Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impacts of hurricane katrina on the government
Impacts of hurricane katrina on the government
Importance of taxation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impacts of hurricane katrina on the government
An immense amount of money is needed to operate all levels of government, and the demand seems to be growing every year. To measure up to such costs, the government needs income or revenue. In the United States, the federal government gets its revenue from a number of sources. “The three primary revenue sources for subnational governments are income, sales and property taxes.” The government pays for such expenses through revenue acquired by taxing income, sales and property.
Individual and business earnings are both subjected to income taxes. Payroll taxes are an important source of revenue. Employers are responsible for paying these taxes, which include Social Security and Medicare, also known as FICA. Over the years, the amount paid in Social
…show more content…
“While state revenues are generally up, they fell so far during the recession that most states have not caught back up to where they were before”. Although making it simple is desirable, unexpected events often require new expenditures, which in turn may require changes in the tax code. Such example of an unexpected costs are the cost of the war in Iraq, along with the enormous damage inflicted by hurricane Katrina in 2005. Tax reforms can also result from political change, which tends to be sudden especially if one party leaves office and another enters. New government administrations often display a sense of insistence to finally do things the “correct” way, or to clean up the acts that their predecessors had …show more content…
However, there is also some ambiguity because so many things can happen to the presented budget. For example, the economy may suddenly speed up or slow down and affect the amount of tax revenues collected. As a result, the federal budget only provides a rough estimate of the actual revenues and expenditures. The Colorado Constitution contains a section designed to protect citizens from their own government. TABOR (Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights) aims to do this by requiring voter approval of new taxes and by limiting annual increases in state spending to a certain level. “The Colorado Constitution requires state and local governments to obtain voter approval prior to imposition of a new tax, rate increase on an existing tax, mill levy increase, valuation for assessment,tax extension, or other change in policy that results in a net gain in tax revenues.” Under TABOR, Colorado residents have had a groundbreaking opportunity to set state fiscal policy through the ballot box. When the government spends more than it collects in taxes and other revenues, it borrows money. “The federal government has no constitutional debt limitation comparable to Colorado’s. For that reason, and also because the federal government has emergencies to meet unlike those faced by states, the federal government find itself trillions of dollars in debt.” The federal government is still dealing with
Holton argues that the Framers formulated a constitution that appeased both the bondholders and allowed for the reduction in taxes paid. Holton cites evidence on how much bondholders actually gained from the Funding Bill. For example, he states “that by 1792 four out of five dollars collected by the federal government was disbursed to bondholders” (Holton 266).
Our Preamble lists five main goals that are required to help create a strong and stable society within our country. However, money is required in order to achieve these goals. We get this money from the Federal Budget which is the yearly amount we receive in order to better our country. The question here is, are we slicing the pie correctly in relation to the federal budget? In each of three budget clusters, the U.S Government should make adjustments in the way it is distributing money by making changes involving the Big Five, the Middle Five, and the Little Guys.
Our current system of taxation is a varied rate percentage based on different income brackets. Many say that it violates our constitutional rights through unequal taxation. Multiple deductions, loopholes, special rates, and a complex system of regulations all characterize our Federal Income Tax System, prompting many to question why it is still being used (Peters, 2013). The current system although bringing in over $3 trillion, taxes income multiple times, and includes the taxing of estate, labor, savings, and investments (National Priorities Project, 2013). The system itself is complex with over 20,000 pages of regulations, requiring a massive filing system, which is set up and maintained by an even larger IRS, requiring over $225 billion in compliance costs (Hall, 2001). One can be hard pressed to find an advantage in the current system, other than the fact that it provides the government with an enormous amount of funds, and it has...
The Australian Budget is an annually published document which details the Federal Government's plans to affect the level of economic activity, resource allocation, and income distribution through the use of fiscal policy. It describes the framework which the government intends to follow during the next financial year which will result in the attainment of their objectives. The budget is a publication of the government's plans regarding the use of fiscal policy, and is published to parliament and the general public on “budget night”, so as to allow open dissemination about the status of public finances and to promote transparency in Australia's fiscal policy.
