More handpicked essays just for you.
Mary shelley's frankenstein character analysis and development
Frankenstein by mary shelley analysis
Mary shelley's frankenstein character analysis and development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley a common theme is monstrosity that appears to be indisputable in both Victor and the creature yet the author’s intentions still stay secluded. By expressing the message that monstrosity is not a fundamental characteristic, but instead one that was created due to merciless revenge, lengthen isolation, and threatening want of knowledge. Mary Shelley uses the approach of monstrosity as a guide advise that going against the realm of God should not be challenged.
When the characters show their naughty desires, the reader can tell that they have become anxious of other parts of life such as love and accompaniment. Instead, Frankenstein and the creature are happy enough to show their hatred towards each
…show more content…
other when they are fighting. The concept portrays that Frankenstein’s actions initiated revenge, and it tested the realm of monstrosity. Shelley intends to pass the message that one should not follow in Frankenstein’s footsteps and be so foolish. “That cannot be; but all that I can say will be of little avail. My revenge is of no moment to you; yet, while I allow it to be a vice, I confess that it is the devouring and only passion of my soul. My rage is unspeakable, when I reflect that the murderer, whom I have turned loose upon society, still exists. You refuse my just demand: I have but one resource; and I devote myself, either in my life or death, to his destruction. (Shelley, find page number) Revenge brings moods of insanity and unhinged mental state that is both present in Victor and his creature. The creature and Victor Frankenstein both show signs of losing touch with the rest of society.
Loneliness creates the two individuals’ reckless doings even though they are both already annoyed by revenge to delight in any action in harming others, this further forms them into monsters who live to destroy everything they touch. It is easy to believe that the monstrosity inside Frankenstein is exceptional as is his isolation chosen. Shelley’s significant message that monstrosity is captured and is not from inheritance, is already illustrated by separation that provokes further monstrosity. From being isolated from the rest of the world, Frankenstein and the creature have not found the guidance in their life from the help of others who would of helped them from going down a destructive path in life. Frankenstein’s creation of the monster and isolation is a result from his discontent he possesses, the novel portrays to readers that a man’s imprudent challenge to God is an effect of monstrosity being provoked by detachment. Frankenstein became so consumed in being acknowledged by others beyond the expectations of society, Frankenstein is illustrated as a maniac. Nevertheless, ambition to be recognized is often known to be a characteristic that is appreciated. Shelley uses Frankenstein as a lesson to be learned that ambitious curiosity only leaved monstrosity behind. Frankenstein continues to show a pattern of behavior that would depict his continuing eagerness to learn the laws of science, within time he evolves and the monster inside Frankenstein continuously grew bigger from his persistent interest that took over his life. The growing monstrosity inside Frankenstein led him to a path of demolition, this is a result of Victor Frankenstein craving the attention from others that challenged natural order where life was created from lifeless
objects. Sickness was a common issue in 19th century Europe with tuberculosis, cholera, typhoid fever and pneumonia being some of the leading causes of death. Death became a growing problem and the lives of individuals were immensely affected by disease. Pure fevers in this novel is not as significant as the moral of the story as the sickness throughout Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein”, the moral of the story serves as Victor’s escape from reality and foreshadows a dark path to come. Before the death of Victor’s mother, Elizabeth eventually becomes ill; Elizabrth had caught scarelet feverl her illness was severe, and she was in the greatest danger (Shelley 44). Victor falls ill as well before the deaths of William and Justine (Shelley 63) Victor, again falls ill shortly before the death of Elizabeth “A fever succeeded to this. I lay for two months on the point of death” (Shelley 181) Before his own death and the death of his own creation, Victor falls ill for the third time. In addition to the mood of the novel, the references of sickness bring death and sadness. Throughout the novel, it becomes apparent that Victor Frankenstein becomes ill multiples times, foreshadowing that his death is near. Victor is depicted in the novel as a character who is exposed after the horrifying events that occur in his life. Each time Victor falls ill he is left unable to take care of himself, as if his illness is brought about psychologically. There is a possibility that the author is trying to show us that the consequences of Victor and his monster’s actions are so unbearable, that he himself is overwhelmed with guilt and despair. Mary Shelley created a dark mood and environment in Frankenstein. Shelley uses sickness to show the idea of death for her readers. Shelley may be pointing out that Victor cannot bear the consequences that his and the monsters actions had brought about and that he is overwhelmed with guilt and sadness. Monstrosity is not a bred in the bone characteristic, but it is one that is obtained through argumentative revenge, considerably isolation, and threatening curiosity to not only Victor Frankenstein, but also the monster inside of him, as the characters in the novel declare. Shelley used Frankenstein to portray the theme that true monstrosity is not from physical appearance, but it is within the minds that are full of damaging intentions. Shelley uses monstrosity as the theme throughout the novel to inform readers the challenging realm of God that leaves an individual with only destruction.
