Racism is a huge problem that faces the American society today. Racial segregation is an important case for a lot of people but not all of them on the same side of this. For example, Florence Wagman Roisman, an associate professor at the Indiana University School of Law in Indianapolis, who is against racial segregation and expresses her opinion in her article “Is Integration Possible? Of Course …,” in Poverty and Race, January/February 2000. On the other side of this case supporting racial segregation is Samuel Francis ,An iconoclastic anti-capitalist columnist, wrote the article “NAACP Recognizes Integration’s Failure” in the Conservative Chronicle, July 23, 1997, This paper intends to prove that Roisman uses more rhetoric tools and more effectively to make her argument convincing. She uses ethos to prove racial separation is unacceptable, logos to prove segregation is inconsistent with civil democracy and pathos to prove that by segregation people would miss the opportunities of great discoveries.
Roisman uses logos to prove segregation is inconsistent with civil democracy. She argues that everyone should be equal in rights and duties .people should not be judged by their ancestor’s skin because that is against everything the American Constitution stand for. She referenced to American constitution as she has a law degree and addressing people with higher knowledge of the American constitution. Her point appears stronger compared to Francis’s who was suggesting that failure of integration is because the racial consciousness. He argues that racial consciousness started to emerge in last generation, which made it difficult for people to be coherent with others because they believe that is how their racial pride is demeaned. Franci...
... middle of paper ...
... the issue to it. Finally, Roisman has a more academic way of writing which is more appealing for the people.
At the end, I believe that Roisman’s article “Is Integration Possible? Of Course …,” is more persuasive than Samuel Francis’s ““NAACP Recognizes Integration’s Failure” because she uses rhetorical tools more effectively to convey her point. Firstly, Roisman uses ethos in an effective way to convince the readers unlike Francis who failed in integrating text and did not use credible enough sources. Secondly, Roisman uses logos to prove segregation is inconsistent with civil democracy and her point was stronger than Francis’s who was arguing that failure of integration is because of racial pride and consciousness. Finally, Roisman uses pathos to sway the readers to her case unlike Francis who did not use it all which can convey the wrong understanding for it.
...isely. This book has been extremely influential in the world of academia and the thinking on the subject of segregation and race relations in both the North and the South, but more importantly, it has influenced race relations in practice since it was first published. However, Woodward’s work is not all perfect. Although he does present his case thoroughly, he fails to mention the Negroes specifically as often as he might have. He more often relies on actions taken by whites as his main body of evidence, often totally leaving out the actions that may have been taken by the black community as a reaction to the whites’ segregationist policies.
Making Whiteness: the culture of segregation in the south, 1890-1940 is the work of Grace Elizabeth Hale. In her work, she explains the culture of the time between 1890 and 1940. In her book she unravels how the creation of the ‘whiteness’ of white Southerners created the ‘blackness’ identity of southern African Americans. At first read it is difficult to comprehend her use of the term ‘whiteness’, but upon completion of reading her work, notes included, makes sense. She states that racial identities today have been shaped by segregation, “...the Civil War not only freed the slaves, it freed American racism
From beginning to end the reader is bombarded with all kinds of racism and discrimination described in horrific detail by the author. His move from Virginia to Indiana opened a door to endless threats of violence and ridicule directed towards him because of his racial background. For example, Williams encountered a form of racism known as modern racism as a student at Garfield Elementary School. He was up to win an academic achievement prize, yet had no way of actually winning the award because ?The prize did not go to Negroes. Just like in Louisville, there were things and places for whites only? (Williams, 126). This form of prejudice is known as modern racism because the prejudice surfaces in a subtle, safe and socially acceptable way that is easy to rationalize.
“The New Jim Crow” is an article by Michelle Alexander, published by the Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law. Michelle is a professor at the Ohio State Moritz college of criminal law as well as a civil rights advocate. Ohio State University’s Moritz College of Law is part of the world’s top education system, is accredited by the American Bar Association, and is a long-time member of the American Law association. The goal of “The New Jim Crow” is to inform the public about the issues of race in our country, especially our legal system. The article is written in plain English, so the common person can fully understand it, but it also remains very professional. Throughout the article, Alexander provides factual information about racial issues in our country. She relates them back to the Jim Crow era and explains how the large social problem affects individual lives of people of color all over the country. By doing this, Alexander appeals to the reader’s ethos, logos, and pathos, forming a persuasive essay that shifts the understanding and opinions of all readers.
