Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the article, “Huxley’s Feelies: The Cinema of Sensation in Brave New World”, Laura Frost compares Aldous Huxley’s experiences with “talkies” and his use of “feelies” in his novel, Brave New World. Huxley was first introduced to moving pictures, that included sound, with The Jazz Singer in 1927, and did not enjoy them (Frost 443). Frost looks at this and many experiences Huxley had with cinema. Frost analyzes Huxley’s complex relationship with cinema to show the multi-faceted effects of cinema on the real-world and Huxley’s literary works.
Huxley is known for deploring talking movies, known as “talkies,” and often condemns them as part of an increasingly industrialized society. But, Frost points out that Huxley recognized “cinema’s potential
…show more content…
to be either an instrument of social and political reform or a medium of cultural degeneracy” (445). Despite his rejection of popular culture, Frost notes the irony of Huxley’s place in twentieth-century pop culture (448). Frost also draws parallels between Huxley’s fate in pop culture and the fate of John the Savage, one of the characters in Huxley’s novel Brave New World. She shows that with John’s eventual death at the end of the novel “the last chance for culture perishes…John is a casualty of popular culture” (454). Frost addresses Huxley’s understanding of cinema and pop culture and how that connects to his use of cinema and pop culture in literature. In Brave New World, there is a great cultural phenomenon called the “feelies”.
They are motion pictures, often erotic, that utilize all of an audience’s senses to provide them with pleasure (Frost 447). “Feelies” are the mass production of pleasure. Huxley felt that changes in the ways we achieve pleasure show the degeneration of our culture, “in place of old pleasures demanding intelligence and personal initiative, we have vast organizations that provide us with ready-made distractions — distractions which demand from pleasure seekers no personal participation and no intellectual effort of any sort” (qtd. in Frost 446). Industrialization and mass production, both of which are looked down upon by Huxley, are now applied to pleasure and leisure. Frost notes that Three Weeks in a Helicopter, the cookie-cutter “feelie” shown during Brave New World, involves many complex allusions and illustrates Huxley’s views (449). One of the allusions is the ironic setting. It is set in Alhambra, a location in Britain that evolved overtime to “accommodate the evolution of popular pleasure” (Frost 450) and embodies the cultural degeneration Huxley found in pop culture. Three Weeks in a Helicopter embodies the idiotic pop culture in a location where Huxley’s “real culture” would have once occurred (Frost 450). Despite Huxley’s disgust with cinema, Frost argues that Huxley’s use of cinema, in “feelies” and training films, “provide both a cautionary tale and a vision of cinema’s social
possibilities” (449). Frost points out the irony and complex usages of cinema found in Huxley’s literary works, to show his views on and understanding of cinema. The addition of sound to moving pictures spurred a lot of debate. Frost illustrates this in her analysis of Huxley’s views on cinema and its connection to the mass production of pleasure. As Huxley states, “few, it seems to me, are more deadly (while none appears more harmless) than that curious and appalling thing that is technically known as ‘pleasure’” and now cinemagoers “need only sit and keep their eyes open” (qtd. in Frost 446-447). This transition in ways we achieve pleasure is hyper analyzed by Huxley in his literary works, as Frost points out through her exploration of the use of cinema in Huxley’s popular novel, Brave New World (449). Frost analyzes Huxley’s reactions to talking movies and draws comparisons between these experiences and the “feelies” found in Huxley’s literature.
Literature and film have always held a strange relationship with the idea of technological progress. On one hand, with the advent of the printing press and the refinements of motion picture technology that are continuing to this day, both literature and film owe a great deal of their success to the technological advancements that bring them to widespread audiences. Yet certain films and works of literature have also never shied away from portraying the dangers that a lust for such progress can bring with it. The modern output of science-fiction novels and films found its genesis in speculative ponderings on the effect such progress could hold for the every day population, and just as often as not those speculations were damning. Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein and Fritz Lang's silent film Metropolis are two such works that hold great importance in the overall canon of science-fiction in that they are both seen as the first of their kind. It is often said that Mary Shelley, with her authorship of Frankenstein, gave birth to the science-fiction novel, breathing it into life as Frankenstein does his monster, and Lang's Metropolis is certainly a candidate for the first genuine science-fiction film (though a case can be made for Georges Méliès' 1902 film Le Voyage Dans la Lune, his film was barely fifteen minutes long whereas Lang's film, with its near three-hour original length and its blending of both ideas and stunning visuals, is much closer to what we now consider a modern science-fiction film). Yet though both works are separated by the medium with which they're presented, not to mention a period of over two-hundred years between their respective releases, they present a shared warning about the dangers that man's need fo...
Lehman, Peter and Luhr, William. Thinking About Movies: Watching, Questioning, Enjoying. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003.
