Sexual orientation is the focal issue regarding the feminist theories of crime. These theories try to clarify the insufficiency of criminological theories with respect to focusing on women and how the speculations apply to clarifying female criminal conduct. One hypothesis incorporated into the feminist theories of crime is John Hagan’s power-control theory. The production of this theory comes from the women’s liberation movement. All the more critically, the impact that women’s expanded entrance into the workforce had on the gender gap in crime rates (Akers & Sellers, 2009). The power-control theory sets out to clarify the gender contrasts in delinquency focused around the strategic maneuver going on in the family structure, and the parental …show more content…
According to Bair, Boehner, Hadjar, and Hagan (2007), the amended hypothesis expresses the connections between force structures in the parents’ work environment, parental controls, and the liking for the child’s hazardous conduct stem from the inclination each guardian has for gender roles and the parents hierarchic self-interest (HIS). HIS is the individual statement of societal dominance. HIS is dominating in cutting edge modern social orders that energize …show more content…
Some of this feedback is focused around thoughts that have not been assessed by theory. According to Ball (2011), Hagan’s hypothesis does not consider different circumstances other than power balance in the family that may impact delinquency, for example, power and class in the public eye overall. A sample of this would be single parent families in low-income areas. Ball additionally clarified that the hypothesis was just used to clarify what they call “regular” or minor delinquent conduct, not perpetual lawbreakers. At last, they say Hagan’s theory has not been tried against other major theories, so it is hard to say if Hagan’s discoveries are legitimate. According to Delisi, Hewitt, and Regili (2010), a significant evaluation of the power-control theory is that the sexual orientation contrasts inside delinquent conduct have little to do with socialization of parental controls. They say that the gender differences are essentially because of the biological contrasts between males and females and their inclination for forceful and antisocial
These women have been increasingly going to jail for longer periods of time for minor crimes, the most frequent crimes that are being convicted are mostly related to drug and alcohol related crimes as well as theft (Mental Health Coordinating Council, 2010). A survey conducted in New South Wales of female inmates had concluded that; 80% are current smokers, 78% have used an illicit drug(s), 67% were unemployed in the six months prior to incarceration, and 66% of these women had also been in a violent/abusive relationship (Mental Health Coordinating Council, 2010). It has been argued that the risk factors for offenders are derived from that of genetic theories of crime and that they are an adequate guide for correctional supervision and treatment-planning decisions for females, however others argue that this approach is highly flawed and does not take into account gender differences (Rettinger & Andrews 2010). This is an issue in the CJS and its importance cannot be undervalued, the assessment for the risk and need has implications for the assignment of female offenders to a correction option that is the least restrictive, the assignment to an appropriate intervention dosage, appropriate targeting of criminogenic needs, and an understanding of female offending (Rettinger & Andrews 2010). Due to the increasingly large number
Bibbings , Lois , and Donald Nicolson. 2000. “General principles of criminal law'? A feminist
This essay will explore reasons why females such as Vanessa George turn to the crime of sex offending. Demonstrating my knowledge and understanding of classical criminological theory, exploring biological theories such as penis envy and more contemporary views such as liberation theory within feminism. The essay will then go on to look at the inequalities female sex offenders face within the criminal justice system in comparison with males, using chivalry theory and evil woman theory to explain this.
Kelly, Liz (1987) “The Continuum of Sexual Violence.” In: Women, Violence and Social Control, edited by J. Hanmer and M. Maynard. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press International: 46-60.
Church, W. T., Wharton, T., & Taylor, J. K. (2008). An examination of differential association and social control theory: Family systems and delinquency. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 7(1), 3-15.
Wiatrowski, M.D., Griswold, D.B., & Roberts, M.K. (1981). Social control theory and delinquency. American Sociological Review, 46(5), 525-541.