Frankenstein by Mary Shelley introduces the change from good to evil with the attention that guardians give a child. William Crisman, in his critique of Mary Shelley’s work, identifies the “sibling rivalry” between Victor and the rest of his family. Crisman remarks that Victor feels as if he is the most important person in his parents’ lives, since he was Alphonse’s and Caroline’s only child. The Frankensteins adopt Elizabeth and Victor sarcastically remarks that he has a happy childhood. This prompts Victor starts to read essays about alchemy and study natural science. Anne Mellor, another critic of Frankenstein, proposes that Frankenstein’s creature was born a good person and society’s reaction to him caused him to turn evil. Victor’s makes the creature in his own perception of beauty, and his perception of beauty was made during a time in his life when he had secluded himself from his family and friends. He perceived the monster as “Beautiful!”, but Victor unknowingly expressed the evil in himself, caused by secluding himself from everybody, onto the creature (60). In this way, the creature is Victor’s evil mirrored onto a body. The expression of Victor onto the monster makes the townspeople repulsed by the creature. The theory of the “alter ego” coincides with Crisman’s idea of sibling rivalry (Mellor). Mary Shelley conveys that through Crisman’s idea of sibling rivalry, Victor isolates himself from society. Mellor describes the isolation during his creation of his creature leads to him giving the creature false beauty that causes Victor to abandon him and society to reject him.
Critic Northrop Frye says, “Tragic heroes tower as the highest points in their human landscape that they seem the inevitable conductors of the power about them, the great trees more likely to be struck by lightning than a clump of grass. Conductors may of course be instruments as well as victims of the divine lightning”. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein greatly exhibits the theme of the consequence of knowledge and irresponsibility among others through its tragic hero, Victor Frankenstein. Northrop Frye’s quote is certainly true when looking at Frankenstein’s situation. Victor is a victim of his divine lightning, and ultimately causes much trouble for himself; however, Victor also serves as the tragic hero in the lives of the monster, his family, and his friends.
As Frankenstein is enroute to his pursuit of gaining more knowledge, he states, “I wished, as it were, to procrastinate all that related to my feelings of affection until the great object, which swallowed up every habit of my nature, should be completed” (Shelley 41). Frankenstein’s decision in allowing his intellectual ambitions to overpower everything else in his life leads him to be blinded to the dangers of creating life. He isolates himself from his society when creating the monster, letting himself be immersed in his creation while being driven by his passions, allowing nobody to be near him. The fact that he allows this creation of a monster to consume his total being reveals how blinded he is to the immorality of stepping outside the boundaries of science and defying nature. His goal in striving to achieve what wants to in placing man over nature makes him lose his sense of self as all he is focused on is the final product of his creation. He starts to realize his own faults as after he has created the monster, he becomes very ill and states, “The form of the monster on whom I had bestowed existence was forever before my eyes, and I raved incessantly concerning him” (48). His impulsive decision to make the monster leads him to abhorring it as it does not turn out to be what he has expected. Because he chooses to isolate himself in creating the
Isolation is one of the major motifs that resonates throughout Frankenstein. Tying into the romantic style of the novel, Shelley uses this element all the way through the work to show a repetition of isolation, an aspect that is present in almost every character in the novel and expressed primarily in Victor and the monster. But even some other minor characters such as Justine, Caroline, and Walton deal with isolation in one way or another.
