Edgar Allen Poe, an American writer who was born in Boston, in the year 1809. Edgar Allen Poe was very detailed oriented in his writings simply because he believed that the reader should calculate every sentiment and idea present in his stories. In The Cask of Amontillado written by Poe. The first person narrator of the story uses manipulative, as well as rhetorical language. Edgar Allen Poe does this to paint an imaginary picture in the reader’s mind to portray the story in an appeasing way.
Even better Poe uses these figurative elements, animating and manipulative aspects by using characters in the story to use these methods. Montresor is number one of the two main characters in the short story The Cask of Amontillado. In the story
…show more content…
Montresor’s motive is to lure the character Fortunato to a six foot deep catacomb and burry him alive. He does this by manipulating Fortunato, telling him of greater things, exploiting his flaws. Which in this case is Fortunato’s pride in his connoisseurship of fine wines. Montresor moves closer to his goal of destroying Fortunato by using figurative speech to manipulate Fortunato to his despise. According to Firat Karadas, author of the academic journal entitled The Monstrous Speech in Edgar Allen Poe’s The Cask of Amontillado. “Relying on Kantian and Romantic ideas of the role of the subject and its imagination in the monstrosity of language, the article argues that the narrating subject of the story, Montresor, uses the animating and manipulative power of speech to construct the world of the text and destroy the enemy.” Figurative language is made even more vital to the story, because through Montresor’s exemplified use of figurative language, we the reader have an insight to his true identity. From a philosophical standpoint.
Poe’s Montresor is a unique character, because of his constructive ability to use monstrous figurative language to get what he wants done in the story. A manipulatively sufficient way to work. However there is no doubt in this writer’s mind that it was not just a mere coincidence that the character of Poe’s Montresor, has been the subject metaphysical philosophy for centuries. From the works of Plato in the early years of the 430’s and Aristotle in the late 380’s up to Kant in the 1720’s. “Montresor, represents the kind of 'constructive' subject that has been the main object of study in metaphysical philosophy “(Karadas 2). Poe uses Montresor to manipulate the imaginations of the readers. A philosopher named Ernest Cassirer once said, "Consciousness is a symbolizing, form-giving activity" (Cassirer 61). Montresor plays on the reader’s consciousness while reading, giving form to the imagination!
Montresor uses situational irony in the beginning, as the two fellows begin on their trudge to the Amontillado. In line 31 of the story. Montresor inquires his friend about his persistent cough. Saying “My poor friend found it impossible to reply for many minuets.” (Poe, 33) Montresor urges Fortunato to let him walk Fortunato back. To prevent his illness to worsen from the poor conditions of the Catacombs. “The cough is a mere nothing; it will not kill me. I shall not die of a cough.” “Enough.” (Poe, 36). Montresor is satisfied with the validity
…show more content…
of his friend’s statement. Verbal irony is another figurative element given to Montresor’s character. In lines 83-84 In the Cask of Amontillado. Montresor uses this verbal irony that he shows the reader throughout the story. Fortunato screams out in a last attempt for Montresor to come to Fortunato’s terms and spare his life. He shrieks out “For the love of God, Montresor!” (Poe, 83). “Yes” I said, “for the love of God!” Montresor uses communication in a very interesting way. Yes he uses the same wording as Fortunato, however Montresor puts a different spin on the context of the sentence. The words mean differently coming from his mouth, as opposed to the way Fortunato used context in that part of the story. As to why Montresor chooses this form of speaking to Fortunato as his final words to his friend, ignites many theories from researchers. However, no one but Poe could ever explain to us the reason for his characters actions. It can be drawn out that Montresor’s pride could only be attributed to his monstrous but constructive figurative language. In determining Montresor’s motives, it can concluded that his resentment to Fortunato transpires from Montresor’s feelings that Fortunato has taken what was rightfully his. When descending into the catacombs, Fortunato is impressed by the vast accompany or Montresor’s deceased entombed relatives. “These vaults” he said “Are extensive” (Poe, 46). “The Montresor’s,” I replied, “were a great and numerous family.” This implies that Montresor’s family was a family of powerful aristocrats. As Italian history will tell, the aristocrats where dethroned of power by the uprising capitalists like Fortunato. “Indicating that he descends from an old aristocratic family that has lost power with the emergence of the capitalistic class. In this regard, the story becomes a re-writing of "The Fall of the House of Usher" as a revenge story against those who dethroned the old aristocrats from their time-honored position and caused the destruction of the feudal system.” (Karadas, 7). Finally the Montresor’s Coat of Arms, which is described in the text as being a large Human foot made of d’or. An italian word meaning made of gold. The foot in a field, crushes a serpent rampant with fangs digging into the heel. Below “Nemo me impune lacessit” (Poe, 49) Meaning “No one provokes me with impunity!” If anyone were to study the coat of arms as an allegorical allusion. It can be interpreted as Montresor becoming the snake who takes down Fortunato, the large golden foot. Montresor is rather appropriate to be the snake in the family arms and the motto because "secrecy, cunning, serpentine subtlety--these are the themes Montresor demonstrates best of all" (Stepp 448). “For the love of God!” For the love of God, Montresor avenges his fallen family by murdering the likes of Fortunato. Taking his life ensures that vengeance shall be received, and Montresor can have his own self-satisfaction. To Montresor, the completed murder and incarceration of Fortunato is carrying out his plan for the love of God. Montresor morphs language into a monstrous power as the power of his figurative language, given to him through Edgar Allen Poe, gives him the ability to center the story, and construct the plot in his own way.