The first important term to know in reference to the topic of patriarchy and delinquency is critical feminist. Critical feminist hold that gender inequality stems from the unequal power of men and women and the subsequent exploitation of women by men; the cause of female delinquency originates with the onset of male supremacy and the efforts of males to control females’ sexuality. The next term that is important to know is patriarchy. Patriarchal is a social system in which men are dominant in family, government, and business matters. The final term that is important to know is juvenile delinquency. Juvenile delinquency is the participation in illegal behavior by a minor who falls under a statutory age (Siegel, 2012).
Although the years since Smart’s study have seen much more interest in the study of female crime and deviance, many general theories in this area continue to neglect gender as a factor influencing criminality. This is despite the fact that official figures suggest that gender is perhaps the most significant single factor in whether an individual is convicted of crime. Any theories which fail to explain this relationship could therefore be seen as inadequate. OFFICIAL STATISTICS, CRIMINALITY AND GENDER Pollak – the ‘masked’ female offender – ‘chivalry’ thesis Writing in 1950, Otto pollak argued that official statistics on gender and crime were highly misleading.
When the criminal justice system was established, the main objective was to create neutrality and fairness between the sexes. Even though people might believe that there is no such thing as ‘stereotyping’ in the criminal justice system, it is quite obvious that women are constantly being looked down upon because of their sexuality. In general, women tend to be treated like fragile objects that could break at any moment; the truth is that women can be strong and courageous just like men. Society stereotypes about women and the criminal justice system are no different. Throughout history, certain crimes have been separated into different categories based on their prevalence.
Historically, criminology was significantly ‘gender-blind’ with men constituting the majority of criminal offenders, criminal justice practitioners and criminologists to understand ‘male crimes’ (Carraine, Cox, South, Fussey, Turton, Theil & Hobbs, 2012). Consequently, women’s criminality was a greatly neglected area and women were typically seen as non-criminal. Although when women did commit crimes they were medicalised and pathologised, and sent to mental institutions not prisons (Carraine et al., 2012). Although women today are treated differently to how they were in the past, women still do get treated differently in the criminal justice system. Drawing upon social control theory, this essay argues that nature and extent of discrimination
The Feminist theory is based around gender inequalities and the concept of an imbalance of power between men and women and within men themselves. This theory argues that male sexual offenders are like normal men, however they have been conditioned within society and culture that when their masculinity is questioned, this creates a reaction where males sexually assault females to boost their male status within society. The feminist theory highlights how women’s experiences are often based around the struggle of male domination or patriarchy (Moore, 2008, p. 5) in relation to sexual offences. This article links closely with the Feminist Theory as
Later, Heidensohn crafted the theory of patriarchal control, arguing women commit fewer crimes than men because the system imposes greater control over women, at home, work and in public therefore reducing their opportunities to commit crime. At home, a women’s domestic role imposes restrictions on her free time and confines her to the house for long periods of time. Daughters are not given the same
The theory also accounts for crime and delinquency in adolescence. Sampson and Laub (2001) differentiated the life course of individuals based on age and argued that the important formal and informal social controls that would restrict deviant behavior varied across the life span. In childhood and adolescence, the dominant sources of informal social controls consisted mainly of parenting styles, such as discipline, supervision, emotional attachment, and on school attachment and peers. As such, when the bonds to these processes weakened, adolescents were more likely to commit deviant acts that extends throughout the life course of the individual (Piquero et al., 2001).
Agnew, R. (1985). Social Control Theory and Delinquency: A Longitudinal Test. Criminology Volume 23 , 47-59.
While all feminist theorists share a common focus on gender inequality, there are differing views on the source of the problem and the ultimate solution. Liberal Feminists Freda Adler and Rita argued that sociological factors, not physiology, best explain women’s criminality. There is a strong relationship between women’s emancipation and the increase in female crime rates. As women become more liberated and become more involved in full time jobs, they are more likely to engage in the types of crime that men commit. Thrasher, a leading exponent of the social disorganization perspective, felt that girls and women committed less crime because they were more closely supervised by boys and men. These arguments lacked any factual support.