Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Technology and addiction in today's society
Influence of media advertising on consumer behaviour
Addictive effect of technology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Technology and addiction in today's society
Fast-fashion refers to clothing produced at a very low cost, at a fast rate to accommodate the current trends (The True Cost, 2015). ‘The True Cost’, a documentary directed by Andrew Morgan, investigates the hidden consequences of the demand for cheap and quick fashion. The ramifications have dire impacts on labor-conditions in developing countries as well as the natural environment, which is increasingly contaminated through the current practices by fashion multinationals. Consumers, nevertheless, continue to demand fast-fashion. The argument proposed throughout this essay is that the current trend in fast-fashion can be understood as a form of slow violence. First, Nixon’s concept of slow violence is unpacked, then, through the documentary, …show more content…
Common conceptions of violence entail “an event or action that is immediate in time, explosive and spectacular in space, and as erupting into instant sensational visibility” (Nixon, 2011, p. 2). In contrast to this, Nixon (2011) proposes his notion of ‘slow violence’ as “a violence that occurs gradually and out of sight…of delayed destruction that is dispersed across time and space, attritional violence that is typically not viewed as violence at all” (p. 2). Since slow violence does not lend itself to immediate visibility, it is often overlooked by the media and consequently not dealt with. This allows the accumulation of problems over time as the violence continues without obstacles. Nixon recognizes that “our media bias toward spectacular violence” (p. 4) is intensified in our “sensation-driven…image-world” (p. 3), which is lacking for slow violence that occurs gradually, over time. This inattention is amplified by shifts in technology and the overstimulation of information, causing “perpetual distraction” (Nixon, 2011, p. 12). Through the immediacy of everyday life, there is an inability to grasp the long-term. This all entails that victims of slow violence are often “not to be seen, not to be counted” (Nixon, 2011, p. 13), and the effects on these dismissed casualties accrue over generations. This postponed confrontation also implies …show more content…
Therefore, the costs of exhausting and contaminating resources are invisible as if assumed to last indefinitely. Equally, the costs of humane treatment of workers and fair wages are avoided. When issues are sporadically brought to light, the fast-fashion corporates circumvent responsibility and attribute blame to locally outsourced companies (The True Cost, 2015). Thereby, in accordance with Nixon’s (2011) concept of slow violence, the violence of fast-fashion is invisible and concealed. Furthermore, as these problems occur out of sight, in desolate places, far away from the Western producers and consumers, there is no direct confrontation between the effects of fast-fashion on its’ victims and its’
A. The “We Beat and Killed People.” Newsweek. 13 May 2002 - 24. Print.
As described in the film “Tough Guise 2”, the U.S. is both obsessed with and is a victim of its own culture. On one hand, movies and video games that glamorize violence and books that argue that violence. Additionally, many other films and books highlight that violence is a core aspect of male masculinity and argues that men are losing it through the empowerment of women and the loss of employment. At the same time, the United States has suffered through countless gun-related deaths and the mainstreaming of media such as Bum Fights, where actual homeless people are assaulted on camera. But due to the politicization of the issue of violence and the news media to properly explain the issue to the U.S., many people are taught that violence stems from the youth, which is only part of the broader picture. Instead of identifying and preventing the largest source of violence in the country, young white males, the focus is instead shifted toward the potential of violence of young men of color in poor urban
Jane Collins is currently a professor of rural sociology and women’s studies at the University of Wisconsin. She also has published a number of books and articles related to the apparel industry. Collins brought a great deal of knowledge to the writing of this book through her childhood experiences growing up in Virginia and her more then thirty years of research experience in Latin America. However, it could be said that having such extensive experience and narrowed knowledge of the industry may have affected the direction and perspectives found in this book.
...ment an integrative approach in a disjointed system of fragmented agencies and separate departments. In addition, examining violence through social development requires long term studies of development through life stages. Unfortunately, in the aftermath of crimes like the Virginia Tech murders, the pressure to re-act can outweigh the patience to act logically.
Manson criticizes the media’s actions and comments about how bullied children could turn these two criminals into their new idols. He wants the reader to see that publicizing violence has only made matters worse and not to “expect the end of the world to come out of the blue- it’s been happening every day for a long time” (Manson 421). For Manson, he see understands that incidence of violence has not increased, it’s the spread of the knowledge that has
"Leo Frank." Violence in America. Ed. Ronald Gottesman and Richard Maxwell Brown. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1999. U.S. History in Context. Web. 10 Mar. 2014.
While climbing up the social hierarchy through the lavish purchasing of clothing, many Americans are inadvertently promoting inhumane wages and working conditions for millions of garment factory workers. In the Conditioning Center, the elementary class repeats, “We always throw away old clothes”. Ending is better than mending, ending is better than mending, ending is better.” (35).
