Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Film analysis
In the movie Hugo, the director Martin Scorsese uses different camera angles, lighting, costumes and sound to give the first impressions of the character, Uncle Claude (Monsieur Claude). These techniques show that Uncle Claude is unsympathetic, his solitary, and unfit as well as lacks skill to take care of Hugo. Firstly; lighting, camera angles and dialogue are used to portray Uncle Claude as an unsympathetic character. The low key lighting creates a dark and foreboding figure. Uncle Claude tactlessly tells Hugo his father has died and rushes him to pack his bag. This shows Uncle Claude has no sympathy for Hugo. He then shouts in a commanding tone “Quick” at Hugo, showing no patience for him to process and digest the devastating news. The director uses imperative dialogue to create authority over Hugo. “Hugo, …show more content…
As uncle Claude abruptly opens the door, Hugo is cut short of his happiness. A reaction shot is used to show Hugo's fear and uncertainty towards Uncle Claude. One of the first things the audience may notice is the way that Uncle Claude stumbles in. It is obvious that he is drunk and is an alcoholic, which is why he is ineligible to take care of Hugo. When people are drunk they can act irresponsibly and become very aggressive. Uncle Claude speaks to Hugo in an aggressive and harsh tone, as a result the audience can see and sense the fear in Hugo. This shows that Uncle Claude does not have tolerance for children, and is very conscious about time. As Uncle Claude opens the door to the room, it is clearly shown that it is filthy and unorganised using a tracking shot. A blue hue contributes to the eerie feeling, in which no child should grow up in. Another attribute about Uncle Claude that makes him unfit to take care of Hugo is that he does not feed him. At the beginning of the movie it shows that Hugo steals croissants, this indicates that Uncle Claude does not feed
During the Talladega 500, Cal Naughton Jr., Ricky Bobby's former best friend, pulled ahead of Ricky, allowing him to slingshot around his car and pass Jean Girard. Though Cal and Girard were teammates at Dennit Racing, Cal disregarded this and jeopardized his team's success to aid Ricky in the movie Talledega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby. This moment was crucial to Ricky, he having fallen from grace, going from NASCAR's top driver to being let go by Dennit Racing. The love Cal exhibited was a selfless form of love that was centered entirely around Ricky's happiness, not his own. Because of this selflessness, Cal compromised his own agenda, winning for Dennit, and disregarded personal consequence in hopes that Ricky would win the race. If you truly love someone as Cal loved Ricky, you must sometimes compromise your own interests for their benefit.
At the start of the book, the residents of Sighet live relatively happily, oblivious to the approaching storm. Moché the Beadle practices the cabbala, with, “dreaming eyes” (13), living his life by his own terms. His eyes are his distinguishing factor; they show his hope for the future, his love of life, and his own freedom. Moché’s eyes seperate him from the rest of the town, elevating him to a model of self-esteem, and a confident, independent person. However, the German cruelty to the foreign Jews changes Moché; “There was no longer any joy in his eyes” (17). By subjecting him to horror and fear, they removed the parts of Moché that made him Moché. When Moché lost his dignity, he lost himself. The horrifying part of Moché’s experience is the Gestapo; they acted, “without passion, without haste” (16). Their apathy towards their ‘job’ turns them into monsters. The inhuman act of murdering hundreds of people in cold blood was made even more heartless by feeling no emotion abo...
Furthermore, the weather illustrated within the scene, is of a lifeless and malicious coldness. Resulting in a tense, hopeless, and somber mood, that creates and eery silence, that consumes the very little light and hope within each man, women, and child's soul. Meanwhile, Jean and 3 other boys walk sullenly and imprisoned , as if each step brings them closer to valley of death, and Jean and Julien pear unemotionally into each other's eyes, knowing it would be the last shared moment between them. However they did not share a single word, because no word could tangibly express, calm, or change the situation, all they could do was look at each other with the deepest of friendship in their eyes, and dream that someday light would liberate their spirits. Lastly, as the viewer of this memorable film, I must say it profoundly impacted and provoked emotional responses within me. It left me with a saturated feeling of hopelessness, and gloominess; that I struggled to ponder and empathize with, which in my humble opinion is the rarest and most sought after imprint, a writer could want a viewer to feel. Because unlike most tragic films, Au Revoir les Enfants successfully transferred the feeling of the characters and of the writer, to the
First and foremost, the scene where Uncle Charlie wakes up parallels directly to the scene of little Charlie waking up. The director makes it obvious that these two characters will be linked in some way through this use of doubles. Later in the film, we find that these two characters are closely connected but have a contrasting relationship. Their relationship was one of much love when Uncle first arrived to the family, and suddenly turned sour when little Charlie told Uncle that there was something inside him that no one knew.
After he uncovers Teddy’s paper world, the uncle reacts in a manner of ignorance and derision, mocking him for his decision to occupy himself with paper dolls. The uncle dubs Teddy as a “great big lummox … playing with paper dolls”, insulting Teddy for his hobbies with a tone of amusement and hysteria. In spite of Teddy’s agitation, the uncle prefers to make a mockery out of Teddy rather than accepting his unique hobbies, suggesting the uncle’s belief that Teddy’s activities are unfitting of someone of his age. In addition, Teddy’s uncle further aggravates Teddy by continuously ridiculing him, leading him to eventually destroy his treasured paper world. Despite Teddy’s attempts at validating the reality of his paper dolls, the uncle “burst into laughter, his cheeks the colour of a tomato.” Teddy’s uncle persistence in mocking Teddy implies his disapproval of Teddy’s world, believing that his world is ludicrous and absurd for someone of his age to be occupied with. The sustained laughter of Teddy’s uncle is explicit and deliberate, intended to warn Teddy against his immature hobby, an evident symbol of society’s expectation of
The movie, “The Perfect Dictatorship” (“La Dictadura Perfecta”), directed and produced by Luis Estrada and released in 2014, is a political, satirical comedy story of two reporters attempting to repair the image of a corrupt governor after he signs a deal with the boss of their television company, Television Mexicana. That’s one way we could describe the plot of the movie. Another would be that the movie depicts the inherent corruption of the Mexican government and the lengths to which they will go to retain (or regain) their reputation. Equally, we could see the movie as a demonstration of the corruption of the Mexican media and the ways in which the media influences and effects politics. In fact, the
...ing Charlie's close-ups portrays a delicate glowing face, which appears frightened and angelic, an obvious contrast to the shadowy right side of her Uncle's face. The lighting scheme on the Uncle's face is a classic cinematic device revealing the duality of his personality. And again we are brought back to duality, one of the most popular themes among this director's films.
