Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Corruption in the us government
Corruption in the us government
United states political corruption
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Corruption in the us government
Always Remember to Read the Fine Print There are so many things you could or be tempted to do with $39 million dollars!!! Reading the fine print when signing a contract is very important to a person and the company itself, not doing so could affect the outcome of the service provided. Also there could be other stipulations and/or very important details that you could omit. As a Senior Official, you are expected to abide by the company’s rule and take the time and preparation to present properly redacted contracts. And if you are a contracting officer you should never sign any documentation before reading it to its entirety to include the fine print. This paper will explain how an official of the State Department manipulated and persuaded a contracting officer into signing a $39 million dollars contract, without …show more content…
She persuaded the officer into signing a contract without reading the fine print. The contract was valued at $39 million dollars and she did not disclose that the company receiving the proceeds was owned by her and her husband. She utilized the proceeds for her pleasure, buying expensive things for her personal use. Her case is not the only one, there are many fraudulent incidents occurring in the Department of Defense for example the Singapore-based defense contractor Glenn Defense Marine Asia, which for decades provided port services to U.S. Navy ships in the Asia Pacific region. In this case, “a former senior federal contracting officer was arrested for conspiracy to commit bribery in connection with his alleged role in the scheme,” (Department of Justice, 2015). It is never ethical to use your position in order to get things done for your benefit and personal satisfaction. Now that you know some of the background and the position that this official held, let’s talk about her choices and
Facts: Who are the parties to the lawsuit, what is their dispute, and which court are they arguing in? In your own words, only include the few important facts necessary to understand the case; e.g. the time of day a defendant was arrested is usually not important, etc.
Well I am sorry to tell you, but you were played, it was all a ruse to hire Tony Chiles and mask incompetency. Let’s start with the hiring of Tony Chiles, John Owens could not hire him as the Deputy because Uncle David Chiles (the current CTO) is a blood relative, and as many of you know you cannot have a blood relative supervising another in the federal government. To accomplish this unethical activity Mr. Owens needed to reorganize the CIO, promote David Chiles to CTO, making him a direct report to Owens, and this cleared the path for Owens to legally hire Tony Chiles as the Deputy, that and the help of a couple of other USPTO SESs. Why did Owens need Tony Chiles? According to several staff members, it was because he was supposedly an expert in DEVOPS, and Mr. Owens needs DEVOPS to save USPTO.
The first blatant ethical issue in the Adelphia scandal stems from the idea that the Rigas family used corporate money for personal use. Nearly $12.8 billion was used to start construction on a personal golf course on their own private land and even more to cover the expenses of the use of the company aircraft for personal reasons. The use of this money was then hidden thro...
I believe this case goes way beyond minor employment violations and obviously due to FBI involvement it is criminal. Stolen funds and several Civil Rights violations dictate that my investigation must be very
Though still shocked at what I was hearing, I explained again how important this project is, and that the money would be put to good use. I explained that Harborco would not be able to afford such a project without the FED?s help and all of our negotiation lies in this issue. Once again, Daniel Kim was not budging and kept on laughing away my request for 3 Billion dollars. With the small group of allies confronting Kim, the blockers (other ports) confronted me by saying that I was a big company and could afford this on our own. The negotiations weren?t going anywhere. Daniel Kim and I began to start arguing over why I need the money and why he wouldn?t give it to us. After explaining to him that 500 million wasn?t even an option on the sheet, he moved up to 1 billion and said either take it or leave it. I tried to further negotiate with him, but he wouldn?t even answer my questions and continued to offer a take it or ...
Evans, J. D., & Hefner, F. (2009). Business ethics and the decision to adopt golden parachute contracts: Empirical evidence of concern for all stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(1), 65-79. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9818-9
Was it unethical practices, poor governmental regulations, or bad organizational behavior that lead Kozlowski to make the decisions that lead to the 2005 conviction? Vasile (2004) defined business ethics as “learning what is right and what is wrong and simply doing what is right” (p. 2). However, the actions attached to the decisions are not always as easily derived. In most instances, leaders are faced with making the decision as to what is...
