Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strengths and weaknesses of motivTION THEORIES
Strengths and weaknesses of motivTION THEORIES
Types of different motivation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Strengths and weaknesses of motivTION THEORIES
Theories of Motivation
Patrice Brown
Contemporary Issues in Organizational Leadership
BUS 660
August 7, 2017
Dr. James Moore
Ashford University
Theories of Motivation
The basic skill of leadership is the ability to motivate others to completes a task or goal. Whether it be going to school or carrying out the tasks of a job, every effort requires motivation. The type of motivation can often be the determining factor of whether or not the effort is successful. According to Warrick (2016) motivation is defined as the processes that account for an individual’s intensity, direction, and persistence of effort in obtaining a goal (in this case, a work-related goal). Employers can thereby gain insight into what motivates an employee by first
…show more content…
There are also disadvantages to each theory as well. For example, in the previous example, the doctor is confronted with a patient that keeps having children despite her dire circumstances. The patient has had children that have been removed from her home due to neglect. Need theory suggests that the doctor should place his own desire to counsel the woman in family planning, above his primary duty of just treating her prenatal needs. Cognitively the doctor may now be in a state of concern, which could influence or motivate him to make a poor choice regarding his handling of this patient. Situational theory also sets forth that since the situation has become heightened, the doctor may also make an unwise choice which may put his job in jeopardy. The doctor may become dissatisfied with his position, which could cause him to not to even treat the patient thoroughly. To a degree, while there are positives to each theory, there can also be some disadvantages.
While motivational and job satisfaction theories can help employers or leaders to gauge what motivates their employees, it is impossible for them to be used to explain all motivating factors. By analyzing these theories, it is possible to understand their basic concepts, and see how they can be an advantage in motivating their employees to the best possible outcome for the
Theories of Motivation What is the motivation for this? According to the text, motivation is defined as a set of factors that activate, direct, and maintain behavior, usually toward a certain goal. Motivation is the energy that makes us do things; this is a result of our individual needs being satisfied so that we have inspiration to complete the mission. These needs vary from person to person as everybody has their individual needs to motivate themselves.
Motivation is an attempt being made to ensure that the desired objectives are achieved. It can also be said as an impetus to strengthen the spirit of how things work is done in an organization. Employees are an airliner is able to contribute time and energy and be able to receive motivational elements such as effort, goals, organization and requirements. Managers in the organization will be faced with the situation of the problems and stress of employees. Motivational problems among workers will cause the performance of the organization is threatened. Therefore, as a manager of an organization should identify the problem of motivation wise and intelligent among workers dealing with the problem based on theoretical methods that have been introduced. With regards to motivation theory approach pioneered by Fedrick Taylor stressing compensation or reward in the form of salary payments to individuals to encourage outstanding work performance. Hence the theory , we can find motivation problems faced by the employees based on the performance of the framework that does not have the quality or the quality of either form of products or activities required by the organization in order to achieve the goal. For example, employees often feel stress and dissatisfaction will do things work with negative emotions such as being lazy, not disciplined, not caring and sensitive in a case that occurred in the organization. If this problem arises, of course, the performance will be affected personally so can result in organizational performance would be problematic.
Nowadays, the main source of job satisfaction is job security, without a misgiving. It is important for both management and staff. People are truly worried about their jobs particularly with the sale of the business and are just appreciative to have a job (O 'Connor M, 2010). Furthermore, Herzberg claimed that job satisfaction was important to enhance an employee 's motivation. Also, the opportunity to do different work and develop skills in different roles is providing satisfaction. Many companies believe that salary is the key motivator. However, people may want to surpass, get acknowledgment for the attempt to themselves, and they may want to feel a part of a team. Also, they want to feel a joyful of worth at the workplace. It is a reason empowerment plays a very important part in a company 's development. (French, R., et al., 2008). For example, one person can be happy with one point of view their job and sad with another outlook. Moreover, Fredrick Herzberg 's hygiene-motivation theory, he had progression ideas that definite factors cause job satisfaction while others lead to dissatisfaction. He suggested the 'Two Factor theory ' of human motivation in the workplace because he believed that people have two sets of needs. One as avoiding dissatisfaction but by themselves and do not provide satisfaction company policy, relationships, work environment and security. While, another needs as being to develop psychologically. Hertzberg assumed that the motivator factors such as achievement, interesting work and responsibility were the main cause of job satisfaction (Herzberg, F,1968). Simply, they are more love their job if they only focus on itself, and less to enjoy it if they just focused on money (Premuzic T,
Pardee, R. L. (1990). Motivation Theories of Maslow, Herzberg, McGregor & McClelland. A Literature Review of Selected Theories Dealing with Job Satisfaction and Motivation.
The goal of any organization is to have a workforce that works to its fullest potential. When the workforce is constantly moving in the direction towards the achievement of the mission statement a leader can often say they have a highly motivated workforce. Ultimately, it is the responsibility of the organization’s leadership and upper management to find a way to bring out the best in their employees. Finding research-based strategies and techniques to truly motivate employees is a necessary skill that all leaders must possess.
