Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Film analysis inside out
Film analysis inside out
Analysing film techniques - pleasantville
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Film analysis inside out
Film Analysis Paper The film that I watched was The Big Short. The explicit meaning of The Big Short is that it follows 3 groups of investors who have found a major problem in the United States Housing Market and they take their new-found information and try to invest in their best interest. By doing this they appear crazy and go against the odds for two years and discover the terrible truth that one day our housing economy would fall apart. I think that the implicit meaning of The Big Short is everything is not always as it seems because each group of investors thought one way, the banks thought another, and the brokers who worked for the banks were unknowingly destroying their own business and essentially our economy in the process of them …show more content…
making money in a way that cheated the system. There could be an additional implicit meaning of trusting your gut because the first investor to discover the “bubble” in the housing market and who also predicted it to happen in 2007 was told by his boss to pull the investments when the opposite was happening. Had he pulled the investments then the business would not have profited the amazing amount. The diegetic elements of The Big Short include narration by multiple characters and dialogue as well as the diegetic environmental sounds.
One could also argue that the short educational videos filmed with celebrates to explain important terms were also diegetic because they were explaining necessary terms and without that explanation the audience may not have been able to fully understands the story. However, because the celebrities were in their homes, in casinos, or other random places to explain these terms they were not in the same location as the story or characters within the story and most importantly the characters in the story were not aware of the explanations happening. This would make them …show more content…
nondiegetic. The Big Short had several nondiegetic elements. This includes the celebrity definition videos. Other non-diegetic elements included the opening credits and opening score, the “based on a true story” frame, and a poem by mark twain over a rather unrelated picture. There were a few other instances of poems being shown in frame. There was a non-diegetic graph at three minutes, a flash of non-diegetic images related to housing and a News broadcast video being played back. There was also the movie title, character name titles on screen, time stamps on screen, the throat diagram on screen, and written definitions on screen. The musical score throughout is of course non-diegetic and this also includes the use of music videos and other videos and their songs being played in montages with narration. The final non-diegetic elements are the ending credits and the photos that accompany them. The Big Short’s story includes all the diegetic elements from the food the investors ate to the heavy metal music Christian Bale’s character listened to.
This also includes the implied events such as the mortgages loans sold by the shifty mortgage brokers that we didn’t see happen but they did. The Big Short’s plot includes everything I saw and heard from beginning credits to ending credits, but it does not include implied events such as the work done by the shifty mortgage brokers. One element of design in The Big Short is setting and I thought the cinematographers did a great job at making the audience feel like you were in the big hub-bub of wall street because of the constant use of cabs by the charters and the highly populated big city in the background. When the characters traveled, they did a great job at making a famous city, like Las Vegas, recognizable. We were shown the casinos, the city scape, and a large convention
center. One example of composition in The Big Short is kinesis. There was an immense amount of kinesis throughout the film. In city scenes, there were so many people and cars and background movement it was almost distracting. I think this was done to make show the audience how all the movement could be distracting for the characters in their daily lives. Due to the large number of characters in each scene there was also a lot more movement because there was more people per frame. The photo and video montages during times of narration with no story film being played were filled with rapid movement. The images moved so quickly it was overwhelming and it was difficult to differentiate between the images. I think that this was done to show important viewpoints or concepts in a very short amount of time. One aspect of lighting in The Big Short was its source which seemed very natural because a lot of the scenes were either outside or in rooms with very large windows creating that bright sunlight look. This was throughout the majority of the movie aside from a view scenes for example in the dark casino when the two investment groups were in Las Vegas. One short type I noticed while watching this film was a close-up shot on Christian Bale’s character. It was just after he had made all his investments against the housing market and he was checking his email. The frame showed his inbox full of e-mail calling him crazy and then the close-up shot was on his face to show us his response. One shooting angle was a high-angle shot on Steve Carrell’s character, Mark, getting out of the cab while on the phone with his wife. One example of continuity editing in The Big Short was the shot/reverse shot technique to film conversations between characters. One specific example is in the casino restaurant when Mark and the major business bad guy were eating and discussing the synthetic CDO’s. The technique shot/reverse shot was used to show their conversation. An example of discontinuity editing was the use of the freeze frame in the very beginning of the film when the characters were being introduced. At the time, Ryan Gosling was the narrator and as he said each person’s name the audience would see a moving image of them and then it would suddenly freeze and their name would pop up on screen. One source of sound in The Big Short was the non-diegetic musical score. This includes the typewriter key sounds when words would come on screen. Also, camera clicking noises during the montage of photos and music during music videos shown and voices during video clips in between scenes. These are on-screen sounds. One type of sound is the vocal dialogue and narration by multiple characters One function of sound shown in the Big Short is continuity because over lapping sounds of city scenes were used throughout the movie constantly and even during switches to scenes. The musical score was also upbeat and fast for the majority which matched the fast paced life of an investment banker and it kept me as a viewer awake and interested from scene to scene.