One could easily dismiss movies as superficial, unnecessarily violent spectacles, although such a viewpoint is distressingly pessimistic and myopic. In a given year, several films are released which have long-lasting effects on large numbers of individuals. These pictures speak
Barn Burning Throughout the story “Barn Burning”, author William Faulkner conveys the moral growth and development of a young boy, as he must make a critical decision between either choosing his family and their teachings or his own morals and values. The reader should realize that the story “Barn Burning” was written in the 1930’s, a time of economic, social, and cultural turmoil. Faulkner carries these themes of despair into the story of the Snopes family. Faulkner opens the story, “Barn Burning” in a southern courthouse room of the during the Civil War reconstruction era, also a time of social, cultural, and economic instability.
Through hypnoaedic teachings, reservation contrasts to the “Civilized” world, and John’s critique of the society, the reader sees Huxley’s point of view of the importance of an individual. With hypnoaedic teachings, Huxley creates the society and the values. Inside the reservation, Huxley contrasts the society of the reservation to that of Lenina’s society. Finally Huxley’s main evaluation and critique of lack of identity is seen in John’s character. John’s horrid descriptions in his point of view on society demonstrate to the reader the importance of an individual. Since there were absolutely no conscious men or women throughout society, ideas of ignoring death, God, and beauty creates a world where men and women sacrifice true happiness (Where pain and hard work are involved for a greater happiness) for a “smooth running society.” The picture of the society to the reader is horrifying and quite terrifying. Overall, within our society, the importance of the individual is not a problem. People, even teenagers, are encouraged to show who they are inside. One can truly see the idea of the importance on individual through the new openness to different sexualities. Overall, within the book, Brave New World, by Aldous Huxley, Huxley demonstrates the need for conscious individuals through a horrifying
...netti, Louis, and Scott Eyman. “The Talkie Era.” Flashback: A Brief History of Film. Ed. Leah Jewell. 4th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2001. 140-145. Print.
In recent times, such stereotyped categorizations of films are becoming inapplicable. ‘Blockbusters’ with celebrity-studded casts may have plots in which characters explore the depths of the human psyche, or avant-garde film techniques. Titles like ‘American Beauty’ (1999), ‘Fight Club’ (1999) and ‘Kill Bill 2’ (2004) come readily into mind. Hollywood perhaps could be gradually losing its stigma as a money-hungry machine churning out predictable, unintelligent flicks for mass consumption. While whether this image of Hollywood is justified remains open to debate, earlier films in the 60’s and 70’s like ‘Bonnie and Clyde’ (1967) and ‘Taxi Driver’ (1976) already revealed signs of depth and avant-garde film techniques. These films were successful as not only did they appeal to the mass audience, but they managed to communicate alternate messages to select groups who understood subtleties within them.
Neill, Alex. “Empathy and (Film) Fiction.” Philosophy of film and motion pictures : an anthology. Ed. Noel Carrol and Jinhee Choi. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2006. 247-259. Print.
“Community. Identity. Stability.” These three words constitute the planetary motto of the characters of Aldous Huxley’s dystopian fiction Brave New World. (7) Theirs is a carefully structured post-modern society which managed to overcome political and social unrest through genetic engineering, strict social conventions, exhaustive conditioning, hypnosis and dependency on a drug called soma. In order for the stability of this world to be achieved, inhabitants are stripped of independent thoughts and emotions. This work is an exploration of the disturbing effects of homogeneity, control of technology and loss of personal autonomy on the members of the Brave New World.
In his essay, “It’s Just a Movie: A Teaching Essay for Introductory Media Classes”, Greg M. Smith argues that analyzing a film does not ruin, but enhances a movie-viewing experience; he supports his argument with supporting evidence. He addresses the careful planning required for movies. Messages are not meant to be telegrams. Audiences read into movies to understand basic plotlines. Viewers should examine works rather than society’s explanations. Each piece contributes to Smith’s argument, movies are worth scrutinizing.
As an audience we are manipulated from the moment a film begins. In this essay I wish to explore how The Conversation’s use of sound design has directly controlled our perceptions and emotional responses as well as how it can change the meaning of the image. I would also like to discover how the soundtrack guides the audience’s attention with the use of diegetic and nondiegetic sounds.
... imagination is sometimes more excessive than the action on the screen. After the application of Williams’ “theory” to David Creonenberg’s film Shivers, it is apparent that the spectator’s personal perception of the action (or inaction) is more the cause of the bodily reaction that Williams is referring to, rather than the objective excess on the screen. Ultimately, various characteristics of Williams’ arguments are true, but as a film theory in general, “Film Bodies: Gender, Genre and Excess” needs further research and flexibility in order to be both relative to all “body” genre films, and applicable to all unique spectators.
Gallagher, T. 2002. Senses of Cinema – Max Ophuls: A New Art – But Who Notices?. [online] Available at: http://sensesofcinema.com/2002/feature-articles/ophuls/ [Accessed: 8 Apr 2014].
“of exhibitionist confrontation rather than absorption,” (Gunning, Tom 2000 p 232) as Gunning suggests the spectator is asking for an escape that is censored and delivered with a controlled element of movement and audiovisual. Gunning believes that the audience had a different relationship with film before 1906. (Gunning, Tom 2000 p 229)
Cinema studies: the key concepts (3rd ed.). London: Routledge. 2007. Lacey, N. (2005). The 'Standard'. Film Language.