Recently, the effect that violent media has on society has been the focus of many psychological studies. According to an article published in the New York Times, research has found that: “Exposure to violent imagery does not preordain violence, but it is a risk factor” (Pozios, Kambam, Bender, 2013). There has yet to be a direct link between violence actually causing people to go on these massive shooting sprees that have been so common lately. It is natural and understandable for the
Fashion in the 21st century is a big business, as its production employs millions of people and generates billions of dollars in revenue. Fashion has for the past century been, and is still today, used as an indicator of social change and progress, as it changes with the social norms of the society and the political changes of the world (Finkelstein 3). Works Cited Finkelstein, Joanne. A.S.A. & Co. Fashion: An Introduction to Fashion. New York: New York University Press, 1998.
It’s no secret that some women believe fashion portrays who they are. Therefore follow every season’s new trend. This leads to spending money that they don’t have. Waller Lea, a journalist, suggest that “for some communities, purchasing knockoffs or generic products are frowned upon, forcing minorities to spend more money. Now businesses and companies are targeting minorities, causing more debt problems.” Addicted to retail or brainwashed? Opponents claim that fashion is simply a creative way to express themselves. There are others ways to express ourselves that are no based on our appearance. Through drawing, painting or through our thoughts and ideas. What happens when someone can’t afford expensive clothing or doesn’t have access to fashionable clothes? They are singled out and excluded from society for being different.
Fashion is everything to society and the media. The fashion industry has transformed into a necessity in the life of people. Everyone wants to look good, feel fabulous and feel as if we belong with everyone else. The envy and desire to wear certain things and look a certain way all come, from wearing the latest fashion handbags, accessories, dresses, shoes, and the list goes on. But, when is considering fashion into an individual’s life going too far to the extreme? Many do not consider the whereabouts of fashion materials and how the environment is affected by the mere existence of certain garments. Some may believe these objects grow on trees. But that is clearly not the case. Even though it would be nice. The fashion industry as a whole, has been notorious from green issues caused by their lack of sensitivity to the environment, conspicuous and unnecessary consumption of materials, encouraging an “throw-away” society and image issues that support women and young adults to look a certain way to feel “beautiful.” This is an issue that has increased over the past decades. Not just women, but men also feel the uncontrollable need to do whatever it takes to look like the celebrities they see on television and on the runways. The thought that the materials to make those desired items may have caused the life of animals or the destruction of mother nature does not come into mind. Countless people are concerned about conserving planet Earth and keeping it healthy. The fashion world has been targeted for many corruptions.
Although fashion has an impact on people’s appearances, it has an even bigger impact on people’s lives. Many workers who manufacture clothes, are actually in a copious amount of danger. According to New York Times Upfront Magazine, “...so when her manager refused last year to give her time off to see a doctor about a persistent fever she accepted it…. Shortly after, her heart stopped
Gardner, Marilyn. "Fast Fashion Is a Problem." The Fashion Industry. Ed. Roman Espejo. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2010. Opposing Viewpoints. Rpt. from "Fashion Industry Gives Rise to a 'Disposable Culture, '." The Christian Science Monitor. 2007. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 22 Nov.
In the early 1800s, France was the sole fashion capital of the world; everyone who was anyone looked towards Paris for inspiration (DeJean, 35). French fashion authority was not disputed until the late twentieth century when Italy emerged as a major fashion hub (DeJean, 80). During the nineteenth century, mass produced clothing was beginning to be marketed and the appearance of department stores was on the rise (Stearns, 211). High fashion looks were being adapted and sold into “midlevel stores” so that the greater public could have what was once only available to the social elite (DeJean, 38). People were obsessed with expensive fashions; wealthy parents were advised not the let their children run around in expensive clothing. People would wait for children dressed in expensive clothing to walk by and then they would kidnap them and steal their clothes to sell for money (DeJean, 39). Accessories were another obsession of France‘s fashion; they felt no outfit was complete without something like jewelry or a shrug to finish off the look and make it all around polished (DeJean, 61). As designers put lines together, marketing began to become important to fashion in the nineteenth century; fashion plates came into use as a way to show off fashion l...
Knowingly hidden from the public’s eye, sweatshop factories happen to hold a relatively high degree of existence in the garment industry. In fact, many well-known companies and manufacturers such as Forever 21, H&M, Old Navy, and Zara depend on the performance of sweatshop workers to mass produce their merchandise out to their eager customers (“Fast Fashion: The Real Costs of Your Cheapest Clothes”). Through the exercise of sweatshops, brand name clothing retailers are able to efficiently feed the constant hunger for inexpensive, bargain priced clothes while keeping production costs low and still maximizing profits. Therefore, the commonality of sweatshop warehouses in the garment industry seems to only increase and multiply, as almost all clothing retailers now use sweatshop labor to manufacture their goods (“Sweatshops”). To satisfy customer needs and maintaining gratification, the chase to fast fashion becomes a competitive race to see who can achieve the cheapest price tag out on the shopping racks.