Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Chapter 1 of understanding psychology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Humans are very complex in many ways including how we think, how we love, and how we accept the people around us. Throughout history and even over recent years, acceptance is something that we as humans, crave possibly more than anything. We are surrounded by other humans every day, some beautiful and others maybe not so much. But is an appealing appearance the only characteristic one must have to be socially accepted? The creature in Joel Ferrell's play, Frankenstein, based on the novel by Mary Shelley, shows how the world views social acceptance and how rejection affects people mentally and physically. This is portrayed when the creature feels the slightest amount of acceptance from De Lacey and Elizabeth due to similarities, yet is constantly …show more content…
knocked down by society. The moment the creature was brought to life in Joel Ferrell's production of Frankenstein, it seemed that he could never gain acceptance from anyone until he met some extraordinary individuals.
The creature was completely neglected by his creator, Victor Frankenstein, and was left on his own to fight off other villagers who were both scared and disgusted by the creature's appearance. The creature came across a house in the woods owned by the De Lacey family. De Lacey was a poor man but was also extraordinary in that he was blind in both eyes. This meant that the creature was not judged on his appearance for once, but for his true identity and character. This corresponds to society nowadays because we are all taught at a young age to not judge a book by its cover and to learn more about a person before we judge them harshly and reject them. Even though this is what we are taught, the creature was rejected by society time after time by everyone who looked at him until he met a man who could not see his face but sees the potential he holds. De Lacey goes on to teach the creature how to speak, read, and write so that he could hopefully fit into society one day. The creature was becoming more confident in himself until everything took a turn for the worst and De Lacey's son Felix, attacked the creature and the creature once again felt rejection and isolation. This causes him to seek revenge and he killed the De Lacey family. This is found in today's society when a person is so …show more content…
lonely and feels heavy isolation that they might lash out and hurt someone or even themselves by committing suicide. The creature left De Lacey with an educated mind and sought acceptance more and more, yet never gained any.
On Victor Frankenstein's wedding night, the creature snuck into Victor's room where his wife Elizabeth was in bed. At first, Elizabeth was frightened and scared like everyone else was. But, after a short amount of time, Elizabeth started talking to the creature about her life and the creature's life. Prior to their encounter, Elizabeth had felt neglected by Victor as well. Victor seemed to choose his work over her every time. She wanted to be loved, touched and cared for. Elizabeth found that the creature was desiring much of the same, and therefore did not neglect him, she accepted him and his needs. We can see this type of behavior in society today when people feel so alone and depressed that all they really need is people to talk to them and find similarities between their lives to show that they are not alone. Similar to the creature's encounter with De Lacey. He is reminded of all the things that people have done to him and how his creator, Victor, of all people was the one who started this by neglecting him from the beginning. The creature kills Elizabeth as a result and flees back into his lonely life. We can find similar instances in today's society where this may occur. People are bullied, and their self-esteem is knocked down every day. These are the outcasts which society has chosen, and they carry the heavy weight of loneliness and rejection. As a result,
they stop wanting help from people and they see everyone as an enemy. This causes them to act in a socially unacceptable way which in this case with the creature, was to hurt the people that were even trying to help. These outcasts are similar to the creature in that if society had accepted them early on instead of rejecting them due to their appearance, horrible consequences could have been avoided. Society needs to be more accepting in order for the world to be a better place for everyone. Dhruv Khullar, a Doctor at the Massachusetts General Hospital wrote "How Isolation Is Killing Us," where he discussed his experiences with patients who were lonely, and what he concluded from all the information he had found. Similar to the creature in Joel Ferrell's play, Khullar saw that his patients that experienced an excess amount isolation and rejection from family and friends due to their condition were more likely to have low self-esteem and higher stress (Dhruv). From Ferrell's Frankenstein, we know what this could lead to and it is important that as a society we prevent these things from occurring. "Since the 1980s, the percentage of American adults who say they're lonely has doubled from 20 percent to 40 percent (Dhruv)." This is not a good sign and needs to be corrected in order for the world to be a better place for all people. Instead of creating a group full of outcasts that have unpredictable decisions and can cause mayhem, why not forget about the appearance of others and just accept them for who they are like Elizabeth tried to do for the creature in Ferrell's play. A central part of our lives is rejection, exclusion, and acceptance according to Nathan DeWall, a psychologist at the University of Kentucky. In his article, "Social Acceptance and Rejection: The Sweet and the Bitter," DeWall discusses the importance