Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of editing in film production
Importance of editing in film production
Analysis of movie genres
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of editing in film production
“Slacker” (1991) is an independent film by director “Richard Linklater”. It's a character-based
fiction, structured with many individual scenes forming a feature film without an apparent narrative.
The film is portraying bits of everyday life of several eccentric people in Austin, Texas.
The film is built up in a way that every scene presents new characters, and after the scene is over
you will never see the same characters again. The camera floats from scene to scene by following
different characters from one location to another.
Like normal three-act-structure'd films, “Slacker” has no protagonist to lead a plot line. It's
therefore no plot to connect the scenes to each other, creating many individual scenes with their
own mini-narrative.
The scenes are linked together to a full-length film, not by a plot, but by physically travelling with
the camera around the city.
In comparison to normal three-act-structured films, I think there's many similarities and many
differences to “Slacker”
Most of the scenes in “Slacker”, like in normal structure'd films, establishes flaws and inner
conflicts in the characters, but offer no solution or resolution to their problems, but rather drift on to
another place with other characters.
Many of the scenes are built up by very few cuts, or even one-takes. I think this is a way of
enhancing the slow, everyday feeling I think the film is trying to describe.
I often feel like cuts are'nt being used to show new emotions, but often more to drive the film in
other physical directions.
And In regular character-based films, close-ups are used to get the audience involved in what's
going on in the protagonist's head. I can't remember seeing any clos-ups throughout “...
... middle of paper ...
...film to a single character. He allows the
viewer a brief glimpse into the lives of the individuals before the camera moves onto
a new character therefore it journey onto an unknown path leaving no room for
character development.
I would like to conclude by; comparing Slacker’s narrative structure and my term
film, titled Lone Wolf it is obvious the Director for Lone Wolf approached this project
with the Three – Act Structure writing process.My experimental film revolves
around various character problems followed by different solutions for each of the
three main characters’, thereafter the film ends with the benefits of the eventual
resolve.
Whereas Slacker has no clear narrative structure because the characters’ in the film
never reconnect. Thus making it impossible to create a turning point in the story,
which would have raised the dangers in the plot.
The film starts off showing the only sincere moments that viewers will watch with cuts to beautiful fields and artistic shots of headlights coming down a road. Director Jack Riccobono is quick to come away from these scenes as he delves straight into the bitter world Rob and Kevin are divulged in. Their story is told through first person accounts of the films Rob and Kevin, showing viewers their life stories through their own words and actions. The director uses techniques commonly found in documentaries, such as having titles and narration, to fully engage viewers into the lives of the subjects.
Mattie, Cogburn, and LaBoeuf’s journey through the Choctaw Nation is a long, gruesome one. The scene features a couple of cinematographic techniques that make it very memorable. One of these is editing. The group’s journey takes approximately ten hours, but Deakins uses time lapse cinematography to make it much shorter. The images dissolve into one another with each new image bringing them farther into the Indian Territory. This technique shows the distance the Mattie, Cogburn, and LaBoeuf travel by compressing the time. Another ...
One way the filmmakers did this is with the on location shots of rubble in many scenes. The characters in these shots are carefully placed to make the rubble stand out behind them. Lighting is carefully placed to illuminate the rubble and make it stand out. However, the carefully planned cinematography also plays into the overall meaning of the film and not just how it looks. The lighting, for example, influences our feelings for certain characters. Susan Wallner is always filmed in light. This is a drastic difference from how we see Hans Mertens. Hans is usually filmed with low light and is very dim. This helps show that Susan is optimistic, while Hans is pessimistic. Another way lighting is used in this film is to create shadows. Shadows are very prevalent in the last sequence of the film. Hans has confronted Bruckner and as the camera cuts back and forth to each of them we see Hans shadow keeps growing bigger and bigger behind Bruckner. We can interpret that as the shadowing is growing bigger so his Bruckner’s fear, because the dialogue coming from Bruckner is getting faster and we can also hear the fear. There are many times in the film where close ups are used to make the storyline more dramatic. One scene that comes to mind that makes use of quick cuts and close ups is in the end of the film: Susan ran in, stopping Hans from killing Bruckner. At this point we
Even though this movie is based in real events, but some scene that appear in the film it just give the movie more action and drama. Alan Parker and the writer Chris Gerolmo wanted to the viewers and critics to be able to think and analyze the movie. I think they added other actors to make the movie intense and to add talk about scene. From experience this was an outstanding film.
Incohesive, long, and dialogue-heavy, Inherent Vice has all the potential to flounder. Yet under the steady (or rather, wild) hands of director Paul Thomas Anderson, the film becomes a psychedelic, incredibly enjoyable ride brimming with wit and melancholy. The film follows Larry ‘Doc’ Sportello (played in routinely magnificent fashion by the now ever-reliable Joaquin Phoenix), and his exploits to help his ex-girlfriend, Shasta Fey (Katherine Waterston, also exquisite) investigate a kidnapping of notorious real-estate billionaire Mickey Wolfmann. From there, the plot descends (or ascends, depending on your perspective of the film) into sumptuous lunacy; a mystery involving the coveted and secretive
consider to be more modern film techniques. Montage plays a key role in this film, as
The use of cinematography helps to convey the superior relationship between characters. This occurs during the film frequently to demonstrate the superiority
Individually, the identities of each character being to shift. To start off, Russell( the non-planned, new front man for the group) starts to change his identity throughout the movie. Lady(Penny) also had an identity shift. The impact and influence that fame, and also the temporary
characters engage in, it becomes a challenge to keep up with the motives and truthful
At this point, the readers create their own movie in a way. They will determine important aspects of how the character speaks, looks like, and reacts. Whereas, in the movie, the reader has no choice but to follow the plot laid out in front of them. No longer can they picture the characters in their own way or come up with their different portrayals. The fate of the story, while still unpredictable, was highly influenced by the way the characters looked, spoke, and presented themselves on screen.
scenes which gives you the need to be one of the characters from the flick.
People can feel better about themselves after watching these types of movies. Using these elements together, it makes the movie better, but not only that, but each element helps each other out in the scene to make it a very good movie
...l map of the location in our minds. This suspense continues to build until he meets Pris and she attacks him. The cuts get immediately more frequent and induce a feeling of shock and surprise in the audience.
In an age where popular entertainment is apparently guided by the maxim "more is better" (see the body count in any popular "action thriller") and "special effects" dominate,
...or visual effects movies. Most of the movies that are released today used this technique only to bring clarity and depth to the film.