This was the question asked in the case Mathews v. United States in 1988. The defendant, an employee of the Small Business Administration (SBA), was the contact for James DeShazer, the president of a company, which participated in the SBA (“Mathews v. United States”). DeShazer believed that he was not being provided with all of the benefits of the program, so he worked together with the FBI to request a loan from the defendant, attached to a bribe. The defendant agreed to these conditions and met up with DeShazer to exchange the money. The defendant was immediately arrested on a federal offense for accepting a bribe in exchange for an official act (“Mathews v. United States”). The defendant asked for an entrapment defense but the Court struck down his motion because the defendant would not agree to all the elements, and the Judged ruled that the jury would not hear an instruction of
However, we do believe that she should have written the letter. As what Sherron Watkins said in one of the interviews, “If your values are being challenged, get out, because you cannot change an unethical corporation unless you are at the very top. Pay attention to rationalizations.” The famous rationalization at Enron was, “What do we have accounting rules in this country for, if you do not use them.” Enron has the obligation to comply with the underlying principles in the accounting rules and when Enron break the rules, there must be someone who comes out to report or correct the mistakes in order to save countless lives and billions of dollars in public funds and prevent the disasters from worsening.
Bribes are not legal fees. Potential bribes were not disclosed in the books as well. This violation not only involves the accountants of Wal-Mart de Mexico, but the CEO, CFO, and auditors that were supposed to make sure records are transparent, accurate, and reliable. Sarbanes Oxley also requires CEO’s and CFO’s to certify that the financial reports are correct. The United States Department of Justice encourages companies to conduct internal investigations and to disclose the relevant facts to the authorities. Any suspicion that the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act is being violated should be reported to the US DOJ, which it was not reported by Wal-Mart. According to The New York Times, Wal-Mart did approach the Justice Department, but after learning about the Times’
An event that definitely can be seen as being unethical involves a twenty-three year old former Phoenix, Arizona Police Officer. While on-duty and in full uniform, Officer James Wren would make unreported traffic stops of suspected drug dealers and steal their drug money for personal use. These thefts occurred on at least two occasions dating back to 2008. However, during these traffic stops Officer Wren was not just looking to gain some petty cash. He would use an accomplice to set-up large deals, and then Wren would target these dealers to gain a substantial amount of money. Wren and his accomplice Avash Mardjaee would split the proceeds after each incident (3 Down). On the first deal, Wren earned himself $16,000 dollars, and on the second he made out with $20,000.
Later in 2003 another issue for the Boeing Company arose which was that documents that belonged to the Lockheed Martin were in the possession of the Boeing managers. This allowed Bowing to have an advantage of the defense contract with the federal. After this Boeing was stopped by Pentagon form bidding on any federal contracts for 20 months which caused CFO Michael Sears to be fired after this incident. After Michael Sears was fired and was put into jail for hiring officer Darleen Druyum, She had made a purchase ...
When put in an ethical situations, people use different reasoning’s’ and perspectives to resolve their problems to their advantage. There was nobody validating what was going on. This brings the ethical conflict of Andy Fastow into play; one of the key problems within Enron. Andy Fastow was the man keeping Enron 's “successful” business appearance. While the company was $30 billion in debt, Fastow manipulated the books to make it look like they were still making profits. Fastow might have not been the one to begin the fraudulent activities, but he did it in order to please his bosses. He created two partnerships called LJM1 and LJM2; with the plan of buying Enron’s poorly performing stock to improve their financial statements. Additionally, Fastow went in front of the board of directors to exempt himself to run the two companies as well as Enron, aka conflict of interest. According to the documentation, Fastow allegedly collected $30 million in management fees while defrauding his own
Henderson printing is single owned company where quality matters more than anything. It has no proper system of payroll or any kind of benefits given to the employee. There are approximately 80 employee works there and each employee has different pay rates. It is also clearly mentioned in case study that he never formally announced any benefits. Employers who needs raise needs to approach to HHH himself and depending on how much he knows that employee and how long he has been working there he gives the raise. If the employee has his family needs he get paid more that the other ones. The has monopoly on raise on wage system. it clearly proves that Henderson printing system follow classical managerial structure power and decision making. Power
According to the scenario, Jacob and Krystal worked in an ad agency that started five years ago in Topeka, Kansas. The ad agency was barely making a profit and needed a large client, which led the agency to put in a bid for a city government contract. Due to Jacob’s son being sick, he was preoccupied with taking care of his son and left Krystal with most of the work. Krystal prepared the presentation and got with Jacob the day before the final meeting with the client. Krystal knew that Jacob has good speaking skills and they both decided that Jacob would do the presentation. Jacob’s presentation was a success and they successfully sealed the contract. The owners of the company were so impressed and gave Jacob a bonus check of $10,000. Jacob saw this opportunity where he could use the money for his son’s medical bills. However, he knew that Krystal did most of the work and deserved the bonus money. Jacob is disappointed and his situation has left him with a decision on what to do with the money. This case study will pinpoint Jacob’s ethical dilemma and what ethical action he should take. Also, the roles and responsibilities of an employee dealing with an ethical situation as well as the ways of an organization to maintain ethical practices in the workplace