Here McGary focuses on two conflicting approaches to racial discrimination which is used as solutions, being the “racial separatist approach” and “racial integration approach” and he compares and contrasts these two approaches but not to choose which is better than the other. In section ‘I’ he explains how some African-American leaders such as Malcolm X, Edward W. Blyden and many more, advocated racial separatism as a way to solving race related issues. They feel by keeping the races separate, one will be aware and have pride of their culture. In section ”II” the author explains some social, economic, etc. arguments that separatist may make and shuts them down by stating the arguments flaws and trying to come up with a better solution . In section ‘III’ he speaks specifically about culture and how separatists define the word “culture” which they often switch the words with ethnicity and race. He also talkes about self esteem and respect.In section ‘IV’McGary speaks about the inegrationist wich include Federick Douglas, Martin Luther Kig,Jr., plus many others. He states that integrationists reject the black separatist point of views when it comes to white racism. They feel separatism is immoral. He then states that the term “integration” can not be defined. He states ‘integration allows for the coexistence of racial identities within a single socioeconomic framework”.In section
“Simple Justice” was written by Richard Kluger and reviews the history of Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court decision that outlawed segregation, and African America’s century-long struggle for equality under law. It began with the inequities of slavery to freedom bells to the forcing of integration in schools and the roots of laws with affect on African Americans. This story reveals the hate caused the disparagement of African Americans in America over three hundred years. I learned how African Americans were ultimately acknowledged by their simple justice. The American version of the holocaust was presented in the story. In 1954 the different between how segregation and slavery were not in fashion when compared with dishonesty of how educating African American are separate from Caucasian was justified by the various branches of government.
The use of threats and name-calling indicates that those threatened by the boycott had reached a place of desperation caused by the continued optimism and small successes of the boycotters. Before the boycott of Montgomery’s buses, those opposed to integration were openly confident about their supremacy and arrogant about their ability to retain their power. Though their belittlement of African Americans in this document proves their arrogance remains, it is clear that their confidence is waning. Just like the rebels, the boycott of Montgomery’s buses was changing the mindsets of whites in
concerns racial equality in America. The myth of the “Melting Pot” is a farce within American society, which hinders Americans from facing societal equality issues at hand. Only when America decides to face the truth, that society is not equal, and delve into the reasons why such equality is a dream instead of reality. Will society be able to tackle suc...
This week’s reading is from Jack Greenburg’s “Crusaders in the Courts: Legal Battles of the Civil Rights Movement”. Chapter 12 “The School Segregation Cases and Our Cast of Characters” discusses the formation of the Legal Defense Fund and the NAACP as two separate institutions caused by concepts of professionalism outlined by ?, like money, autonomy, strain, and a structural hierarchy, similar to the transformation of other professions. This chapter also outlines the fight against segregation as a top-down strategy of legal realism (CITE) where law serves as a catalyst for change. These concepts and the key players in this fight were also outlined in the documentary viewed in class, The Road to Brown. These institutional actors, much like
In 1896 the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the law of racial segregation in public. It was known as separate but equal. Yet one cannot be equal, because Cauca...
William Apess then asks his mostly white audience to reexamine their Christian values along with their prejudices. His essay acknowledges that unless the discrimination and prejudices that plague the white man over the other races disappear, then there won’t be peace in the Union.
The issue of racial segregation and racism is a strong point emphasized through out Gruwell’s novel, and it is also a topic that has been prev...
Before any steps could be taken for the equality of human kind, we had the tackle the idea of intergrationism. This time is often referred to as the Nadir of American Race Relations, which simply put means that racism was at its worst during the time period of the Civil Rights Movement. Pulling together for equality proved to be a grueling task for Americans. In order to move into the future, one must let go of the past, and many people were not eager to abandon the beliefs that had been engrained in them since birth. Racial discrimination was present nationwide but the outrageous violence of African Americans in southern states became know as Jim Crow Laws.
During this time, the idea of segregation was a very controversial topic among the c...
To continue, The purpose of King's speech is to persuade. The aim is to introduce and explain the anti-segregation movemen...