This is apparent through Montresor pushing his own agenda, lobbing to the reader to conform to Montresor and see eye to eye his hatred for Fortunato. Finally the gothic tale concludes with Montresor succeeding in his manipulative ways. Montresor sees the determination of his goal to take down Fortunato has been accomplished. “Since wit and fancy finds easier entertainment in the world than dry truth and real knowledge, figurative speeches and allusions in language will hardly be admitted as an imperfection or abuse of it ... But yet, if we would speak of things as they are ... all the artificial and figurative application of words eloquence hath invented, are for nothing else but to insinuate wrong ideas, move the passions, and thereby mislead the judgment, and so indeed are perfect cheat...Eloquence, like the fair sex, has too prevailing beauties in it to suffer itself ever to be spoken against (in De Man 13, Locke). Locke’s philosophy on figurative speech has sense been disproven, and no longer is defendable by current philosophers. However, the most interesting point is Locke’s warning of figurative language in the hands of a distressed character like
Montresor.
In the story “The Cask of Amontillado”, the author uses lots of verbal irony to emphasize the evil intentions of Montresor.One of the examples of verbal irony in the story that he uses is “The cough’s a mere nothing; it will not kill me. I shall not die of a cough.” and “true--true, I replied.” The effect of this irony is it that Montresor already knows how Fortunato will die.Another example of verbal irony used in the story was when they did a toast to each other. “I drink”, he said, to the buried that repose around us.”
One of the most horrifying lines in the story is given by Montresor after Fortunato says, “I will not die of a cough” (Baym ). Montresor says, “True— true..” (Baym ). It seems that Montresor's murder plot became subconsciously manifest in those two words. Dramatic irony is irony that is inherent in speeches or a situation of a drama and is understood by the audience but not grasped by the characters in the story (“dramatic-irony”) and Poe uses this effectively in this story.
Edgar Allen Poe is the author of many great pieces of literature. He uses his narrators to explain situations that are going on in their life. The narrators of "The Cask of Amontillado" and "The Black Cat" demonstrate their love for mans inhumanity to man and animals through horrific murders.
Edgar Allan Poe is one of the most celebrated literary authors of all time, known for writing very suspenseful, dramatic short stories and a poet; is considered as being a part of the American Romantic Movement, and a lesser known opinion is he is regarded as the inventor of the detective-fiction genre. Most recognized for his mystery and macabre, a journey into the dark, ghastly stories of death, deception and revenge is what makes up his reputation. The short story under analysis is a part of his latter works; “The Cask of Amontillado”, a story of revenge takes readers into the mind of the murderer.
Poe, Edgar Allan. “ The Cask Of Amontillado.” Heritage Of American Literature .Ed. james E. Miller.Vol.2.Austin:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich,1991.20.Print.
Montresor proves not to mess with someone's feeling. He explains, “I must not only punish, but punish with impunity” (Poe 372). Fortunato does not know that he is going to die, yet Montresor and the reader do know, making the situation dramatic irony. By punishing him with impunity he is going to get revenge that he has wanted now for years ever since he did wrong to Montresor and now that he finally gets the chance of course he will seek revenge on Fortunato. And it is dramatic irony because Fortunato is oblivious to the situation. Montresor proves that one should be careful on what they say. He speaks, “I continued, as was my wont, to smile in his face, and he did not perceive that my smile now was at the thought of his immolation” (Poe 372). Montresor is saying
In her article, Renee utters that when the thought of vengeance build up in an individual’s brain, it coerces him insane and does not tolerate him to present it a second thought. The first sentence of the story, “The thousand injuries of Fortunato I had borne as I best could, but when he ventured upon insult I vowed revenge,” clearly describes the whole theme of the story as a deeply enrooted revenge in Montresor’s mind” which is an absolute portrayal of retribution that occurs due to arrogance and jealousy. Author sees himself as a superior individual and was victimized by a superiority complex which is quite visible through the phrases which he wrote in the story that Montressor expresses superiority as showed his victim as a foolish person by attributing weird physical appearance and dress appearance in which he described his dress code of “tight fitting parti striped dress and head was surmounted by the conical cap and bells.”
