Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Vietnam war movie essay
Vietnam war movie analysis
Essays on Vietnam films
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Vietnam war movie essay
The Deer Hunter The Deer Hunter film is about factory workers from the state of Pennsylvania became soldier in the Vietnam War. The movie was so popular that it won an Oscar in the late 70’s. The films setting in the beginning is the location of Pennsylvania, and this is where the story began for the workers in the movie. In this part of the film viewers got to the story of the workers and their situation change as they get drafted into the Vietnam. The actual part of this film involving war was mostly short because the movie didn’t really focus on war but the character’s themselves and how they lived. In the film you learned that they was captured, terrorized, and how that survived in Saigon. Then story mainly goes back to Pennsylvania telling the story of one the character’s in the film. As the film comes to closing you see that one of the characters return to Vietnam looking for his lost friend of war, and he find him only to later watch him die by playing a game of roulette. The film received much criticism as many believed that this film was anti- American and that it portrayed Americans as weak so to say. …show more content…
There is a part in the movie that people had a hard time dealing with and was question the director as to why he had chosen to show roulette in this movie among American soldiers at war time.
Showing that the soldiers survive the game at the POW camp in the movie but only one of them to be killed in the end. This scene was very controversial to many viewers and received a lot of backlash because it didn’t show the American’s triumph in the movie. Michael Cimino , the film’s director stated the he heard about those games being played. These events that where showed in this film has not been validated that the portrayed events are real or even have merit. This movie wasn’t a war picture even though some of the scenes dealt with war. Little parts such as the camps, small battles, but not actual war
life. The Deer Hunter is a good movie and if you could actually understand the director’s intent of the film you would see that it isn’t about war. I the showed us how soldiers sometimes deal with issues in a different way and brothers of war sometimes band together. You get to feel the emotions of the character’s love for each other and feel their pain with their own struggles. This film could be called a soldier return if you asked me because it mostly shows the effects of people after war and how challenging it is to make it back home after experiences certain horrors of war. The little part in the movie about war, you saw how it was for them in battle against the Viet Cong. The actions was high paced and the images that the director shot showed how violent war could be. You learn about the environment in which that had overcome along with fighting. The where imprisoned, forced to play Russian roulette, and mentally tortured. In the roulette scene, you could actually see the emotion of the characters as the gun clicks, and this built suspense alone with controversy. The scene gave viewers the power to visualize had thing could have been in the war and how badly that a person could be effected form those exposures. Images can linger in a person mind for a long amount of time and depending on how real those images are they contribute to negative actions in a person. This film showed a lot about that and that is the actual theme of this film. The director angles and shot selection captured all that emotion so the viewer at the end could realized the point of this film.
The Vietnam War was a controversial conflict that plagued the United States for many years. The loss of life caused by the war was devastating. For those who came back alive, their lives were profoundly changed. The impact the war had on servicemen would affect them for the rest of their lives; each soldier may have only played one small part in the war, but the war played a huge part in their lives. They went in feeling one way, and came home feeling completely different. In the book Vietnam Perkasie, W.D. Ehrhart describes his change from a proud young American Marine to a man filled with immense confusion, anger, and guilt over the atrocities he witnessed and participated in during the war.
As the war progresses, Caputo requests to go to a line company in the middle of November. This is a change from the “office” position he currently held where he was largely responsible for counting casualties. At this point, the romanticized visions Caputo had of war have been completely shattered and he goes into this transfer being fully aware of this. This change in viewpoint becomes even more clear when compared to the beginning of the novel where Caputo was intrigued by the romance and action of war. While readers would expect more action and typical war stories in this section of the book, Philip Caputo writes anything but. Caputo writes, “It went like that for the rest of the month. It was a time of little action and endless misery…Almost every hour of every night, the radio operators chanted, ‘All secure. Situation remains the same’ (1996: 240). Caputo repeats the phrase “All secure. Situation remains the same” five times throughout this single paragraph. Because of this, readers see the dull and mundane side of war that is often not talked about. In addition, Caputo continues to comment of the large amounts of waiting throughout the autobiography. When most think of the Vietnam War, they picture the “main events”. Similar to the numerous documentaries we watched in class, some of the main points of the war include: The first Indochina War, The Gulf of Tonkin, and the Tet Offensive. These documentaries all focused on these monumental events and because of this, the public perceives this war as the sum of these events. However, what many fail to consider the large gaps in time between these events. It is in these large gaps that little action occurred and most of the soldier’s time was spent waiting as Caputo depicted in this scene. In connection with
people killed in combat, and the feelings and thoughts of the opposing Vietnamese soldiers. After almost being killed Perry realizes what Peewee said was right.
The things this reader likes about this book is that it was interesting in the fact that it had real stories from real veterans in the war. Some of the stories were explained in gruesome detail in which this reader thought was very disturbing. It is disgusting to know what happened to some of the Vietnamese and veterans during that war. What this reader also liked was how they explained the war while showing the opinions of some of the veterans. The least thing this reader liked about this book was that it didn’t keep you on the edge. Even though this was a war story it didn’t captivate me as much as I would have wanted it to. It became boring at parts when they explained how the war started and how the Chinese were trying to take control of Vietnam. What the author should have done was explain the war with minimum detail and have many comments from the people who were actually involved in it.
