Free Education Is Worth The Cost Of Post-Secondary Education

574 Words2 Pages

Education is a necessity for success. This being so, free education is provided to the citizens from primary to secondary levels. After completing the secondary school, many students choose to attend the post secondary institutions. Enrolling in post secondary education is significant since it teaches the skills the students need to pursue their careers, but are limited in lower levels of schools. Although tuition that follows is considered the greatest obstacle, higher education is worth the cost and is not a thing to be free for everyone.

Firstly, free post secondary education isn’t actually free; it merely shifts the responsibility of the bill to taxpayers. Free tuition would cause a huge surge in applicants, which indicates that the institution will require to providing more supplies and hire more faculty members. In the name of helping the lower class, his simply means higher taxes to cover all the expenses. For instance, some European countries do not charge the tuition to their students. However, according to OECD, Europe has the highest income tax rates over 40%, which allows them to offer the free education. Like what being said, post secondary schools can never be free. It’s a matter of ‘who’ pays the cost, and that will most likely be the …show more content…

The fees the students pay are mostly used for the welfares for themselves. Free tuition means higher tax, and this means that the school is being pressurized on resources. If insufficient amount of tax is supported, the institution will be enforced to ration or “[compromise] the quality of their offerings” (Andrew P. Kelly). This not only would hamper the attainment, but also decrease the value of higher education, making the bachelor’s degree to be viewed equally as a high school diploma. Better academic quality is valuable than the cost of tuition for achieving students’ career goals. The fine quality justifies the high

Open Document