Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Influence of power in organizations
Influence of power in organizations
Influence of power in organizations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the article, “The Possible Benefits of the Federal Trade Commission” by Alexander W. Smith, it addresses competition in trade as warfare, and furthermore, it notes how the Federal Trade Commission is for the people (1916). This means the sum of all of the businesses, government, and politics must be regulated by the Federal Trade Commission in order to be serving the public’s best interests (Smith 1916). Smith argues the “obvious cause of the trust problem is the unlimited power to create corporations now lodged in the several states with no adequate power vested anywhere to control them” (1916). Based on this statement, it reiterates the importance how if there is not enough regulation for corporations, the public will suffer due to the …show more content…
Is it permissible to allow certain corporations with more power, more political influence, and more money to have absolute control over the given market? In the journal article, “Trade Restraints: Federal Trade Commission: False Representation as Unfair Method of Competition,” it states how under the Federal Trade Commission Act unfair methods of competition in commerce are declared unlawful (1937). Furthermore, it addresses whether it is permissible to have a product being sold under two names while representing it is sold for less than the usual price, (“Trade Restraints: Federal Trade Commission: False Representation as Unfair Method of Competition,” 1937). This is important to note because forms of unfair competition still exist within corporations, even with the Federal Trade Commission being a part of …show more content…
The provisions for suppliers of products is to require them to provide proportionally equal assistance to all competing resellers of their products (Dufresne 1972). An example would be an instance in Lakeland, Florida consisting of ‘free’ offers of an established brand’s toothbrush with the corresponding brand’s toothpaste (Dufrense 1972). However, the 1971 ‘free’ guide only allows for situations in which the offer is proper, and if no sale has been made prior (Dufrense 1972). The 1971 ‘free’ guide addresses that when a new product or service is being introduced, it must be at the same price for which it was promoted for (Dufrense 1972). This means it would not be permissible in this instance to sell the toothbrush or toothpaste for any cost other than ‘free’ because when the supplier decided to sell the toothbrush when it came out as new as ‘free,’ The Lakeland example addresses how the supplier would then be required to offer the special promotion to all drug stores, grocery stores, and other miscellaneous shops in which are competing in and around Lakeland promoting the brand to be sold (Dufrense
One’s ability to analyze the motives of the Framers necessitates some understanding of the sense of national instability instilled in the US its first form of government, the Articles of Confederation in granting little power to the central government; in particular, focusing on the economic turmoil and it’s effects on the Framers. In his analysis of America in the Articles, Beard comprehensively summarizes the failures of the Articles as compromising to the “national defense, protection of private property, and advancement of commerce,” (Beard, 36) in the US. Additionally, Beard utilizes these indisputable truths to establish a case for what he believes to be the self-interested influences that urged the Framers to craft an undemocratic Constitution. As Beard puts it, the state centered control of the US under the Articles caused the economic
Unfortunately, these monopolies allowed companies to raise prices without consequence, as there was no other source of product for consumers to buy for cheaper. The more competition, the more a company is forced to appeal to the consumer, but monopolies allowed corporations to treat consumers awfully and still receive their business. Trusts were bad for both the consumers and the workers, but without proper representation, they could do nothing. However, with petitions, citizens got the first anti-trust law passed by the not entirely corrupt Congress, called the Sherman Act of 1890. It prevented companies from trade cooperation of any kind, whether good or bad. Most corporate lawyers were able to find loopholes in the law, and it was largely ineffective. Over time, the Sherman Anti-Trust Act of 1890, and the previously passed Interstate Commerce Act of 1887, which regulated railroad rates, grew more slightly effective, but it would take more to cripple powerful
Even though monopolies are illegal, public corruption allows companies to form and continues to be a problem today. In an article published by the Los Angeles, Anh Do
Narrow construction is not found in the Constitution, but the powers granted to Congress to regulate commerce are found. Exactly stated, “Congress shall have power to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes.” This clause has no definite interpretation, but has included many aspects of regulating. The word “commerce” is defined as the exchange or buying and selling of commodities on a large scale involving transportation from place to place (Webster 264). Congress has exercised this delegated power in many cases. The nature and basic guidelines of Congress’ power over commerce is first laid out in the case of Gibbons v. Ogden. In addition, the case United States v. Lopez is a prime example of Congress’ ability to carry out the Commerce Clause to the furthest extent. Lastly, the case National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation brings to light the Wagner Act of 1935. Through a review of these three cases, it can be concluded that there are no real limitations on Congress when regulating commerce.
...tually break up monopolies when they formed, by specific legislation” (600). They see that the government is letting the business tycoons to own whatever land they want and extend their fortunes. Unlike the first two books, Johnson’s book discussed the history of the book without bias and from a different perception; one that was not came from an American view.
