Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Works cited for the sunflower on the possibilities and limits of forgiveness
Works cited for the sunflower on the possibilities and limits of forgiveness
Emotional and psychological effects of war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Sunflower
We often tend to reflect on our past actions and tend to question ourselves on having done the right thing. In The Sunflower, a SS solider asks Simon Wiesenthal for forgiveness for a crime that he has committed against Jewish people. Later though out his book Simon asks for reassurance for his actions as he questions his readers, “Was my silence at the bedside wrong? Did I even have the right to forgive? What moral obligation do we have to remember? What should I have done?” Although it is nearly impossible to put one’s self in Simons shoes, is nearly impossible due to the fact that I was not physically nor emotionally exposed to the Nazis torturous ways. After reading several responses in The Symposium and careful deliberation,
…show more content…
Although, Simon did not give Karl a straight forward answer for him to sit there in silence and listen to the dying Nazi solider is more than enough. According to theologian and scholar, Cardinal Franz Konig in The Symposium, from The Sunflower, “The distinction between whether we can forgive and whether we may forgive still leaves unresolved the question of whether we should forgive” (182). Basically, what Konig is trying to say is that as humans cannot be forced to forgive. Even though there are instances where we may want to, it is often it is nearly impossible because we all cope with things differently. Since, Karl’s questions caught Simon by surprise his actions were …show more content…
Instead we repent in a way we know will benefit us. Karl never showed any intention of an actual sorrowfulness, instead he took advantage and of any Jew to die in peace. Andre Stein states, “I will reach out to you from the grave and will not let you forget that you did not grant me, a dying man, his last wish”. Karl only seems to seek salvation for himself, his word shows a true act of selfishness. It is very ironic how he seeks sympathy for himself from his deathbed to a Jew whom suddenly seems to matter to him because his forgiveness. In the end Karl’s apology was to only benefit himself. Karl knew better than to make the decisions he made, the dying solider had a Catholic upbringing with very religious parents. Instead of following his religion, voluntary he joined Hitler’s Youth he was not forced Karl choose to take advantage of the power he had as a soldier while left behind the moral values his family had taught him. They could have held him back from all those murders he was accountable for; in which they’re getting back at him now that his time has come. Now the only thing that’s left of him is a guilt that can never be forgiven and should not be
He should not have forgiven him because, “One soldier got up from the bench and looked at us as if we were animals in a zoo” (Wiesenthal 20). “Rectifying a misdeed is a matter to be settled between the perpetrator and this victim” (Wiesenthal 54). This shows only a small portion of what the Jewish people were treated as during this time. They were treated like animals, yet they are completely human. Also, an approximate eleven million people were killed during the Holocaust. Six million were Polish citizens, three million were Polish Jews, and another three million were Polish Christians. A single person who was not affected by the soldiers decisions cannot represent the eleven million people who were affected. In order to achieve actual “forgiveness” he would need to speak to every single person who was
Analysis and explanation of Wiesenthal’s actions When Simon was asked to forgive the SS officer, he blankly looked at the man, stood up, and left. One of the main problems that he faced is he definitely was not able to absolve the man of the crimes considering he could not speak for his entire people. Wiesenthal did not have authority to absolve the actions of those who were responsible for the holocaust nor did he want to in the first place. Different people have different ideologies about the way that one can accept forgiveness. Literature from the Jewish culture has a lot to say about this and understandably so.
The Art of Forgiveness Most runaway youth are homeless because of neglect, abuse and violence, not because of choice. Lily Owens is the protagonist in the novel, Secret Life of Bees, by Sue Monk. Kidd, is no different. Lily is a fourteen year old girl still grieving over her mother's death. T. Ray, a man who has never been able to live up to the title of a father, due to years of abuse, has not made it any easier.
