Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strengths and weaknesses of fair value accounting
Advantages of fair value accounting
Strengths and weaknesses of fair value accounting
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Strengths and weaknesses of fair value accounting
According to IAS 32 Financial Instrument is a contract that gives rise to a financial asset of one entity and a financial liability or equity instrument of another entity.
The global financial crisis has brought significant focus on the accounting model for financial instruments, both in the United States and around the world. The significant rise in the volumes of asset securitizations and derivative financial instrument transactions has served to bring attention to particular features of accounting standards. The harshest criticisms often relate to the substantial use of fair value accounting for many financial instruments.
The introduction of International Financial Reporting Standards, users of financial statements are facing a wide range of information on financial instruments yet it is becoming increasingly difficult to understand what is most important.
This research focuses on the main causes of complexity in reporting Financial Instruments, how current measurement causes complexity, discusses ways it might be reduced in the intermediate term and suggests how using a single measurement attribute, such as fair value, could reduce complexity.
This research elaborates on the long-term solution of measuring all financial instruments at fair value. An intermediate approach is required to reduce the current complexity of IAS 39.
Many respondents commented on complexity and noted that reducing complexity in the accounting for financial instruments was one of the IASB’s original objectives in replacing IAS 39.
FASB is seeking comments on reducing complexity in reporting financial instruments to simplify measurement requirements for financial instruments while providing clearer and more complete information to us...
... middle of paper ...
...ents and report unrealized gains and losses may result in:
two identical instruments being measured differently by the same
entity, because
• management’s intentions for realizing the value of an instrument may determine the way it is measured.
• management has the option of measuring many financial instruments at fair value.
• the way in which an instrument was acquired may affect its measurement (for example, interests received by the transferor in securitization transactions).
• the percentage of total ownership interests that an investor holds in an investee affects how the investment is accounted for.
two identical instruments being measured differently by entities in different industries. Under US GAAP, specialized measurement practices apply to broker-dealers, investment companies, pension plans, mortgage bankers, insurance companies and others.
Return on financial mechanism is calculated by considering both cash flows received on instrument and capital appreciation on it, whereas risk is measured as standard deviation on those returns.
Include as discussion of the topic, subtopics, sections and subsections in your answer. The new Codification does not change GAAP, but all existing ...
To help accounting professionals easily navigate through 50-plus years of unorganized US generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and standards the Trustees of the Financial Accounting Foundation approved the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (Codification.) By codifying authoritative US GAAP, FASB will provide users with real-time and accurate information in one location. Concurrently, FASB developed the FASB Codification Research System; a web-based system allowing registered users to electronically research accounting issues. Since 2009, the codification became the single source of nongovernmental authoritative GAAP.
U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), formerly known as iGAAP, are two accounting standards used in today’s world of financial reporting. These standards have differences as well as similarities in reporting requirements. Organizations in the United States are required to follow GAAP principles in preparing financial statements and other financial reports. Whereas, organizations outside of the United States may follow IFRS. Balance sheet reporting and formatting is an area in which GAAP and IFRS may differ, yet be similar in many respects. The balance sheet is a financial statement of what a company owns and what it owes at a given date and time (Spiceland, Sepe, & Nelson, 2013). This paper will address differences and similarities in respect to balance sheet reporting and formatting as it relates to fixed assets and liabilities, inventory, and goodwill.
As technology progresses it can truly change how a business operates in terms of accounting and financial reporting. Online software has become a widely used system by many businesses around the globe. Financial reporting is essential to any business especially when seeking for potential investors or stakeholders. The reason being is because a financial report contains all of the records of how a business is performing financial wise. Likewise there are purposes of securities regulations and the main one is to disclose any schemes.
2a. The conceptual framework identifies the primary users of accounting information as investors, creditors, and those who advise them. It also assumes a “prudent” investor; that is, an investor who takes the time to become reasonably well informed with respect to accounting theory and practice. Discuss this concept with respect to the current economic environment. Are different groups of investors “prudent?”
IASB revenue recognition benchmarks entering the merging venture comprised of two gauges, IAS 18 and IAS 11. IAS 18 worries about revenues including offer of products, administrations, intrigue, eminences and profits. IAS 11 centers around development contracts. Likewise with all IASB gauges, these standard give standards-based direction without particular direction at the exchange level. The guidelines of U.S. GAAP, gave by FASB, then again comprise of an arrangement of more than one hundred revenue related direction of particular principles on an industry and exchange level; in any case, a great part of the general direction is given by Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 5, a non-legitimate wellspring of U.S. GAAP. The IASB and FASB are ready to embrace a joint standard on revenue recognition. This new world standard would adopt an advantage obligation strategy, for example, that of pre-meeting IFRS, while containing more particular direction than IFRS clients are acquainted with seeing, taking a signal from the GAAP guidelines of the United
Indeed, the IASB has some accounting aspects in common with FASB; nevertheless, there exist more dissimilarities than similarities. GAAP and IFRS both offer remarkable accounting principles; nevertheless, the USA should continue to follow GAAP and continue to have GAAP created by the FASB.
During the last 20/30 years there has been an increase in trade and communication. It is easier for people to do business across the world as the new technology allows this to be possible. The problem with this is that different countries have different ways of accounting standards, and therefore there is a problem on how to account standards. Hence, during the last years the debate on whether to use Fair presentation or the True and fair View is becoming a major concern. Fair presentation and the true and fair concept may seem as a similar concept, however, they do differ as well. While the former is the concept for United States, the latter is used in the UK, EU, Singapore, Australia and New Zealand.
...all, R. (2006). International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): Pros and Cons for Investors. Accounting and Business Research.
GAAP is exceptionally useful because it attempts to regulate and normalize accounting definitions, assumptions, and methods. Because of generally accepted accounting principles one is able to presuppose that there is uniformity from year to year in the methods that are used to prepare a company's financial statements. And even though variations might exist, one can make realistically confident conclusions when comparing one company to another, or when comparing one company's financial statistics to the statistics for the industry as a whole. Over the years the generally accepted accounting principles have become more multifaceted because financial transactions have become more intricate (Accounting Principles, 2011).
Dr George Georgiou is a senior lecturer in Accountancy and the director of the MSc International Accounting & Finance course at the Birmingham Business School, University of Birmingham. He has the following qualifications: BA, MAcc, PhD & CPA. Georgiou is also a PhD supervisor in his research interest topics which lie in accounting regulation, accounting theory, government accounting and market-based accounting. (University of Birmingham, 2010).
The globalization of business has resulted in the need for compatible accounting standards that can be used internationally for financial reporting. As a result, the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) were developed by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) to unify the various financial reporting methods and create a single accounting standard which can be applied to any financial statement worldwide (Byatt). The global standardization of financial reporting will increase the readability and enhance comparability of globally traded companies’ financial statements, without the need of conversion or translation. There are a few main differences between the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and the U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S GAAP). The increasing recognition and acceptance of the International Financial Reporting Standards by accounting professionals in the United States, will affect the way in which the U.S will record financial statements in the future.
The success of a company is very dependent upon its financial accounting. In accounting there are numerous Regulatory bodies that govern the accounting world. These companies are extremely important to a company because they set the standards when it comes to the language and decision making of a company. These regulatory bodies can be structured as agencies, associations, commissions, and boards. Without companies like the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC), The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB), Internal Accounting Standards Board (IASB), Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and other regulatory bodies a company could not make well informed decisions. In this paper the author will look at only four of them.
Derivative instruments are ‘financial contracts whose value is based on, or derived from, a traditional security such as a stock or bond, an asset, such as a commodity or a market index’.