Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays about family ethics
Essays about family ethics
Ethical dilemma in pediatric nursing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays about family ethics
A child’s ability to make their own medical decisions has been based on many factors, of which include; a stable sense of self, established values and mature cognitive skills. For circumstances when the child want to have a say with their medical decisions, the authors discuss how the family-centered ethic model is used to be the most morally and legally correct in respect to child’s decisions (31).
The practice of the family-centered model allows for consideration of all family members and effect the decision would have, benefits and drawbacks, responsibilities while considering the vulnerability of the child. They then raise a problem with this model being when a parent and a child disagree regarding treatment decisions. This can arise
Autonomy is a concept found in moral, political, and bioethical reasoning. Inside these connections, it is the limit of a sound individual to make an educated, unpressured decision. Patient autonomy can conflict with clinician autonomy and, in such a clash of values, it is not obvious which should prevail. (Lantos, Matlock & Wendler, 2011). In order to gain informed consent, a patient
A. A. The "Best Possible Child" Journal of Medical Ethics 33.5 (2007): 279-283. Web.
Alan Goldman argues that medical paternalism is unjustified except in very rare cases. He states that disregarding patient autonomy, forcing patients to undergo procedures, and withholding important information regarding diagnoses and medical procedures is morally wrong. Goldman argues that it is more important to allow patients to have the ability to make autonomous decisions with their health and what treatment options if any they want to pursue. He argues that medical professionals must respect patient autonomy regardless of the results that may or may not be beneficial to a patient’s health. I will both offer an objection and support Goldman’s argument. I will
According to Richard Charles (2001) “the effectiveness of family systems theory rests not much on empirical research but on clinical reports of positive treatment outcomes, the personal benefits experienced by the families that underwent this kind of treatment, and the elegance of Bowen’s theory” (p. 279). Bowen’s family systems theory views the family as an emotional unit and is a theory of human behavior. Systems thinking is used to describe the complex interactions in the unit. However, the client’s ability to differentiate himself/herself from the family of origin is the basis for Bowen’s family systems theory. In addition, the primary focus for growth within the emotional system is differentiation of self.
The Family-Centered approach to care is important to the delivery of behavioral health services for children and adolescents because it involves the families in their natural environments and allows the families to make decisions about their care. It promotes home and community based care by creating an equal partnership with the family to ensure optimal delivery of care at all levels (Brewer, McPherson, Magrab, & Hutchins, 1989). For children with special health care needs, such as mental or developmental disorders, coordinating care between all services and people can help to introduce flexible and reasonable ways of providing the maximum amount of care to children and families (Brewer, McPherson, Magrab, & Hutchins, 1989).
Charlotte’s parents thought otherwise, the Ethics Advisory Committee had to get involved. The debate surrounded if the doctors were in the right to control the life of someone who were incapable of deciding themselves, or is it the parents right. The Ethics Advisory Committee, stated that the parents were superior to those of the hospital and the hospital should conduct with less painful test. Charlotte’s parents wanted the doctors to continue testing until it was determined that her life diffidently had no chance of remaining. Because, of Charlotte’s parents’ desires unfortunately caused Charlotte to die a painful death without her parents. If the patient is unable to speak for their selves, the family should be able to have some say in the medical treatment, however; if the doctors have tried everything they could do, the hospital should have final decisions whether or not the patient dies or treatment
Although minors are not fully educated or mature enough to make medical decisions for themselves, there are some minors who have been through treatment a lot that do understand their condition. In the article, “Right to Die”, the author James Deacon states that for a child to refuse treatment, they must have the maturity and intelligence to make an informed choice. But the most important is that the child must have the clarity of thought under the circumstances to understand the consequences of either being treated or refusing treatment (Deacon). The author is concluding that if the child is new to this situation and doesn’t know what is going on, then they shouldn’t be allowed to refuse treatment and the medical professionals have every right
In his essay, “The Refutation of Medical Paternalism,” Alan Goldman discusses his argument against differentiation in the roles between physicians and patients. He says the physician may act against a patient’s will in order treat the patient in their best interest. Goldman makes his whole argument around the assumption that a person’s right to decide his or her future is the most important and fundamental right, saying, “the autonomous individual is the source of those other goods he enjoys, and so is not to be sacrificed for the sake of them.” His claim is that most people agree that they are the best judges of their own self-interest and there is an innate value in the freedom to determine their own future. On these principles, Goldman starts by discussing conditions under which paternalism may be justified.
