Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethics in research
When beginning to look at religions and cultures and their intertwining effect on each other, you can see that a religion shapes society, and equally society shapes religion. When comparing the theories of two popular anthropologists, Durkheim and Geertz, I believe that Geertz’s theory is more realistic and reliable than Durkheim’s theory. Durkheim’s theory says that religion is a joined community effort that brings people together like a social glue, and uses the definitions of the sacred and profane to distinguish what makes things religious. On the other side, Geertz’s theory holds that religion is a cultural organization, and showed that religion and society can have an impact on each other, and religion is a set symbols of that promote an emotional response, ultimate meaning, ordering of the world, and marks a special status in one’s life. When examining both theories I saw that Geertz’s theory challenges Durkheim’s theory in the definitions of the sacred and profane, Durkheim’s view of religion as a social glue of society, and Durkheim’s neglection of the individual’s use of religion impacting society.
Before discussing the reasons why Geertz’s theory challenges Durkheim’s theory, I think is important to point out the limitations of Geertz’s theory. The first shortcoming I noticed is Geertz view on using one study as a test case for another will offer suspicious results. This is true to a certain extent, but potentially you could draw small conclusions that can be related to other cultures as well even if all the parameters do not fit.
When delving deeper into Durkheim’s theory I think it is important to critique Durkheim’s view on the sacred and the profane. The sacred represents objects or practices set apart from eve...
... middle of paper ...
...915. 40-41
Pals, Daniel L. "Religion as Cultural System: Clifford Geertz." In Eight Theories of Religion. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.
Pals, Daniel L. "Religion as Cultural System: Clifford Geertz." In Eight Theories of Religion. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. 269-273
Durkheim, Émile. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. New York: Free Press, 19651915. 35
Pals, Daniel L. "Religion as Cultural System: Clifford Geertz." In Eight Theories of Religion. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. 267-277
Pals, Daniel L. "Religion as Cultural System: Clifford Geertz." In Eight Theories of Religion. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. 275-276
Pals, Daniel L. "Religion as Cultural System: Clifford Geertz." In Eight Theories of Religion. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. 277-278
Annemaire de Waal Malefijt, “Religion and Culture An Introduction to Anthropology of Religion” The United States of America 1989
Boyer, Pascal. Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought. New York, NY: Basic Books, 2001.
Peterson, Michael - Hasker, Reichenbach and Basinger. Philosophy of Religion - Selected Readings, Fourth Edition. 2010. Oxford University Press, NY.
Smart, Ninian. "Blackboard, Religion 100." 6 March 2014. Seven Dimensions of Religion. Electronic Document. 6 March 2014.
Smith, Huston. World’s Religions: A Guide to our Wisdom Traditions. San Francisco: Harper Collins, 1994.
Carmody, Denise L. and T.L. Brink, Ways to the Center: An Introduction to World Religions, 7th ed. Boston: Wadsworth, 2014. Print.
Oxtoby, Willard Gurdon., and Alan F. Segal. A Concise Introduction to World Religions. Don Mills, Ont.: Oxford UP, 2007. Print.
Oxtoby, Willard G., and Alan F. Segal. A Concise Introduction to World Religions. Oxford, Canada: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Oxtopy, W., & Segal, A. (2007). A concise introduction to world religions. (1st ed., p. 258). New York: Oxford University press.
Ward, John. "Chapter VI Religions of Roman Britain." .Roman Era in Britain (2000): pp. 102–103. Pdf.
Geertz defines religion as ‘(1) a system of symbols which acts to (2) establish powerful, pervasive, and long-lasting moods and motivations in men by (3) formulating conceptions of a general order of existence and (4) clothing these conceptions with such an aura of factuality that (5) the moods and motivations seem uniquely realistic.’ In this essay, I will focus on the Geertz’s idea, and Asad’s subsequent critique, of symbols. (Geertz, Clifford, and Michael Banton. "Religion as a cultural system." (1966).)
Durkheim, Emile. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York, New York: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print.
Eastman, Roger. The Ways of Religion: An Introduction to the Major Traditions. Third Edition. Oxford University Press. N.Y. 1999
Hopfe, L. M., & Woodward, M. R. (2007). Religions of the World (10th ed.) New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Organ, Troy Wilson. Eerdmans' Handbook to The World Religions. Woodbury, NY: Barron's Educational Series, 1974. Print.