Edgar Allen Poe uses irony and poetic justice all throughout “The Cask of the Amontillado”. The places where irony and poetic justice hold the most significance are the scenes where, Montresor speaks of the wronging done to him by Fortunato, where Montresor and fortunato speak of the coat of arms, and where at the very end when Montresor traps Fortunato in the catacombs and leaves him to die. These scenes clearly show the use of these two tools that Poe used to tell the story of Montresor and
Poe uses the aspects of dramatic and verbal irony, foreshadowing and symbolism to shape his tale of revenge. Fortunato's fate is death and Montresor tries to make his intentions seem honorable. His intentions were not honorable, just evil. He does however, manage to get what he set out for, revenge.
The first literary device used by Poe in his short story “The Cask of Amontillado,”
Because Montresor narrates the story in the first person, the reader is able to perceive his thoughts and understand his motivations and justifications for his ruthless murder in a manner which a third person point of view would not allow. Montresor’s personal narration of the events of the story does not justify his crime in the audience’s eyes, but it does offer a unique opportunity for the audience to view a murder from the perspective of a madman killer. It is Poe’s usage of this unique angle that causes the story to be so captivating and gruesomely fascinating. As the story opens, Montresor explains why it is necessary that he “not only punish but punish with impunity” to avenge for Fortunado’s insult to him. This justification for his crime is a piece of information that the audience is able to learn only because they are permitted inside the mind of the protagonist. In the final scene, when Montresor is carrying out his murder pl...
Poe’s first-person narration style in “The Cask of Amontillado” allows the reader to experience the story from a different level and the ability to look at the story from a different light. An unusual perspective. From the mind of a killer, the narrator and main character making him familiar with the reader. Poe focuses more of the thoughts and emotions of the main character rather than physical attributes of Montresor which made for a more intimately disturbing story for the reader.
Fortunato “takes possession” of Montresor’s arm, for which he suffers (716) in order to carry out his plan. Poe’s use of possession and suffer give the impression that Montresor is being afflicted again by Fortunato. Once Montresor reveals this meeting at this evening is no coincidence by divulging he made sure none of his attendants would be home. By giving the direct orders to be home. Poe shows us that Montresor was not respected or feared by his servants’ actions. The servants’ leaving after being given a direct order to stay does give credence to the fact that Montresor must be very methodical and unyielding to his schedule. Only once Fortunato to the catacombs does he betray his own premise. Montresor refers to Fortunato as his “poor friend” (716). At this point Poe has depicted this instigator of a “thousand injuries” as a drunken jester that can barely catch his breath at this point in the story. Now Montresor is showing some sympathy towards him. At this point the transition is complete. Where the two men stopped at the entrance to Fortunato’s tomb, this is the moment that leaves no doubt that Montresor is the villain and Fortunato is the
The first indirect factor that could contribute to Montresor’s vengeful act, and thus the story’s theme of revenge, is the character of Montresor. Montresor tends to harbor feelings of resentment and has a hard time not taking things out of context (Womack). He also plans the murder of Fortunato in advance and devises it in such a way that he will not be caught. In killing Fortunato, Montreso...
The major characteristics of the narrator and main character, Montresor, are anger, hatred, and revenge. In the story, he is angry with Fortunato because he believes that Fortunato has wronged and insulted him many times by saying, “thousand injuries of Fortunato I had borne as best I could…he ventured upon insult…” (Poe). In addition, Montresor’s hatred for Fortunato goes so far that he believes he must kill Fortunato. He mentions this in the story as, “[y]ou, who so well know the nature of my soul, will not suppose, however, that I gave utterance to a threat” (Poe). He seems to say that his soul is made of hatred and goes on to say he must give Fortunato the utmost punishment: death. Montresor even shows traits of revenge when he says, “…but when [Fortunato] ventured upon insult, I vowed revenge.” and “...I would be avenged…” (Poe). He is saying that he will get revenge on Fortunato, whom he is angry with and hates for being insulted by.