Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How does a child/young person's environment affect their development
How does a child/young person's environment affect their development
Literature and its impact on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, geography separates the characters Robert Walton and Victor Frankenstein, but many commonalities unite them. Divided by an immense amount of land, Frankenstein and Walton grew up having no knowledge of each other’s existence; however, despite living most of their lives separated, they developed similar personality traits and intellectual interests. When the two men meet, these similarities create a connection between. This connection causes the characters to feel sympathy for their respective struggles and achieve “the highest ideal of social interaction”(Bloom 126). The author connects Victor Frankenstein and Robert Walton through their inclination to stay connected with their family, desire to …show more content…
leave home, and aspiration to learn more about the natural sciences, and these connections cause the two characters to sympathize with each other’s struggles. The strong ties that exist between Frankenstein and his family are also apparent in Walton’s relationship with his sister. Throughout Frankenstein’s research in Ingolstadt and his struggles with the monster , Frankenstein maintains contact with his family. Despite the length of Walton’s journey , he updates his sister on his location and condition frequently. Frankenstein waits patiently for the day he will finally marry Elizabeth, and her death leaves Frankenstein seeking only to “pursue and destroy the being to whom [he] gave existence”(S 187) and join his love in death. Walton has many adventures but longs for the day he will see his sister again. After Walton sees how Frankenstein let his quest for knowledge destroy his family, he realizes he cannot neglect his sister to appease his “senseless curiosity” (Shelley 185). Walton is also able to sympathize with Frankenstein’s loss because they both have a basic love for family. Frankenstein’s and Walton’s connection through strong familial relationships strengthens their, brief but powerful friendship. Similarly, the two character’s common desire to travel beyond their birthplaces makes this friendship even more powerful.
Frankenstein leaves home to “apply to every branch of natural philosophy”(S 43). In like manner, Walton departs his hometown to “satiate [his] ardent curiosity with the sight of a part of the world never before visited”(S 13). Both of these characters felt that they needed to leave home to achieve their goals in life. Even though Walton and Frankenstein both had incentives to continue living where they were born, they elected to . spsleave and expand their knowledge of the world around them. This compulsion to explore the unknown would be both Frankenstein’s and Walton’s downfall. In Ingolstadt Frankenstein learned about the natural sciences, and used his knowledge to challenge nature itself. On his journey of exploration, Walton nearly kills himself and his entire crew. Influenced by Frankenstein, Walton decides to change course and save his ship instead of venturing further into danger. While the outcomes of their voyages are different, Frankenstein and Walton are both driven by a compulsion to endeavor beyond what they know. This similarity further solidifies the bond that these two characters …show more content…
share. Additionally, Frankenstein’s passion for the natural sciences is equivalent to Walton’s enthusiasm for exploration.
Frankenstein wants to not only learn about the natural sciences but to “pioneer a new way, explore unknown powers and unfold to the world the deepest mysteries of creation”(S 42). Curiosity about the about the unknown world also compels Walton. Driven by his spirit of inquiry, Frankenstein studies and learns about what eventually destroys him. In an attempt satiate his curiosity, Walton journeys north to explore places few men dare to travel. Frankenstein’s and Walton’s desire to learn allows them to identify with each other as men of science. However, Frankenstein lets his pursuit of knowledge destroy himself and everyone he loves. Seeing the disastrous effects of Frankenstein’s quest for knowledge “fills [Walton] with sympathy and compassion”(S 23). While Frankenstein is also sympathetic towards Walton’s failed expedition, he implores his friend to abandon his voyage before it destroys him. The sympathy that the two characters have for one another supports their friendship even further. Victor Frankenstein and Robert Walton are linked by maintaining a connection with family, leaving home in pursuit of knowledge, and expanding their understanding of the universe. Within the novel exists an “emphasis on social connectedness as a fundamental aspect of our being”(Gómez 366). Because of the similarities shared by these two characters, they are able to attain
companionship from each other when they needed it most. Frankenstein’s and Walton’s ability to sympathize with each other on multiple levels is a direct result of the similarities that they share. These similarities allowed the two characters to understand each other in ways no one else could and gives them a friend when they most need one.
