Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Advantages and disadvantages of full body scanners
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
At many airports across the country, passengers are sharply greeted with the hassle and headache generated by the long security lines. Many travelers complain of the continuing list of rules they have to observe and how they seem to get persistently worse. The government’s solution to the hassle and headache is full-body scanners. The government claims these full-body scanners are faster to go through versus the traditional metal detector, detect weapons and bombs easier, and reduce the stress of the long security lines. In the past, airport security has not been fully successful in protecting the country from terrorists. As a result, many terrorists without being detected are escaping and are free to pursue their assault on America. Having full-body scanners will allow for less time in security, easier detection of terrorists, and will help to protect the United States.
The security at airports has continued to tighten based on the numerous threats against the people of the United States. The greatest level of concern is the terrorist attacks on New York’s World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 (Airport). After terrorists of Al Qaeda hijacked four planes and intentionally flew two of them in the World Trade Center, the government formed the Transportation Security Administration, TSA, to enforce rules of what someone could carry on a flight. The new TSA and rules though did not prevent others from threatening the country. Eight years after the attacks on the World Trade Center, Umar Abdulmutallab, known as the Christmas Day bomber, got on a flight while hiding a bomb in his underwear (Airport). In that incident, airport security did not have the ability to recognize the bomb. At the time of the incident, the metal detectors o...
... middle of paper ...
...singviews.com. Opposing Views, 16 Nov. 2010. Web. 16 Nov. 2010.
"EDITORIAL: Body Scanners: Airport Embraces High-Tech Search." America's Intelligence Wire 22 July 2010. Popular Magazines. Web. 10 Nov. 2010.
Frank, Thomas. “Most Ok with TSA Full-Body Scanners.” USATODAY.com. USATODAY, 11 Jan. 2010. Web. 10 Nov. 2010.
Park, Alice. “X-Ray Vision.” Article. Time Magazine. 4 Oct. 2010. Global Issues in Context. Web. 10 Nov. 2010.
“Security Shake-up: Should Airports use Full-Body Scanners to Screen Passengers?” Current Event. Weekly Reader Publication 18 January 2010. Global Issues in Context. Web. 10 Nov. 2010.
“Will Profiling Make a Difference?” nytimes.com. New York Times, 4 Jan. 2010. Web. 11 Nov. 2010.
Wohlsen, Marcus. “Travelers’ Choice: Give Up Privacy in Favor of Security?” Spartanburg Herald-Journal 31 Dec. 2009: n.pag. SIRS Researcher. Web. 8 Nov. 2010.
Clay Dillow’s “To Catch a Bombmaker” was published by Popular Science in October 2015. This article educated the reader about the FBI’s Terrorist Explosive Device Analytical Center— a key aspect in the fight against terrorism. Dillow focused on ethos and logos to strengthen the validation of his claim concerning the importance of the TEDAC and was successful in persuading the reader to believe in its significance as well. He used expert quotes from FBI agents to give the article credibility; In addition, he presented statistical data in a clear and concise manner and gave many factual cases in which the TEDAC facilitated the government in their pursuit of terrorist and bomb makers. As proven by Dillow in “How to Catch a Bombmaker,” the Terrorist
The terrorist attacks on September 11, 2011 prompted the world to reevaluate and drastically modify airport and airline security. “Four targets had been chosen, all iconic American buildings that would send a clear message of the depth of their hatred for the United States. All four planes crashed, killing all on board—terrorists, crew members, and passengers, along with hundreds who were killed inside the structures, on the ground, and the men and women who ran into collapsing buildings in an effort to try and save others” (Smutz 1). As Jason Villemez said “the decade after the 9/11 attacks reshaped many facets of life in America” (Villemez 1). Before the attacks, people did not think that large scale hostility towards innocent people in our country was remotely possible. Ever since that fateful moment, citizens in America are on their toes every day worrying about another attack happening. United States citizens have had to adapt and change in response to this fear of further terrorist assault on our country. One of the ways they have adapted is by changing their means of security concerning airline travel.
This paper describes our nation and the worlds mindset about airline terrorism before 9/11 and airline terrorism today. This remains a very real and deadly subject even though we don’t have as many incidents occurring at this moment in time. Still the potential for countless lives being lost in an aircraft accident from the actions of a terrorist or terrorist organization is still very real and innocent families across this nation and abroad remain the targets. Additionally, it will show that the security measures in place at airports prior to 9/11 were far less adequate, than today, and personnel responsible for airport security at the gates and throughout were either poorly trained or not trained at all when it came to hijackers and terrorist. This paper will also identify the extensive security measures, rules and training that have been put into place, which helped to curtail acts of terrorism onboard airliners.
