An Analysis Of I-Love-You By Robert Solomon

1104 Words3 Pages

The article “I-Love-You” by Robert Solomon ticked me to the point I felt frustrated, puzzling my mind with a melange of different thoughts about love. Holding the same perception with him, I was in love with the article – how subtle the words are, how every sentence spoke right out of my mind and how careful the arrangements of the points are for you to be convinced by his principles of love. If I could briefly describe his article, I would say it’s ‘the harsh truth’. However, not all of his dogmatic proclaimations about love I give nods on - some of the ideas he presented looked rather from the thoughts of a depressed mind and some came outright untrue, but some did piqued my interest to the point I would embed his quotations and keep it …show more content…

Hardly a word at all”, he described how an “i-love-you” confession would be in a writing, a letter. In my opinion, confessing love through writing is no less collapsible than how he describes. Love, ironically, as he said is a strong word – one that moves us, one that makes us significantly happy and, also, that will last. Like a memento box where we keep objects that meant the world for us – those objects are equivalent to a letter filled with love. The way those three words bring back the memories of the past – the smiles, the laughter and everything that was shared – is already enough to defy the author’s claims on how trifling an “i-love-you” is in a letter. Imagine living in a faraway place from home and you got a letter from your hometown. It has been years since you last saw them, but yet looking back at those four letters written all over the paper was just enough for you to live up and get a move on. As the author had said “...it has meaning only to you, and only while you can imagine my speaking it.” as he claimed was completely false. He had been kept repeating on how love should be showed with actions, not in words and same as the letters are. I will not remember how you said love to me, but I will remember how you love me. He was, without realizing, contradicting …show more content…

As the author claims “Barther says it is “released”, but I say, shot out, like a weapon” and that we have to commit when we say “I-love-you” is a negative of its own ideas. Love is not a weapon, one that we should be daunted by the commitments and the responsibilities that follow, but rather things that we are going to share together. When one of the cowboys in Texas who pulls a woman was using his rope, and the woman reciprocated, he could cut the rope off. However, in occasions when she came closer, the rope that links them and the journey that trails along the line is what love is all about. If a love is true and strong enough, we will not regard it as a weapon, but as a rope that links us together, making us stronger. The commitments and the responsibilities are not the bullet holes that we have to bear, but rather the threads that strengthen our bonds. The way the love that he describes is too focused on love of a partner rather than love of the whole segment of community in this world. What lies behind the “shots” that we released should not be feared, instead should be released in an honest way when necessary. We never knew if we hit the target if we never try. If the fear of being rejected is as scary as a weapon, but we could never forget the “ropes” that we have with others, pushing ourselves forward and be ready to “cast” it

Open Document