Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender in literature
Gender issues in literature
Literature and Gender
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender in literature
Metafiction, loosely defined as fiction about fiction, provides an intriguing perspective on literature. J.M. Coetzee’s novel Foe and Margaret Atwood’s short story “Happy Endings” are able to provide a commentary on fiction writing while still retaining their own identities. Both authors offer criticism of fiction writing as connected to gender issues, societal expectations, and the process and components of fiction writing itself. In order to become metafictional, Coetzee and Atwood had to make readers aware of what they were reading. Coetzee, by creating a story in which an author exists as a main character, personifies the act of writing fiction. In addition, by partially basing Foe off of Robinson Crusoe, Coetzee makes it obvious that his own book is a piece of metafiction. The very character of “Foe” represents a minimalist version of Daniel Defoe’s much longer Robinson Crusoe. Atwood, taking a different approach, directly addresses the conventions of storytelling in her own story. Plot, character development, setting, and form are all addressed within “Happy Endings.” And by creating multiple versions each with their own ending, Atwood encourages readers to interact and assign meaning to the stories both separately and when strung together. Not only does "Happy Endings" create a story about fiction writing, it also makes that story interactive, which draws more attention to itself as a criticism of traditional fiction. Both "Happy Endings" and Foe provide commentary on gender issues in modern fiction writing. In "Happy Endings", Margaret Atwood’s attack on gender stereotypes reveals itself in the form of character interactions. Her various story versions portray how women are victims of conformity in a patriarchal societ... ... middle of paper ... ...ssion, political oppression, social oppression, etc., Friday is a symbol of those left without power of expression and, therefore, without an audience. Language, written or spoken, is a form of power and without it one is helpless in the face of society. The concept of metafiction in Foe and “Happy Endings” is both engaging and difficult to grasp. While metafiction lends a sense of self-consciousness to the individual pieces of writing, identifying exactly what the authors are trying to say about fiction writing itself is complex and open to multiple interpretations. Nevertheless, Coetzee and Atwood both identify some similar ideas within their works. Gender conflict plays a central role in both stories, as women such as Susan and Mary are portrayed as inferior to their male counterparts. Their stories are dismissed in favor of a more conventional perspective.
Margaret Atwood’s speech ‘Spotty-Handed Villainesses’ is an epideictic text, which explores the significance of having a multi-faceted depiction of female characters within literature as a means of achieving gender equity, centring on the fictional presentation of women as either virtuous or villainess. The title of the speech
Viramontes, Helena. "Miss Clairol." Literature and Gender: Thinking Critically through Fiction, Poetry, and Drama. Eds. Robyn Wiegman and Elena Glasberg. New York: Longman, 1999. 78-81. Print.
Kennedy, X., & Giona, D. (Eds.). (2007). Literature an Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, Drama, and Writing (10th ed.). New York: Pearson Longman
end. This essay will further show how both stories shared similar endings, while at the same time
Throughout most of literature and history, the notion of ‘the woman’ has been little more than a caricature of the actual female identity. Most works of literature rely on only a handful of tropes for their female characters and often use women to prop up the male characters: female characters are sacrificed for plot development. It may be that the author actually sacrifices a female character by killing her off, like Mary Shelly did in Frankenstein in order to get Victor Frankenstein to confront the monster he had created, or by reducing a character to just a childish girl who only fulfills a trope, as Oscar Wilde did with Cecily and Gwendolen in The Importance of Being Earnest. Using female characters in order to further the male characters’
In the predominantly male worlds of Virginia Woolf’s A Room of One’s Own and Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s “Aurora Leigh (Book I)”, the women’s voices are muted. Female characters are confined to the domestic spheres of their homes, and they are excluded from the elite literary world. They are expected to function as foils to the male figures in their lives. These women are “trained” to remain silent and passive not only by the males around them, but also by their parents, their relatives, and their peers. Willingly or grudgingly, the women in Woolf and Browning’s works are regulated to the domestic circle, discouraged from the literary world, and are expected to act as foils to their male counterparts.
Kennedy, X.J and Dana Gioai, eds. An Introduction to Fiction. 11th ed. New York: Longman, 2002. Print.
Literary Review of Canada. 2011. Why Fiction is Good for You | Literary Review of Canada. [online] Available at: http://reviewcanada.ca/magazine/2011/07/why-fiction-is-good-for-you/ [Accessed: 9 March 2014].
There is a famous expression about three demands of writing fiction. It goes, “Make them laugh, make them cry, make them wait.” By following these needs, an author can spark interest in his or her work. In the novels The Catcher in the Rye and Lord of the Rings, the novelists utilize the latter requirement, “Make them wait.” This essay will show how the authors use that specific demand in their novels.
Reading literature, at first, might seem like simple stories. However, in works like William Faulkner's “A Rose for Emily,” Katherine Mansfield's “Miss Brill,” and Kate Chopin's “The Storm,” the female protagonists are examples of how society has oppressive expectations of women simply because of their gender.
Atwood’s speech “Spotty-handed Villainess” highlights how gender construction is inherently influenced by certain social delimitations which consequently contorts reality as the real nature of woman is overlooked in literature successfully belittling the idea of gender equality. The oxymoronic allusion “Angel/Whore split” in her exordium compels the audience to process the dichotomous image of women portrayed in literature. The inclusion of this academic allusion enlightens the understanding of the audience as explored in Campbell’s: Four Ends of Discourse, as the audience are coerced to question the neat categorisation of women in literature that has lead to “bland” female characters. Atwood furthers the pursuit of gender equality as she appoints
The texts, 'Orlando ' by Sally Potter and 'Sula ' by Toni Morrison are both, in a sense, biographies of fictional people, challenging traditional values and gender constructs. While Italo Calvino’s novel ‘If on a winter’s night a traveller’ and Marc Forster’s film ‘Stranger than Fiction’ examine and reimagine the relationships between author, reader and text.
...ar Story': Metafiction in The Things They Carried." Critique 36, No. 4 Summer 1996: 249-57. Rpt. in Contemporary Literary Criticism. Vol. 211. Detroit: Gale, 2006. 187-91. Literature Criticism Online. Web. 14 Apr. 2014.
Updike, John. “A&P” Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, Drama, and Writing. 7th ed. Eds. X. J. Kennedy and Dana Gioia. Boston: Pearson, 2013. 17-21. Print
Every life story ends with death. Everyone knows this without thinking about it. In Margaret Atwood’s short story Happy Endings she puts forth that all stories end in death, insinuating there is no such thing as a happy ending. To prove this point, she gives examples of the possible relationship scenarios of John and Mary. Some are happy, some are tragic, and each end in death, reinforced with the words, “John and Mary die. John and Mary die. John and Mary die.” The fact that everyone dies does not need proving. It is a fact and not a happy one Ms. Atwood is recently joined by a vast number of authors writing dystopian style stories that foreshadow a very bleak future for mankind indeed, namely mass destruction and death. Yet