Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Online education versus face to face education
Online classes and face-to-face classes
Online education versus face to face education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Online education versus face to face education
Carey’s final claim that he points out is that the for-profit University of Phoenix education system has changed through time by having access and learning through online in order to speed up their process of earning their degree. Carey states how “for-profits fill a void left by traditional institutions that once believed their world was constant. Fast-developing methods of teaching students over the internet have given the velocity of change a turbo boost.”(3) Since modern technology is always advancing, also school learning is evolving by now doing school over online and being taught through the computers so basically you can finish the courses quicker. One disadvantage would be if you don't understand, technically there's no help unlike if it was face to face learning. Many people who want to get back to school may have some problems by working a lot of has a family to take care of. This can be time consuming so what students do they enroll in …show more content…
Carey’s article explains how for-profit colleges should be fixed by offering actually training to improve students education and to pursue their degree. Also how for-profits are all business, for example he used University of Phoenix and how he interviewed Michael Clifford, an investor, to explain what their goal was in for-profits and that was to make money. I believe that Carey’s argument improves and from the credible sources I found, it shows a lot how for-profits are a no good even just to be educated, it's just a waste of time and money. My first source that was used” Former Grand Canyon University investor: No future in for-profit education” by Angela Gonzales connects to Carey’s article building more effective by showing more valid and
Shown in the essay, they are worth nothing and teach nothing, ”online courses are perhaps one of the most complete expressions of the denigration of university education (Srigley),” there is no good side of online classes shown. There is nothing to show how online learning is making learning accessible,”work online with no direct support from a faculty member. Digital lectures for live classes with real students? Sounds expensive. How about no lectures, no students, and, best of all, no professor (Srigley).”
On the other hand, I believe that parents and the students are the one that will create the new standards for colleges to be chosen. Why do I think this way and disagree with Kevin Carey? I disagree with him because business, whether for profit or non-profit, will not change a marketing strategy if they see it is working. Colleges will only change if they see that consumers are changing. Yes, colleges will try to distract consumers with amenities. But, if consumers look for the information they need colleges will give it to them. The reason this works is because students will go to a college that will supply them with their demands, the law of supply and
That was Maney’s answer to the million dollar question, Is College a Suckers Bet? Now a days what you are paying thousands of dollars for at a university can easily, and for a lot cheaper be attained through the internet. “ The flexibility that having very little student debt afforded me changed my life- and flexibility is one of the most important attributes anyone can have in a time of revolutionary change”. In today's economy you have to be able to be flexible and that is much simpler to do with less student debt. So why go and pay for a more expensive college when you can attend a community college or online? Everything has changed drastically, and we need to be able to do the same in order to make somewhat of a
If the article was written to people who had already completed college and were well into their careers, it would be a pointless essay. Same goes for if the essay was written for people who had no plans on ever attending college. This essay was specifically written for those who are either about to enter college or have opportunities to transfer still. The author wants the audience to make the best decisions on what kind of institution is best for receiving and retaining knowledge. He also wants future prospects to see that so much more happens in college than just learning and the overall experience as a whole is what shapes one into an intellectual person. This is seen through his comment when he communicates that while some “working adults pursuing clearly defined vocational programs” (Neem 93) may learn wonderfully in an online environment, overall “we must deepen our commitment to those institutions that cultivate a love for learning in their students” (Neem 94). He wants an audience that sees the importance of furthering their education in the right environment like he does. This audience along with an intellectual appeal complement each other well in this argument and lead to an overall good
The first political advocate to ever address the issue of education was in 1877 when Rutherford B. Hayes became the first president to make a strong case for universally public education (Sanders). He was a representative for republicans at the time, while many advocates for free education are, contrarily, a part of the Democratic Party in the present day. One of the first cases of a free college education having positive effects of society was in 1944, when the newly issued GI Bill allowed free tuition for World War II Veterans, as well as many other benefits for them, such as benefits in home loans and the unemployment pay (Staff). In fact, Veterans chose to not take advantage of the unemployment pay, but rather use the free education to
Throughout the years, America has always debated whether education is needed- if it helps people succeed or not. The argument in the past was always over high school education, which is now mandatory. That decision has helped the US rise economically and industrially. Today, the US is in the middle of the same debate- this time, over college. Some, like David Leonhardt, a columnist for the business section of The New York Times, think a college education creates success in any job. Others, such as Christopher Beha, an author and assistant editor of Harper’s Magazine, believe that some college “education” (like that of for-profit schools) is a waste of time, and can even be harmful to students. Each stance on this argument has truth to it, and there is no simple answer to this rising issue in an ever changing nation full of unique people. Any final decision would affect the United States in all factions- especially economically and socially. However, despite the many arguments against college, there is overwhelming proof that college is good for all students, academically or not.
