Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on power of word
The Human Spirit VS The Human Ego
The power of the written word has been utilized across the span of human history and the conflict between Bill the infamous novelist and Jean-Claude or the prisoner who is a writer of almost no renown is my focus here. In Bill we see a writer trapped by his success, a man who would have gladly traded his fame for ambiguity and the freedom it entails except that this would compromise his name and his legacy. The written word has facilitated all of Bill’s dreams while crushing him beneath the weight of their meaning to others. Jean-Claude is a prisoner of a Maoist extremist group in Beirut led by a man who believes they are the beginning of a “world revolution.” (233) Jean-Claude is introduced already imprisoned
…show more content…
but almost manically positive. The idea of his own demise does not initially enter his mind, he will by force of will he would “learn Arabic and impress his captors” (108). By his “recall of detail and his analysis of facets and aspects” he will impress the authorities who will eventually question him in order to track down the people responsible for his capture. (108) As his time in captivity goes on we see him break down to the external agitator and to the hopelessness that is his imprisonment. Jean-Claude is powerless to affect the world around him which he feels most in his inability to “sustain a thought,place it in the world” and trapped by forces entirely outside his control (110). Bill is trapped inside a prison of his own ego and Jean-Claude mirrors this in his actual imprisonment, one incapable of escape and one unwilling to break free. Bill struggles throughout the novel with an inner conflict centered around his own persona and a novel he has written that he cannot escape which has come to represent everything Bill finds himself struggling with internally. Bill struggles with his own fame, he lives in stark fear that if he goes out in public that he will be recognized and forced to interact with people who have taken his writings and made him into some kind of deity evidenced in Scott’s mission to and eventual success in tracking Bill down and becoming his assistant. Bill had formulated a plan to violently remove himself from interacting with Scott in their initial meeting until Scott sold himself to Bill. This is Bill’s everyday terror, that he will interact with people and they will see him simply as a man and he won’t have the answers to the profound questions that his readers expect he will know. Bill cannot finish his novel as he is convinced it cannot compare with his other novels and it will destroy his reputation. The written word has left him no escape that does not involve destroying his own perception of himself. In his photo shoot with Brita, she estimates Bill’s last photographic appearance “ Am I right that it’s thirty years since your picture has appeared anywhere?” (36) Bill explains that he wouldn’t know right off hand but that this is the reason for their current interaction, Bill states that “When a writer doesn’t show his face, he becomes a local symptom of God’s reluctance to appear.” (36) Scott and Bill hope that by doing the photo-shoot it might take some pressure off Bill and allow him to refocus on his work. Bill’s work being the thing that has become his inner demon his “second self” the “self-important fool that keeps the writer going.” (37) The photoshoot with Brita is their attempt to open the proverbial spillway but what it actually does is crack the very foundation of the dam holding Bill together. The series of events that follow are almost unavoidable in retrospect, Bill having allowed himself to be consumed by his own image, driven away from the world by his own fame trapped by his will to preserve his legacy is undone by a two day visit from an inquisitive photographer. Scott has made every attempt to normalize Bill’s behaviour and gloss over the cracks in his psyche. During their dinner together Brita does not have some prepared attack on their living arrangements she simply asks the most rudimentary questions a slightly more than casual observer might raise. This line of questioning leads to a violent physical outburst from Bill pointing to the real turmoil in his soul, the tenacity of Scott and the strength of the partition between Karen and the real world. Scott has bought Bill time and Karen showed them how they could live in such a way to make it seem normal. Without the forces of Scott and Karen, Bill cannot cope with his demons and finds an outlet in saving the prisoner. Bill quickly realizes however, that it isn’t the saving of the prisoner that matters to him it is the validation of his legacy intertwined with his own demise that replacing the prisoner offers that he seeks. Rashid will further immortalize Bill while also releasing him from the burden of his legacy. Bill sets out on his path of self destruction only to be mortally injured in a hit and run car accident. The running theme of the remainder of Bill’s adventure is that no matter the evidence provided to the contrary he is convinced he will meet the demise he has set out to find. Even in his dying Bill believes it will go like one of his stories, just the way he would have written it. His ego is his undoing and the inherent folly of man his ultimate demise, that the self will actually live forever, Jean-Claude begins his part in the story viewing the world through the same self serving egotistical view that Bill never escapes. In the beginning Jean-Claude assumes he will survive, that survival is the only logical conclusion to his internment. As time goes on and he further experiences torture and captivity his world-view shifts and his drive becomes a list of once mores. If he could look at a woman just once more, or perhaps just her stockings it would help him survive a bit longer. If he could put into words his suffering it would all make sense. For Jean-Claude it isn’t about escaping his pain but making his pain mean something, anything at all besides simple cruel misfortune. Jean-Claude struggles with no inner demons, he has real world antagonists.
