Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Family dynamics and their effects
Effects of family dynamics
Effects of family dynamics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Family dynamics and their effects
It is always a valid reminder to appreciate the achievements and failures of past therapeutic approaches and frameworks. I think it was entertaining to promote a quick fix therapy for a problem to be processed in ten sessions versus the long-term modalities. From a marketing perspective of a family, it is engaging to be able to repair the issue immediately so is that life can go on. Understandably, families came to these sessions to have a therapist resolve their single issue. In regards to longevity of the effectiveness, I do not see the value in the ability to maintain family cohesiveness, for it focuses on a single issue. Contrary to this statement, the treatments effectiveness relies on the families ability to follow through on direction
In attempting to understand the blended family system, one would be remised if we did not first look at, and understand primarily what a family system dynamic is. Unfortunately, this is a theory that once had very clear cut lines; today those lines are a little burred and more subjective than ever before. Given that the family is an ever changing system with fluid boarders, this author will illustrate some finite distinctions that may separate the typical family system from a blended family system.
Within a family system, individuals were seen as a product of the family unit, rather than exclusions of the unit; this eliminated compulsions and obsessions in a family unit (Taylor, Asmundson, & Jang, 2011). Within family system therapy, the goal is to be capable of eliminating abnormalities in functions that affect all individuals and to treat or respond to the entire family; the goal is to also focus on the identified family member, reducing their extreme stress (Carr, 2000). The family system therapy searches for the balance between the independent individual performance and the function of the group (Taylor, Asmundson, & Jang,
Nieter et al. (2013) looked at PCIT with community families and whether the behaviors of the children changed after the 12 sessions. The sample of 27 families was in low socioeconomic statuses, and the children were between 2-8 years of age. Only 17 of these families completed the entire treatment. The families that were in the PCIT program exemplified that the parents and/or caregivers gained skills to help their children’s behavior. The caregivers also in the experimental (PCIT) group believed that their children’s behavior improved by the end of treatment and the parents’ stress level decreased as well. Not only did the children’s behavior improve, but the parents also felt like they did not exhibit inappropriate behaviors (e.g. critical statements) as much and used more prosocial behaviors. The study’s results also may show that the fact that the treatment was in a group setting may have been beneficial, because it provides a support system, and they are able to problem solve together. Even after treatment ended, the parents reported that they kept in contact, creating a strong community. However, on the other hand, the problem with the group setting was the because there were so many groups, each caregiver only received 10-15 minutes of coaching which is shorter than the individual sessions. Thus, the therapists could not ensure that each family fully mastered each session before moving on to the
Today I received a referral from a family who is seeking help regarding their dysfunctional family structure. The Simpson’s are a nuclear family that is having difficulties living as a family. I have already spoken to Marge Simpson and agreed to find a way to get her husband and children to therapy. She has very high aspirations of attending therapy with her family because she has longed for a “normal” functioning family in which her husband and children interact in a much healthier manner than they do now. She described her husband of being careless, her son uncontrollable ate times, and her daughters disconnected from the family. We have set up the meeting for next week, Wednesday at six, when she believed her family would be more willing to attend and actually participate in the therapy session.
In understanding others, one must first understand our own family background and how it affects our understanding of the world. Conversely, family systems draw on the view of the family as an emotional unit. Under system thinking, one evaluates the parts of the systems in relation to the whole meaning behavior becomes informed by and inseparable from the functioning of one’s family of origin. These ideas show that individuals have a hard time separating from the family and the network of relationships. With a deeper comprehension of the family of origin helps with the challenges and awareness of normalized human behaviors. When interviewing and analyzing the family of origin, allow one to look at their own family of origin
Conflicts within relationships are inevitable and some conflict can help strengthen a relationship; however, in marriages and families, many people fail to work through their conflict, which results in unhealthy patterns of behavior. Over time, if left unresolved, these patterns of behavior can lead to a breaking of the relationship. Furthermore, most people do not set out seeking conflict within relationships, but rather they lack the emotional maturity to move through conflict. In fact, it is not the differences between the two parties that create the conflict, but rather the emotional reaction to their differences. Therefore, an intervention is required to begin the healing process of working through conflict. Often a pastor or counselor
“Cognitive-behavior therapy refers to those approaches inspired by the work of Albert Ellis (1962) and Aaron Beck (1976) that emphasize the need for attitude change to promote and maintain behavior modification” (Nichols, 2013, p.185). A fictitious case study will next be presented in order to describe ways in which cognitive behavioral therapy can be used to treat the family members given their presenting problems.
