Naylon And Rehak Case Study

693 Words2 Pages

“Project part 5”

Capstone

Juan Unda

Investigation Overview Naylon & Rehak
Tim Rehak and Mark Naylon are excused of corruption and violating the civil rights of drug dealer Vincent Pelligatti. In 2004 and 2005 they failed Integrity tests given by the FBI. Test 1 in November 2004, the location “Best Western” Hotel they were observed stealing evidence. The sum of $6,000 went missing; this was recorded. During Test 2 in July 2005 this also occurred. Mark Naylon also impersonated a peace officer; working with the Special Investigations Unit without the proper authorization
They are currently on Administrative leave. Their termination is pending the verdict of this legal matter. I feel they will not be able to work the streets after these videotaped violations of procedure. Based on those violations limited duty is off the table. …show more content…

I plan on interviewing the accused very soon. These interviews will be videotaped and I will suggested they each pass a polygraph. I’ll inquirer during the interview: Who did what, when they did or didn’t do these things and what they believe the FBI was looking for. I will dig very deep.
The law dictates they must be given a fair trial and an unbiased investigation must take place on my end. Their Union contract will allow them to continue receiving a salary until there is a legal verdict. Rehak and Naylon acquired attorneys claiming their innocents.
I believe this case goes way beyond minor employment violations and obviously due to FBI involvement it is criminal. Stolen funds and several Civil Rights violations dictate that my investigation must be very

Open Document