There is controversy on if officials should be able to use information they obtained from private devices or social networking sites in order to protect the community. It is believed that officials should not be able to use this data they received from these private electronics and their sources in order to protect the community. Although, some others believe officials should be able to use details they got from private devices or social networking sites.
There is a long list of reasons why this information should not be used for protection. For example, parents should be put to their job, which means they should guide their child in the correct direction. In the article Freedom Comes First by Akash Bagaria, it says, “...the role of educators is to teach, not to monitor kids outside the classroom.”An
…show more content…
A parent’s job is to monitor their child at all times available to teach and to give the child a role model that shows them what is acceptable, which means they should scold and advise when unacceptable behavior takes place. In addition, the student-teacher relationship is based on trust and this should be portrayed at all times.“There should be a level of trust between teachers and students. Trust strengthens people’s values of commitment and responsibility,” says the article Freedom Comes First, by Akash Bagaria. A teacher forcibly getting into a child’s private life can break trust. Without trust there will be no commitment to the subject in which the teacher and pupil are related in, and this leads to bad results in the student’s education progression and success of the teacher doing their job. Furthermore, looking through someone’s phone is an invasion of privacy. In the Abuse of Power article, Valinten Perez said, “People could have....pictures in there, like of their girlfriends, that they don’t want somebody else to see, and it would be an invasion of privacy not
The expansion of the Internet infrastructure across the world, has brought an increased audience. Which has provided expanded markets for businesses and exploited new opportunities. There are virtually countless social sites and media used by individuals to access and share experiences , content, insights, and perspectives. Parents today tend to believe they should spy on their kids online activity. I argue parents should respect the privacy of a child's social life and his/her internet activity.
The poem, “My Great-Grandfather’s Slaves” by Wendell Berry, illustrates the guilt felt for the sins of a man’s ancestors. The poem details the horror for the speaker’s ancestors involvement in slavery and transitions from sympathy for the slaves to feeling enslaved by his guilt. Berry uses anaphora, motif, and irony, to express the speaker’s guilt and provide a powerful atmosphere to the poem.
There are many kids that are not doing well academically at school due to a bungle parenting. Parents must check their child’s activity outside and inside the house because it is very inevitable for kids nowadays to determine and keep a close eye on their
Anthem by Ayn Rand is considered a dystopian novel. The characters live in a society where everything is bad, and they have no control over their life or destiny. The book is about a man, Equality 7-2521, who breaks all the laws of his society and dares to be different. The book is in first person and designed to seem like journal entries.
Privacy was once taken for granted in public education, but now through the 1974 law, Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act it is pushed to the forefront of the minds of every educator in the United States (Cossler, 2010). This law has paved the way for many lawsuits regarding privacy of student’s records, which have left teachers scared, undereducated and unaware of certain regulations of the law. FERPA laws provide protections for students, but also allow access of all student records to the student’s custodial parents, which in some situations has cause problems and in some cases have specifically brought clarifications of the law. Has the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act provided the much needed privacy for students or created an overboard policies?
“Pope Paul, Malcolm X, British politician sex, JFK, blown away, what else do I have to say? We didn’t start the fire, it was always burning since the world’s been turning,” was written by a profound songwriter and singer, Billy Joel in his song, “We Didn’t Start the Fire.” Shaking my head, I called up to my father, as I was sitting in a car seat. I specifically asked him who those people and places were. The response I got was “Son, this world is one of violence, terror, and scary things, and it will always exist just as Billy says.” As I may have been satisfied by that answer at age 7, I got older, and I started to become increasingly more interested in Political Science. Now at 19 years old, I examine the mathematics behind the Civil Rights
Coming from Russia during the civil war between a collectivist party and capitalism, author Ayn Rand grew up under the exposure of communism. She strongly disagreed with the sentiment of socialism, thus moved to the U.S. to experience the capitalist system. Here, Rand’s books became critically acclaimed through her unique perspective and characters. The majority of these novels is heavy handed and are heavily laced with biases that depict her strong distaste of collectivism. In the particular novella Anthem, Rand gives a warning to readers about the dangers of depending on the ‘we’ of society.
