Figurative Language In The Cask Of Amontillado

1263 Words3 Pages

Edgar Allen Poe, an American writer who was born in Boston, in the year 1809. Edgar Allen Poe was very detailed oriented in his writings simply because he believed that the reader should calculate every sentiment and idea present in his stories. In The Cask of Amontillado written by Poe. The first person narrator of the story uses manipulative, as well as rhetorical language. Edgar Allen Poe does this to paint an imaginary picture in the reader’s mind to portray the story in an appeasing way.
Even better Poe uses these figurative elements, animating and manipulative aspects by using characters in the story to use these methods. Montresor is number one of the two main characters in the short story The Cask of Amontillado. In the story …show more content…

Poe’s Montresor is a unique character, because of his constructive ability to use monstrous figurative language to get what he wants done in the story. A manipulatively sufficient way to work. However there is no doubt in this writer’s mind that it was not just a mere coincidence that the character of Poe’s Montresor, has been the subject metaphysical philosophy for centuries. From the works of Plato in the early years of the 430’s and Aristotle in the late 380’s up to Kant in the 1720’s. “Montresor, represents the kind of 'constructive' subject that has been the main object of study in metaphysical philosophy “(Karadas 2). Poe uses Montresor to manipulate the imaginations of the readers. A philosopher named Ernest Cassirer once said, "Consciousness is a symbolizing, form-giving activity" (Cassirer 61). Montresor plays on the reader’s consciousness while reading, giving form to the imagination!
Montresor uses situational irony in the beginning, as the two fellows begin on their trudge to the Amontillado. In line 31 of the story. Montresor inquires his friend about his persistent cough. Saying “My poor friend found it impossible to reply for many minuets.” (Poe, 33) Montresor urges Fortunato to let him walk Fortunato back. To prevent his illness to worsen from the poor conditions of the Catacombs. “The cough is a mere nothing; it will not kill me. I shall not die of a cough.” “Enough.” (Poe, 36). Montresor is satisfied with the validity …show more content…

This is apparent through Montresor pushing his own agenda, lobbing to the reader to conform to Montresor and see eye to eye his hatred for Fortunato. Finally the gothic tale concludes with Montresor succeeding in his manipulative ways. Montresor sees the determination of his goal to take down Fortunato has been accomplished. “Since wit and fancy finds easier entertainment in the world than dry truth and real knowledge, figurative speeches and allusions in language will hardly be admitted as an imperfection or abuse of it ... But yet, if we would speak of things as they are ... all the artificial and figurative application of words eloquence hath invented, are for nothing else but to insinuate wrong ideas, move the passions, and thereby mislead the judgment, and so indeed are perfect cheat...Eloquence, like the fair sex, has too prevailing beauties in it to suffer itself ever to be spoken against (in De Man 13, Locke). Locke’s philosophy on figurative speech has sense been disproven, and no longer is defendable by current philosophers. However, the most interesting point is Locke’s warning of figurative language in the hands of a distressed character like

Open Document