Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Medias influence on public opinion
Importance of freedom of speech
Importance of freedom of speech
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Medias influence on public opinion
One example is the Jimmy Kimmel incident last year. The October 16th’s Jimmy Kimmel Live Show aired by ABC has ignited thousands of Chinese in over twenty cities in the U.S. to protest. During the segment ”Kids Table”, when Kimmel asked how should the U.S. solve its debt issues with China, a six years old child’s response “killing everyone in China” followed by Kimmel’s “that’s an interesting thoughts” and” should we allow the Chinese to live” has angered many Chinese both in the U.S. and abroad. Over 100,000 people signed the petition to the White House to demand Kimmel’s sincere apology of his “incitement to mass murder”, and racism to Chinese people.
While some people argued that the show was not meant to be serious, some protestors said
…show more content…
To them, the “joke” of “killing all the Chinese” does not seem to be fun. Thus, the protest of Jimmy Kimmel and ABC soon spread out among many of the Chinese-Americans and Chinese citizens nationwide to gather outside ABC’s offices in twenty cities. Protestors hold posters of Kimmel with a Hitler mustache, and accused him of “manipulating children” and “promoting racial genocide” outside of Kimmel’s Hollywood studio. According to the Associated Press, more than 1,000 people gathered for this particular protest. Protesters demand ABC to fire Kimmel and close down the show entirely. Both ABC management officials and Kimmel had apologized …show more content…
He apologized both on-air and in written statement. As he said: ”If I upset you, I am very, very sorry. I come to you with nothing but love in my heart,” during a protest outside the ABC studio in Hollywood. However, this was not Kimmel’s reaction at first. When Kimmel answered a reporter of how he would response a group of Chinese-Americans are raising money to sue him. Kimmel responded: ”Well, In America we have the freedom of the press. If they want to waste their money suing me, I would recommend they don't do that, but that’s their choice. ” (Spegele, 2013) The largest Chinese broadcast station CCTV (China Central Television) broadcast this video clip of Kimmel answered the reporter along with the Jimmy Kimmel show of “Killing all the Chinese” to the domestic Chinese citizens, who may never heard of this show or lack of understanding in
Nayan Shah is a leading expert in Asian American studies and serves as professor at the University of California. His work, Contagious Divides: Epidemics and Race in San Francisco’s Chinatown explores how race, citizenship, and public health combined to illustrate the differences between the culture of Chinese immigrants and white norms in public-health knowledge and policy in San Francisco. Shah discusses how this knowledge impacted social lives, politics, and cultural expression. Contagious Divides investigates what it meant to be a citizen of Chinese race in nineteenth and twentieth-century San Francisco.
She chooses to cite only academic publications, Canadian governmental documents, and local newspaper articles in her long list of sources, none of which provide perspective from the people around which the article is centered; the Chinese. This highlights the key issue within the article; whilst Anderson meticulously examines how Chinatown is simply a construction of white supremacists, she ignores what life was actually like for the area’s inhabitants, and how the notion of ‘Chinatown’ may have become a social reality for those living in it. By failing to include sources written by those who lived in Chinatown during the time or live there now, she misses the notion of Canadian-Chinese agency and its potential willingness to thrive and adapt in an environment she deems simply a hegemonic construction. Barman’s sources are all encompassing from varying perspectives. This may be due to the fact that she wrote the article 20 years after Anderson’s, during a time in which history was beginning to be viewed through a culturally-relativistic lens.
The treatment of Chinese immigrants and Chinese-Americans is often overlooked as the struggles of other ethnic groups in the United States take center stage in history. Many remember the plight of African-Americans and their struggle over basic civil liberties during the 19th and 20th centuries in America. However we shouldn’t forget that the Chinese were another group heavily discriminated against with the use of legal racism in the form of laws violating basic human rights and Sinophobe sentiments held by the American populace. After the “fall” of China to communism, anti-Chinese sentiments were only exacerbated due to the second Red Scare and the Communist witch hunts that it created. People of Chinese descent were another unfortunate target of racism in America’s long history of legalized racism.
This source supplies my paper with more evidence of how freedom of speech is in a dangerous place. American has always stood by freedom of speech, and to see how social media platforms try to manipulate and take off as the choose to increase slight bias is unpleasant. The article establishes a worry to the fellow readers that hold freedom of speech so high and that it is at risk. The article manages to explain why freedom of speech is in danger, and why there should be no limits to free speech.
