Film Analysis: The Birth Of A Nation

2075 Words5 Pages

Art Vs The Artist The room is silent. The only noise that can be heard are the soft inhales and exhales coming from the audience. Dazzling lights illuminate the stage. The spotlight is on Nate Parker. The writer and director of the period drama, The Birth of a Nation. That night, Nate Parker was awarded the grand jury prize and the audience award at the Sundance Film Festival. As a black man in America, he defied the odds by attaining a prestige award that most only dream of. The crowd roared with excitement as Parker stood on stage with his unblemished prize. Months before its nation wide release, The Birth of a Nation was already getting Oscar buzz and was being praised by dozens of critics across the country as one of the best films …show more content…

And in distant, but similar ways, The Birth of a Nation reflects the harsh realities in todays America. Though the film was not as historically accurate as many might have wanted it to be. The film is still able to capture the atrocities and inhuman conditions that inhabited our country at one point. And if there is an argument that Parkers skin color has nothing to do with why The Birth of a Nation failed, and that his color is a mere coincidence. Parker hasn’t been the only person of color who has been berated. Comedian Bill Cosby also endured a sexual assault case and has been condemned by the public ever since. He 's been hit with a virtual tsunami of public scorn and outrage over his abuse of women, while Allen has more or less given a free pass – even though his misconduct is equally, if not more, disturbing (Daily Kaos). Maybe America has been hit with too many reminders of the wickedness we partook in. Maybe the fear of the Black Live Matter movement caused promotion of The Birth of a Nation to be minimal. Maybe a rape allegation was all the critics needed to dismiss another slave movie. Or maybe, justice for Sharon Loafer 's sister is finally being

Open Document