An idea becomes a vision, the vision develops a plan, and this plan becomes an ambition. Unfortunately for Victor Frankenstein, his ambitions and accomplishments drowned him in sorrow from the result of many unfortunate events. These events caused Victors family and his creation to suffer. Rejection and isolation are two of the most vital themes in which many dreadful consequences derive from. Victor isolates himself from his family, friends, and meant-to-be wife. His ambitions are what isolate him and brought to life a creature whose suffering was unfairly conveyed into his life. The creature is isolated by everyone including his creator. He had no choice, unlike Victor. Finally, as the story starts to change, the creature begins to take control of the situation. It is now Victor being isolated by the creature as a form of revenge. All the events and misfortunes encountered in Frankenstein have been linked to one another as a chain of actions and reactions. Of course the first action and link in the chain is started by Victor Frankenstein.
Locked in a perpetual struggle for dominance, both struggle to gain internal peace. Victor Frankenstein feels obligated to destroy his creation for the good of society, and the Monster wishes to come to terms with his abandonment – both are unable to find happiness. Here there is a contrast of power: Frankenstein’s intellectual power contrary to the Monster’s physical power (this is however, not to say the Monster lacked intellectual power, only that Frankenstein possesses greater fear of the physical aspects of the Monster). The first instance of this battle for power can be seen when the Monster demands of Frankenstein to “create a female…with whom [he] can live in the interchange of those sympathies necessary for [his] being.” (p174) – here Frankenstein is in control. He is the only one that has the knowledge to create another being like the Monster, and thus, when the Monster asks this favour of Frankenstein he places his happiness in the hands of another. The Monster is dependent on the actions of another. However, there is a power reversal when Frankenstein denies the monster his ‘female’ (p174). Frankenstein dashes the Monster’s last hope at happiness, so the Monster threatens the life of his loved ones. Here, Frankenstein is at the mercy of his creation. For though “[Frankenstein is the] creator… [the Monster is his master” (p205) – here the Monster establishes his dominance over Frankenstein by outwardly stating his power over his creator. This power struggle is most effectively culminated in the chase around the globe. Yet it must be seen that neither Frankenstein and his Monster are in control. The Monster leaves clues for Frankenstein, demonstrating his need for Frankenstein to follow him, for without Frankenstein the Monster has no purpose in life. On the other hand, Frankenstein is following his creation all over the world, through desert, sea, and cold. Thus, it is clear that as a
This point will guide our discussion of first how Frankenstein and the Monster first become segregated from humanity due to seeking knowledge that neither should have in the context of their lives. Then the creation scene will be discussed in detail to show how Frankenstein’s perversion of natural, biologically driven birth adds a dimension to that separation, an incompatibility with human nature, that makes their isolation complete. After which, the final outcome of the man’s and monster’s isolation will be described as an inevitable downfall since they cannot surmount this misalignment because it mires them in personal solitude they cannot overcome themselves, and they cannot reach seek help because their isolation is so complete, i.e., their plight is truly monstrous and irreproachable. The discussion will be concluded by using a wider perspective to explore the true depths of the isolation these unhappy characters feel, and what lessons about our own experiences with loneliness we gain from understanding those
What is a monster, really? Is it really a Creature that has three eyes instead of two, with pus seeping out of every crevice in his face and an abnormally large form? Or is it someone with a mind so corrupt it rivals that of Satan? Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a story within a story that centers on the tale of a man with an immense thirst of knowledge and a fetish to imitate the Creator. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a lot like the Greek mythological tale of the Greek God, Prometheus, and his brother, Epimetheus, who were assigned the task of creating man. The story captivates the theme of monstrosity. Mary Shelley wrote the novel in a form so the reader’s opinions never stray far from sympathy for the monster and apathy for Victor Frankenstein. The novel looks at “Monstrosity” and “Humanity” in a deeply analytical way.
