Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Criminal justice system not sex discrimination
Common stereotypes of female offenders
Gender within the criminal justice system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Criminal justice system not sex discrimination
tarcher
Sociology 324
Final paper
05/08/2015
The gendered nature of the criminal justice system is evident through the treatment of female offenders. The evil women hypothesis states that gender discrimination exists for women in the criminal justice system. Offending women are punished not only for breaking the law, but also for violating gender roles. Therefore aggressive female offenders are often punished more harshly than male offenders. The socialization of these gender roles is problematic, because women are treated unfairly in the correctional system. Another problem in female institutions is the health care system. The majority of prisons fail to include gynecological care for women. Most prisons lack appropriate personnel to provide
…show more content…
Another problem unique to women in prison is the issue of child care. Typically when fathers enter prison, the mother of the child takes custody. However, women are more likely to be the primary care giver of their children. Therefore when women are sent to prison, the children are usually placed in foster care or sent to live with relatives. However, improved counseling and medical programs could aid both women and their children, in overcoming some of these negative consequences. Counseling programs could encompass a variety of programs beneficial to women. First these programs could serve as an intervention for juvenile offenders. Through offering education, career services and mentoring to juvenile offenders, these programs could guide young girls. Secondly, counseling programs could offer parenting classes to mothers, allowing them to become good parents outside of prison. Along with counseling, improved medical programs are a necessity for women in prison. Increasing the number of medical doctors at women’s facilities could help provide adequate care for pregnant women, and meet the physical needs of other inmates. The following story about Mama Sheik provides …show more content…
She is also the mother of three children. As with most mothers who enter prison, she is the primary caregiver for her children. When she went to prison, the children went to live with her elderly mother. Although, the children are not in foster care, Sad Eyes’ mother struggles financially to support all three children. Unfortunately the children rarely visit their mother in prison. Sad Eyes was also subjected to inadequate medical care while in prison. When she developed a medical condition requiring assistance, a special trip was arranged to a male prison. The female prison facility lacked the necessary personnel to treat Sad Eyes. Programs which increase the number of doctors at female prisons are necessary to ensure of the safety of the women. Increased medical facilities in female prisons are also important, for the general health care needs of the inmates. In addition counseling programs would also aid Sad Eyes in becoming a better parent, benefiting her children in the long term. Thus programs such as improved counseling and medical services would benefit both Mama Sheik and Sad
Thompson, P., & Harm, N. (2000). PARENTING FROM PRISON: Helping Children and Mothers. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing , 61-81.
Imagine Kirsty and Marc, a young couple who resort to robbing a house in a desperate attempt to make money. They are caught, charged with the same crime and given the same sentence, except for one thing: the male dominant world we live in does not stop at the courtroom door. Marc is sent to a medium security prison one hour from his family with every opportunity to earn his way into a minimum-security facility. He spends his days learning to cook in the kitchenette and has access to basic necessities like aftershave or hairspray. Meanwhile, Kirsty walks into her frigid six-by-ten foot cell with bars for a door, a toilet in plain view and not a trace of sunlight. She is twelve hours from home with no hope of changing location since there is nowhere else to go. The stories of rapes, beatings and riots told by her new neighbours are endless. Kirsty realizes that the only way for her to survive this place is to oppose nature and forget what it is to feel. This is discrimination against women as they are penalized more severely than men for committing less crime. How can women strive for equality when they cannot attain justice in the justice system itself? The controversy over the gender bias goes beyond the "too-few-to-count" syndrome as Sally Armstrong calls it, it is a question of women's constitutional right to be treated equally.
Sexual orientation is the focal issue regarding the feminist theories of crime. These theories try to clarify the insufficiency of criminological theories with respect to focusing on women and how the speculations apply to clarifying female criminal conduct. One hypothesis incorporated into the feminist theories of crime is John Hagan’s power-control theory. The production of this theory comes from the women’s liberation movement. All the more critically, the impact that women’s expanded entrance into the workforce had on the gender gap in crime rates (Akers & Sellers, 2009). The power-control theory sets out to clarify the gender contrasts in delinquency focused around the strategic maneuver going on in the family structure, and the parental
When the criminal justice system was established, one of the goals was to create neutrality and fairness between the sexes. However, during those times, women were not known for behaving in such manners. If a woman did in fact take part in any criminal activities, those crimes would have been blames on an individual that could of not fought for themselves. Even though people might believe that there is no such thing as ‘stereotyping’ in the criminal justice system, it is quite obvious that women are constantly being looked down upon because of their sex. In general, women tend to be treated like fragile objects that could break at any moment; the truth is that women can behave like men. Society stereotypes women; and, the criminal justice system is no different. When it comes to the stereotyping of women in the criminal justice system, society presents women who are indeed capable of committing such crimes as victims because by doing do they can achieve a lesser sentence or if necessary a longer sentence that will protect them from any harm.
When the criminal justice system was established, the main objective was to create neutrality and fairness between the sexes. Even though people might believe that there is no such thing as ‘stereotyping’ in the criminal justice system, it is quite obvious that women are constantly being look down upon because of their sex. In general, women tend to be treated like fragile objects that could break at any moment; the truth is that women can be strong and courageous just like men. Society stereotypes women and the criminal justice system is no different.