The movie revolves around Eddie Mannix, head of a production company, who must look after his actors no matter what happens to them. However, chaos arises after one actor is kidnapped and held for ransom by communists, another accidentally gets pregnant, and a director is stuck with an actor who has absolutely no talent.
Huge technological improvements and scientific breakthroughs have paved the way for larger, more stable and profitable financial markets. Fast and easy money was to be made by playing the booming stock market - many laymen took advantage of these opportunities without having a complete understanding of what exactly they were doing. This inevitably led to the crash that sent America and the world into the Great Depression. In the movie we see the first stages of the panic that spread throughout the country. People got scared and ran to the bank to take out their life savings.
Sex, love, depression, guilt, trust, all are topics presented in this remarkably well written and performed drama. The Flick, a 2014 Pulitzer Prize winning drama by Annie Baker, serves to provide a social commentary which will leave the audience deep in thought well after the curtain closes. Emporia State Universities Production of this masterpiece was a masterpiece in itself, from the stunningly genuine portrayal of the characters of Avery and Rose, to the realism found within the set, every aspect of the production was superb.
In the documentary “Fed Up,” sugar is responsible for Americas rising obesity rate, which is happening even with the great stress that is set on exercise and portion control for those who are overweight. Fed Up is a film directed by Stephanie Soechtig, with Executive Producers Katie Couric and Laurie David. The filmmaker’s intent is mainly to inform people of the dangers of too much sugar, but it also talks about the fat’s in our diets and the food corporation shadiness. The filmmaker wants to educate the country on the effects of a poor diet and to open eyes to the obesity catastrophe in the United States. The main debate used is that sugar is the direct matter of obesity. Overall, I don’t believe the filmmaker’s debate was successful.
"Mrs. Robinson, you are trying to seduce me," says Benjamin Braddock (Dustin Hoffman). The Graduate, directed by Mike Nichols in 1967 is an influential satire/comedy film about a recent East Coast college graduated who finds himself alienated and aimless in the changing, social and sexual general public of the 1960s, and questioning the values of society. The theme of the film is of an innocent and confused youth who is exploited, mis-directed, seduced (literally and figuratively) and betrayed by a corrupt, self-indulgent, and discredited older generation (that finds stability in “plastics”) that I found to be quite clear and understanding, while also capturing the real spirit of the times and allows America's youth to perceive onscreen an image of themselves which they can both identify with and emulate. The Graduate is a significant film even today due to its use of abstract camera angles, telephoto lenses, excellent cinematography, and great acting. Few visual effects were used, however, matting and numerous point of view shots were used. These characteristics and the fabulous use of mis-en-scene, great writing and the era of the film all made The Graduate what it is today, magnificent.
The Bad and The Beautiful (1952) and State and Main (2000) are films within films that unmask Hollywood Cinema as a dream factory and expose the grotesque, veneer hidden by the luxury of stars. The Bad and the Beautiful, directed by Vincent Minnelli, is a black and white film narrated in flashback form. The films theatrical nature requires more close-ups than wide-screen shots to capture the character’s psychological turmoil. For example, Fred and Jonathan’s car ride is captured in a close-up to signify their friendship; however their relationship deteriorates after Jonathan’s deceit. While the camera zooms out, Fred stands alone motionless. Here, Fred is captured from a distance at eye-level and he becomes ostracized by the film industry and
Mortgage loans are a substantial form of revenue for the financial industry. Mortgage loans generate billions of dollars in the financial industry. It is no secret that companies have the ability to make a lot of money by offering a variety of mortgage loan products. The problem was not mortgage loans but that mortgage companies were using unethical behavior to get consumer mortgage loans approved. Unfortunately, the Countrywide Financial case was not an isolated case. Many top name mortgage companies have been guilty of unethical behavior. Just as the American housing market was starting to recover from its worst battering since the Great Depression, a new scandal, an epidemic of flawed or fraudulent mortgage documents, threatens to send not just the housing market but the entire economy back into a tailspin (Nation, 2010).