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 can be termed as a major overhaul of the communications law in the past sixty-two years. The main aim of this Act is to enable any communications firm to enter the market and compete against one another based on fair and just practices (“The Telecommunications Act 1996,” The Federal Communications Commission). This Act has the potential to radically change the lives of the people in a number of different ways. For instance it has affected the telephone services both local and long distance, cable programming and other video services, broadcast services and services provided to schools. The Federal Communications Commission has actively endorsed this Act and has worked towards the enforcement and implementation of the various clauses listed in the document. The Act was basically brought into existence in order to promote competition and reduce regulation so that lower prices and higher quality services for the Americans consumers may be secured.
Apart from Antitrust laws, there are several other laws that promote fair business practices. The Robinson-Patman Act prohibits price discrimination. This act ...
The growth of large corporations had impacted American politics by causing governmental corruption because of the power some industries had in society. Since the government had used laissez faire in the late 1800s for the big businesses to...
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act brought the most significant changes to financial regulation in the United States since the reform that followed the Great Depression. It made changes in the American financial regulatory environment that affect all federal financial regulatory agencies and almost every part of the nation’s financial services industry. Like Glass-Steagall, the legislation passed after the Great Depression, it sought to regulate the financial markets and make another economic crisis less likely. Banks were deregulated in 1999 by the Gramm-Leach-Biley Act, which repealed the Glass-Steagall Act and essentially allowed for the excessive risk taken on by banks that caused the most recent financial crisis. The Financial Stability Oversight Council was established through the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and was created to address the systemic risks in the United States financial system and to improve coordination among financial regulators.
Next, the process moves to the publication of the Notice of Proposed Rule Making through the Federal Register. Congress enacted the Federal Register Act in 1935, so all agency proposals and regulations could be listed for the public. This method allows citizens to know about regulations that can affect them. This system requires the agency to file documents with the Office of the Federal Register and the placement of those documents for public inspection. The documents are posted in the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations. This gives the public the official notice of the rule and its contents. Presidential papers are included in the Register including "proclamations, executive orders, notices and documents the President or Congress require to be published."
The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 and the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 are two things that work together to help explain and prohibit things that people believe are wrong in the world and definitely hurts peoples and the governments wallets.
The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 was an early attempt to try to control abuses by large combinations of businesses called trusts. The Act was weakened by the Supreme Court used against labor unions rather than against monopolies. Roosevelt’s first push for reform on the national level began with a secret antitrust investigation of the J. P. Morgan’s Northern Securities Company whom monopolized railroad traffic. After successfully using his powers in government to control businesses, Roosevelt used the Sherman Antitrust Act against forty-three “bad” trusts that broke the law and left the “good” trusts alone.
...ed submissive to the businesses in power. The government recognized that it was their responsible to protect the interests of consumers when they are disadvantaged and are powerless to help or defend themselves by helping consumers comprehend their rights and responsibilities within the market.
Rockefeller’s Standard Oil Company was one of the trusts at that time. “Within a decade, it controlled 90 percent of the refining business. Rockefeller reaped huge profits by paying his employees extremely low wages and driving his competitors out of business by selling his oil at a lower price that it cost to produce it. Then, when he controlled the market, he hiked prices far above original prices.” (textbook, pg449) This empire threatened the whole American economy by breaking the regulation of the market. It monopolized other people’s business and forced them to join his company. Thus, his empire became stronger and stronger. It was a detriment to consumers and the economy. “They were able to manipulate price and quality without regard for the laws of supply and demand. Basic economic principles no longer applied” (socialstudieshelp.com, “How and why did American business seek to eliminate competition”). This is another evidence supports that trusts generated excessive margins while doing little to improve their product or relevant processes. The economic system became disorder and messy. Therefore, it could cause a great depression in economic system. What’s more, monopolies in economy could stop the progressive economy. “A highly-profitable monopoly also may have little incentive for improvement as long as consumers still demonstrate a need for their current product or service. In comparison, businesses in a competitive market can compete by making changes to existing products and services and lowering prices.” (smallbusiness.chron.com, “How does a monopoly affect business and consumers?”) This evidence shows that monopolies didn’t help improve the society. Instead, they couldn’t consumers’ need as time went
In 1934 the Securities Exchange Act created the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) in response to the stock market crash of 1929 and the Great Depression of the 1930s. It was created to protect U.S. investors against malpractice in securities and financial markets. The purpose of the SEC was and still is to carry out the mandates of the Securities Act of 1933: To protect investors and maintain the integrity of the securities market by amending the current laws, creating new laws and seeing to it that those laws are enforced.