Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Transformational leadership 4 stages
Participatory versus directive leadership style
Components of transformational leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Transformational leadership 4 stages
The five different types of leadership strategies are laissez-faire, Autocratic, participative, transactional, and transformational. Each of these types of leadership have a different belief of how employees should be deployed. A successful leader must have the ability to influence other people and must be able to inspire, motivate and direct their activities. This push provided by leaders directs employees in the right direction to achieve group and organizational goals. Corporate leaders that demonstrate strong participative and transformational leadership qualities are more successful with new generations versus historical autocratic leaders that imposed their beliefs and opinions on their work force. The result of a leader adopting participative …show more content…
Only highly experienced and trained employees who require little supervision fall under the laissez-faire leadership style. This leadership style hinders the production of employees needing supervision. The laissez-faire style produces no leadership or supervision efforts from managers. This often leads to poor production, lack of control and increasing costs(Johnson, n.d, para 2). The autocratic leadership style allows managers to make decisions alone without the input of others. Managers possess total authority and impose their will on employees. No one challenges the decisions of autocratic leaders. This leadership style only benefits employees who require close supervision. Creative employees who need time and space are unable to thrive with this leadership style (Johnson, n.d, para 3). The transformational leadership style depends on high levels of communication to meet goals. Leaders motivate employees and enhance productivity and efficiency through communication (Johnson, n.d, para 6). Participative leadership values the input of team members and peers. This leadership strategy boosts employee morale because they are able to contribute to the decision-making process (Johnson, n.d, para 6). Choosing to follow the beliefs of transactional and participative leadership benefits a wider variety of employees, where as laissez-faire and …show more content…
They have no need to explain their rationale and followers must obey instructions without question. This form of leadership is dictatorship and absolute monarchy within a corporation (Bowen, 2015). In the past, the New York Times ranked among the top companies with autocratic leadership. a famous autocratic leader named Rosenthal lead the company during the 1970s. While it was not easy to work under such an autocratic leader; this style raised efficiency and contributed to bottom line growth in the highly demanding newspaper industry(Bowen, 2015). This worked in the past when businesses needed this form of control to ensure the growth of the company, however, times have changed. Success is made by the steps a leader choses to follow when leading a group of people. This form of leadership now leads to distress and dissension among staff, lowers morale, and leads to a decline in both quality and quantity of information (Bowen, 2015). Raines, the executive editor between 2001 and 2003 tried to follow Rosenthal’s footsteps. This autocratic style led to charges of highhandedness and callousness. His drive to get things done made him contemptuous, dismissive, and sarcastic. He centralized decision-making, and killed stories at will. Leaders choosing to use transformational and participative are more successful in
The styles of leadership to be discussed are transactional, transformational, and “level 5.” The leadership styles will be explored based on the scenario information. There will also be a theoretical assumption used to show company changes that will occur after Executive A retires. From the information presented, the changes could occur immediately or gradually depending on the length of the transition period.
Have you ever had a leader that inspired you to develop your own leadership traits? “A leader is someone who demonstrates what’s possible” (Mark Yarnell, 2015). There are numerous leadership styles. Each of the numerous leadership styles can be beneficial if utilized in an appropriate means. I have chosen three leaders and their unique leadership styles to discuss in this paper. The unique styles that will be discussed are situational leadership, transformational leadership, and laissez-faire leadership. I will also discuss each leader’s approaches, their fundamental leadership principles, and how each leader used their style within their profession.
The idea of approaching leadership from the standpoint of values has been echoed in several studies. O’Toole (1995) compared and contrasted contingency and situational approach to leadership with value-based leadership. He stated that all leadership styles eventually enforces the individuals to follow what their leader commands them to do rather than focusing on what is the will of the followers – this he called as disrespect for the individuals. It is important for the leader to understand, why people are resistant to change in reality and must make a personal commitment to overcome this resistance to changing environment or culture. He suggested that if the company wants to initiate change that is constructive, focus must be placed on the
A leadership theory is a clarification of some features of leadership; theories have practical importance as they are being used for better understanding, anticipating, and controlling successful leadership. Hence, the main principle of any theory is to inform practice(Lussier and Achua 2009). Leadership theories could be classified into eight main categories: Great man, trait, behavioral, contingency, Situational, Participative, Relationship , management (Cherry 2010).
