Freedom and Responsibility in Understanding of Plato and Kant

1626 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Kant's view of freedom

In the works of Plato and Kant we can find both similarities and differences in how they understood the concepts of freedom and responsibility. This essay presents the points in which they converge and also the points in which they diverge in their understandings.
Both Plato and Kant give the paramount importance to a person’s ability to reason; they both acknowledge that only through reasoning that is not hindered by prejudices and biases can true knowledge be obtained and enlightenment be achieved.
Kant maintains that all people need to be free in reasoning without being dependent on another who will guide him through life and make decisions for them. He also claims that people should be totally unrestrained in publicly announcing their opinions and feelings about any subjects and questions thus participating in changing laws and legislations. Nonetheless, Kant asserts that people should obey the law of the State. If they find one particular law unjust, they should express their feelings about this law without interfering in the current state of affairs, and the law will be changed if that view undergoes a trial of time, and is approved by majority. For that reason, Kant brings in the notions of “private use of reason” and “public use of reason”. By “private use of reason” he understood the use which one applies carrying out one’s duty on a particular civil post, and by “public use of reason” – the use which one applies as a “scholar before a reading public”. Kant writes that private use of reason should be “narrowly restricted”, because if it is not it might result in revolution which will create chaos in the state. But “public use of reason” must be totally unconstrained because only that way will enlightenment follow. Plato, in his turn, does not think that for a state to be good there should be absolute freedom of expression. He claims that it will bring a

Show More
Related

  • Inaccessief Theory: Plato's Concept Of Knowledge

    1317 Words  | 3 Pages

    Life without knowledge would be worthless. Talking about knowledge what i mean is knowledge about something. The description of the state of some object is knowledge. The object may be either abstract or physical. Some examples of abstract things include memory, feelings and time. But how we obtain knowledge? Many philosophers tried to find an adequate answer to this question. They came up with so many theories summarizing the process of knowledge. But none of them all was able to state a clear definition of pure knowledge. One of those philosophers is Plato. In this essay I am going to discuss the concept of knowledge according to Plato’s philosophic conception of knowledge. I will clarify what knowledge is not perception. And from this I will move to explain the justified true belief theory. Then I will show the lack in this theory by referring to counterexamples: the Gettier cases. To end up with a conclusion that states what is my understanding of the process of knowledge.

    Read More

  • Bernard Williams's Critique Of Kantian Moral Theory

    1104 Words  | 3 Pages

    In this paper, I will argue that Kant provides us with a plausible account of morality. To demonstrate that, I will initially offer a main criticism of Kantian moral theory, through explaining Bernard Williams’ charge against it. I will look at his indulgent of the Kantian theory, and then clarify whether I find it objectionable. The second part, I will try to defend Kant’s theory.

    Read More

  • Plato's Allegory Of The Cave

    1521 Words  | 4 Pages

    Plato found freedom in the world of intellect. Let's take a look at his quote:

    Read More

  • Kant's Many Formulations of the Categorial Imperative

    2450 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Categorical Imperative has been the subject of debate since Kant first wrote his moral works. Philosopher’s have argued as to what Kant intended its true meaning(s) are and what the problems with these various definitions are. In the 20th Century there has been a significant rejection of the ‘traditional’ view of Kant’s Categorical Imperative. Leading this movement was Paton, Duncan and Williams. More recently joining the debate was Gregor, a student of Paton’s...

    Read More

  • Morality Vs Immanuel Kant

    2119 Words  | 5 Pages

    Immanuel Kant was an eighteenth century philosopher whose ideas redefined philosophical views of morality and justice, and provided a base for modern philosophers to argue these ideas. In Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, he argues against Hume’s idea of utilitarianism. Kant also explores the idea of freedom, free action, moral action, and how to determine if our actions are moral by use of the categorical imperative.

    Read More

  • Essay On Kant On The Good Will

    1143 Words  | 3 Pages

    Obvious -the word that perhaps succinctly defines the way Kant saw the truths of the world around him. Not so obvious are the arguments that lie within his writings. As he emphasizes the importance, yet confusing nature of reason in his Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, he proves his own point by his reasoning processes. However, in this work he systematically develops his argument for a universal good- the good will, in which inclination, duty, and reason play crucial roles. In this essay I will explain Kant's reasoning behind his statement that the only true good, without qualification, is the good will, and consequentially determine whether his idea of good varies from the Platonic ideal of goodness.

    Read More

  • Kant and Luther’s Understandings of Human Freedom

    908 Words  | 2 Pages

    For Kant and Luther, the question of human freedom and the amount individuals are at liberty of, if any, is determined in an effort to achieve high morality. However, it is precisely the outlook that Kant deems fatalist which Luther argues for, that is, freedom through faith. For Luther, we do not possess the liberty required to live a moral life without God’s guidance. On the other hand, for Kant, the predestination that Luther argues for places individuals in a state of “immaturity” and therefore unable to achieve freedom to be moral. In contrast to Luther’s argument, Kant’s self-determination, autonomy, and morality are closely related to his notion of human freedom.