Family systems therapy helps in knowing and understanding the family values. It helps in knowing the bonds that are generated in the relationship between the different family members. Dave knows that he needs help from his parents, but is not able to express it. This approach will help him to talk to his parents, as well as will help him to get close to his parents in such bad times. It is not easy even to talk to your parents, and hence this theoretical approach describes the path through which one can achieve his desired family objective. Family is important in every need and in every cause. But, this theoretical approach needs to be applied along with the application of integration and application theory (Attree, 2005). Family life alone will not help Dave to come out of his problems; hence, he needs some sort of integration that will handle all his issues. He needs to improve his relations with his friends and colleagues, in order to perform better in his life. And, this will be only possible, if he is able to integrate his professional life as well as personal life in a better way. Further, family systems therapy will help him to stay in a better way with his parents. He will engage them in his every conversation, which in turn will make his life joyful. He will feel more relax, cool, calm, and stress-free in his life
Adolescence 38.150 (2003), she says that Although adults receive considerable encouragement to become active participants in healthcare decisions, children and adolescents often have little voice in decisions about their medical treatment (Kunin, 1997; Lidz et al., 1984). As minors, adolescents often are unable legally to provide informed consent and are granted limited access to
It is clear that modern medicine is capable of rescuing patients from near death. Whether the patient wants to be rescued may be their own legal right but is an ethical dilemma for the medical community. We also observe the denial of proper treatment from those who are bound by the religious views of their employment. An adult with a clear state of mind should have the right to accept or deny treatment, while the physician should not have the right to deny life-saving treatment. It is clear that when a child’s life is endangered, treatment will be given even against the will of the provider. This is a field that will continue to face ethical decisions and ensuing cases against the medical community for their choice to either uphold or deny their patients choice.
Neonatal resuscitation is intervention after a baby is born to strengthen it’s breathe or to boost its heartbeat. Approximately 10% of neonates require some assistance to begin breathing at birth, but only 1% require serious resuscitative measures. Informed consent regarding neonatal resuscitation is a constant ethical debate. This discourse ordinarily occurs between doctors and parents; parents often feel that the decision has been made for them, believing that they were not fully informed of any consequences that may occur before making their final action plan, or thinking that their opinion was not taken seriously; however, doctors see the procedure in a different light, that the parents can’t choose the best option for the child regardless of counseling, or performing as the parents wished but believing that the result could have differed if the parents had known all the effects that it will have further down the line, or convinced that they would have made a better
Is it true that working-class couples actually marry for love, or does it depend on the situation? What causes people to want to get married? Do people want to marry someone based off similar family values? If so, what differentiates family values from regular values? A family value is a value that a family holds while a regular value is held by an individual. Family values can change as a family grows and changes. My family personally has gone through several family value transitions, and so has many other families in the world.
Medical emancipation takes away authority of the parents to be involved with medical matters relating to their children even if they are under the age of majority” (Hunter). Now, the reason Anna seeks medical emancipation is because her parents expect her to give up one of her kidneys to her older sister Kate. The reason she felt that she needed to appeal for medical emancipation is because her parents would always assume command in making their daughter’s medical decisions. They never gave Anna the choice to refuse the procedure. Anna’s forced cooperation brings about the ethical issue of whether a parent always knows best.
...e upon a painful treatment the child is in no position to tell them otherwise. “According to a traditional Confucian interpretation, a child who agrees to a parent’s refusal of treatment would be violating the principle of filial piety” (Bowman). This makes the children very inactive in their own situation’s outcome. Therefore children and doctors do not have a very direct relationship and the communication is left to be between the older people of the patient’s family and the doctor resulting in a more technically based and advanced language.