These antagonists are personified in the boy. For Jean-Claude the boy is both paingiver and life preserver. The boy brings pain through torture and assault. These attacks could be ordered and methodical or what seems more likely is a warden abusing his ward simply because there is no one to care that he does. The other side of the coin that is the boy is the life giver. It is always the boy who provide food and water. Jean- Claude is hand fed like a baby and it is done in such a way that Jean-Claude must match his captors pace or choke. This pacing provides another facet to the control the boy has over Jean-Claude. Jean-Claude finds himself feeling empathy towards the boy and feeling that he himself is in fact just a materialization of the boy’s reality and not a person at all. Jean-Claude eventually sets his will to some final drive, that his pain must be for something and the only way to ensure it was all meaningful is to put it into words. It doesn’t matter to him if it is on a wet sheet of toilet paper written in crayon as Jean-Claude says “Only writing could soak up his loneliness and pain… Let him write ten words and he would come into being once again.”
(204) Jean-Claude represents the enduring will of mankind. When stripped down of all its pretense there is in all of us the will to leave our mark. In Bill’s efforts to secure his immortality he stumbles vainly to a pauper's unnamed grave. Jean-Claude is given over to fundamentalist terrorists and it is never explicitly stated that he is killed but it can be inferred that this is the case. When Brita goes to Beirut a year after Bill dies of his injuries she asks after the fate of the young writer and we learn that he was traded as such things are since his death by the Maoist terrorists no longer carried any political power. Bill and Jean-Claude meet similar fates. They both die in unspectacular ways and not to great political upheaval which was the intention of everyone involved in orchestrating first Jean-Claude’s capture and Bill’s trip to Beirut. Bill trapped inside himself and unable to escape what he has built himself up to be walks straight into death's embrace because he cannot see past his own ego. Jean-Claude well and truly trapped in a very physical sense of the word lives out his last days in a very different fashion. His unquenchable human spirit still strove to reach out further than his means would allow died striving for one more final thought to cast into eternity, a message in a bottle or even more simply a word or two etched out on a flimsy piece of scrap paper. I firmly believe that Jean-Claude is the better man when comparing him to Bill. With all his fame and fortune Bill could not have been a more ineffectual person and he knew it, that is the thing he ran from hardest while also being the most honest truth he admitted to himself. He could not face it and that in the end consumed him. Jean-Claude struggled with stockholm syndrome and the inability to understand the why of his situation but he never lost sight of the thing that meant the most to him which was his writing and his will to write. I would very much have liked to see him delivered safely home and perhaps more so I would have liked to know exactly what his final words would have been.
In “1984,” Orwell portrays Winston’s secret struggle to undermine the totalitarian rule of Big Brother and the Party in Oceania. The different government agencies, such as the Thought Police and Ministry of Love, exercise unrestricted totalitarian rule over people. Winston actively seeks to join the rebellion and acquire the freedoms undermined by the Party. On the other hand, Heinlein’s brief narrative, “The Long Watch,” depicts a contrasting struggle championed by Dahlquist against the power hungry Colonel Towers and the Patrol. In his struggle to prevent the total domination of the world by the Patrol, Dahlquist chooses to sacrifice his life. Le Guin’s “The Ones who walk away from Omelas,” illustrates a communal form of injustice tolerated for the benefit of the entire city but necessitating the inhumane imprisonment of a child. He portrays the ambiguity of human morality and the individual struggle to determine right from wrong. The authors address social change and power in different ways, reflective of their individual perceptions. Hence, in each narrative, the author illustrates the individual’s role in effecting social change and the conditions under which such change becomes possible.
Most people agree with the quote “sometimes you have to do what’s best for you
Words can have a profound, meaningful impact that may alter, shift, and even end lives. In “Create Dangerously”, Edwidge Danticat reveals how words crafted her reality and identity as a woman who lived through a dictatorship. “Create Dangerously” is a nonfiction essay and memoir that focuses on the impact of literature not only in dire times, but in everyday life. Through the use of detail, allusions, and vivid recounting of the past in her writing, Danticat reveals importance and valor of creating art in times where art is a death sentence, and how this belief shaped her identity.