While not always seen, overall, teenagers get far less privacy than adults do. Between schools checking through the belongings of their students without solid evidence to allow it, or parents monitoring the activity of their children online, teenagers today are subject to much of their privacy being taken away. It is true that this can sometimes be helpful in busting drug dealers or keeping teenagers from getting involved with bad habits online. However, it can also have an adverse effect, ruining the relationship between a parent and his or her child, or other relationships throughout the rest of the teenager’s life. Teenagers should be allowed more privacy, if not as much as adults have, as it will keep them less fearful, as well as help to keep their interpersonal relationships strong and their emotions in a good state.
Booker T. Washington was a young black male born into the shackles of Southern slavery. With the Union victory in the Civil War and the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863, Washington’s family and blacks in the United States found hope in a new opportunity, freedom. Washington saw this freedom as an opportunity to pursue a practical education. Through perseverance and good fortunes, Washington was able to attain that education at Hampton National Institute. At Hampton, his experiences and beliefs in industrial education contributed to his successful foundation at the Tuskegee Institute. The institute went on to become the beacon of light for African American education in the South. Booker T. Washington was an influential voice in the African American community following the Civil War. In his autobiography, Up from Slavery, Washington outlines his personal accounts of his life, achievements, and struggles. In the autobiography, Washington fails to address the struggle of blacks during Reconstruction to escape the southern stigma of African Americans only being useful for labor. However, Washington argues that blacks should attain an industrial education that enables them to find employment through meeting the economic needs of the South, obtaining moral character and intelligence, and embracing practical labor. His arguments are supported through his personal accounts as a student at Hampton Institute and as an administrator at the Tuskegee Institute. Washington’s autobiography is a great source of insight into the black education debate following Reconstruction.
While Coben argues in favor of monitoring children's behavior online, parents should not spy on their children. When parents do this, it is an invasion of privacy which leads to distrust between children and their parents. Additionally, if parents spy on their children, the child will soon grow out of having overprotective parents who give them no privacy, that will eventually lead them to rebel.
If my parents decided to get a tracker and watched me what I was doing, I would not care about it at all. My parents has brought me up in a good way. My personal demeanors are neutral, and I do not have a concrete position about tracking their kids.
...by inhibition of social sites and emails and this is the theme for a discussion. How far can schools go to protect their students? There has to be done a compromise between both sides. Possible solution can be seen in the future generations because they will grow up with all the preventions around them in prepared world.
However, sensitive information that may be shared might later embarrass the children as they grow older and realize what is available on the internet. Such events may result in resentment and misunderstandings on both the children and the parents’ sides. According to Steinberg (2017) in “Sharenting: Children’s Privacy in the Age of Social Media,” there have been long-term issues and conflicts regarding parental sharing and whether children have the right to control what is shared about them. Another long-term problem raised by parental sharing is the idea of data collecting. Per “Children’s Privacy in the Big Data Era: Research Opportunities,” “These trends raise serious concerns about digital dossiers that could follow young people into adulthood, affecting their access to education, employment, healthcare, and financial services. Although US privacy law provides some safeguards for children younger than 13 years old online, adolescents are afforded no such protections” (Montgomery, Chester, & Milosevic, 2017, p.
"Is it against your individual rights for the government to monitor your social media? This is the question that is very controversial among government officials and the people of the U.S.. Some people believe that this is unconstitutional but others think that it is necessary for keeping us safe. The government has no right to monitor people’s social media because we have the freedom of speech, it invades people’s privacy, and it is unconstitutional. The government wants to try to keep the people of the U.S. safe but they may also be invading our privacy.
These individuals feel that it is an invasion of the teenagers’ right to privacy and the development of their trustworthiness. Kay Mathieson states “only by giving children privacy will they come to see their thoughts as something that belongs to them – to which they have an exclusive right.” In the United States and according to the law, monitoring the internet usage of a minor does not break any laws and is a moral obligation of the parent. Trustworthiness is an important development of a child to learn in order to develop genuine relationships with others in the lifetime. “Not only does monitoring have the great potential to undermine the trust of the child in the parent, and thus to undermine trust in others more generally, it also has the potential to undermine the capacity of the child to be worth of trust” (Mathieson). If the parent has not already had conversations with the teenager about monitoring internet usage and the parent is not telling the child about the monitoring, there is already an issue with the development of trustworthiness in the teenager. There was already a failure of development of this skill before the internet or internet monitoring was introduced.