The Texas government is a complex system whose ultimate purpose is to serve its citizens. Oftentimes, its complexity in certain aspects causes problems in its efficiency in serving. The way the Texas Constitution is written, how local governments run, the judicial, legislative, and executive branches’ efficiency, as well as Texas public policy and fiscal policy result in a government that is not set up to best serve its citizens. By 1875 the need to rewrite the Texas Constitution had become very evident, and a Convention was held to rewrite the Constitution.
Texas is big! From the size of the state, to our trucks, and to our pride, there are countless examples of why “everything is bigger in Texas”. Even our state constitution is bigger! With approximately 87,000 words and 474 amendments, the current Texas Constitution of 1876 is one of the longest state constitutions in the United States. Compared to the United States Constitution with only 4,400 words and 27 amendments, one wonders how the Texas state and local governments can operate efficiently with such an overwhelming document. The length and detail of the constitution stem from the specific policies written into the document, making it statutory in nature. This specificity has resulted in a restrictive document that requires frequent amending.
For government budgeting to be effective, the process that guides it must be an evolving one. As the government gets bigger, it will most likely destabilize the existing method. Therefore, it must change to keep pace with the demands and growth of the country. The process must be capable of handling the complexity of our nation and its multifaceted needs so it will always need revisions and restructuring to face these new challenges. Its ultimate goal must be to reinforce the government and strengthen the country.
During the 1980’s Colorado experienced a bust in its economy. Like always, Colorado made a comeback in the 1990’s and early 2000’s. In this paper I will discuss what accounted for this bust, the resurgence of this bust, and how federal spending played a role in this point in history.
When states try to find ways to restrain from non-essential areas, unfunded federal mandates are at the top of the list. These mandates often force state and local governments to spend much more than necessary on everything from medical care to welfare to road building. A complex web of federal programs bind together the tree treasuries of the local, state, and federal government. As much as 25 percent of state budgets now comes from the federal government, and up to 60 percent of some state budgets is spent on joint federal-state programs.
To define the terminology of federalism to a simplistic way is the sharing of sovereignty between the national government and the local government. It is often described as the dual sovereignty of governments between the national and the local to exert power in the political system. In the US it is often been justified as one of the first to introduce federalism by the ‘founding fathers’ which were developed in order to escape from the overpowered central government. However, federalism in the United States is hitherto uncertain where the power lies in the contemporary political system. In this essay I will outline and explain how power relationship alternates between states and federal government. Moreover I will also discuss my perspective by weighing the evidence based upon resources. Based on these resources, it will aid me to evaluate the recent development in the federal-state relationship.
The preamble of the United State’s constitution sets many goals for the country. These goals are to form a more perfect union, to establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense , promote the general welfare, and to secure the blessings of liberty for ourselves, and our posterity (US Const). With all of these goals it begs the question are, parts of the United State’s government meeting these goals? One specific case with this relationship is the relationship between the federal budget, and the goals in the preamble. The federal budget is meeting the goals set out in the preamble of the constitution because the federal budget defends the country, promotes the welfare of America’s citizen, and establishes justice
Since the 1980s, a problem has arisen in the form of unfunded mandates. The federal government has created national directives, but occasionally failed in providing the necessary funding. As a result, its power in cooperative federalism may be compromised as it is not keeping up its end of the bargain. States and local governments have been forced to shoulder the costs of these programs (Ginsberg and Lowi et al. 83). The syllable of the syllable.
One way the federal government gains more power is by giving grants to states. Although the money is free in reality it not. The ...
Social Security along with Medicare, are benefit taxes that are equally paid by the employer and the employee in the form of a payroll tax. This tax constitutes the largest portion of the federally mandated benefits with its purpose being to “help provide financial support to workers and their families when workers retire, die, or become disabled. Medicare provides healthcare assistance to older workers and to people with long-term disabilities … often referred to as FICA (Federal Insurance Contributions Act) or OASDI (old age, survivors, and disability insurance) for Social Security deductions and as MHI (Medicare hospital insurance)” (BLS.org, 2005). In other words, Social Security and Medicare provides for the needs of both individuals and their families. This program protects aging individuals and the disabled from expenses that they cannot afford and that may drain their savings. Social Security is an insurance system administered by the federal government and as stated before, it is mandatory for both employees and emp...
Taxation has always been a major controversy. Just like any major corporation, the government is constantly looking to raise revenue. The easiest and fairest way to do this is by taxing the people. However, how the people will be taxed is always an issue.