In the novel Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, the main theme revolves around the internal and external consequences of being isolated from others. Being isolated from the world could result in a character losing his/her mental state and eventually causing harm to themselves or others. Because both Victor Frankenstein and the creature are isolated from family and society, they experienced depression, prejudice, and revenge.
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a nineteenth century literary work that delves into the world of science and the plausible outcomes of morally insensitive technological research. Although the novel brings to the forefront several issues about knowledge and sublime nature, the novel mostly explores the psychological and physical journey of two complex characters. While each character exhibits several interesting traits that range from passive and contemplative to rash and impulsive, their most attractive quality is their monstrosity. Their monstrosities, however, differ in the way each of the character’s act and respond to their environment. Throughout Frankenstein, one assumes that Frankenstein’s creation is the true monster. While the creation’s actions are indeed monstrous, one must also realize that his creator, Victor Frankenstein is also a villain. His inconsiderate and selfish acts as well as his passion for science result in the death of his friend and family members and ultimately in his own demise.
Isolation is often a result of choosing to seek refuge in solitude, however, in many cases, it is a result of brutality from the surrounding environment. In Mary Shelley’s Gothic novel, Frankenstein, a gruesome and painful story serves as a cautionary tale in order to prevent another from a similar downfall. Although Victor Frankenstein is the narrator for the majority of the novel, the audience learns of the destruction that has followed his decisions as well as the forced estrangement upon those he has encountered. In Frankenstein, Shelley uses relatable characters that reflect the harsh superficial aspects of society. Victor’s initial isolation as a child foreshadows the motif of detachment that occurs throughout the novel.
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus, explores the monstrous and destructive affects of obsession, guilt, fate, and man’s attempt to control nature. Victor Frankenstein, the novel’s protagonist and antihero, attempts to transcend the barriers of scientific knowledge and application in creating a life. His determination in bringing to life a dead body consequently renders him ill, both mentally and physically. His endeavors alone consume all his time and effort until he becomes fixated on his success. The reason for his success is perhaps to be considered the greatest scientist ever known, but in his obsessive toil, he loses sight of the ethical motivation of science. His production would ultimately grieve him throughout his life, and the consequences of his undertaking would prove disastrous and deadly. Frankenstein illustrates the creation of a monster both literally and figuratively, and sheds light on the dangers of man’s desire to play God.
In Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, many similarities can be seen between the creature and his creator, Victor Frankenstein. While Victor and the creature are similar, there are a few binary oppositions throughout the book that make them different. The binary oppositions in the novel serve as thematic contrast; and some of the most illustrative oppositions between the two characters are on the focus of family, parenthood, isolation and association with others.
Mary Shelley’s gothic novel Frankenstein is a novel narrated by Robert Walton about Victor Frankenstein and the Monster that he creates. Frankenstein grew up surrounding himself with what he loved most, science. He attended Ingolstadt University where he studied chemistry and natural philosophy, but being involved in academics was not enough for him. Frankenstein wanted to discover things, but did not think about the potential outcomes that could come with this decision. Frankenstein was astonished by the human frame and all living creatures, so he built the Monster out of various human and animal parts (Shelley, 52). At the time Frankenstein thought this creation was a great discovery, but as time went on the Monster turned out to be terrifying to anyone he came in contact with. So, taking his anger out on Frankenstein, the Monster causes chaos in a lot of people’s lives and the continuing battle goes on between the Monster and Frankenstein. Throughout this novel, it is hard to perceive who is pursuing whom as well as who ends up worse off until the book comes to a close.
However repugnant he was on the outside, when Frankenstein’s creature begins to tell his tale of sorrow and rejection the creature does not seem to be monstrous. Although rejected multiple times by the humans around him when he finds a family in poverty and “suffering the pangs ...