Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Assimilation into the life of America
The development of american individualism
Melting pot united states
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Assimilation into the life of America
There is great debate on Frederick Jackson Turners thesis on whether or not the great west is where American character was formed. The West was more a form of society than an actual area. The term is applied to the region in which the social conditions resulted from the application of older set colonies. By this application a new environment was entered. A new environment of freedom and of opportunity was opened and a new line of activities, ideas, customs, and growth were brought into existence in the Great west. Their opportunistic, individualistic, and willingness to accept innovations are of reasons I agree with Turners analysis that true American character was formed in the great west. Being stripped from industrialization and modes of travel to being arrayed in "the hunting shirt and moccasins"(Turner, 167) and "put into …show more content…
the birch canoe"(Turner, 167) this is how a new product that is American comes to be. This is known as the Great West. People working in factories leave what they have behind in chance of opportunity. The West was in other words another title for opportunity. This is a place where mines had yet to be mined and fertile valleys awaited to be seized and cropped and all the natural resources were available to the most opportunistic and boldest. Robert Baird in his primary source describes the west to immigrants and travelers in that the people who live in the west as people who "think nothing of making a long journey, of encountering fatigue, and of enduring every species of hardship."(Baird, 177) This shows the significance in which that the people who did come to the Great west had specific traits of character that "distinguish the population of the west," (Baird, 177) as opportunistic and hardworking people. Thus setting the west as the place in where true American character was formed because to this modern day "opportunistic" is seen as a trait of American character. With the Americans that moved west, it included freed indentured servants of non-English stock.
Because coming to the West meant new opportunities for these people, it meant picking up everything they could take and moving. What this was, was continual rebirth that Americans had to deal with. With continuing to rebirth, a person becomes different as in there is a sense of finding themselves a sense of individualism. In other words a sense of what is now American character. "Moving westward, the frontier became more and more American." (Turner, 166 ) Turner writes "In the crucible of the frontier the immigrants were Americanized, liberated and fused into a mixed race." The west being a unique place as Turner states, it also has its own national identity and is not sectional but rather it is like a melting pot where these immigrants were "Americanized". This is shown in Frank Marryat's primary source of drawing in "A San Francisco Saloon" (Marryat, 182) in which it shows the diversity of the West. Depicted in Marryat's drawing are Chinese, Spanish, and white male gold miners, as well as some dressed in top hats in a gambling
saloon. Free land is something which lies at the heart of Turners individualism. The self made man was the western mans ideal, the man in which they all could become in the west. Turner fashioned the freedom of the individual to seek his own opportunities. The independent self made man plays a major central role in Turners thesis in that Americas west was a place where true American Character was formed. Pride and arrogance are also of two American characteristics in which were formed in the Great West. Though these characteristics are characteristics that were not formed on their own but rather characteristics that are still seen in modern day American character. Opportunism and individualism are of two characteristics that partly make up the pride and arrogance characteristic of American character. This pride of being American comes from the success in the opportunities that the travelers took with the availability of land in the West. The success in that New York Journalist , John L. O'Sullivan called Manifest Destiny. Manifest Destiny meaning that the United States at this time, "had a divinely appointed mission , so obvious as to be beyond dispute, to occupy all of North America."(Foner, 267) Arrogance can be seen as a characteristic in which Manifest Destiny was seen as a way to spread the "superior race" that is, white people of European origins. "During the 1840's, territorial expansion came to be seen as proof of the innate superiority of the "Anglo-Saxon race." (Foner,374) They saw the Indians, Mexicans and other races in the Western as unfit to be a part of America.
The West is a very big part of American culture, and while the myth of the West is much more enticing than the reality of the west, it is no doubt a very big part of America. We’re constantly growing up playing games surrounded by the West such as cowboys and Indians and we’re watching movies that depict the cowboy to be a romanticized hero who constantly saves dames in saloons and rides off into the sunset. However, the characters of the West weren’t the only things that helped the development of America; many inventions were a part of the development of the West and helped it flourish into a thriving community. Barbed wire, the McCormick reaper and railroads—for example—were a large part of the development in the West—from helping to define claimed land boundaries, agricultural development and competition, and even growth of the West.
According to the thesis of Fredrick Jackson Turner, the frontier changed America. Americans, from the earliest settlement, were always on the frontier, for they were always expanding to the west. It was Manifest Destiny; spreading American culture westward was so apparent and so powerful that it couldn’t be stopped. Turner’s Frontier Theory says that this continuous exposure to the frontier has shaped the American character. The frontier made the American settlers revert back to the primitive, stripping them from their European culture. They then created something brand new; it’s what we know today as the American character. Turner argues that we, as a culture, are a product of the frontier. The uniquely American personality includes such traits as individualism, futuristic, democratic, aggressiveness, inquisitiveness, materialistic, expedite, pragmatic, and optimistic. And perhaps what exemplifies this American personality the most is the story of the Donner Party.
In week three, our professor a question in regards to Turner’s thesis asked a question of me. The question that was posed to me was this, “which groups did he (Turner) exclude and why should they be included if we are to provide a balanced accounting”? After going back and reading the thesis again to make sure I had not miss anything, I still felt that Turner was very biased in his thinking. I gave my honest feedback on who I felt was left out of the thesis and was going to leave it at that, however I thought, before I submit let me see what other historians are saying about this thesis and Turner in the field of history. Well, was a I surprised when I was informed this was a leading paper in on the American West. However, I still could
This historical document, The Frontier as a Place of Conquest and Conflict, focuses on the 19th Century in which a large portion of society faced discrimination based on race, ethnicity, and religion. Its author, Patricia N. Limerick, describes the differences seen between the group of Anglo Americans and the minority groups of Native Americans, Asian Americans, Hispanics Americans and African Americans. It is noted that through this document, Limerick exposes us to the laws and restrictions imposed in addition to the men and women who endured and fought against the oppression in many different ways. Overall, the author, Limerick, exposes the readers to the effects that the growth and over flow of people from the Eastern on to the Western states
...to Americans: if their prospects in the East were poor, then they could perhaps start over in the West as a farmer, rancher, or even miner. The frontier was also romanticized not only for its various opportunities but also for its greatly diverse landscape, seen in the work of different art schools, like the “Rocky Mountain School” and Hudson River School, and the literature of the Transcendentalists or those celebrating the cowboy. However, for all of this economic possibility and artistic growth, there was political turmoil that arose with the question of slavery in the West as seen with the Compromise of 1850 and Kansas-Nebraska Act. As Frederick Jackson Turner wrote in his paper “The Significance of the Frontier in American History” to the American Historical Association, “the frontier has gone, and with its going has closed the first period of American history.”
Patricia Nelson Limerick describes the frontier as being a place of where racial tension predominately exists. In her essay, “The Frontier as a Place of Ethnic and Religion Conflict,” Limerick says that the frontier wasn’t the place where everyone got to escape from their problems from previous locations before; instead she suggested that it was the place in which we all met. The frontier gave many the opportunities to find a better life from all over the world. But because this chance for a new life attracted millions of people from different countries across the seas, the United States experienced an influx of immigrants. Since the east was already preoccupied by settlers, the west was available to new settlement and that was where many people went. Once in the western frontier, it was no longer just about blacks and whites. Racial tension rose and many different races and ethnic groups soon experienced discrimination and violence based on their race, and beliefs instead of a since of freedom at the western frontier.
Turner’s thesis was to a wide extent based on this belief. Turners tried to convince people that American uniqueness is as a result of the constant contact with an open frontier for about 300 years. Turner’s conclusion significantly builds up on the American exceptionalism or uniqueness. He summarized his thesis by saying the most relevant aspect of the frontier was promotion of individualistic democracy. The ubiquity of opportunity and significance of individual labor restrained monopoly of political power from developing and led to American Democratic
The Turner Thesis in the Modern United States Despite being written over one hundred years ago, Frederick Jackson Turner’s Frontier Thesis is still valid to this very day. Turner developed his Frontier Thesis as a means to determine where distinctly American characteristics developed. Turner stated that it was the Western settlers who developed a unique identity as they adapted and tamed the Frontier. Consequently, Turner saw this process as an evolution of a distinctly American culture – people who were not afraid to venture westward in order to exploit resources. As these people relocated westward in search of resources, more settlements developed in the West.
While the US may have prided themselves in the fact that we didn’t practice imperialism or colonialism, and we weren’t an Empire country, the actions conquering land in our own country may seem to rebuff that claim. In the 19th century, the West was a synonym for the frontier, or edge of current settlement. Early on this was anything west of just about Mississippi, but beyond that is where the Indian tribes had been pushed to live, and promised land in Oklahoma after policies like Indian removal, and events like the Trail of Tears. Indian’s brief feeling of security and this promise were shattered when American’s believed it was their god given right, their Manifest Destiny, to conquer the West; they began to settle the land, and relatively quickly. And with this move, cam...
Miller makes clear the impact of wilderness on early American life. While the Old World mentality presented wilderness as mysterious and filled with demons, the new American nation viewed it differently. Rather than possessing a sense of fear, their belief in the divine mission to spread democracy and civilization inspired them to journey west. Accordingly, they did so with a sense of excitement and a thirst for discovery. As such, I wholeheartedly agree with Miller’s view that the early romantic images of the American landscape were expressions of a new cultural nationalism. According to Miller, these early countrymen viewed the new nation as “...a place apart, an unpeopled wilderness where history, born in nature rather than in corrupt institutions,
...or wider opportunities. Even the safety valve theory has an element of truth when applied to ambitious young men of the professional class who had a better chance of making it big much quicker in the West than in the East. Without the open frontier, moreover, there would have been a much larger migration of young people from the farms to the cities; thus the frontier helped indirectly to check the exploitation of the working class by preventing it from expanding too rapidly. The Westward Expansion also weakened state and regional loyalties and promoted national unity due to its inherent mobility. Most westerners thought of themselves primarily as Americans, and wanted strong national government with broad powers for developing transportation and promoting the general welfare. The most significant feature of the Westward Expansion was that the pioneers took with them the essential institutions of their civilization. Thus we must look upon the Westward Expansion as one of the factors in the shaping of the American civilization but not the only one. AKSHARA PRADHAN Roll No. 385 Tute. Grp.- Tuesday, 1st Pd.
Over the years, the idea of the western frontier of American history has been unjustly and falsely romanticized by the movie, novel, and television industries. People now believe the west to have been populated by gun-slinging cowboys wearing ten gallon hats who rode off on capricious, idealistic adventures. Not only is this perception of the west far from the truth, but no mention of the atrocities of Indian massacre, avarice, and ill-advised, often deceptive, government programs is even present in the average citizen’s understanding of the frontier. This misunderstanding of the west is epitomized by the statement, “Frederick Jackson Turner’s frontier thesis was as real as the myth of the west. The development of the west was, in fact, A Century of Dishonor.” The frontier thesis, which Turner proposed in 1893 at the World’s Columbian Exposition, viewed the frontier as the sole preserver of the American psyche of democracy and republicanism by compelling Americans to conquer and to settle new areas. This thesis gives a somewhat quixotic explanation of expansion, as opposed to Helen Hunt Jackson’s book, A Century of Dishonor, which truly portrays the settlement of the west as a pattern of cruelty and conceit. Thus, the frontier thesis, offered first in The Significance of the Frontier in American History, is, in fact, false, like the myth of the west. Many historians, however, have attempted to debunk the mythology of the west. Specifically, these historians have refuted the common beliefs that cattle ranging was accepted as legal by the government, that the said business was profitable, that cattle herders were completely independent from any outside influence, and that anyone could become a cattle herder.
The westward expansion was the starting point for the growing America. There are many reasons to believe why westward expansion was a good idea, and there are also many reasons to believe why it wasn’t a good idea. The texts “There is No True History of the Westward Expansion,” by Robert Morgan, “The Way to Rainy Mountain,” by N. Scott Momaday, “Thomas Jefferson’s America, 1801,” and Reporting to the President, September 23- December 31, 1806” by Stephen Ambrose and “Chief Joseph Speaks…” by Chief Joseph show different point of views and opinions on westward expansion. The central ideas made from Morgan are “The westward expansion wasn’t caused by heroes nor villains,’ and “The average American people were responsible for the rapid expansion across the country,” From the text “There is No True History of the Westward Expansion.”
Analysing The West: Unique, Not Universal. Throughout history, Western civilization has been an emerging force behind change in foreign societies. This is the concept that is discussed in the article, the West Unique, Not Universal, written by Samuel Huntington. The author makes a very clear thesis statement and uses a variety of evidence to support it. This article has a very convincing point.
Lynn Hunt et al., The Making of the West: peoples and cultures, a Concise History (Boston:Bedford/St. Martin's, 2003), 43, 45, 132, 136, 179-180