Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The struggle for redemption
An essay over the word redemption
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, the main character, Victor Frankenstein, may not exactly qualify as a “hero,” but is still a fitting figure for a piece of literary advice. Thomas Foster advises to “never stand next to the hero,” well, in this case, the characters in Frankenstein should, “never stand next to the main character.” The characters in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein play a pivotal role in the life of Victor Frankenstein by shaping the person he is at a young age, giving him reasoning to be concerned with his actions, and by being the reasons he can personally grow and bring about change in himself.
It is notable in Frankenstein that the characters other than Frankenstein and his monster are not fully developed and elaborated on, this
…show more content…
makes them prime tools to help develop Frankenstein himself. Thomas Foster in How to Read Literature Like a Professor gives insight into the relationship between types of characters: “Round characters are what we would call three dimensional, full of traits and strengths and weaknesses and contradictions, capable of change and growth...flat characters not so much. They lack full development” (Foster 84). The main attributes to the development of Frankenstein’s adolescence, Elizabeth, Henry Clerval, and his mother, are prime examples of these flat characters. They are in the story primarily to shape Frankenstein and provide plot action when needed, plot action to be discussed later. Elizabeth is key to developing the nurturing and loving side of young Frankenstein; when his mother gives him “possession” of Elizabeth, he takes it quite literally and feels as if it is his duty to care for and protect her. Henry Clerval, the best friend, is used as any young friendship should be used, to develop the social skills necessary for human companionship, which Frankenstein is able to use later in life with his colleagues and professors. His mother, or more specifically her death, gives Frankenstein his fascination with life, which directly feeds into his fascination with creating life, his goal in developing the creature. Moreover, since these flat characters expired their use at an early part of the novel, they then became susceptible to being expired themselves, thus reinforcing the notion to never stand next to the hero. Furthermore, because these characters do not have an elaborate backstory, and the audience is not emotionally attached to them and therefore to the book only through them, this makes them very easy to use as pawns for developing a plot.
Before the death of William, Frankenstein was very unconcerned with the actions of his creature. He feared him yes, but his days were not spent agonizing over the creature’s daily habits. Once he realizes, however that the creature he has put life into has taken the life of another, a life he loved so dearly, it spurs him into action. A death needed to occur for Frankenstein to care, and the death of innocent William was simple for Shelley to enact. Her audience was not emotionally devoted to the child, but the relationship between that child and Frankenstein was shown just enough for the audience to feel for Frankenstein and understand why he reacted the way he did. Additionally to using the deaths of characters to make Frankenstein invested, certain actions have to happen to get the story to the point Shelley wants it. Without the death of William, and Justine, Frankenstein never would have been desperate enough to agree to making a companion for the monster; “His power and threats were not omitted in my calculations...I should comply with his request” (Shelley 113). After realizing the capacity for misery this creature could create, Frankenstein is determined to do anything to stop him. Foster’s advice again shows because if William and Justine had never been acquainted with Frankenstein, had never stood next to the hero, their deaths would not have been significant to his story development and would have been
spared. Thomas Foster also points out that “the most important thing that characters can do is change grow, develop, learn, mature,” and throughout the novel, Frankenstein most certainly does change (Foster 77). He quickly learns the fault in his thinking that he has the right to toy with life when the most prominent people in his life are being killed off one by one. After the death of Henry he exclaims “Have my murderous machinations deprived you also, my dearest Henry, of life? Two I have already destroyed; other victims await their destiny,” thus realizing he is the true reason his friends are dead. (Shelley 135). He further changes, or more specifically matures, by the fact that he has gained a sense of responsibility. Once his father dies and he is left with no one else to care for he makes it his life's mission to track down the creature. After failing to muster the resources of the magistrate, he explains to him, “ My rage in unspeakable when I reflect that the murderer, whom I have turned loose upon society, still exists. You refuse my just demand: I have but one resource; and I devote myself, either in my life or death, to his destruction” (Shelley 153). He knows that he has made a life altering mistake when he created this monster, and that it is now his duty to make sure he no longer has the capability to endanger anyone else. The people who stood next to Frankenstein were valuable in bringing about a change in him for the better, but at a heavy price to themselves. Whether or not Frankenstein is classified as a hero in his story, the characters usage and situations surrounding him still fit the bill of Foster’s “Never Stand Next to the Hero.” They are used to shape him at a young age, give him reasoning to be concerned with his actions, and make him accountable for his actions while personally growing and changing, but it cost them their lives.
Victor Frankenstein may be the leading character in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, but a hero he is not. He is self-centered and loveless, and there is nothing heroic about him. There is a scene in Chapter twenty-four where Captain Walton is confronted by his crew to turn southwards and return home should the ice break apart and allow them the way. Frankenstein rouses himself and finds the strength to argue to the Captain that they should continue northwards, or suffer returning home "with the stigma of disgrace marked on your brows." He quite obviously has alterior motives and if he were not the eloquent, manipulative creature he so egotistically accuses his creature of being, he might not have moved the Captain and the men so much that they are blind to the true source of his passion. Unfortunately for Frankenstein, the crew, (however "moved") stand firm in their position. Yet the things he says in his motivational speech are prime examples of the extent to which Frankenstein is blind to his own faults and yet will jump at the chance to harangue others. He is so self-centered that his lack of interaction and love for others after his experiment has been completed, would barely qualify him as a person, if the difference between being human and being a person lies in the ability to have relationships with others.
In many works of literature, authors place morally ambiguous characters in their work to allow the readers to decide on the character’s true morality. In Mary Shelley’s, Frankenstein, Shelley inputs a morally ambiguous character, which takes on an extreme significance to the work, allowing the reader to understand the emotional journey that occurs throughout the novel. The morally ambiguous character in Frankenstein is Victor Frankenstein, which is displayed through the way he treats his creation, his arrogant personality, and his obsession with natural philosophy.
Frankenstein is a horror movie that tells the story of Dr. Henry Frankenstein’s experiment. In search for the fame and glory of playing to be god, he reaches a point where he is able to revive dead people. In this version of Frankenstein’s monster we see a selfish and careless scientist that created a creature with his intelligence. The way the character is shown reflects how ambitious someone can be to reach to be known in the world. This movie makes the people who are watching to feel empathy on the poor creature. This poor creature that did not want to live in a life where everyone is going to hate him for having a horrible aspect and not following rules that he has no idea about.
Critic Northrop Frye says, “Tragic heroes tower as the highest points in their human landscape that they seem the inevitable conductors of the power about them, the great trees more likely to be struck by lightning than a clump of grass. Conductors may of course be instruments as well as victims of the divine lightning”. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein greatly exhibits the theme of the consequence of knowledge and irresponsibility among others through its tragic hero, Victor Frankenstein. Northrop Frye’s quote is certainly true when looking at Frankenstein’s situation. Victor is a victim of his divine lightning, and ultimately causes much trouble for himself; however, Victor also serves as the tragic hero in the lives of the monster, his family, and his friends.
By the end of Frankenstein, Mary Shelley wanted the reader to discover that it was not Frankenstein’s creature that was the monster, but Victor Frankenstein himself. She was able to accomplish this fully by highlighting the absence of a single trait in Frankenstein; he has no empathy. Empathy, the ability to feel with another creature, is an integral part of what makes us human, what separates us from inanimate objects and animals. It is possible for a person to register another creature’s emotions without truly being empathetic. True empathy requires an individual to merge identities and act upon both their own and the others’ emotions.
In the novel Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, the main theme revolves around the internal and external consequences of being isolated from others. Being isolated from the world could result in a character losing his/her mental state and eventually causing harm to themselves or others. Because both Victor Frankenstein and the creature are isolated from family and society, they experienced depression, prejudice, and revenge.
...most readers tend to sympathize with Frankenstein because of the way in which he is mentally and physically harmed by his creation. However, one must also realize that while Frankenstein is a victim in the novel, he also exhibits features that make him a monster. These monstrous qualities, however, stem from his passion for science and his desire to create life. Not only does the reader criticize and pity Frankenstein, but the reader also empathizes with Frankenstein’s creation. He was unjustly shunned by society because of his physical appearance. On the other hand, the reader realizes that like Frankenstein, the creation can not be sympathized with entirely. He too exhibits traits that make him appear villainous. It is the duality of these two characters that make Frankenstein and his creation two of the most appealing characters of the nineteenth century.
