Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Chemistry reactions and observations lab
Chemistry reactions and observations lab
Chemistry reactions and observations lab
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Chemistry reactions and observations lab
Introduction
For this lab, a number of reactions were performed to aid in the identification of a set of cations. This process was performed to show the effects various chemicals have on the given set of cations. The method through which this experiment was performed included mixing two reactants, a cation and a chemical compound, then examining whether or not a precipitate was created by the mixture. If a precipitate did form, the mixture was then centrifuged to solidify whatever insoluble material was created. After decanting, washing and re-centrifuging the solution, the now semi-pure solid was then submerged in Sodium Hydroxide, while once again recording the appearance of the solution. Many of the methods used in this lab would be most
…show more content…
Yellow hue, but no actual reaction between the Aluminum and Ferricyanide
Slight yellow hue from the Ferricyanide but once again no actual reaction
Blood Red precipitate was formed by combining Cobalt and Ferricyanide
Yellow sludgy precipitate was formed
Mustard-colored cloud of precipitate material
PO43-
White cloudy precipitate was formed in solution
White precipitate that was dissolved from the addition of Water
Dark Purple precipitate was formed by combing Phosphate and Cobalt
Thin blue cloud of mineral like material
White precipitate
OH-
White precipitate was dissolved by the Hydroxide
N/A
Dark Blue precipitate that faded back to the original Pink the Cobalt solution had prior to mixing
Cloudy blue precipitate
Zinc-Hydron precipitate was dissolved by the addition of Sodium Hydroxide
NH3 (NH4OH)
N/A
N/A
The precipitate was barely affected by the Ammonia and remained solid
Precipitate dissolved, leaving a blue solution
N/A
H+
N/A
N/A
The solid was dissolved and the mixture reverted back to the Cobalt’s original Pink hue
The precipitate once again dissolved, leaving a green solution
N/A
The table above shows the numerous cations and chemicals experimented upon and the visual observations each reaction yielded
Data Analysis &
…show more content…
I would then add a fair amount of Sodium Triphosphate. If the white precipitate and only the white precipitate remains, I could be sure the solution did in fact only contain Ca2+ Ions.
Scenario 2: For scenario two, I would add some Potassium Ferrocyanide to the solution supposedly containing Zn2+ and Ca2+ ions. If the solution yielded a yellow precipitate, Zinc is present. If only a white precipitate remained, Ca2+ is present. If there’s combination of yellow and white precipitate material, then both are present.
Scenario 3: For this scenario involving a solution supposedly containing Al3 and Co2+, I would add several drops of Ammonia. If the solution produces a dark precipitate, then cobalt is present. No precipitate would mean that Al3+ was present and a lightly colored precipitate means there is a mix of both.
The purpose of the Unknown White Compound Lab was to identify the unknown compound by performing several experiments. Conducting a solubility test, flame test, pH paper test, ion test, pH probe test, conductivity probe test, and synthesizing the compound will accurately identified the unknown compound. In order to narrow down the possible compounds, the solubility test was used to determine that the compound was soluble in water. Next, the flame test was used to compare the unknown compound to other known compounds such as potassium chloride, sodium chloride, and calcium carbonate. The flame test concluded that the cation in the unknown compound was potassium. Following, pH paper was used to determine the compound to be neutral and slightly
The primary goal of this laboratory project was to identify an unknown compound and determine its chemical and physical properties. First the appearance, odor, solubility, and conductivity of the compound were observed and measured so that they could be compared to those of known compounds. Then the cation present in the compound was identified using the flame test. The identity of the anion present in the compound was deduced through a series of chemical tests (Cooper, 2009).
The technique used to narrow down the identity of unknown white compound were solubility test, pH test, flame test, and ion test. The first technique used to narrowed the properties of unknown white compound was using solubility test. To conduct solubility test, 0.25 gram of unknown white compound was dissolved in 100 mL of water. After carefully observing the change while string unknown white compound in water, the unknown white compound was soluble because it dissolved in water completely. Using bursen burner, matches and deionized water, flame test was conducted for unknown compound and it burned lilac color. Then compared the color of unknown white compound to other compound that were narrowed. The results of flame test for compounds that were narrowed down is shown in the following table. The pH test was conducted using litmus paper. 0.50 gram of unknown white compound was measured and dissolved in 10 mL of water in beaker. After dissolving, placed the litmus paper in solution and recorded the pH value of unknown compound which was neutral. Then compared the pH value of unknown white compound to compound that were narrow down. The pH result of the KCL, KNO3, NaCl, and K2SO4 is presented in the following table. The ion test was also conducted in order to make sure that the identity of unknown white compound was matched with the compound that were narrow down. After conducting the test, the result of unknown white compound which formed precipitate compared to KCl, KNO3,NaCl, and K2SO4. The results shown in the following
In our experiment we utilized the hydrate cobaltous chloride. Hydrates are crystalline compounds in which one or more molecules of water are combined with each unit of a salt. Cobalt (II) chloride hexahydrate is an inorganic compound which is a deep rose color in its hydrated form. As an inducer of
An elements¡¦ reaction to certain substances may be predicted by its placement on the Periodic Table of Elements. Across a period, an element on the left will react with more vigor than one on the right, of the same period. Vertically, as elements are sectioned into groups, the reaction of each element increases as you move down in the same group. With this in mind, the reactions of the substances involved in this experiment may be hypothesized, observed, and validated.
