Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Argumentative essays on why college should not be free
Argumentative essays on why college should not be free
Argumentative essays on why college should not be free
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The issue of whether or not tuition in public colleges should be free in the United States has been the question to many politicians, students, parents, and people recently. Free tuition seems like a positive thing to most people, but what those individuals have not looked beyond the word “free”. Advocates such as Bernie Sanders have argued why tuition should be free, and have made plans for this change. Free colleges tuition to many people is very appealing, but the big picture of free colleges can have big effects on the economy, and public colleges across the United States. Concern about the cost of tuition for college students leads many of us to oppose that to attend college you should have to pay a tuition. We worry that if tuition …show more content…
is free it will be too expensive for federal and state governments to maintain long-term, degrees will lose their value, and cause students to take college education less seriously. Many of the people who believe that free college tuition in public universities will be the most beneficial have said that it would make college students debt free, students wouldn’t have to worry as much about costs, and they would be able to succeed more.
While these statements are all true for the most part, the bad outweighs the good in this situation. The overall effects that free tuition will have is bigger than college students being debt free. Having to pay for and worry about the costs of college is not necessarily a bad thing. “Students may not learn to become as financially literate or independent as they should be, choosing instead to stay dependent on government programs whenever possible. It is very possible for anyone that cannot afford college to seek grants, scholarships, and financial aid.” (Trade Schools). Many people also have argued that this plan will help low income families, which it will, but there are plenty of families that can afford to send their children to college. While I do agree that the cost of college tuition is very high and many people struggle to send their students to college for that reason, as most advocates of free college think, I do not agree that free college is the answer. More student aid and scholarships should have more funding in order to help resolve the …show more content…
issue. Many people hear the word free and focus solely on that, but what many people don’t understand is the effects that free tuition can have. Nothing is really ever free, somebody has to end up paying for the billions of dollars in costs that colleges require. What advocates of making college “free” do not see is that the state and federal government has to get that money from somewhere and where it will be coming from is your pockets. The cost for taxpayers will have to increase, because in reality the government cannot afford the nearly 750 billion dollars of cost for free tuition. “Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont has called for free tuition at public institutions, which would cost taxpayers $70 billion a year” (The New York Times). People who do not even have children or someone they are responsible for helping go to college are having to pay for students to attend. Not only are these expenses of college a factor in why college tuition should not be free, the value of something that is free is the the question to many people.
If college is easily accessible to so many people, that also means that the access to degrees will be easier. If everyone can be a lawyer, a doctor, or have a higher degree than high school for free then how can everyone be able to have a job in that specific field. “Many people see education as an investment to a better career, but it is unfortunate that the same employment could previously be obtained without such an expensive price tag” (The Crimson White). The point of college is to be able to pay for a higher education and in return you will be able to have a better career. If anyone can easily get a degree and more and more people are attending college as said in an article by Sarah Howard “a four-year degree will soon be too standard and it will take a master’s degree or higher to have a comfortable income”. Essentially if college is free for everyone it is defeating the purpose of college and reversing the effect because in the end it will take more time to graduate with a degree that will provide a comfortable income, and cost more because of living
expenses. While the value of the degree decreases if free college were to exist, the value of going to college will decrease. Many students take college more seriously because they are aware of the expenses of college. An article by Belinda Luscombe, an Australians whose college degree was paid for, writes about what it is really like when your college tuition is paid for. In her article she says “Many people fear that not having to pay for college will make students take college less seriously. This is absolutely true. My fellow students and I did not take college very seriously”. If student get to attend college for free students will no longer value it as much. Students won't be losing anything, therefore they can take as long as they want to get a degree and not have to worry about how much money they are losing. It is important to remember why a higher education is an expense. There have been many reasons to show for this, and many reasons to show what will happen if tuition is free in public colleges across America. While many people agree that tuition should be free and that it will help student it is only hurting students ultimately. The cost of zero tuition will cause an increase for taxpayers, and potentially another debt that America does not need. College will begin to lose it’s value and in order to get a degree with value and a comfortable income students will have to have a higher degree and pay more money for costs of living. Students will also lose their will to take college seriously and appreciate the value of college.
Ellison, Keith. “The Argument for Tuition-Free College.” The American Prospect. The American Prospect. 14 April 2016.Web. 20 March 2018.