Exile. Behind the word lies angst, behind it lies fear, behind it lies sorrow. To be exiled, outcasted, or abandoned is one of the biggest fear of humanity. For to be alone, one is left with their own thoughts. No one wants to be the fallen angel. The world exile carries with it many different negative connotations. The rest of society does not dare to interact with those exiled. Society does not dare to dance with the devil. In Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein creates a monster. The creature is abandoned by Frankenstein. And the creature searches for company and to eliminate the feeling of loneliness he has inside. After scrutinizing Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, the creature chases after a normal life, one without loneliness; however, society
Is it possible for one thing to have such a negative impact on a person? Because of his creation, Victor Frankenstein was a recluse who did not tell anyone of his creation because he regretted creating it. Although this may be true, Victor only wanted to do good and help humanity by bringing loved ones back to life. In order to create life, he isolated himself from his family to work on his experiment. After the monster committed homicide several times, Victor could not tell any sane person the truth. And he felt guilt because his loved ones died too early and at the hands of his scientific advancement. To conclude, isolation, secrecy, and guiltiness are prevalent in the book Frankenstein by Mary Shelley.
The theme in a piece of literature is the main idea or insight on characters. Most pieces of literature do not limit itself to one but many other themes all collected into one. This is just like in Frankenstein by Mary Shelley. This horrifying story was produced in 1818 and has several themes that she portrays throughout. The theme of dangerous knowledge is unmistakably seen theme in Frankenstein. In Frankenstein we see this theme through three of the main characters, Victor Frankenstein, Robert Walton and the creature. We can see how their desire for knowledge can take them places and show them eventually what they are looking for. Sooner or later it will take them to dangerous and unwanted places. The desire for knowledge can eventually lead one to its grave. Victor Frankenstein’s scientific endeavor, Robert Walton’s search for the North Pole, and the creature’s kind heart but scary features creates this theme of dangerous knowledge.
As a response to the Enlightenment movement in 18th century Europe, Romanticism gradually began to undermine the way people thought about human consciousness and nature itself. Appreciation of the natural beauty of the world and pure, human emotion bloomed in Europe as Romanticism’s influence grew ("Topic Page: Romanticism”). Romantics valued Individualism and thought that being close to nature would make them closer to God (Morner and Rausch). People also searched for solace in nature to overcome the adversities and cynicisms that followed the French Revolution ("French Revolution."). Romanticism and Romantic ideals influenced Mary Shelley, and that influence can be seen throughout her novel Frankenstein. The two main characters, Victor Frankenstein
Victor Frankenstein and his creation were both portrayed as a villain and a hero. The Monster learned that murdering innocent people and his creator, did not bring him any peace. Instead, his murders and agony he brought upon innocent families only increased his desolation and in the end, he vowed to kill himself to put an end to his, and everyone else’s suffering. As the Monster learned too late, not everyone in the world is going to neither accept nor appreciate the beauty and knowledge someone else brings into the world. However, like the Monster found the blind man, if an individual can find that one person in the world who can look past the flaws, their life would be filled with love and
In Frankenstein, Mary Shelley highlights on the experiences her characters undergo through the internal war of passion and responsibility. Victor Frankenstein lets his eagerness of knowledge and creating life get so out of hand that he fails to realize what the outcome of such a creature would affect humankind. Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, highlights on how Frankenstein’s passion of knowledge is what ultimately causes the decline of his health and the death of him and his loved ones.
In Frankenstein there are many actions chosen by the characters that could be viewed as evil or immoral. While their actions are viewed as sinful there tends to be sympathy evoked due to one’s knowledge of the character’s background and person. Victor’s monster would appear horrid and vile until the reader is made aware of the monster’s background. Having all the pieces of the puzzle changes one’s perspective which changes the opinion of the reader towards characters. Frankenstein is the prime example of an innocent character who is driven to evil actions by the insensitive actions of others when the creature created by Victor turns into a monster due to cruel treatment because of his physical appearance.
Mary Shelley in her book Frankenstein addresses numerous themes relevant to the current trends in society during that period. However, the novel has received criticism from numerous authors. This paper discusses Walter Scott’s critical analysis of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein in his Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine Review of Frankenstein (1818).