Simon Wiesenthal’s book The Sunflower: On the Possibilities and Limits of Forgiveness spoke to me about the question of forgiveness and repentance. Simon Wiesenthal was a Holocaust prisoner in a Nazi concentration camp during World War II. He experienced many brutal and uneasy experiences that no human being should experience in their lifetime and bear to live with it. Death, suffering, and despair were common to Simon Wiesenthal that he questioned his own religious faith because he asks why would his God allow the Holocaust happen to his people to be slaughter and not do anything to save them. During Simon Wiesenthal time as a Jewish Holocaust, Simon was invited to a military hospital where a dying Nazi SS officer wanted to have a conversation. The Nazi SS officer told Simon his story of his life and confesses to Simon of his horrific war crimes. Ultimately, the SS officer wanted forgiveness for what he done to Simon’s Jewish people. Simon Wiesenthal could not respond to his request, because he did not know what to do with a war criminal that participate in mass genocide to Simon’s people. Simon Wiesenthal lives throughout his life on asking the same crucial question, “What would I have done?” (Wiesenthal 98). If the readers would be on the exact situation as Simon was
As strong, independent, self-driven individuals, it is not surprising that Chris McCandless and Lily Owens constantly clashed with their parents. In Jon Krakauer’s novel, Into the Wild, Chris was a twenty-four-year-old man that decided to escape the materialistic world of his time for a life based on the simplistic beauty of nature. He graduated at the top of his class at Emory University and grew up in affluent Annandale, Virginia, during the early 1980’s. In The Secret Life of Bees by Sue Monk Kidd, Lily was a fourteen-year-old girl who grew up in the 1960’s, a time when racial equality was a struggle. She had an intense desire to learn about her deceased mother. Her nanny, Rosaleen, with whom she grew very close over the years, raised Lily with little help from her abusive father. When her father failed to help Rosaleen after three white men hospitalized her, Lily was hysterical. Later, Lily decided to break Rosaleen out of the hospital and leave town for good. While there are differences between Chris McCandless and Lily Owens, they share striking similarities. Chris McCandless’ and Lily Owens’s inconsistencies of forgiveness with their parents resulted in damaged relationships and an escape into the unknown.
In Simon Wiesenthal’s The Sunflower, he recounts his incidence of meeting a dying Nazi soldier who tells Simon that he was responsible for the death of his family. Upon telling Simon the details, Karl asks for his forgiveness for what he helped accomplish. Simon leaves Karl without giving him an answer. This paper will argue that, even though Karl admits to killing Simon’s family in the house, Simon is morally forbidden to forgive Karl because Karl does not seem to show genuine remorse for his committed crime and it is not up to Simon to be able to forgive Karl for his sins. This stand will be supported by the meaning of forgiveness, evidence from the memoir, quotes from the published responses to Simon’s moral question, and arguments from Thomas Brudholm, Charles Griswold, and Trudy Govier. The possibly raised objection, for this particular modified situation, of forgiveness being necessary to move on from Desmond Tutu will be countered with the logic of needing to eventually find an end somewhere.
“Nazi Hunting: Simon Wiesenthal.” United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. United States Holocaust Memorial Council, 10 June 2013. Web. 06 Feb. 2014
Personally, I make mistakes every single day. For example, over this past winter break, my Mom bought our entire family tickets to the Seattle Boys Choir for the night I got home. Instead of going to the concert with my family I ditched them to go to a party at my high school friends house. My Mom was really hurt by my lack of recognition of her hard work to create a special memory for my family and I. All she wanted to do was spend time with me and I blew her off for something pointless. When I do something I regret, I hope that whoever afflicted would find it in their heart to see that I was sorry, and that they see that given the chance to re-do the situation, I would choose to change my actions. To be clear, I am not in the slightest defending or validating the actions of the Nazi regime during the time of the Holocaust. But as a person who has regretted certain actions or decisions I’ve made, I can understand the root of his need for forgiveness. The Nazi’s plea for forgiveness points toward his recognition of fault. Many Nazi’s were operating on the mindset that the atrocities they were committing were actually in the right. This Nazi, seeing the error in his actions, shows that he realizes what he did was wrong. For some people, the request for forgiveness isn’t enough to justify the act of giving it. In my opinion, if the person who is requesting the forgiveness is genuine in their motives, then they deserve
...nt, I was put in a time and place where I did not have the ability to think before my actions. This summer in Israel, before going to the Holocaust museum, our authority figures, our counselors, told us to get in a circle. They told us to hit the person next to us harder than the person before hit us. Not knowing why we were doing this, my group starting hitting away, almost breaking each other’s backs because we were hitting so hard. The majority of us hit the people next to us because that is what everyone else was doing. It would have been difficult to stand up for what we believed in. Just like we obeyed our authorities because we feared what they would do to us, Wirz feared General Winder because he was not sure what he was going to do to him.