of acceptance and how rejection is increasingly dangerous to humans. DeWall believes that one of the reasons we as humans need acceptance is due to our ancestor's needs for a group in order to feel safe and protected in harsh environments (DeWall). Perhaps this is one of the reasons the creature craved acceptance from Victor. The creature needed to be protected and taught about humankind before being forced into society unprepared, and alone. Moreover, DeWall's research found that people who have been excluded often lash out towards themselves or others. An analysis of fifteen school shooters found that thirteen of them have been socially rejected prior to their violent crimes (DeWall). This helps prove that the creature's actions in Joel Ferrell's play have multiple parallels to today's society. The creature was constantly excluded by people, not knowing that their actions would end up causing multiple people to lose their lives. Although the creature in Joel Ferrell's play had the strong body of a man, he was brought into this world with the mind of a child. There were instances at the beginning of the play where his mind would wander off into the forest, and he would be chirping like a bird or letting the sun hit him directly like he was soaking it all in. Since this was the case, the effect of Victor neglecting this child-like creature and leaving him alone was greater. Diana J. English, the chief of research at the Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, wrote an article on the effects of child maltreatment which corresponds with the way the creature acted a result of his rejection by Victor and society. English believes that as these children get older, they are more likely to engage in physical aggression, commit crimes, and inflict injuries on oneself or others (English). In the play, as the creature got wiser and more educated, he realized what was happening and how he was being treated which caused him to react in a negative way towards society. Similar to kids wanting to lash out at the ones who caused emotional distress on them, the creature was aiming to hurt society and cause others to feel the same loneliness and neglect that he did. People in isolation and who experience loneliness are less likely to receive help when they are in need. Erin York Cornwell from Cornell University and Linda J. Waite from The University of Chicago studies the effects of isolation on people's health. Cornwell and Waite found that, compared to people who do not experience loneliness, those that experience high rates of isolation are less likely to be socially connected. This may lead to them not receiving assistance in stressful situations which would end up causing a decrease in that person's active coping skills (Cornwell). This helps show the side of the creature in Ferrell's play that at times may have been hard to see. The creature needed help, he needed help from anyone who could give it to him, especially Victor. The creature needed the assistance that Cornwell and Waite found was necessary for people to overcome stressful situations. A stressful situation is quite an understatement when discussing the story of Frankenstein, nevertheless, if the creature would have gotten the help that he needed, then deep isolation would not have been the outcome of his life. Since it was, he was left with huge burdens and sad thoughts that could only be fixed with revenge. Throughout Joel Ferrell's play of Frankenstein, the creature's self-esteem is consistently knocked down, and people are always pushing him away causing him to be in deep isolation and loneliness. Even when De Lacey and Elizabeth care for the creature and show that they want to help him, the weight of everyone else's hatred towards him, causes him to constantly seek revenge. Researchers have found a relationship between extreme isolation and violence along with health issues. Joel Ferrell's creature is a perfect example of how people in the world today are affected by isolation and loneliness caused by rejection from others.
Rejection is one of the issues associated with social prejudice in Shelly’s novel. The monster in Frankenstein is abandoned because of his hideous features. Victor, who was his creator, cannot look upon what he has brought to life. Victor explains, “I beheld the wretch-- the miserable monster whom I had created. He held up the curtain of the bed; and his eyes, if eyes they may be called, were fixed on me. His jaws opened, and he muttered some inarticulate sounds, while a grin wrinkled his cheeks. He might have spoken, but I did not hear; one hand was stretched out, seemingly to detain me, but I escaped and rushed downstairs” (Shelly chapter 5 p 43). The monster responds to Victor as a child who looks to his father for reassurance and acceptance. Though the monster was not a child in his physical appearance, his emotional state was that of young child. Since the 1890s, researchers have conducted studies called Parental acceptance-rejections t...
In Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, the Creature executes extreme and irreversible acts due to his isolation from society. Although the Creature displays kindness, his isolation drives him to act inhumanely. The Creature, pushed away from his creator because he is an abomination, and indicates his isolation as the only one of his species. As the Creature gets more comfortable with the De Lacey ’s, he approaches the old man as his children are gone but before he can explain himself, the children come home and see the Creature, “Who can describe their horror and consternation on beholding me?
The creature was created with the intention of goodness and purity but because of this, he wasn’t equipped to deal with the rejection of his creator. After Victor Frankenstein’s death, Robert Walton walks in to see the creature standing over his friend’s lifeless body.