In our society families are the foundation of all human relationships. Therefore learning to maintain and develop healthy families are the goals of family therapist. Counselors can use the Structural Family Therapy approach in counseling hurting families. The pioneer of structural family therapy is Salvador Minuchin (Hammond & Nichols, 2014).
Divorce is and has become a major issue in our society, the reason for that has been attributed to the drastic increase in divorce rates over the years. Divorce often disrupts the flow of the family structure, increases discord, and affects how family issues are handled. Families dealing with divorce are often times in a state of complete confusion and disorder, and filled with frustration, anger, and pain. Power struggles between spouses, which often times spread to the children if there any increase as the addiction worsens. There is a growing concernment among those in different fields like Social Work, Academia, and Mental Health in the United States, other countries, who have taken an interest in how divorce is readjusting
(Jackson & McKergow, 2007) There are important tools that the counselor uses in solution-focused therapy with clients. By focusing on solutions, you can encourage solution talk, negotiate solvable problems and establish who are change customers. (Jackson & McKergow, 2007) The primary maxim of solution-focus therapy is, “find what works and do more of it.” (Jackson & McKergow, 2007) The secondary maxim of the solution-focus therapy is “stop doing what isn’t working and do something different.” (Jackson & McKergow, 2007) I do understand that the solution-focused therapy may not be applicable to cases, but there is a wide variety of clients that this type of therapy can be used on. Some limitations on solution-focused therapy, it may not help in the cure for psychiatric disorders, but it may improve the quality of life. It is apparent that solution-focused therapy does have a great value as a preliminary and sufficient intervention and can be used safely as an adjunct to other treatments. (Iveson, 2002) According to Iveson, he and his colleagues used brief therapy in London work routinely with all age groups and problems, including behavioral problems a school, child abuse and family breakdown, homelessness, drug use, relationship problems and the more intractable psychiatric problems. (Iveson, 2002) In conclusion, solution-focused therapy will work in just any situation for
My theoretical approach to family therapy is very integrative as I believe families cannot be described nor treated from a single-school approach. I view humans through a humanistic and existential lens but am more technically structural and solution-based. With this integrative approach, I believe I will be the most effective in helping families grow and reach their goals.
-Psychologist Robert B. Hobson, having worked with children/adolescents for over 32 years, works with younger clients in need of therapy and sometimes adults. Raising three children of his own, which are now grown, helps him see the patiences issue from both a personal and professional perspective. He works to include family and parents to help participate in ones therapy process. He is a man who Strives to treat the people with respect, listen, and understand ones issues with no mind of judging. Also, he puts in a huge amount of work and time to come up with treatment techniques based on research that supports their effectiveness for each individual. It is important to him that he understands a child’s and family’s strengths and weaknesses in order to
So, they are helpful in changing our behavior patterns. Moreover, psychologists approach treatments and therapy differently. As a matter of fact, these approaches are: behavioral, psychodynamic, humanistic, cognitive, evolutionary, and sociocultural. To me, the sociocultural approach is the most effective in building family relationships. Before therapy, my family and I had multiple arguments, in which sometimes resulted in domestic violence. Due to poor communication, we fought with each almost everyday, usually about small topics. After consulting with a therapist, however, my family’s relationship has transformed. From my experience, family therapy enabled us to admit our problems with each other. Despite the tense moments, we addressed the major issues within our relationship and brainstormed ways in solving them. Furthermore, the therapist restructured the coalitions in my family by suggesting how we should act with one another. Our family therapist also shared the same social and cultural values as my family. We did not oppose to any of her suggestions in improving our behaviors. As a result, the therapist instructed my parents to be less strict and be more lenient towards my siblings and I. In accordance, the motivators of life contributed in improving our relationships by focusing on our social and cultural
When the word “family” is discussed most people think of mothers, fathers, and other siblings. Some people think of grandparents, aunts, uncles, and even cousins and more on the pedigree tree. Without family in people 's lives they would not be the same people that they grew up to be today and in the future. When people hear the word family they think about, the ones who will help them in any way they can whether it 's money, support, advice, or anything to help them succeed in life. Family will forever be the backbone of support. They are the ones who support their children during those life decisions. Family is not always blood related. Finally family is forever, family will never go away.
Walter, J., and Peller, J. (1992). Becoming Solution Focused in Brief Therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel