Fraternities: A Rhetorical Analysis

1163 Words3 Pages

Fraternities- Instruments of Injury, Assault, and Death In the article published in The Atlantic, “Banning Pledging Doesn’t Fix Fraternities’ Health Problem”, the author Jacoba Urist argues to college students and their parents that while a new fraternity pledging policy that reduces the time period for pledgeship may be good public relations, it does not address the health risk of the binge drinking culture that infests fraternities. The author uses primarily logic and emotional arguments to persuade the reader to her point of view, but also uses ethical arguments. Fraternities have been criticized for many years for encouraging alcohol abuse, which is then linked to injuries, sexual abuse, and even death. The article suggests that the pledging process has been a facilitator of these ills, but shortening that process may not actually address the underlying cause. The Atlantic article particularly examines the Sigma Alpha Epsilon fraternity, or as it’s better known “SAE”, because of their new national …show more content…

While publicizing the reduced pledgeship period as a solution to a real problem, she suggests SAE is not being serious about that problem and is misleading the public. The author points out that while SAE announced they are eliminating their infamous pledge process, they actually created a substantial loophole that perpetuates the culture of drinking and sexual assaults. The ethical persuasion derives from SAE saying one thing but doing something else. The author also relies on Dr. Foubert who suggests an informal agreement between the national fraternity office and local chapters where local chapters “pull the wool over national’s eyes, and national looks the other way as much as they possibly can” (Urist 5). Again, the use of ethical persuasion is effective at undermining the seriousness of SAE’s efforts to fix their cultural

Open Document