The film that is being used for the movie analysis is “Enough”, this movie was chosen due to the fact that it is based on domestic violence towards women. The movie begins with in Los Angeles diner were a waitress named slim works with her best friend Ginny (Kazan, 2002). While working her shift slim has a customer that starts harassing her over the name she has, but the companion of the annoying customer defends slim, which in turn starts a romance, later to become a marriage between the two (Kazan, 2002). The couple is later blessed with a daughter they name Gracie, and at the beginning the marriage seems to be a fairy tale out of a story book (Kazan, 2002). The fairy tale becomes a nightmare as time moves forwards for the couple,
I made the fourth option and watched the Wall Street movie. Oliver Stone directed this movie in 1987. The movie talks about the big business world and Wall Street. The two main characters in the movie were Charlie Sheen, named Bud Fox and he is a new stockbroker who wanted to be rich, and Michael Douglas, named Gordon Gekko who works as a banker, real estate agent, and manager of Wall Street. Gekko character was a man who will do anything to make money, even if it requires break the laws. Both Gekko and Bud were at the second stage of Kohlberg’s. Another character in the movie, Carl Fox, acted by Martin Sheen, who is Bud’s father, and he was always telling Bud about the ethical and moral role in being successful and happy
This movie starts off as Jordan Belfort, the main character in the movie, losing his job as a stockbroker in Wall Street. After losing his job, he goes and gets a job in a Long Island brokerage room. In the brokerage room, he sells penny stocks. Thanks to him being aggressive in his selling skills, he was able to make a profit. With the new income, he gives his wife a bracelet and she asked him why doesn’t he go after the people that can afford to lose money, not the middle-class people or lower income people. That is when he gets the idea to get a lot of young people and train them to become the best stock brokers.
The Wolf of Wall Street produced and directed by Martin Scorsese tells a story of Jordan Belfort, a stockbroker living a luxurious life on Wall Street. Due to greed and corruption, Jordan falls into a life of crime and abusive activities. Belfort made millions of dollars by selling customers “penny stocks” and manipulating the market through his company, Stratton Oakmont, before being convicted of any criminal activity (Solomon, 2013). Jordan reveals behaviours and impulses all humans have, however, on an extreme level. This movie illustrates “why ethics is another tool whose importance cannot be overstated” (Delaney, 2014). Without ethics and morality, individuals can never truly live an honest and happy life.
Michael Lewis is the author of “The Big Short: Inside the Doomsday Machine” and Lewis’ main theme, or the main point, that he is trying to get across is how the 2008 financial crisis came to be, who saw it coming, and how people reacted. Lewis has experience with Wall Street and has worked for Salomon Brothers when he was younger. Today, Lewis is an American non-fiction author and financial journalist. There were three things I highly enjoyed “The Big Short”: the character development, themes, and personalization.
Wall Street is a movie that exposes corruption and disguises all values, beliefs, and other ethical philosophy. Throughout the movie, Wall Street shows how ethics adapts to a person’s personality by power and wealth alongside honesty and truth. Bud Fox, a young stockbroker is looking for a way to make a name for himself. He is determined to get as many clients as he can to become successful. He later meets a ruthless man named Mr. Gekko where learns how to reach to the top by illegal actions such as insider trading. Bud Fox was an honest living man who had good ethics but was later showed what true power is became money hungry. The power of greed is fascinating the code that everyone lives by is inevitable once money comes into play. There are five types of interpersonal power; reward power, coercive power, legitimate power, referent power, and expert power. These types of power will be used to correspond relationships throughout the movie. In Wall Street we realize how Gordon Gekko uses Bud Fox for his benefit. In this paper I will show the types of powers that are used by Gordon Gekko and how they are used. One clear type of power that Gordon Gekko uses in his relationship with Bud Fox is the Referent power base. This power stands out because it is clear that Bud wants to become a top notch in the industry. Bud is striving to be successful when he exposes what he’s able to do at the meeting with Gordon Gekko he instantly become closer to his goals. There were scenes where Gordon had legitimate power. His knowledge and information was what made him rich. Bud Fox had to listen to what Gordon was telling him in order to become successful. This was an example of Gekko having legitimate power over Bud Fox. Expert power which is an ...
Margin Call depicts a realistic take on what happens inside a Wall Street firm. It is about a company that is downsizing their workers because of a firm’s crisis. One of the victims, Eric Dale, was working on a major analysis when he was laid off. He hands his coworker Peter Sullivan his USB, which contains the major analysis. Peter stays late and cracks the issues and calls his coworkers and bosses in about the financial disaster he had discovered. He had discovered that the company is about the crash. He tries to get ahold of Eric, no luck. He then calls his coworkers Seth Bregman and Will Emerson, who are at a bar and tells them that they need to come back to the office for an emergency situation. After showing the situation to Will, John Tuld, the Chief Executive Officer, quickly hears about it. They all have a conference meeting and decide that the company will sell all of the mortgages, which have little to no value. Once the sale is completed, the company tries to save their reputation by saying that this issue was nonpreventable.
The “Inside job” movie proves how neo- liberalism system has turned this world into a chaos. I find this movie very informative, hard to believe but it shows the reality of the world in which we live. The movie is structured into five parts which are: how we get here, the bubble, the crisis, accountability, and where we are now. The movie denounces how academic economic experts, politicians, and board of directors use their political influences on financial industry. Those experts are extremely corrupt and above all very selfish. They have no feelings for the majority and totally ignore inequality. They all work together based on the same ideas, use the same techniques and strategies to make money. They come up with policies and complicated laws that are hard for people to understand, and they are the only one who benefit from those laws.