As humans, we are entitled to making mistakes in our lives, but by forgiving one free himself from anger. Marianne Williamson wrote this about forgiveness: “ Forgiveness is not always easy. At times, it feels more painful than the wound we suffered, to forgive the one that inflicted it. And yet, there is no peace without forgiveness.” In the book The Glass Castle undergoes many difficult circumstances in which the act of forgiveness is the only way to be at peace with her family, but more importantly herself. But the real question is does she truly forgive them. Jeanette’s ability to constantly forgive her parents enabled her to have a positive attitude because the negativity was released when
He told of being on a balcony, seeing people pass by, and wanting to have a machine gun to release his anger. His hatred for the Germans and what they had done to him and his family was very evident. On a personal level Thomas Buergenthal learned to forgive, because it benefited him more than staying bitter. He sums this up when talking about himself and his mother by saying, “ I doubt that we would have been able to preserve our sanity had we remained consumed by hatred for the rest of our lives.” The process of forgiving took a lot of time. He eventually realized “that one cannot hope to protect mankind from crimes such as those that were visited upon us unless one struggles to break the cycle of hatred and violence that invariably leads to more suffering by innocent human beings.” This realization lead Buergenthal to go to law school and work in multiple human rights organizations and courts. He felt fit to serve in such a place as he was a victim of the greatest infringement on human rights in
Life and Death in the Third Reich. 1st Ed. -. ed. a. a. a. a. a. a. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, Harvard UP, 2008.
I thought angrily. How do You compare to this stricken mass gathered to affirm to You their faith, their anger, their defiance? What does Your grandeur mean, Master of the Universe, in the face of all this cowardice, this decay, and this misery? Why do go on troubling these poor people’s wounded minds, their ailing bodies? … Blessed be God’s name? Why, but why would I bless Him? Every fiber in me rebelled. … But look at these men whom You have betrayed, allowing them to be tortured, slaughtered, gassed, and burned, what do they do? The pray before You! They praise Your name! … I was the accuser, God the accused. My eyes had opened and I was alone, terribly alone in a world without God, without man.” (Wiesel
I believe that Karl could have had better timing in terms of confessing his sins, but I guess it's better late than never. It sounds suspicious to why he was so eager to apologize to a Jewish man at the very last possible moment, which it makes it sound not so sincere. It makes one think if he would have confessed if nothing tragic happened to him, or if he would just continue to kill otherwise. If this lies the truth, Karl could have been trying to find a way to forgive his actions in order to make peace with himself and have a good afterlife. Under these circumstances, I do believe at some extent Simon shouldn't have forgiven him, but still stand with my original conscious where Karl should have been granted
Forgiveness can only be given by the person who was directly affected by the crime (Picoult, 366). Leo’s way of dealing with life’s wrongs is to find the people responsible for criminal actions, and put them behind bars to pay for what they did. Even though the Hauptscharfuhrer had helped Minka and was one of the less evil Nazis, Minka could not find it in herself to forgive him (Picoult, 366). Minka did not talk about her experiences with anyone over her years because she did not want to give in to the enemy by having what they did to her have an impact on how she lived the rest of her life. Forgiveness is saying “You’re not important enough to have a stranglehold on me.