The purpose of the first part of this experiment was to determine which unknown cations were in the given metal nitrate salt solution using qualitative analysis. Quantitative analysis involves a numeric measurement of a species, and qualitative analysis (the method used in the experiment) involves the identification of a species. In part A, the solution was analyzed for lead or silver and calcium or barium in part B. In part A, silver was present in the solution, and in part B, calcium was present in the solution.
Fe 3+ (aq) + S︎CN – (aq) ⇌ Fe ( SCN ) 2 + (aq) ( ∆H = - ve ) Pale Yellow Colorless Blood Red This experiment uses Iron (III) ion and thiocyanate ion ; the two chemicals are yellow colored and colorless, respectively. The product of the forward reaction is Iron (III) Thiocyanatoiron, which has a blood red color.
A precipitation reaction can occur when two ionic compounds react and produce an insoluble solid. A precipitate is the result of this reaction. This experiment demonstrates how different compounds, react with each other; specifically relating to the solubility of the compounds involved. The independent variable, will be the changing of the various chemical solutions that were mixed in order to produce different results. Conversely the dependent variable will be the result of the independent variable, these include the precipitates formed, and the changes that can be observed after the experiment has been conducted. The controlled variable will be the measurement of ten droplets per test tube.
The purpose of this experiment was to use qualitative analysis methods to identify the metal nitrate salts that were present in an unknown solution for parts A and B. In part C, a third method, the cation flame tests, was used to identify cation solutions based on the color that was emitted by the flame.
It is an alkaline solution used to test for the presence of aldehyde groups (RCHO). The reducing sugar (Glucose) reduces the copper (II) Sulphate to Copper (I) oxide. The colour of the precipitate varies dependent on the strength of the reducing sugar present. The colour can vary from blue to red-brick: indicating a high concentration of sugar. Glucose contains an aldehyde group, so it is able to reduce the Benedict's solution and form a precipitate.
Hypothesis is always more than one, it required to making testable hypothesis until the confirmation of the experiment. This lab is to test the seven compound with ferric chloride to confirm that which ferric chloride reacts with. The reaction identifies by compare the intense color change with the experiment control which the control only contains water, ferric chloride, and ethanol. The control of this experiment was color yellow, test tube number 8. If color of liquid change to yellow, it means that FeCl3 not react with compound. When the color changed to other color, wasn’t yellow, it means the functional groups react with the ferric
In the experiment, there was a very obvious pattern and many effects on the metals that did react with the acid.
Reprecipitate the silver chloride by adding 6M nitic acid until the solution is acid to litmus paper. Observe and record data. For PO4-3 (Phosphate) test, place 1 mL of 0.1 M sodium phosphate in a test tube, add 1 mL of 6M nitric acid and add 1 mL of 0.5M ammonium molybdate and mix thoroughly. Place the test tube in boiling water and remove it after five minutes to observe the solution. For SO4-2 (Sulfate) test, place 1 mL of 0.1 M sodium sulfate in a test tube, add 1 mL of 6M hydrochloric acid, and add 3-4 drops of 0.1M barium chloride and mix
When the reagents (Aniline and Acetic anhydride) were initially added to the flask, the crude product of acetanilide started to form, along will a small number of impurities. As the compounds were mixed the solution turned a pale-yellow color, with white crystals of acetanilide forming in the solution as the reaction proceeded. As the solution began to heat up the crystals dissolved because the energy (as heat) was being added to the molecules of liquid causing separation between the pure Acetanilide and impurities in solution. The charcoal was then added to bond to the impurities in the solution, separating them from the Acetanilide, and ensuring they would not recrystalized as the solution was cooled. The solution was then left to return to room temperature, and the acetanilide became purified pure crystals, while the impurities remained in the solution and were filtered out. The final product was flaky white crystals of
In this experiment the Sodium Hydroxide solution went through three different phases where its quality and quantity changed. The first phase was called I. Preparing Approximately 0.1M NaOH, 1000mL of clear distilled water was boiled and then chilled to room temp.