They were tired of just hiding from sniper fire coming from the Viet Cong. The soldiers wanted to go out a fight. Caputo described numerous times were the soldiers almost shot one another in the dark because they thought they were Viet Cong. Caputo does a good job at this as well you can feel the turning point when some of the men start to realize the reality that takes place in Vietnam. Caputo was different he seemed to feel at ease even when a bullet landed only a few feet above him. Later when Caputos platoon were chasing down some of the Viet Cong. they find a camp of the enemy that has letters, pictures, and items from their families back home. This information gives the audience a different outlook on war. Everyone thinks especially me that the enemy are heartless criminals that you would not think twice about killing. Seeing that the enemies have families and kids changes how you view them. That is what makes this book special you have a first hand information that has not been altered to make the story more enjoyable. Unlike how most people view wars through hollywood movies. This book lets you see and feel the war exactly like a marine would have during his time there. As the war goes on the death toll rises. Men start to pile up a deaths start to come daily. I feel like this is Caputos turning point. He is heavily involved in this because he is doing the casualty reporting. When he
*Hunt for the Wilderpeople* builds on Waititi 's drama/comedy combination and further cements his auteur status. *Wilderpeople* is about an orphan boy who moves from one foster family to another, generally being a delinquent. This causes him to earn the title of "a real bad egg". The majority of the film takes place as Ricky Baker is on the run through the vast forest. While structurally different than *Boy*, both films deal with coming-of-age, parents, and loneliness. Unlike *Boy*, *Wilderpeople* is divided up into ten chapters and an epilogue. Despite this, *Boy* is the more episodic film. Since *Wilderpeople* relies more on a causal narrative, it seems more like a standard Hollywood film at first. But Waititi finds a way to make it his own.
The impact of the Vietnam War upon the soldiers who fought there was huge. The experience forever changed how they would think and act for the rest of their lives. One of the main reasons for this was there was little to no understanding by the soldiers as to why they were fighting this war. They felt they were killing innocent people, farmers, poor hard working people, women, and children were among their victims. Many of the returning soldiers could not fall back in to their old life styles. First they felt guilt for surviving many of their brothers in arms. Second they were haunted by the atrocities of war. Some soldiers could not go back to the mental state of peacetime. Then there were soldiers Tim O’Brien meant while in the war that he wrote the book “The Things They Carried,” that showed how important the role of story telling was to soldiers. The role of stories was important because it gave them an outlet and that outlet was needed both inside and outside the war in order to keep their metal state in check.
portrayal of the horrors of the War. This is an anti war story and it
Going to the movies is an experience that everyone can enjoy, and while most people have an idea of what genre of movie they are partial to, there are some movies that will appeal to almost any crowd. I recently took my two nieces, ages ten and thirteen, to see the 2014 musical Into the Woods, and in the audience there was a large group of teenagers, a couple families that had brought their preteen and teenage children, and even some adults that had gone to see it for their own enjoyment. There are numerous aspects of a movie that can catch a person’s attention, and the film producers of Into the Woods knew exactly how to draw in the desired crowd. In order to do this, the filmmakers used both ethos and pathos to appeal to their intended preteen, teenage, and adult audiences.
Fighting the Vietnam War dramatically changed the lives of everyone even remotely involved, especially the brave individuals actually fighting amidst the terror. One of the first things concerned when reading these war stories was the detail given in each case. Quotes and other specific pieces of information are given in each occurrence yet these stories were collected in 1981, over ten years following the brutal war. This definitely shows the magnitude of the war’s impact on these servicemen. These men, along with every other individual involved, went through a dramatic experience that will forever haunt their lives. Their minds are filled with scenes of exploding buildings, rape, cold-blooded killing, and bodies that resemble Swiss cheese.
We Were Soldiers' purports to tell the story of the bloody battle in the Ia Drang Valley in Vietnam's Central Highlands in November 1965. Despite its pretensions to honour the suffering and service of the combatants, the film profoundly misrepresents the nature of this battle and of the war in Vietnam in general. In doing so, it glorifies the military establishment and bolsters the current propaganda drive for US military action on foreign shores.
When people read a book that they like they cant wait to see the movie that is based on the book. Many people criticize the movie or are not satisfied. While you watch this movie it is visually breathtaking and easily relatable. Chris McCandless is played by Emile Hirsch who does an outstanding job of portraying McCandless. McCandless’s parents are Walt and Billie McCandless. In the book they are portrayed as a little stuck up and snobbish. Sean Penn is a screenwriter and director for the movie adaptation of Into the Wild by John Krakauer. Sean Penn portrays Chris’s parents in a negative way in order to show that they were essentially responsible for him breaking away from society.
‘Our interest in the parallels between the adaptation inter-texts is further enhanced by consideration of their marked differences in textual form,’
Based on a true story, the movie ‘Lone Survivor’ features four Navy SEALs that set out on a mission to Afghanistan with orders to capture and kill Taliban leader Ahmad Shah. The Navy SEALS are detected by villagers and the mission was compromised. Ultimately, the mission had been discovered and the men found themselves surrounded by dozens of Taliban soldiers. One of the Navy SEAL soldiers managed to dispatch to base and retrieve assistance but the Taliban shoot down the helicopter. During battle, three of the Navy SEAL soldiers were killed leaving one still alive.
In my opinion this film was pro-war rather than anti-war. I think that the film was pro-war because, in the beginning there was never any talk about not wanting to go to war. There were soldiers walking through the town, people clapping, and the students in the class were given a speech on why they should stand up for their country and join the military. I believe the beginning would have been very different if they were anti-war, they may not have paraded the soldiers through town, there would not have been as many people cheering and clapping for them, and during the speech to the students they may have talked about some of the cons of going into war, or even talked about the problems with the country going to war. I think that the film maker wanted the audience to know what it was like during that time of war, he did not focus on the women or families, but rather the men, who at the time were supposed to fight. The film marker also focused on the war, he wanted to portray the conditions in which most of the soldiers lived, and what they had to do during the time they were fighting.