While due to the reason that Authentic Leadership is still in the formative phase, the textbook by Northouse provides different definitions of this type of leadership depending on the viewpoints that make this leadership style very broad compared to other more defined leadership styles, I do find Authentic Leadership as a compelling theory. While it is a broad style, it is also very complete by having different approaches that fulfill the goal of explaining the different components of this style. This leadership style has four skills need as Northouse (2016) describes that “ it is important for leaders to have self-awareness, an internalized moral perspective, balanced processing, and a relational transparency to be authentic” (pg. 206), as
The principles of leadership and management are helps to understand the management style and make the effective decision. An effective decision helps to gain the success of an organization. Lots of way to manage and collect information/question for leadership and management which are describing in the below:
Based on Burns (1978) there are two types of basic leadership styles, transformational and transactional. Transactional leaders are in contact with an individual for an exchange that will occur between them while transformational leaders motivate and connect with their followers
Additionally, each leader will usually have a distinctive With this particular style, leaders are known to have a hands off approach when guiding others, and usually they do not provide the support that may be needed. Furthermore, Laissez-fair leaders allow individuals to make their own decisions without much interference or feedback. In addition to a Laissez-fair leader, there is also the transformational method of leadership. A Transformational leader can be described as a person who “persuades their subordinates to take on the organizational revolution as their own” (Rana, Malik, & Hussain, 2007, p. 163). In addition, transformational leaders also formulate challenging purposes in order to pave the way for others.
Effective use of leadership styles and models can foster organizational success by increasing motivation, enhancing cooperation, and giving sense of direction to the staff and executives. Building awareness of the various leadership models and styles can help leaders develop their approach to enable them become more effective leader. In this article, six video clips will be examined for the leaderships styles used and their effectiveness for the specific situation.
Leadership is defined as a process by which an individual influences others to obtain goals. There are three aspects that should be addressed when explaining leadership. One aspect is that leadership is a social influence process; leadership could not exist without a leader and one or more followers. Another leadership aspect is compliance; all of the leader’s directions must be complied with voluntarily. Compliance is what separates leadership from other influence-based formal authority. Finally, leadership results in the followers’ behavior, that is purposeful and goal-directed which must be in some organized setting (Leadership Theories and Studies, 2009).
Over the course of my professional career in different organizations in the past three years, I have worked under many managers. This has been a learning curve for me to understand the different managing styles and leadership characteristics of people. One of the managers whom I worked under, was the lead in a government project which also happened to be my last project before I took a break for continuing my studies, is a person I admire till date. I learned several life lessons in addition to the technical subject associated with the industry. This paper demonstrates the leadership styles exhibited by my manager with suitable examples.
An authentic leader is someone who over the years has developed a unique vision; a person who is respected, not only because they are expert in their field, but is also respected because of their humility. An authentic leader is someone who is open to hear ideas other than their own ideas; someone who fosters creativity in a team. An authentic leader is someone who also sets clear expectations for the vision they have and along the way challenges their employees to achieve more than they even though was possible, but will those accountable who are not on board with the vision and expectations set forth. Lastly, an authentic leader is someone who will face and have to make difficult decisions without compromising core values.
What is leadership? Leadership is defined as a process by which a individual will influence others to obtain goals. Leaders will guide, direct motivate, or inspire others. Leadership is defined by not only traits but actions as well. Leaders are inspirational, trustworthy and charismatic. Many people may think a manger is leader. Although leadership and management go hand in hand, they are not the same. Everyone has their own beliefs about what characteristics an effective leader should have. To me, communication skills, critical thinking skills, and having a vision are few characteristics of becoming an effective leader. A leader is not only born, but made. Some are born as leaders or some are made to be leaders.
When we work together in a team, or in a broader sense as a society, the leader takes on the most important role. It is the leader that helps prioritize activities and direct people’s thought process in the right direction. They are the ones who have the ability to bring the group together as a whole. Because of this, not anyone can be a leader. Only people with certain qualities and abilities are able to fill this role. So what makes a good leader? There is a defined path and specific characteristics that makes someone a good leader.
There are a few different types of well known leadership styles, authoritarian, delegative, and democratic. To assess my leadership style I used two online tests to help me determine my style. I felt the results were accurate and I fall into a democratic style/participative style. If I am leading I prefer to include the group and get their feedback on solving issues. However, I still make the final decision after listening to the thoughts of the group on a particular topic. This is considered to be a positive style of leadership that is inspiring to the group involved. The leaders decision making tends to be more accurate due to the input of other experts. (Cite)