As a student at the University of Aberdeen I naturally have very strong intentions to maximise the benefits, opportunities and overall experience of studying here. Theories of motivation significantly help clarify my reasons and intentions of engaging in various activities both internal and external to the university. My enthusiasm is mainly orientated around conscious yet simple desires and goals. According to McClelland (1987) motivation refers to conscious intents and observed behaviours. But do these desires and goals cause motivation for the activities I partake in? My answer to that question is yes. In this essay I will be discussing and reflecting on how three different theories of motivation in particular help to explain my intentions of getting the most out of my experience as a student studying in the University of Aberdeen.
Employee motivation has always been a central problem in the workplace, and, as an individual in a supervisory position, it becomes one’s duty to understand and institute systems that ensure the proper motivation of your subordinates. Proper motivation of employees can ensure high productivity and successful workflow, while low worker motivation can result in absenteeism, decreased productivity rates, and turnover. A large body of research has been produced regarding motivation, and much of this research is applicable to the workplace. Due to the nature of man, motivation varies from individual to individual, and, because of this, there is no one system that is the best for ensuring worker motivation in every organizational situation, and, as a product, many theories have been created to outline what drives people to satisfactorily complete their work tasks. Throughout the course of this document, the three main types of these motivational theories will be outlined and examples of each, as well as how these theories can be used to further strengthen and sustain worker motivation....
Motivation is the driving force behind job satisfaction, job involvement, and job performance. Motivation provides individuals the drive to behave and act in a certain way in order to influence their work environments (Robbins & Judge, 2014, pp. 35-36). When employees are able to influence their work environments, they can make a psychological identity with their organization that provides a sense of purpose, or meaningfulness, to their existence in their job performance and involvement (Robbins & Judge, 2014, pp. 35-36). Thus, providing employees with a higher level of job satisfaction. To promote higher levels of job satisfaction, involvement and performance, managers will utilize motivational strategies to encourage their employees
Motivation is the force that transforms and uplifts people to be productive and perform in their jobs. Maximizing employee’s motivation is a necessary and vital to successfully accomplish the organization’s targets and objectives. However, this is a considerable challenge to any organizations managers, due to the complexity of motivation and the fact that, there is no ready made solution or an answer to what motivates people to work well (Mullins,2002).
The motivation of employees is a crucial element in any organization. Employers should be able to implement all the strategies for motivation to increase the worker's performance. Motivation has a tremendous influence in the performance levels and productivity in any organization. An example of motivational ways is through rewards, promotion, job recognition and others. The key factors to motivation also can include such factors as useful communication, supervision, career progression, interpersonal relations, recognition, money and also control. These factors influence the healthy performance behaviors of employees (Healy, 2016).
Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is always to try just one more time (Thomas A. Edison). “Motivation relates to a range of psychological processes that guide an individual toward a goal and cause that person to keep pursuing that goal” (Sadri). Motivation determines what direction an employee will choose to take, how hard they will work toward that chosen path, how long they will persist and how long they will persevere in the face of obstacles. Positively motivated employees will work harder and produce more high quality work than non-motivated employees. The ability to motivate employees is paramount to achieving a competitive advantage over the competition and keeping ones employees from seeking more fulfilling employment elsewhere (Fairbank). Motivating employees can be accomplished by meeting their needs and requirements, positive reinforcement, and through organizational identification or attachment.
The article discusses four major dimensions contribute to motivation. The first dimension was competence (am I capable). This dimension indicated the student believed he or she had the ability to complete the task. The second dimension was control (can I control it?). Control made students feel they were in control by seeing a direct link between actions and outcomes. The students retained autonomy by having some choice about whether or how to undertake the task. The third dimension was interest (does it interests me/is it worth the effort?) Interest was the student has to have some interest in the task or saw the value of completing it. The fourth dimension is relatedness (what do others think?) Students believe that completing the task is related to social rewards such as a sense of belonging to a classroom or other social groups or approval form a person of social importance. These dimensions of motivation were what many of the students used or relayed on though out their learning experience. As educators, we need to be aware of where are students are and channel in to increase their motivation level.
This paper focuses on employee motivation as this could highly influence and affect employee job satisfaction.
Throughout this quarter, we have learned about many concepts managers should have or apply to their job in order to be successful. One of the most important concepts is motivation. Motivation is the persistence and intensity of the individual to reach a particular goal. As a manager, you need to understand the needs of employees and try your best to motivate them. Motivation is what gets tasks done, and improves companies around the world. Motivation can come from physiological needs, safety needs, social needs, esteem needs, or self-actualization needs. To be a successful manager, we must recognize the different needs that are important to each employee then design jobs that address those needs to maximize motivation as well as results. However,
As a manager, a major factor in your success is your ability to motivate the employees that work for you. If you cannot motivate your employees, you will most likely be an ineffective manager. Motivations are complex, resulting in a variety of theories focused on the topic. Content theories of motivation focus on the individual needs of people being the driving motivational force (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2013). These theories fail to account for individuals’ interactions with their environments and how they influence motivational factors, process theories of motivation attempt to encompass these influences (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2013). A myriad of factors influence what motivates individual employees, but often financial compensation is a huge motivating factor and the perceived fairness of that compensation.