The funding of public education has long been an issue for the state government of Texas. Starting before Texas was even a state, public education funding was at the forefront of politicians’ minds. In 1836, one of the reasons Anglo-Texans wanted to become independent from Mexico was Mexico’s lack of a public school system (An Overview of the History of Public Education in Texas, 2016). This drove the desire of President Mirabeau B. Lamar of the Republic of Texas to create legislation that would grant public schools land (A Brief History of Public Education, n.d.). This act set aside four leagues of land per county for the use of free education centers and thus began the funding of public education by the state government (An Overview of the History of Public Education in Texas, 2016). In the last 177 years, the Texas Legislature and the Texas Education Agency have created numerous acts and laws regarding the funding of education, but it has been in the last 50 years that this topic has become highly contested, resulting in several lawsuits and endless efforts (by the school districts) to equalize the distribution of funds to Texas school districts (Texas School Finance History, n.d.). In sum, the complex issues and policies that surround the funding of public education are derived from a combination of the legislature, bureaucratic agencies, and local governments in the form of school districts.
Over the years, these nontraditionals have chosen either slower or faster options to proceed through their chosen curricula. They could work incrementally, taking a few courses per year while taking advantage of workplace tuition reimbursement programs or similar specialized programs to fund their college education. Recently, online education has allowed accelerated progress toward earning degrees. Traditional institutions developed these formats to serve working adults, and the emergence of nontraditional institutions such as the University of Phoenix delivered accelerated education in a variety of flexible formats such as asynchronous learning.
For most young Americans, college has always been preached to them as being a vital part to their success in the adult world; but as they reach this educative rite of passage many find they must take out inflated loans, work part time jobs, or even become dissuaded entirely due to the exorbitant costs of higher education. We must forsake this current antiquated system in favor of government subsidized tuition. Therefore, college education must be free because of its benefit to the economy, creation of equal opportunity, and the resolution of the student loan crisis.
When students are deciding on where to go to college, they have the option of choosing between online classes and the traditional classroom classes. Today, some students are finding it much easier to maintain a job, family and start a college career, all by taking online classes. Although some students still prefer to stick with the traditional classroom classes, they still have the option to take online classes. Both online and the traditional classes will provide the educational requirements needed to obtain a college degree and opportunities in the work field. Although the online classes offer just as much as the traditional classes, they are completely different when it comes to teaching methods, course material and time.
“Is the idea of a privatizing education the best way for the future of American Education?”
According to the ProPublica “96 percent of those enrolled in for-profit schools who take out student loans” while only “57 percent of those enrolled in four-year private, non-profit colleges who take out student loans (Lee).” Yes, one might be able to argue that For-profit education serves student neglected by public universities and private nonprofit school and offer classes at the students’ convenience and most will go as far as to even promise students they can earn so and so degree at the comforts of your pajamas and sandal or juggling kids and work. But at what cost? Not at the expense of high loan and higher than average tuition with little to no prospect of finding future
Independent.Leadership.Equality. All of these are three characteristics as to what free university education can provide to citizens.Higher education should be free of charge for the citizens of the United States.In the US the average cost for colleges per year is $8,893. Many middle class and under class people cannot afford such costs. It is true that the government will give you grants but most of the time students never get funding from them (Emmons 3). Most people of today can hardly afford a car let alone the fees and tuition of college. Also, it could provide equality to all people. Allowing everyone an equal opportunity to go to college and make something of themselves. It provides a way for poorer families to break free from their social strata that they have been put into (“This House Believes University Education Should Be Free” 4). This is why it is important to make university education free.In the end citizens of the US would benefit from university free education.
Many people think online education can be more expensive than a traditional school setting. Previous generations did not have the option for online learning experience, so why should we start now? An interesting point about online education is that LeBaron (2010) states, “The largest school in the U.S. is the University of Phoenix Online, with a whopping 380,232 students. That’s over 5x more than the largest public school, Arizona State University, which has 68,064 students” (para. 7). Despite the cost effectiveness, distance education is becoming the educational model of the future.
Society is feeling the impact of the shift in educational options. However, while there are more opportunities for students, there is another door opened for inequality to take place. As technology advances, a social phenomenon is beginning to change the way that Americans are obtaining college degrees. Approximately 3.2 million students were enrolled in at least one completely online class in the fall semester of 2005 (Clark-Ibanez & Scott, 2008). The effects of technological advances within the educational setting are having an impact on the way in which students are learning, leaving some students with limited options.