After 9/11 there was a great increase in security nationwide. One major example of this is the number of agencies created as a result of 9/11. Among these agencies include the creation of the TSA (Transportation Security Administration), the DHS (The Department of Homeland Security), the ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement), and lastly the massive advancement of the US Coast Guard. Every one of the budgets of these agencies has doubled since 9/11. The creation of the transportation and security administrations primary goal is to improve the safety of all American Citizens traveling by plane. The TSA started implementing, new policies and new technological advancements.
With the government’s fear of another 9/11, preventing this from reoccurring is very crucial to the United States politicians and so through the use of modern technology, they are willing an...
Do police officers really need body cameras is a question that has been repeated all throughout the nation. Body cameras are video recording systems that are used by law enforcement to record their interactions with the public and gather video evidence. Most police departments do not wear body cameras currently and the ones that do are in trial phases to see how it works out. There are many advantages to police officers wearing body cameras but in asking the question should they wear body cameras the stakeholders should look at the complete picture. One reason that police and body cameras have constantly been brought up lately are the instances of police brutality happening within the United States. Police brutality within the United States
Goodwin, Chuck. "Airport Security & Body Scanners: An Overview." (n.d.): N. Pag. Rpt. In Points of View Reference Center. N.p.: N.p., 2013. Web.
Prior to the terrorist attacks that took place in the United States on September 11, 2001, security screening of airline passengers was contracted by individual airports or by the airline companies themselves. Afterward, with the passing of the Aviation and Transportation Security Act (ATSA), the power of securing the nation's airports was given to the Transportation Security Agency (TSA). (ATSA, 2001)
Airport security has changed since September 11, but this change is not always a good thing. One of the major changes that has taken place in airport security is more searches are being done. As a result of increasing the number of searches taken place, more people have their privacy rights violated. Another result of the increase of airport security is that less peopl...
To whom it May concern I am writing this letter to inform you that I stand against this policy of positioning body scanners in airports this scanner can affect our health by stepping in and having the x-ray’s hit our body, the outcome of this is to check if we have any dangers weapons that can’t be carry on airport grounds. A second reason why I stand against body scanners is the invasion of our privacy, this scanner processes our whole body inside out giving a whole picture of our body without any clothes on. While we might think that these machines will prevent future terrorist attack, but the reality is that terrorist will change tactics to avoid airport scanners. This scanner will slow airport
Airports make people feel safe because they have security to protect them, but airports also make people feel uneasy because of all the security needed to get through to make it to the airplane. Having heightened security makes people feel safe while the United States is under threats from other countries. The security causes people to feel safe because of the full-body scanners that can detect if a person is hiding a weapon. A need for involvement of going through security makes us feel safer, but also nervous. People know it is a way to try and stop the terrorists from traveling with weapons, but are scared that the TSA agents will think they are dangerous too. There are little things that are done in airports to make people feel better, such as something simple as the bomb sniffing dogs. In attempt to make people feel safe, the bomb sniffing dogs used in airports usually have fluffy ears, instead of pointy, because it makes them look friendlier (Deane, 21). They are trying to make people feel better about traveling, rather than being anxious. The airport and United States government are trying to show us that there is nothing to worry about when flying. Full-body scanners both keep us safe from danger, and make people feel better about traveling because they are
Conventional wisdom has it that having to submit into a TSA or Full Body Patdown can save lives. This is all done due to safety precautions, without this safety precautions significant amounts of accidents can happen such as hijacking and plane crashes. After 9/11 occur, according to, Airport Security depends on TSA Body Scans and Pat Downs, “Ever since the 9/11 attacks, the United States has struggled to find a balance between beefing up security against terrorism and upholding the rights of individuals - whether it be a right to privacy, a fair trial in court, or freedom from racial profiling”(Christian Science Board). What this shows is that TSA will not have trust because a tremendous of lives are at risk and people need to put a part
In the wake of 9/11, the once “simple things in life” required not much thought at all now they have been transformed into complicated procedures only brought about in a time of war. Traveling by air has been a very rewarding experience for most but courtesy of terrorism, it has mutated into a list of banned items, random luggage searches, and armed soldiers ominously toting M-16 rifles.
Walsh, Paul. "MSP to begin high-tech body scanning soon: The airport installed its first full-body scanner and expects to use it on passengers within a few weeks. Critics charge that the devices violate privacy." Star Tribune (Minneapolis, MN) 18 Aug. 2010: Newspaper Source. EBSCO. Web. 27 Jan. 2011.
Seidenstat argues that security is a relative thing and that no set of policies or measures can eliminate all terrorist acts (Seidenstat 2009 ,4). Terrorists will stop at nothing to foil our defenses. They are very patient and creative in planning their attacks. Terrorists will continue to invent ways to defeat our security measures while we are busy with our lives and forgetting about the last attack. Sometimes they don’t need to do nothing but wait for us to let our guard down so they can easily slip passed security measures.