For many, the term juvenile delinquent likely conjures up images of groups of young men standing on street corners, wearing baggy clothes, and boasting defiant attitudes. However, some may be surprised to learn that the face of the juvenile delinquent is swiftly changing. While boys are responsible for the majority of juvenile crime overall, the number of juvenile females involved with the justice system has been steadily increasing over the past three decades (Gross 84). Of greatest concern is the context of the crimes being committed by juvenile girls, as arrest rates have increased most in the area of violent offenses. In response to this emerging trend, juvenile justice professionals are increasingly advocating for gender specific intervention and rehabilitation models to deter further delinquency involvement. This effort is rooted in investigating the risk factors for criminal behavior among adolescent females, and the compound effect multiple risk factors may illicit.
Delinquency in and of itself has been observed, studied, sifted, put into one form of statistical data or another and published for years. The question of “should girls’ delinquency be studied separately from boys’ delinquency?” can only be answered with an answer of yes. Data from every aspect of delinquency should be studied whether it be age, race, type of crime, along with gender. Without viewing all aspects of delinquency in regards to gender, any conclusions found would be biased, possibly leading to the enforcement of inappropriate laws and or treatments.
Traditionally, there has been little research on or interest in the impact of female crime in modern society. In addition, juvenile crime rates are on the rise, which combine for a void of research or information on female juvenile offenders. In general, crime rates for women offenders have risen since the 1990's. Increasing numbers of young women are also offending at higher rates. In a 1996 U.S. Department of Justice Report, the number of arrests of young women had doubled between 1989 and 1993. Twenty percent of all juvenile arrests were committed by girls, an increase of 87 percent. However, according to The National Study of Delinquency Prevention in Schools, males are far more likely to admit to criminal involvement than are females. For example, 12 percent of males and 4 percent of females reported carrying a hidden weapon other than a pocketknife in the past year (Wilson, p.150). There are several theories for this rise in crime proposed by modern feminists, including that the introduction of women into traditional male roles prompted women to commit increasingly dangerous and violent crimes. However, this paper will rely on Meda Chesney-Lind's theories from The Female Offender.
Not only is prison ineffective in preventing reoffending in women and is expensive, it can be extremely damaging to the female’s well-being and their families. The effect that a custodial sentence has on women is arguably far worse than for men. Women are often not prepared or equipped for their life following their prison sentence; due to the fact that women are more likely to be lone parents before prison (Social Exclusion Unit, 2002), are more likely to leave prison homeless and unemployed (Wedderburn, 2000), and are more likely to lose access of their children whilst serving their sentence (Corston, 2007). Statistics from 2010 showed that around 17,000 children become separated from their mother by imprisonment (Wilks-Wiffen, 2011). This can be absolutely devastating to not only the female offender, but to their innocent children too. Moreover, due to the small number of women’s prisons, the average distance that women are sent away from their homes is around 60 miles (Women in Prison, 2013). Therefore, even if the women are lucky enough to keep in contact with their children, it can be tremendously hard to organise visitation and uphold
Before the jury stands the defendant. There is overwhelming evidence in the favor of the prosecution. The verdict comes back from the jury, not guilty. Why? The defendant is a woman. In our era of equal rights and civil liberties women have made great strides in their advancement and role in society, yet it seems that gender segregates when it comes to crime. There have been countless cases where women and men have been tried for the same crime, yet when it comes to verdict and sentencing, the results don’t necessarily match. If one commits a crime one should be punished accordingly regardless of gender. In our society we seem to have two separate rules for our criminals, one for men and one for women. The key issue is are men and women treated equally by the criminal justice system. Another issue in gender biased sentencing is in its is its severity. Are women sentenced heavier for certain crimes then men.
While all feminist theorists share a common focus on gender inequality, there are differing views on the source of the problem and the ultimate solution. Liberal Feminists Freda Adler and Rita argued that sociological factors, not physiology, best explain women’s criminality. There is a strong relationship between women’s emancipation and the increase in female crime rates. As women become more liberated and become more involved in full time jobs, they are more likely to engage in the types of crime that men commit. Thrasher, a leading exponent of the social disorganization perspective, felt that girls and women committed less crime because they were more closely supervised by boys and men. These arguments lacked any factual support.
Not every prison gives women the right to health care and I believe that every female prisoner should have the opportunity to see a healthcare provider, such as the Gynecologist. Gynecologist specializes in finding and treating breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and cervical cancer. When these types of cancers are detected early it can save lives. That is why it is important for every woman to see a health care provider. Female prisoners should be healthy and taking care of, and this should be priority number one for prison
2. Definition if key concepts 2.1. Female crime Female crime can be defined as crimes committed by women and this type of crime classification derive from a gender standpoint (Meixiang, 2011:197). Furthermore, female crime is a topic which has been narrowly researched because female offender can be described as invisible, due to the low numbers of female crime statistics in the criminal justice system (Hudson, 2010:1).
Conversely, this was not the case for the main character’s mother as when she gave birth to him, she failed to provide him with the care he needed as she was depressed from
Existing criminal theory suggest that gender is a significant factor in understanding criminality. Compared to male offenders, women have specific needs and tend to offend in different ways and for different reasons. Understanding the needs of women and the nature and cause of their crime is essential to developing an equitable approach to female criminality. Feminist scholars have critiqued the justice system’s approach to gender, with some suggesting that the law is, fundamentally, sexist. As Haney (2000) notes: “Legal interpretations of suffering also failed to acknowledge the distinct quality of women’s pain”; she notes that “[a]ccording to West (1991), men and women experience pleasure and pain differently; men often find pleasure in