Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay about figurative language
How writers engage their readers
An essay about figurative language
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay about figurative language
The use of language to push a narrative of the internal turmoil that comes with love. Firestone takes the more explanatory approach, as he writes, “Although the experience of being chosen and especially valued is exciting and can bring happiness and fulfillment, at the same time, it can be frightening and the fear often translates into anger and hostility,” which illustrates and explains how and why people can tend to lash out when shown affection. Even in a relatively plain article without much figurative language to speak of, Firestone still clearly illustrates the contrast between the expected reaction and reality, with a sudden shift in tone mid-sentence to draw the reader’s attention to his point. As for a more figurative and thought provoking
text on the subject, T.S. Eliot takes a more poetic approach to the subject. His repetition of the phrase “In the room the women come and go / Talking of Michelangelo,” immediately followed by switching to the point of view of the main character of the story, Prufrock, where he says, “To wonder, ‘Do I dare?’ and, ‘Do I dare?’ / Time to turn back and descend the stair,” says several things about the main character and about love itself. Eliot not only establishes the women in this room to be supposed love interests to Prufrock, but also establishes a metaphor for Prufrock’s love. By establishing the light, playful, comfortable atmosphere that these women are in separate from the dark, gloomy, dirty city outside their window, Eliot shows the reader Prufrock’s desire for love and happiness, but also his fear of being cast away. Such leads Prufrock to stay in his comfort zone, the gloominess of the outside, out of fear instead of taking a risk in order to pursue love and happiness.
The title of the short story, “Four Directions” is symbolic for Waverly’s inner misconceptions. As she goes about her life, she is pulled in different ways by her past and her present. She is torn between her Chinese heritage and her American life. She never thought that instead of being pulled in four directions, she could take all of her differences and combine them. In the end she realizes this with the help of her mother. “The three of us, leaving our differences behind...moving West to reach East” (184), thought Waverly. Her whole life she misconceived her mother’s intentions. Lindo never wanted Waverly to solely focus on her Chinese heritage, but rather combine it with her new American ways. The idea of being pulled in four
A Pulitzer Prize is an award for an achievement in American journalism, literature, or music. Paul Gigot, chairman of the Pulitzer Prize board, described the award as a “proud and robust tradition”. How does one carry on this robust tradition? By mastery of skilled writing technique, one can be considered for the awarding of this prize. Since its creation in 1917, 13 have been awarded annually, one of which, in 1939, was given to Marjorie Kinnan Rawlings for her novel, The Yearling. Rawlings is an American author from Florida known for writing rural themed novels. Consequently, The Yearling is about a boy living on a farm who adopts an orphaned fawn. Marjorie Kinnan Rawlings procured a prestigious Pulitzer Prize for her effectual use of figurative language, sensory details, and syntax.
In Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, a slave narrative published in 1845, Frederick Douglass divulged his past as a slave and presented a multifaceted argument against slavery in the United States. Douglass built his argument with endless anecdotes and colorful figurative language. He attempted to familiarize the naïve Northerners with the hardships of slavery and negate any misconstrued ideas that would prolong slavery’s existence in American homes. Particularly in chapter seven, Douglass both narrated his personal experience of learning to write and identified the benefits and consequences of being an educated slave.
Much like Lorraine Hansberry, Madeleine L’Engle believes that “the growth of love is not a straight line, but a series of hills and valleys.” Lillian Hellman’s The Little Foxes, Tennessee Williams’ Cat on a Hot Tin Roof, A Streetcar Named Desire, and The Glass Menagerie, and Robert Harling’s Steel Magnolias use the idea that even through struggles their characters show that love always endures. Although loving someone, who is not particularly loveable, is one of the most difficult parts of being human, it is possible by remembering that addictions can be reversed, blood is forever, and a ring is more than just an object.
The Book Thief, Markus Zusak’s 2005 novel, uses various stylistic devices and conventions to portray key ideas of the value of lifе, the beauty and brutality of human nature and the power of words - highlighting not only their ability to be used for good, but also reminding the reader that words can also be responsible for great evil, during the second World War. Through the meticulous use of narrative voice and having Death as the narrator, then incorporating analepsis, prolepsis, motif, symbolism and figurative language, Zusak is able to highlight these key ideas by successfully taking an innovative approach to creating a captivating and complex text.