As in many other stories, Robert Walton performs a primary role, the narrator. As a polar exploring narrator, first of all, Robert Walton holds a third person view when recounting Frankenstein’s tale, which gives a more objective and reliable feeling to the readers. Secondly, Walton’s narration not only gives a just account for the narrative of Frankenstein, but also sets the scene for Victor’s own story and life to begin, to break, and to end. The novel starts right with the letter from Robert to his sister, so readers are brought right into the plot. At the same time, because it introduces the background of meeting Frankenstein, the story has a sense of reality. Then within the time Victor explains his adventure, Robert functions as a joint for different events and breaks of Victor. When approaching the experience of learning about the death of Henry, Victor once said, “I must pause here, for it requires all my fortitude to recall the memory of the frightful events which I am about to relate, in proper detail, to my recollection” (158). Even though Walton is not directly introduced into the conversation, audience can feel that the reference to Walton pulls th...
...the downfall of Frankenstein and the monster. Frankenstein found the secret to life, though he applies his gained knowledge and ambition to his own selfish goals, which wind up destroying him and those closest to him. Walton has something in common with Frankenstein; his ambition to achieve something that no man has ever accomplished before. The difference between Victor and Walton is tat Walton decides to turn back. The monster on the other hand never wanted any fame or glory; his ambition was motivated by the thirst for revenge. Ultimately even Frankenstein, on his deathbed, realized the harsh consequences of his actions. Victor states, "Seek happiness in tranquility, and avoid ambition..." (Shelley 229).
In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, the concept of "discovery" is paradoxical: initial discovery is joyful and innocent, but ends in misery and corruption. The ambitions of both Walton and Frankenstein (to explore new lands and to cast scientific light on the unknown, respectively) are formed with the noblest of intentions but a fatal disregard for the sanctity of natural boundaries. Though the idea of discovery remains idealized, human fallibility utterly corrupts all pursuit of that ideal. The corruption of discovery parallels the corruption inherent in every human life, in that a child begins as a pure and faultless creature, full of wonder, but hardens into a self-absorbed, grasping, overly ambitious adult. Only by novel's end does Walton recognize that he must abandon his own ambition (the mapping of previously uncharted land), out of concern for the precious lives of his crew.
...ctor Frankenstein, while Victor gains monster-like traits, Frankenstein gains human-like traits, this journey is particuallary evident in the early development of the two characters and their acquirement of knowledge. While the reader generally gravitates towards the monster, through empathy they experience disappointment in Victor Frankenstein, this leaves the reader is left in confliction. The reader is unsure whether in today’s appreance focused society it will be viewed as appropriate to feel empathy towards a ugly monster. This confliction ultimately results in the reader reflecting upon the extent of which they wish to conform to society.
Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein, is a book in which men pursue their goals against hopeless odds. Robert Walton’s decision to turn the ship around at the end of the novel is questioned by many. This essay will discuss the interpreted views on Robert Walton’s decision to retreat by Victor Frankenstein, Mary Shelley and myself. Although, some may disagree ultimately Robert Walton made the right choice to turn his ship around at the end of the novel and is therefore not a failure.
Although “Frankenstein” is the story of Victor and his monster, Walton is the most reliable narrator throughout the novel. However, like most narrator’s, even his retelling of Victor’s story is skewed by prejudice and favoritism of the scientist’s point of view. Yet this could be attributed to the only view points he ever gets to truly hear are from Victor himself and not the monster that he only gets to meet after he comes to mourn his fallen master.
In Frankenstein, Shelley describes Walton’s perception of Victor’s perilous adventure to eliminate his life-threatening creation. In accounting Frankenstein’s journey, she adds a cautionary message to society by illustrating the devastating consequences of scientific inquiry and the overall acquirement of knowledge. She uses both Victor and Walton as examples of men attempting to exceed human limits. From Victor’s initial “success” with reanimation, his creation ultimately symbolizes the unpredictability of unrestricted experimentation. His creation throws him into multiple depressions and Victor struggles to maintain a stable life. In the end, Walton considers Victor’s demise from a disastrous appetite for “nature’s secrets” as a lesson for his own conquest for glory and knowledge. In this, Shelley uses Frankenstein to warn society about its further audacity in pushing boundaries to uncomfortable limits.