“Conformity is the jailer of freedom and the enemy of growth.” These are the words of, once president of the United States, John Francis Kennedy. He relays a message of strength and a lecture on what it means to perform one’s duty as a member of a modern, accepting society. Likewise, Mary Shelley's Frankenstein exploits one of mankind's most persistent and destructive flaws that has never died down over the thousands of years of our existence, prejudice. From his very beginning, the creature was abandoned and left to question his very existence. Nearly every character in the novel assumes that the monster must be dangerous based on its outward appearance, when in truth the monster is essentially warm and open-hearted. Continuously the monster
Humankind is unable to see that in the beginning, the creature is innately good. Also, society’s ability to make a judgement without substantial amounts of knowledge drove the creature further towards self destruction. For instance, when the creature saves a little girl from drowning, he does not receive the praises that would normally be expected. Instead, the creature is shot, and “inflamed by pain, [he] vow[s] eternal hatred and vengeance to all mankind” (Shelley 143). When the creature first gains awareness, it is not yet corrupted by the ills that society forces on him. However, society is making the generalization that ugly is equivalent to evil, which causes the creature to see himself as evil. Rosemary Jackson acknowledges that “naming the double [creature] is impossible for Frankenstein and society since it is themselves in alienated form, an image of themselves before they acquired names”(Jackson). In other words, the creature is an outsider because its name is unknown to society. Society not giving the creature a name, but referring to him as a “monster, ugly wretch [and] an ogre” it is telling the creature that he is wicked because they are associating his appearance with things that society sees as evil (Shelley 144). Thus, the creature realizes that he must be malicious because he does not have a name to define
In Frankenstein, Victor’s monster suffers much loneliness and pain at the hands of every human he meets, as he tries to be human like them. First, he is abandoned by his creator, the one person that should have accepted, helped, and guided him through the confusing world he found himself in. Next, he is shunned wherever he goes, often attacked and injured. Still, throughout these trials, the creature remains hopeful that he can eventually be accepted, and entertains virtuous and moral thoughts. However, when the creature takes another crushing blow, as a family he had thought to be very noble and honorable abandons him as well, his hopes are dashed. The monster then takes revenge on Victor, killing many of his loved ones, and on the humans who have hurt him. While exacting his revenge, the monster often feels guilty for his actions and tries to be better, but is then angered and provoked into committing more wrongdoings, feeling self-pity all the while. Finally, after Victor’s death, the monster returns to mourn the death of his creator, a death he directly caused, and speaks about his misery and shame. During his soliloquy, the monster shows that he has become a human being because he suffers from an inner conflict, in his case, between guilt and a need for sympathy and pity, as all humans do.
One way in which society influences the Creature’s behavior is their disgust and hateful attitude towards him. For example, when the creature landed upon a village, he was attacked because of his looks, “…I had hardly placed my foot within the door, before the children shrieked and one of the woman fainted. The whole village was roused, some fled, some attacked me, until grievously bruised by stones and many others kinds of missile weapons” (93). Just the looks of the creature was enough to set off the village to attack him. People fear what they don’t understand and can act irrationally. After this, it is understandable that the creature would despise and seek revenge against humans. Another example of how poorly society treats him is shown when the creature finally manages to bring up courage and talks to the blind man. They are interrupted when his family come back home. “Felix darted forward, and with supernatural force tore me from his father… he dashed me to the ground and stuck me violently with a stick” (122). The creature managed to have a conversation with the blind father yet when others say him; he was beaten and chased out. The fact that the family he had observed for so long shunned him at the sight of his face shows the ignorance in society. Society affected the creature by punishing and...