One of the hot topics of debate going on in the U.S. today that presidential candidates are talking about is college tuition. Some have revealed their proposals to American citizens on how they would tackle the issue of tuition. The question is which one of the many proposals will work and limit the amount of people who don’t go to college and give them a reason to go. The tuition issue is not a case by case problem, but a national problem. While there are some who have the opportunity to attend college others are not as fortunate. But everyone can have a part in shaping the future for many generations to come. The objective is to find a way to make what some would call “college free”to everyone. How were we able to find a way to make public
“If a college education has value, why give it away?” (Luebke). Most everyone wants to have higher education because it has value in this day and age. It opens up more career options, and lets them have more freedom to pick the career they want. With higher education being tuition-free, students might take their college education less seriously because they don’t have to pay for it (Should College Be Free? Pros, Cons, and Alternatives). Because of this, graduation numbers might drop, or the people who do graduate may not be as well prepared for the workforce. Yes, there are still entry requirements that limit the amount of students allowed into the school, but much of the drive for the students comes from the fact that they are paying a lot of money to be there. Also, giving away college education would almost certainly do the opposite of what people want it to do, which is give more money to students from richer families than from poorer ones. It isn’t that they want to necessarily take money from the richer families, but they want to give poorer families more opportunities to get money. “Without a dramatic overhaul of how we understand student benefits, making college more or entirely free would most likely boost the wealth of college attendees without securing any important egalitarian gains.” (Bruenig). This is because students from well-off families already enjoy a disproportionately successful future than students from poor families,
First and foremost, Trade Schools, Colleges and Universities states, “After all, more and more of today's jobs are knowledge-based or require advanced technical skills. So a better-educated workforce would help fill many of the skills gaps that prevent America's economy from growing faster.” If more people attended college then there would be more jobs to fill in America’s economy. There have been droughts in America’s economy, but with free college tuition, droughts would decrease. It would not be fair that someone who could be successful at the job would not be granted the ability to get the job because they don’t have a piece of paper with a signature on it compared to someone who does average or mediocre at the job and had the opportunity to go to college. Making college free also comes with consequences. So graduation numbers might drop, or the people who do graduate might not be as well prepared for the workforce. Also, with more people choosing to attend public colleges because of their tuition-free status, many schools might have to create wait lists or expand the ones they already have. State budgets could become strained, which might lead to cuts and decreased access to the programs that students want to take. Here is the weakness, although it benefits many students, the nation's existing
First, free college can encourage students to go to college to get a degree which leads to a high paying career. It can fulfill those students that are having a hard time financially, and fewer students will be in debt. Second, with free college, colleges will be more likely to help students that need the guidance to stay on track and get a diploma. Clayton and Bailey mention, "If we want to significantly improve educational outcomes, we need to make college more affordable so more students can enroll, and make the reforms needed to en-sure community college students can succeed in their courses, complete their program, and grad-uate within reasonable amount of time" (Clayton and Bailey). Finally, free college can help the U.S. catch up to the rest of the countries with higher education. For example, it can help the United States surpass Russia, where more than half of adults have a diploma. Frohlich explains, “More Than 53% of Russian adults between the ages of 25 and 64 had some form of higher edu-cation in 2012, more than in any other country reviewed by OECD” (Frohlich). Although free college is an attractive idea, it will leave the United States in a bigger debt which will be hard to recover from and more students will be unmotivated to
College is one of the most fundamental institutions in our modern world. It is a place where most of our future politicians, doctors, scientists, and leaders are made. Though, it seems that the price tag that comes with a college education is something that is too hefty for some students. Countless debates go on about whether the price of college should be abolished or whether the cost still is on the students to pay for.
He gives many reasons against the tuition-free college proposal. The proposal requires higher expenditure for government and it is not guaranteed that it will improve the educational system and be beneficial for students at community college. Furthermore, community colleges should figure out the solution to solve the growing dropout rates problem instead of trying to add more students to fill their classrooms. For working-class students, the Pell Grant program of federal government already provides two years of free community college for them, and it might also benefit middle-class students. He concludes that the most important thing is figuring out how to use tax money sensibly to help students attend post-secondary school. This article provides current and valuable information for anyone who is concerned with free tuition college
As people attend college, fees build up and students loan money and possibly be in debt. Not only that, some may say college isn’t worth it, but it is. Getting a degree pays off at the end, going towards your career path, making twice as much as you would work at a regular job. Students who have received a degree are slowly declining. To make adjustments, college should be free for everyone.