The crowd in awe, they are exposed to Melies work. As George's spark comes back, he watches his wonderful work in amazement and triumph. After George is acknowledged, the characters are once reunited again for the last time in a party. The panning camera, gives the audience a perspective of everyone who found their purpose. A glimpse of George Melies animated in a conversation, displays his progress throughout the film, 'broken' to gratified. As the camera pans, Hugo is seen presenting the few people a magic trick, also showing how he found his purpose, with the help of Isabelle and George Melies. The last of pan, shows Isabelle recounting Hugo's story. "It's about how this singular young man searched so hard to find a secret message from his father and how that message led his way, all the way home." Home being his purpose, Isabelle says explaining how he found his purpose, unlocking an automaton holds. Thus it is evident that with the help of others, everybody can find their purpose, but its just a matter of
In conclusion, Laurie, who really has become Charles completely, has too much pride in himself and his actions which makes him arrogant. He is creative because he is bursting with different and colorful ideas although they may not all be benevolent and he loves attention; he always finds a way to take the attention and does not realize how much others mind his behaviour making him flamboyant. He demonstrates all these attributes throughout this story as he is telling his parents about Charles. Laurie’s parents do not see this about Laurie until the end of the story which up until that point; they believe that he is a quick adjuster, a wearer of bibs and corduroy overalls, when in fact, the son they are raising is now Charles.
Think about your favorite movie. When watching that movie, was there anything about the style of the movie that makes it your favorite? Have you ever thought about why that movie is just so darn good? The answer is because of the the Auteur. An Auteur is the artists behind the movie. They have and individual style and control over all elements of production, which make their movies exclusively unique. If you could put a finger on who the director of a movie is without even seeing the whole film, then the person that made the movie is most likely an auteur director. They have a unique stamp on each of their movies. This essay will be covering Martin Scorsese, you will soon find out that he is one of the best auteur directors in the film industry. This paper will include, but is not limited to two of his movies, Good Fellas, and The Wolf of Wall Street. We will also cover the details on what makes Martin Scorsese's movies unique, such as the common themes, recurring motifs, and filming practices found in their work. Then on
In the third sentence of the extract, the narrator states that the father “nonchalantly stands . . . like a horse at rest”, connecting him with the image on a strong and powerful horse. The father is viewed by the narrator as being in control and mighty. The diction used by the narrator develops an atmosphere than is tense, like walking a tightrope. The use of “if” and contrasting sentences displays the anxiety present in the scene. Should the father accept the offer, the mood will become “exuberant”, but if the father tears the ticket, refusing, the atmosphere will become “quiet” and in the future, cause “anger”. As of the moment of the scene however, the atmosphere is taut and nerve-wracking. Synecdoche is also used to distinguish to the reader which parent the narrator is focused on, such as when the father is being addressed. The narrator takes note of watching “Dad’s hands as he walks the line”. This prompts the reader to focus their attention to the father’s hands and how they are linked to his line of work, the trading mainly. This gives off the essence of a working class as usually one would watch someone’s back as
In paragraph 2 the author uses foreshadowing when it said "I had seen Aunt Gertrude more in the past two years than I had ever before in my life, and she could be terrifying, often wearing a mean scowl on her deeply lined face." It makes the reader think that aunt Gertrude is mean and doesn't care about her
Elizabeth reaches out to Napoleon to dismiss the bitter thing Hugo says. By encouraging that “[She] has no knowledge of [Hugo]; [she] never saw his face and certainly doesn’t know how to come now to make [Hugo] apology.” This being said she may have no idea who Hugo is. She still expresses condemnatory that he is not left behind. Elizabeth is saying that Napoleon III, the Emperor of France, will bypass what Hugo says about the
Dutilleul’s boss leaves and is replaced. The new boss and Dutilleul don’t strike up a good relationship from the beginning. The boss named Mr. Lécuyer gave Dutilleul an awful time at the beginning until Dutilleul began to frighten his boss by sticking his head through the wall and talking to
These antagonists are personified in the boy. For Jean-Claude the boy is both paingiver and life preserver. The boy brings pain through torture and assault. These attacks could be ordered and methodical or what seems more likely is a warden abusing his ward simply because there is no one to care that he does. The other side of the coin that is the boy is the life giver. It is always the boy who provide food and water. Jean- Claude is hand fed like a baby and it is done in such a way that Jean-Claude must match his captors pace or choke. This pacing provides another facet to the control the boy has over Jean-Claude. Jean-Claude finds himself feeling empathy towards the boy and feeling that he himself is in fact just a materialization of the boy’s reality and not a person at all. Jean-Claude eventually sets his will to some final drive, that his pain must be for something and the only way to ensure it was all meaningful is to put it into words. It doesn’t matter to him if it is on a wet sheet of toilet paper written in crayon as Jean-Claude says “Only writing could soak up his loneliness and pain… Let him write ten words and he would come into being once again.”