed all of these attributes. The goddess Aphrodite, for instance, was not nurturing, nor was she very caring.
When beginning to look at religions and cultures and their intertwining effect on each other, you can see that a religion shapes society, and equally society shapes religion. When comparing the theories of two popular anthropologists, Durkheim and Geertz, I believe that Geertz’s theory is more realistic and reliable than Durkheim’s theory. Durkheim’s theory says that religion is a joined community effort that brings people together like a social glue, and uses the definitions of the sacred and profane to distinguish what makes things religious. On the other side, Geertz’s theory holds that religion is a cultural organization, and showed that religion and society can have an impact on each other, and religion is a set symbols of that promote an emotional response, ultimate meaning, ordering of the world, and marks a special status in one’s life. When examining both theories I saw that Geertz’s theory challenges Durkheim’s theory in the definitions of the sacred and profane, Durkheim’s view of religion as a social glue of society, and Durkheim’s neglection of the individual’s use of religion impacting society.
Religion is an institution that can provide stability for societies through various religious concepts, and is substantial for the support of social cohesion and order. Many functionalist theories of religion, for example, claim that religion functions in such a way as to integrate societies (McCauley, 1984). There are many types of religion that people practice world-wide such as Christianity, Catholi...
Gods and goddesses in mythology are used in allusions and often referred to in our daily lives, but do we truly understand them? We may not understand how or why they look the way they do, how they behave, what they are capable of accomplishing, or how they interacted with humans. These super-beings of extremely high status were the heart and soul of prayers and explanations of natural phenomena. They had a variety of natures and were represented in a variety of ways, by different religions.
Some sociologists claim that what changes primarily is the social system and religious change is an effect of the change in the former. It is not religion but, to a larger extent, the economy that is supposed to legitimize reality. From this perspective it is the social system that changes and this change in relation to religion means secularization, which generally speaking means the diminishing impact of religion on social life at various levels, degrees and intensities. Theories such as Luckmann’s privatization thesis or Hervieu-Le´ger’s emotional theory of religion may be categorized as giving priority to changes within the individual. The fundamental thought is that in contemporary society it is primarily the individual who changes. It is the individual that seeks direct contact with the sacral sphere, is driven by emotion, feeling, a personal and individualized need. The third current of theoretical solutions to the question of what predominates in modern and post-modern changes is the one that points to religion itself as the sphere of these changes. It is neither the society nor the individual, but rather religion that is pushed to the forefront of the phenomenon. Religion in confrontation with modernity takes on new forms which function well in the modern
I have always found the role of women in religion to be a fascinating and diverse subject, varying from community to community. Sometimes, the role of a woman in society is so closely linked to her religious role, that the two are indistinguishable. For example, why is it that some women are expected to upkeep the home and children without question? How are such gender roles assigned? Are these gender roles created by religion and upheld by culture or created by culture and upheld by religion? Where do such social expectations stem from? What does the daily life of a woman in religious groups that hold such expectations look like? And given these questions, is it possible for such roles to evolve? Has social change within gender roles occurred in the context of religion? In order to find the answers to these questions and questions like them, one must seek further insight of religion itself and the social context within which it exists.
Over the years, society has come to evolve and progressively become more efficient as society’s viewpoints and perspectives on various aspects of life have also changed. However, the one aspect of life that has stayed constant has been religion. The impact of a constant religious opinion on a changing society has detrimental and benign effects on the populace of such a society.
People of the ancient world often had questions about their existence and how life and people came to be on earth. Most ancient people answered these questions through religion. The Sumerians were the first important group of people to inhabit Mesopotamia and they were known to practice a form of worship called polytheism, which is the worship of several gods. Mesopotamians associated different gods with natural events, emotions, and other occurrences. Their main deities included An (the god of the heavens), Enlil (Lord Storm), Enki (god of wisdom), and Nihursaga (the mother of all living things)(p.22). The Mesopotamians believed that the gods controlled all of the events and occurrences in life. An ancient text called “Creation of Man by the Mother Goddess” (p.34) helps us understand how the M...
There are many socially constructed beliefs that help feed gender inequality. One of the primitive and initial source that influences gender inequality is tradition developed by religion.
Religion was a major part of Ancient Egyptians’ lives. Their faith was so engrained in them that it was more of a lifestyle than a set of beliefs. The Egyptians practiced polytheism, or the worship of many gods, and they believed that their pharaoh was a god on Earth (Doc 3). The people worshipped the pharaoh and gave him all respect and power. They believed that their two main goals in life were to keep the pharaoh and the other gods happy and to live a good life so that they may enjoy a happy life after death. Their shared faith strengthened their society because everyone was working toward the same goal. Groups were not divided based on what god they worshipped. Instead, the fact that every person lived to please the same gods and wished to go to the same afterlife gave them something in common and brought them together as a community. Sumerians also practiced polytheism and believed that their priests were connected to the gods. The people thought it was their responsibility to keep the gods happy, and believed that if the gods were pleased, they would allow their people to be content as well (Doc 6). Because of their desire to please the gods, Sumerians performed every task to the best of their ability. For example, they invested lots of time and money into their ziggurats, or temples, because they only wanted to give their best to the gods. The Sumerians’ devotion to every task ensured that everything was done well and helped their civilization
The majority of the gods and goddesses take a form that combines animal and human features. For example, rain and earth deities often have characteristics derived from crocodiles and snakes (Thompson, 1998). The Mayan deities also have a duality complex in which they could be both benevolent and malevolent, but this duality could also apply to age and sex such as a god or goddess being portrayed as youthful or aged or a masculine god sometimes being portrayed as feminine (Thompson, 199). Worship of animals, such as the Jaguar, was present (Thompson, 200) and numbers were seen as deities as well (Thompson, 239). Each deity corresponds to a number.
In placing all importance in religious symbols, Geertz does not account for any social, historical, political or economical factors which may influences one’s life, world-view and belief system. Geertz essentially argues that religious symbols create belief, but Asad denies this, arguing instead that religious symbols only serve as a catalyst for belief. Thus, because social conditions will differ from culture to culture, Asad believes it is pointless to try and find common ground between all religions. Instead he insists that looking at historical facts, which may gives us an insight into the kind of institutions and ideologies were present at the time to allow a certain way of belief to become prominent, is the preferable way of studying
The people thought of all the gods to be wise and would seek their guidance in certain situations. Their religious beliefs brought this respect, and in some ways fear, to honor the gods so they would be gracious in return. “Religious beliefs instilled fear of the gods, who could alter the landscape, and desire to appease them” (Bulliet, 19). The Mesopotamians believed that the gods were human like in form, but that if they were to be unhappy by something the people did, they could alter anything in their lives, and in some cases even kill
All three authors agree that there are clear indicators of inequality that are not morally justified. One significant aspect of creation that promotes the gender inequality present today within religions, is the labeling of women. This point is countered based on the premise that one bad woman does not mean all women are bad. Thought patterns such as this in terms of a lesser than equal role for females regardless of their procreation function and physical attractiveness are based on archaic ideologies that diminish the value of women in relation to men. Finally, arguments from Genesis show that there is a system of subordination based on Eve being created from the rib of Adam. This originates all making from one source, but ultimately creates a system of inequality or hierarchical understanding. Perhaps if it was possible to create a basis for equal thought then it may be conceivable to have a hierarchy free society. Unfortunately, this fundamental understanding is not conceivable in terms of the relationship between the two forms of mankind. Ultimately there are a number of clear indicators that morally unclear implications for the relationship between men and women have been promoted through the creation story and prominent examples of its