Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Journalists'defamation cases
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Journalists'defamation cases
In my last analysis is the US Supreme Court decision in Falls v The Sporting News Publishing Company that is an example of how the district court of Michigan defined a sportswriter as a pubic figure. At the time of the libel suit, Joseph F. Falls was a 57-year-old veteran Sports Editor of The Detroit News. In 1963, Falls began working freelance writing a weekly column for The Sporting News Company. It was during this employment that the libel dispute took place. The libel dispute had its beginning in 1985 when Falls was fired by Tom Barnidge, The Sporting News’ Editor. Upon firing Falls, Barnidge was quoted as saying “Mr. Falls no longer fit our image” (Falls v. The Sporting News Publishing Company, 1990). In addition to the first comment, …show more content…
on June 19, 1985 Editor Barnidge wrote in response to a reader’s letter regarding Falls termination that "I know that Joe brightened a lot of hearts with his column through the years but we felt it was time to make a change, with more energetic columnists who attend more events and are closer to today's sports scene." Moreover, on September 17, 1985 USA Today wrote a “cover story” about the events taking place at The Sporting News Company where defendant Richard Waters, president and chief executive officer of The Sporting News Company was quoted as saying "[t]hose who seem to have reached maturity and are on the downswing are giving way to some of the up-and-coming young writers who we think deserve a chance." Therefore, these two statements form the basis for Falls defamation claim because they are embarrassing, defamatory attacks to his character. Defendants Waters and Barnidge argued that Falls should be tried as a public figure because he is an integral part of their success – without his articles, TNS would not be nearly as popular with its readers.
Moreover, the whoel controversy was sparked over a letter to the editor. Furthermore, Relying on Gertz v Robert Welch, the district court states that a public figure is “"For the most part those who attain this status have assumed roles of especial prominence in the affairs of society. Some occupy positions of such persuasive power and influence that they are deemed public figures for all purposes. More commonly, those classed as public figures have thrust themselves to the forefront of particular public controversies in order to influence the resolution of the issues involved. In either event, they invite attention and comment." (Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 1974) Therefore, with regard to his activities relating to sports, writing, and criticism – anyone who voluntarily writes articles for a national purpose is deemed a public figure. However, Falls didn’t agree that he should be tried as a public figure, and thus, we will explore his argument. The Plaintiff Falls argues that he is a not a public figure because he did not voluntarily thrust himself into public controversy over his termination. However, this is not the test. Rather, the test is if the title “sportswriter” earns him public figure attention for the purposes of commentary. According to the USA Today’s “cover story,” The Sporting News had a circulation of 700,000 in 1985. Due to this finding, Falls could not argue a claim for protection as a private figure, and thus, he is required to prove actual
malice. In handing down their decision, the district court found that the prominence of Falls’ role as a sportswriter in accordance to his role as a sports editor for The Detroit News did indeed make him a public figure. Moreover, Falls played a large role in The Sporting News viewer rate. Although, Falls has yet to prove actual malice, the judgment of the district court was affirmed. In conclusion, defamation law is a double-edged sword that can ruin lives. Protecting people’s character comes with cost and defamation law tries to balance that by weighing the right to free speech against the right of people to their reputations. If disputed correctly, one can use defamation law as a means to combat libel and slander.
McKichan v. St. Louis Hockey Club, L.P. was a personal injury case filed on March 17, 1998, in which the plaintiff claimed that the defendant club was vicariously liable for their employee’s actions that caused the plaintiff’s injury. The injury in question occurred in Peoria, Illinois during an IHL game on December 15, 1990 between the Peoria Rivermen and the Milwaukee Admirals. While the St. Louis Hockey Club technically wasn’t playing in the game, they can be held liable for the injury, as the Peoria Rivermen are a subsidiary of the club. During the third period of said game, the defendant, Stephen McKichan, a goalie for the Admirals, was both injured and rend unconscious by a body-check from a Peoria player. This body-check occurred after play was stopped due to the hockey puck floating out-of-bounds. Also, the defendant player ‘s body-check had occurred after the referee had blown his whistle twice to signal the play stoppage. After the injury, the defendant’s player received a game misconduct and a suspension. The player would also go on to settle with the plaintiff out
In Herbert’s and Seaver’s letters (1970), Herbert writes to Seaver discussing Seaver’s commercial use of the line “It’s the Real Thing” for Mr. Haskin’s book without “consent” from the Coca-Cola company: Seaver’s letter is a reply discussing the misunderstanding for the line. The speaker of both letters utilizes a different approach to explain to each other their justification of Coca-Cola’s ownership for the line and commercial use of it. Herbert’s letter contains a condescending and arrogant tone; because of this, Seaver replied back in a satirical, sarcastic, and an almost amused tone.