In the novel, Frankenstein, by Mary Shelly, the first characters introduced are Robert Walton and Margaret Saville. The characterization of the siblings is seen through Walton’s letters to Margaret. In these letters it shows that Walton is an adventurer. He has grown up in a life of “ease and luxury” but believes he can accomplish a great purpose. He states in his second letter, “the first fourteen years of my life I ran wild on a common and read nothing but our Uncle Thomas’ books of voyages.” This not only shows where he has gotten most of his education, but also how he got the idea to go on such a voyage. His sense of adventure is also something that he got from his father as he says in his first letter, “…on learning that my father’s dying
Similarities between Walton and Victor are evident throughout the story. Walton plays an important part in the book because without him, the reader would not know about the tragic story of Frankenstein. Walton offers an alternative perspective on Victor’s life since their decisions and choices lead to separate outcomes (Paul). For Victor, his decision to not confront his creation lead to his sickness and his downfall (211). As for Walton, he let go of his ambition to voyage across the Artic so he would not spiral down the same path as Victor (214). However, despite their different conclusions at the end of the novel, both Walton and Victor express reflections of each other (Paul).
Mary Shelley’s seminal science fiction novel Frankenstein cautions man against becoming “greater then his nature does allow” as Victor’s ironic claim “a new species would bless me as their creator” is ultimately juxtaposed with a subsequent self-loathing of his creation “became a thing such as even Dante could not conceive”. Further intertextuality occurs when Walton writes “therefore do not be alarmed for my safety or if I should come back to you as worn and woeful as the ‘Ancient Mariner” serves to resonate with victor’s remorse, metaphorically hung around his neck. Throughout Frankenstein, Mary Shelley identifies nature and familial interaction as a means to prevent the contextually profane religious allusive pursuit of “a country of eternal light”. This is further emphasised through religious allusion and metaphor as Walton asserts his compulsion has arisen from “an enthusiasm which elevates me to heaven”. Walton’s hindrance to Victor’s cautioning celebrates Shelley’s ultimate Romantic idealistic yet familial French Revolution assertions; a return to traditional natural and human interaction is vital in repairing this contemporary division between science and ethical
In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, she tells a tale that is not a verdant one, but rather a dreary one about abandonment, creations and relationships. At the exordium of the tale, it may seem that scientist Victor Frankenstein lack of abstaining himself from forbidden knowledge, may be his fault. Yet, once Victors replays his story to Walton it is evident that his hunger for knowledge was just the tip of the iceberg that he fell off of. In Frankenstein, Victor's makes imperious decisions about creation, but his real fault was his inexorable choice to pour all himself into his creation and neglecting his family; only to abandon it as if it were a dross object.
Frankenstein's recount of his story to Walton reveals a sense of intimacy and affinity which eventually discourages Walton to further continue his Arctic voyage after listening to his story. Preston suggests that Walton sees in Frankenstein's insatiable search for scientific mastery 'a reflection of his own restlessness and desire for knowledge' . Frankenstein, through the telling of his narrative, tells Walton to 'learn [...] how dangerous is the acquirement of knowledge' lest him become the 'author of your own speedy ruin' (Frankenstein, p.38). The initial intentions of Frankenstein's research are corrupted (?) by the arrogance of his 'fervent longing to penetrate the secrets of nature' (Frankenstein, p.54) which leads him to become a 'slave
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is an attempt at connection—a narrative woven by its three principal narrators that attempts to share their legacies, dreams, and destructive secrets. The novel begins with the sea captain Walton writing to his sister about his longing for a companion, a wish paralleled by the other characters in the story: namely Victor Frankenstein and the monster he creates. The whole narrative, therefore, is an effort to connect with others and alleviate loneliness and seclusion. It is fitting then, that this very notion of isolation is the greatest destructive force in the novel, as it facilitates and prompts monstrous behaviors. Emotional isolation from both family and society drives Frankenstein and his creation to dangerous
...s father’s dismissal of his study into the alchemists that spurred him on, in Walton’s case he went against his father’s “dying injunction” (Shelley, 1998, p, 17) by going to sea. It is also true to say that “Walton is a solitary like Frankenstein and his obsession with the pole answers to Frankenstein’s obsession with life” (Joseph, 1998, p, ix).
Friendship is one of the most common human desires found all over the world in every different type of people. In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, this deep-seeded need is explored, especially as it manifests itself in the hearts of three great men. Captain Walden writes to his sister about the loneliness that he is experiencing on his journey at the very start of the book. Then, as the story progresses, a similar want can be found in Victor despite his tightly woven relationship with Henry Clerval. The Creature is constantly denied his lust for companionship demonstrates the horrible consequences of incessant loneliness. His amiable nature combined with his grotesque appearance proves to be a horrific collaboration that serves only in gaining rejection as he is shunned, quite irrationally, over and over again by all living beings. The Creature's suffering could only be abandoned if he were able to encounter an unprejudiced and completely tolerant friend. Shelley masterfully conveys the importance of a kindred spirit and the overall necessity of loyalty between people.