    Read More

  • Kant vs. Mill: Human Rights and Utilitarianism

    1725 Words  | 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral philosophy is very direct in its justification of human rights, especially the ideals of moral autonomy and equality as applied to rational human beings. John Stuart Mills’ theory of utilitarianism also forms a solid basis for human rights, especially his belief that utility is the supreme criterion for judging morality, with justice being subordinate to it. The paper looks at how the two philosophers qualify their teachings as the origins of human rights, and comes to the conclusion that the moral philosophy of Kant is better than that of Mills. Emmanuel Kant Kant’s moral philosophy is built around the formal principles of ethics rather than substantive human goods. He begins by outlining the principles of reasoning that can be equally expected of all rational persons, regardless of their individual desires or partial interests.

    Read More

  • Plato’s Theory of The Soul in The Republic

    1754 Words  | 4 Pages

    Plato’s Republic introduces a multitude of important and interesting concepts, of topics ranging from music, to gender equality, to political regime. For this reason, many philosophers and scholars still look back to The Republic in spite of its age. Yet one part that stands out in particular is Plato’s discussion of the soul in the fourth book of the Republic. Not only is this section interesting, but it was also extremely important for all proceeding moral philosophy, as Plato’s definition has been used ever since as a standard since then. Plato’s confabulation on the soul contains three main portions: defining each of the three parts and explanation of their functions, description of the interaction of the parts, and then how the the parts and their interaction motivate action. This essay will investigate each segment, and seek to explain their importance.

    Read More

  • Justice and Moderation of the Soul in The Republic, by Plato

    3023 Words  | 7 Pages

    In his philosophical text, The Republic, Plato argues that justice can only be realized by the moderation of the soul, which he claims reflects as the moderation of the city. He engages in a debate, via the persona of Socrates, with Ademantus and Gaucon on the benefit, or lack thereof, for the man who leads a just life. I shall argue that this analogy reflecting the governing of forces in the soul and in city serves as a sufficient device in proving that justice is beneficial to those who believe in, and practice it. I shall further argue that Plato establishes that the metaphorical bridge between the city and soul analogy and reality is the leader, and that in the city governed by justice the philosopher is king.

    Read More

  • Comparing Descartes' Meditations on First Philosophy and Plato's The Republic

    1499 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the field of philosophy there can be numerous answers to a general question, depending on a particular philosopher's views on the subject. Often times an answer is left undetermined. In the broad sense of the word and also stated in the dictionary philosophy can be described as the pursuit of human knowledge and human values. There are many different people with many different theories of knowledge. Two of these people, also philosophers, in which this paper will go into depth about are Descartes and Plato. Descartes' Meditations on First Philosophy and Plato's The Republic are the topics that are going to be discussed in this paper.

    Read More

  • Plato's Moral Psychology

    3996 Words  | 8 Pages

    I argue that Plato's psychological theories are motivated by concerns he had about moral theory. In particular, Plato rejects the modern account of rationality as the maximization of subjectively evaluated self-interest because, had he adopted such an account, his theory of justice would be subject to criticisms which he holds are fatal to the contractarian theory of justice. While formulating a theory to remain within ethical constraints sometimes violates the canons of scientific theorizing, Plato avoids this mistake.

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Justice In Plato's Republic

    1440 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Plato’s Republic, the main argument is dedicated to answering Glaucon and Adeimantus, who question the reason for just behavior. They argue it is against one’s self-interest to be just, but Plato believes the behavior is in fact in one’s self-interest because justice is inherently good. Plato tries to prove this through his depiction of an ideal city, which he builds from the ground up, and ultimately concludes that justice requires the philosopher to perform the task of ruling. Since the overall argument is that justice pays, it follows that it would be in the philosopher’s self-interest to rule – however, Plato also states that whenever people with political power believe they benefit from ruling, a good government is impossible. Thus, those who rule regard the task of ruling as not in their self-interest, but something intrinsically evil. This is where Plato’s argument that justice is in one’s self-interest is disturbed. This paper will discuss the idea that justice is not in one’s self-interest, and thus does not pay.

    Read More

  • Plato's Explanation of an Ideal State in his Work, The Republic

    1874 Words  | 4 Pages

    ... state. In Plato's argument for the ideal state, the fundamental bonds which hold together his republic are unity and harmony. He explains how the just state is held together by the unity of each individual in each social class, and harmony between all three social classes. Plato explains how the ideal state must have citizens who are united in their goals. It is not the happiness of the individual but rather the happiness of the whole which keeps the just state ideal. At the same time, Plato argues that there must be harmony within the individual souls which make up the state. The lack of unity and harmony leads to despotism through anarchy which eventually arises within a democracy. Plato makes a clear argument, through The Republic, that without the unity and harmony of the individual and the state there can be no order and therefore there can be no ideal state.

    Read More

  • Reflection Of Plato And Socrates

    1009 Words  | 3 Pages

    For my paper I have chosen Plato and Socrates as my most liked philosophers. The idea that I found most important is how "reason can show us the best way to live"(Haberman & Stevenson, pg 79). Plato and Socrates both agree on this idea since Plato saw Socrates as his role model. For example, "Socrates, whose teaching deeply impressed Plato"(Haberman & Stevenson, pg 79) helped Plato see that with every decision a consequence could arise and if so it was better to face it than just avoiding it. Even though for the most part people lack in controlling their emotions and desires which makes them take the wrong initiative.

    Read More

More about Freedom and Responsibility in Understanding of Plato and Kant

Open Document