A) McGeary, Johanna. McCarthy's First Slander. Time, 3/31/2003, Vol. 161 Issue 13, pA28,1/4p 1bw; (AN 9349282)
“NEW YORK TIMES v. UNITED STATES.” The Oyez Project. llT Chicago-Kent College Of Law, n.d. Web. 5 Dec. 2013.
Gevinson, Matilda. Ethical Rules on Sport’s Justice. Dallas: East Dallas Times, page 21. 2008. Print
Hariman, R. “Performing the Laws: Popular Trials and Social Knowledge” from Popular Trials: Rhetoric, Mass Media, and the Law, Robert Hariman, ed(s)., University of Alabama Press, 1990. 17-30.
Riccardi, Michael (1998) “Dennis: Get Rid Of Challenges Without Cause” The Legal Intelligencer, Oct. 14: pg 1.
Remy, Richard C., Gary E. Clayton, and John J. Patrick. "Supreme Court Cases." Civics Today. Columbus, Ohio: Glencoe, 2008. 796. Print.
Palmer, Elizabeth A. "The Court and Public Opinion." CQ Weekly 2 Dec. 2000. CQ Weekly. SAGE Publications. Web. 1 Mar. 2000. .
Athletes have been abusing their spouses since sports were created, but not until the OJ Simpson trial did domestic violence become "the issue du jour." When Simpson was arrested on New Years Day for beating his wife, none of the newspapers reported it. When he pleaded no contest five months later, there was a small brief in the second page of The Los Angeles Times' Metro Section (Cart).
Arguing that the experiences of the McCarthy years profoundly influenced the practice of journalism, he shows how many of the issues faced by journalists in the 1950s prefigure today's conflicts over the right of journalists to protect their sources. The journalists’ treatment was unfair that is why they believed that going to jail is better than stating false facts in front of the court because they were innocent. “If you don’t stand for what you believe in, don’t risk a decision because you think you might lose, I think that is a short-sighted approach” (Alwood, 148) This is a fascinating and detailed look at one aspect of the McCarthy era that continues to influence contemporary journalism.
Holmes Jr, Oiver Wendle. United States. Supreme Court. 274 U.S. 200, at 207. 1927. Print.
Writers John Stossel and Frank Mastropolo, both working as a correspondent and journalist in ABC News, open their article highlighting the accomplishments of Bruce Marrow, a radio personality legend who “has been on the air for decades,” “Introduced the Beatles at the New York Shea’s Stadium,” and “was credited with helping push oldies station WCBS-FM to number one” (Stossel). However, the writers ended the paragraph talking about how legend Bruce Marrow, despite his endeavors, had been abruptly fired without any warning three years ago. They then continue to apply the same scenario to Kansas City DJ’s Max Floyd and Tanna Guthrie from 99.7 KY. The main reason why Stossel and his co-writer had decided to brusquely end the first paragraph of the article, it is not to embarrass Bruce Marrow or Max Floyd or Tanna Guthrie, but instead, to identify whether it is fair for people to get fired, even after they help build a company, just because they are getting old. The writer’s thesis starts off effective, but the bitter, harsh tone undoes its effectiveness.
The author provides a rough timeline of the objective norm emerging in American journalism, and explains the inner origin of these co...
Sport is never far from controversy. Whether it be alcohol-fuelled misbehaviour, allegations of drug abuse or inappropriate public musings on a thorny political issue, the national press is filled to the brim with sports stars dragging the image of their employers — and the sports they represent — through the proverbial mud.