Vanity as a central theme in Frankenstein is constant fuel for conflict; the society the Creature is exposed to deems him unworthy of simple kindness
There was no one left to provide the creature with companionship and was forced to isolate himself from society once again. When the family moved out of their cottage, the creature decided to go on his own adventure and seek out his creator. Upon doing so, the creature encountered a young girl who was about to drown near a lake. When the creature successfully saved the little girl, an older man confronted the creature and shot him in the shoulder. Because of what happened, the creature explained to Frankenstein that his, “...daily vows rose for revenge-a deep deadly revenge, such as would alone compensate for the outrages and anguish [he] had endured.” (Shelley 61). With this burning rage, the creature decided to take his revenge out on his creator, Frankenstein. One by one, Frankenstein’s relatives and closest friends were murdered by the creature, but his father’s death, was the final push. Frankenstein believed that he was the cause for all the murders and that he had to destroy what he created. He told Walton that, “...as [he] awakened to reason, at the same time awakened to revenge.” (Shelley 88). The only way to stop future deaths, was to hunt down the creature and kill him. Fueled with hatred, Frankenstein traveled for months in hopes of finding the creature. However, in his final days, Frankenstein was no longer able to continue his search, and passed away due to malnutrition. Upon discovering what had happened, the creature came out from hiding, and decided to explain his side of the story to Walton. Now that Frankenstein was dead, the creature decided to wander off and slowly die, isolated from the
Frankenstein by Mary Shelley portrays an individual in a unique situation trying to overcome daily interactions while being faced with inconceivable misfortunes. Created by Victor Frankenstein, who set out on a journey to bring life to scrapped pieces of waste, he was then abandoned and left to fend for himself in a world he was abruptly brought into. After being abandoned by his creator for his less than appealing looks, this then sparked his inevitable desire for revenge. Eventually leading to the destruction of those associated with his creator. Knowing that he will never fit in, the monster began to act out in hopes of getting back at his creator for what he did. His vulnerability due to missing guidance and parental figures in his beginning stages of life contributed to his behavior. The books and article Family Crisis and Children’s Therapy Groups written by Gianetti, Audoin, and Uzé, Victim Of Romance: The Life And Death Of Fanny Godwin by Maurice Hindle, and Social Behavior and Personality by Lubomir Lamy, Jacques Fishcher-Lokou, and Nicolas Gueguen support why the monster acts the way he does. The monster’s behavior stems from Victor’s actions at the beginning of his life and therefore is not to blame. The creature in Frankenstein is deserving of sympathy even though he committed those murders because the lack of parental guidance, lack of family, and lack of someone to love led him to that. All in all his actions were not malicious, but only retaliation for what he had been put through.
Many people know that Mary Shelley, the author of Frankenstein, was part of a family of famed Romantic era writers. Her mother, Mary Wollstonecraft, was one of the first leaders of the feminist movement, her father, William Godwin, was a famous social philosopher, and her husband, Percy Shelley, was one of the leading Romantic poets of the time ("Frankenstein: Mary Shelley Biography."). What most people do not know, however, is that Mary Shelley dealt with issues of abandonment her whole life and fear of giving birth (Duncan, Greg. "Frankenstein: The Historical Context."). When she wrote Frankenstein, she revealed her hidden fears and desires through the story of Victor Frankenstein’s creation, putting him symbolically in her place (Murfin, Ross. "Psychoanalytic Criticism and Frankenstein.”). Her purpose, though possibly unconsciously, in writing the novel was to resolve both her feelings of abandonment by her parents, and fears of her own childbirth.
Humanity has given citizens an idea on how everyone should act, and set so much pressure on people to be that specific way. Due to this idea that everyone must act a certain way, many will not act on their own accord. Much of the time people conform to the way society wants them to be. To be an individual is difficult for many. In Mary Shelley's book, Frankenstein there are many times that the characters make the decision on whether to act on their own, or to go with the crowd. Although expressing someone's entity is important, there are times when conforming is a better decision, Frankenstein shows many examples of these verdicts.
“The development of self-esteem in young children is heavily influenced by parental attitudes and behavior.” (Longe). If a parent is not taking care of their own kid and just leaving it here and there, the child wouldn’t have a loving connection with his/hers mother. A mother and child’s love is what bring the self-esteem out of a child. It helps the child develop self-acceptance and without self acceptance or confidence, how is the child supposed to make friends or even communicate with others without being “stuck” all the time?. In the book Frankenstein, he is recently brought to life and is clueless like the mind of a new born baby, but over time he educates himself and notices other people’s reactions when they see him or when he tries to talk. “The more I saw of them, the greater became my desire to claim their protection and kindness; my heart yearned to be loved and known by these amiable creatures.” (Creature, 133). The people didn’t love him because all they noticed was that he was macabre and was very different from everyone else. Even his own creator Victor didn’t love him, he just abandoned him like he wasn’t a living person. What went wrong is that the creature needed the love and affection at the start of his life to develop some sort of self-acceptance and self-confidence, but no, Victors disapproval of the creature seemed like it angered the creature
However repugnant he was on the outside, when Frankenstein’s creature begins to tell his tale of sorrow and rejection the creature does not seem to be monstrous. Although rejected multiple times by the humans around him when he finds a family in poverty and “suffering the pangs ...
In the novel the creature is confused and does not know where it fits in with the social contract and the society. Don’t judge a book by its cover! I bet you have heard that before haven’t you? In our society unfortunately we do do this. In Frankenstein when Victor first sees the creature