George Carlin and Radio Censorship Americans hate the word censorship. It puts fire into the eyes of any self-proclaimed, speaker of the people. but is censorship bad, or wrong? Censorship is an enormous part of the stability of society. One of the many types of censorship takes place on the airwaves.
York, Geoffrey. 2007. “Text-messages: the new Chinese protest tool.” Globe and Mail, Friday, June 1: A13.
Since television came into existence, it has evolved into a useful tool to spread ideas, both social and political, and has had a great effect on the generations growing up with these heavily influential shows. To these younger generations, television has taken the role of a teacher, with the task of creating a social construction by which many of us base our personal beliefs and judgments on. This power allows television shows take the opportunity to address problems in a manner that many audiences can take to heart. Many television shows present controversial topics in a comical matter, in some ways to soften the blow of hard-hitting reality at the same time bringing attention to the issue being addressed. In the television show, Everybody Hates Chris, season one, episode four entitled “Everybody Hates Sausage”, the stereotypes that continue to fuel racism are examined in a satirical motif, and class is presented in a comical way, but carries serious undertones which present a somewhat realistic view of the different social strata within the United States.
The first Chinese immigrants to arrive in America came in the early 1800s. Chinese sailors visited New York City in the 1830s (“The Chinese Experience”); others came as servants to Europeans (“Chinese Americans”). However, these immigrants were few in number, and usually didn’t even st...
Lindo Jong provides the reader with a summary of her difficulty in passing along the Chinese culture to her daughter: “I wanted my children to have the best combination: American circumstances and Chinese character. How could I know these two things do not mix? I taught her how American circumstances work. If you are born poor here, it's no lasting shame . . . You do not have to sit like a Buddha under a tree letting pigeons drop their dirty business on your head . . . In America, nobody says you have to keep the circumstances somebody else gives you. . . . but I couldn't teach her about Chinese character . . . How to know your own worth and polish it, never flashing it around like a cheap ring. Why Chinese thinking is best”(Tan 289).
Wu, Frank H. "Embracing Mistaken Identity: How the Vincent Chin Case Unified Asian Americans." Asian American Policy Review 19 (2010): 17-22. ProQuest. Web. 5 May 2014.
They served subpoenas for documents that would prove the illegitimacy of Chinese citizenship. The Six Companies, which represented the interests of the community, fought back claiming “the subpoena was being used for the ‘obvious purpose of oppressing and intimidating the entire Chinese American community…” Delivering mass subpoenas proved jurisdictionally unsuccessful. Yet, the INS Chinese Confession Program in 1956 birthed a second opportunity to dispute Chinese legal
It is as though Asian Americans are succumbing to the thought that America is the only place to be and that they should be grateful to live here. On the other hand, keeping silent due to pressures from the white population means being shunned by the members of the Asian American population. I disagree with Chin’s assertion that “years of apparent silence have made us accomplices” to the makers of stereotypes (Chin 1991, xxxix). I agree with Hongo’s argument that the Chin viewpoint “limits artistic freedom” (Hongo 4). Declaring that those writers who do not argue stereotypes of the good, loyal, and feminine Chinese man or the submissive female, are in any way contributing to or disagreeing with them is ridiculous.
Some Chinese men, Pun Chi , in particular, tried reaching out to Congress on behalf of all Chinese immigrants asking for mercy and peace. They brought to attention that America’s claim to be a christian country were badly contradicted because of the way they treated the Chinese. In his appeal to Congress in 1870, he says “Now why is it that, when our people come to your country, instead of being welcomed with unusual respect and kindness, on the contrary they are treated with unusual contempt and evil?” The Chinese were told that if they came to America, that the Citizens of the U.S. would care for, love, and respect the Chinese race, yet they received the exact
Freedom of speech cannot be considered an absolute freedom, and even society and the legal system recognize the boundaries or general situations where the speech should not be protected. Along with rights comes civil responsib...
Freedom of speech is the right any person has to express the beliefs they have without any restraint even if they aren't factual. Whereas an ethical speech means to have trust and respect for the speaker and receivers of the speech given. According to the text, in order to balance free speech with ethical speech the speaker has to be responsible when handling the information as well as the awareness of and concern for the speechmaking's outcomes or consequences (Gamble, 45). This meaning, you have to take into account belief, value and moral principles of the audience while in the process of speechmaking. The reason for that is to not offend anyone listening to the speech you are giving.