Calling a college education “free” is a contradiction because nothing in life is truly free. Someone will be responsible for paying for this education, even if it is not the person receiving it. To support this flood of hopeful college students, the American Government will have to heavily tax the working and upper classes. Taxes will have to be inflated to compensate for the price of college, and in some cases, may become outrageously high. If the upper class becomes constantly taxed, what keeps them from dropping down a class? What keeps the middle class from becoming the lower class? In an extreme situation, if the middle and upper classes were constantly taxed, there risks a problem of creating a bigger class divide. Maybe the plan to pay for college education starts out with only the rich being taxed. In America, there are roughly 324 million people. This number increases every eight seconds, so there is a constant increase of citizens. Imagine if half of that number decides to go to college. College education is free for them, but their tuition is paid for by the upper class. Now, average college tuition runs for about $9,410 for State Universities, and around $32,405 for out of state students. This amount of money, per student, is paid for by the upper class’s taxes. Taxes are raised higher and higher to pay for all these students until they cannot be raised any further. The upper
With the rapid growth of college tuition, it has become an important issue in higher education. College Tuition is simply defined as the charge or fee for instruction, at a private school or a college or a university. Most people agree today that college tuition is too high or that it needs to be completely dismissed. There are some however, that may disagree with the claim about college tuition and state that college tuition is necessary for college growth, and it’s primary purpose is to pay for college expenses to support the institution financially. Research shows that college tuition is too high and that debt has become a standard in America after attending post-secondary school.
College tuition costs have been on a tremendous incline over the past decades. Many young students have avoided seeking or attending higher education as a result of this. Students who have chosen to attend college now face the reality of having to loan money or accumulating huge amounts of debt." Democratic candidates such as Bernard Sanders have been trying to enact laws that would grant public colleges to be free for students. People against free college tuition have voiced their opinions stating that free tuition would have many negative consequences and flaws. While people in opposition of free college tuition have their valid points, free tuition would actually provide a ton of benefits. Therefore, Lawmakers should enact a law into legislation that would require public college tuition to be free because it allows great
Therefore, college should be free for all. So students can have the opportunity to graduate debt free, and start fueling the economy. First of all, more individuals would attend college if it were free, which means that America would have a greater number of college educated. Nearly 40 percent of working-aged Americans now hold a college degree, according to a new report from the Lumina Foundation. Statistics also show that by 2012, 39.4 percent of Americans between 20-60 years of age held a two-year college degree.
Free college is a way to better our faltering society by providing the much needed high quality education that everyone deserves. For example, free college would reduce the high student loans that leave the students in debt and usually defaulting on the loan, leading to financial trouble. Federal funding would make college free and would reduce defaulting drastically. Another example is that it is projected to reduce unemployment by 2 million. Due to everyone getting good college degrees. Thirdly, there would be a drastic reduction in crime rates, because a highly educated society will lead to smart decision making on all social levels. Which is only possible if college is free. Another reason is it will cover the costs for families who are
This has sparked the debate as to whether higher education ought to be offered free of charge or not, with many rallying for the former. In order to level the playground for all Americans and offer equal opportunities in life; higher education should be offered free of charge to all. This paper seeks to make a convincing argument regarding the importance and need of having free higher education. At the same time, this essay seeks to cite some of the opinions of those of a contrary opinion, giving them a different viewpoint. In the end, this essay will weigh the benefits of free higher education against the drawbacks and probably, convince everyone that the benefits are enough to guarantee free higher education.
Among educational system, discussions about the education free in the U.S. has always existed. Free education is a current issue for the society today. Furthermore, it's not approved yet, especially among government and intelligentsia, generally, fit into one of two categories. Education increase the growth of public culture in a community. Other approach is about quality and equality, which improve the works specialization. Also, education is the main advantage in grow up intellectual and cultural development of a society. The greatest impact of higher education, rather than students, and argues that legal and institutional changes have reduced the pressure on a government to generate high-quality education for US students.