Love caused his logic and sensibility to fail him, and provoked him to commit monstrous acts that destroyed many lives. Through analysis of “Happy Endings” by Margaret Atwood, it can be concluded that one of her many intended lessons was to show the value and the powerful effects of love. Atwood successfully proved this lesson by using powerful examples of both successful and disastrous relationships to illustrate the positive and negative effects of love. Atwood truly demonstrated what it is like to follow your heart.
Loving and being loved adds a feeling of purpose to our lives. Humans accept love from anyone and anything they can receive it from, it’s just human nature. In the literary work of “The Most Excellent and Lamentable Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet” by William Shakespeare, the reader is introduced to two characters, Romeo and Juliet, who believe they share feelings of “true love” towards each other. However, such deep affection that both characters had for each other is not something that can be developed in a short amount of time, for that would not be love, it would be lust. Romeo and Juliet were two impulsive teenagers who did not understand the concept of “true love”.
This passage marks the first of several types of love, and gives us an intuitive
Cummings theme of how strong someones love can be appeals to readers minds, because everyone wants that connection with their partner, That undying love for one another. Some people long for a love...
Hazlitt’s use of figurative language allows the reader to reflect on their own views of money while also establishing his credibility as a professional writer amidst the chaos of the world. Although Hazlitt uses allusions throughout the text, the use of hyperbole is also evident within it. He writes on how a person’s fate is to be “an exile in one’s own country” as a result of lusting for money.
This poem has captured a moment in time of a dynamic, tentative, and uncomfortable relationship as it is evolving. The author, having shared her thoughts, concerns, and opinion of the other party's unchanging definition of the relationship, must surely have gone on to somehow reconcile the situation to her own satisfaction. She relishes the work entailed in changing either of them, perhaps.
Leek, McKenzie. "What Is Love?" The Sun Chronicle. The Sun Chrinicle, 3 Jan. 2012. Web. 24 Jan. 2012
Scott Peck expresses his unusual perspective of love in his work, The Road Less Traveled. Peck's view of love was a correction to what he thought everyone else thought love was. This paper will be an explanation of Peck's beliefs about love, a contrasting view on love, and my personal knowledge of Peck's beliefs.
However, there are those that contend that love can take a more humanistic path to love as a facet of self-actualization that can comprise caring, cooperation, adaptability, and evolution. This so called path, however, still puts an emphasis on psychological definitions and outcomes that are based on perceptions of perceived happiness, as well as individual needs and wants for happiness. The very notion that love has sociological basis is rooted in the fact this alone can be the basis for conceiving love as a manifestation of a “cooperative principle” which has become increasingly important in evolution (Restivo, 1977). “Sociologists tend to psychologize love by defining it in terms of feelings. [It can be] summarized [that] the sociological literature on love by noting that most definitions of love present it as a strong emotional bond between two people which satisfies their needs to give and to receive happiness. Even when they focus on love as a relationship, sociologists tend to define it as a psychological state of mind that brings happiness. For example, [some sociologist] purposefully limit [their] discussion of love to the interpersonal bond. [They] do not, however, define love in terms of the bond but rather as a ‘pleasurable’ or ‘joyous’ feeling that brings happiness. The prevailing paradigm in the sociology of love is further characterized by an emphasis on the romantic aspects of love often to the point of equating ‘love’ with ‘romantic love’ [the] critique of romantic love is a notable exception. Some sociologists have noted the need to broaden the study of love, and to treat it in more strongly [in] sociological terms. These efforts, however, have been carried out within the boundaries of heterosexual relationships, courtship, and marriage and that this is
The article “I-Love-You” by Robert Solomon ticked me to the point I felt frustrated, puzzling my mind with a melange of different thoughts about love. Holding the same perception with him, I was in love with the article – how subtle the words are, how every sentence spoke right out of my mind and how careful the arrangements of the points are for you to be convinced by his principles of love. If I could briefly describe his article, I would say it’s ‘the harsh truth’. However, not all of his dogmatic proclaimations about love I give nods on - some of the ideas he presented looked rather from the thoughts of a depressed mind and some came outright untrue, but some did piqued my interest to the point I would embed his quotations and keep it