We have studied the two major theories that answer the question, “who should I be?”. These theories are egoism and altruism. In this paper, I will argue that the correct moral theory lies in-between the theories of egoism and altruism.
Fredrick Douglas is a well known figure in the abolishment movement through his narrative “Learning to Read and Write,” Douglas shares his own personal journey of how he learns to read and write. His organization helps the reader get a better grasp of the stages in his life; his innocence, his epiphany, his loathing and finally his determination. Through the use of syntax and diction, metaphors and the use of irony, he portrays the thoughts that went through his mind as a slave.
”The values, beliefs and attitudes of George Orwell’s can easily be seen in the novel 1984, as no text is neutral. These values attitudes and beliefs have shaped the novel to reflect socio-cultural context and by the use of certain discourses, ideologies, and historical influences support the idea that) “The explanation of a work is always sought in the man or women who produced it “Bathes Roland (1977).
all four of these selection demonstrate that a prisoner’s literature can affect many people such as family, which was shown in soledad brother. the general public can also be affected this was show with the publications of all of these pieces of work. movements such as the civil rights movement were affected by dr. Kings letter and also
... reflects the accomplishments made in four centuries. While man still does not have absolute free speech, he is not so suppressed that he must hide his feelings by literary means.
69. What is the difference between a '' and a ''? What Causes ‘State of Mind’ that manifests in ‘HUMAN MATERIALISM’ aka EGOISM? Once more, the ‘ordinary science’ proves itself as the master of classification, inventing and defining the various categories of Egoism. Per example, psychological egoism, which defines the doctrine that an individual is always motivated by self-interest, then rational egoism, which unquestionably advocates acting in self-interest.
Egoism is a teleological theory of ethics that sets the ultimate criterion of morality in some nonmoral value (i.e. happiness or welfare) that results from acts (Pojman 276). It is contrasted with altruism, which is the view that one's actions ought to further the interests or good of other people, ideally to the exclusion of one's own interests (Pojman 272). This essay will explain the relation between psychological egoism and ethical egoism. It will examine how someone who believes in psychological egoism explains the apparent instances of altruism. And it will discuss some arguments in favor of universal ethical egoism, and exam Pojman's critque of arguments for and against universal ethical egoism.
Hooks, Bell. "Narratives of Struggle." Critical Fictions:The Poltics of Imagnitive Writing. N.p.: Dia Center for the Arts, 1991. 53-61. Print.
The now-famous story of Jean Genet’s ascension to literary sainthood begins with an accusation. The young Genet, an orphan and an outcast in the rural Morvan, was subject to suspicion and, due to his dubious origins, finally accused of thievery. However, instead of shaking the label, Genet decided to embrace it to fulfill all the mordant potential that it promised. From this inaugurating act sprang the literary Genet. As Sartre says in his monumental study Saint Genet: “For him, to compose is to recreate himself”(584). As a result, Genet’s persona is as famous (or notorious) as his works are.
Ethical egoism can be a well-debated topic about the true intention of an individual when he or she makes an ethical decision. Max Stirner brings up a very intriguing perspective in writing, The Ego and its Own, regarding ethical egoism. After reading his writing some questions are posed. For example, are human beings at the bottom? Following Wiggins and Putnam, can we rise above our egoism and truly be altruistic? And finally, if we are something, do we have the capacity to rise to a level that we can criticize and transcend our nature? These questions try to establish whether or not we are simple humans, bound to our intrinsic nature, or far more intellectually advanced than we allow ourselves to be.
...y to write a novel that so clearly shows the power of the state and diminish of the individual send chills to those who read his book. Even in the future, every reader is faced with the reality of the possibility of such a society existing. With technology advances and many history defining issues arising, the possibility of elements of the book coming true seems to become more and more of a reality.
Has anyone thought about the word “human” in the word humanities? The study of humanities and the significance of the word “human” helped better understand this word. This is also showing the significance of the title of the text, “The Art of Being Human”. According to The Art of Being Human “the study of human culture, like philosophy, history, and literature.” (Janaro 2012) There are people who look at the word humanities as just a word; humanities can go into more detail than that. Now you can take some time and think of this word on your own, and I am going to explain what this word meant to me before, during, and after this class. Even though people may think humanities are not about their life, this word can show a guidance in a person’s