Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
My culture - essays
English language: writing argumentative essay
My culture - essays
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: My culture - essays
First thing that I want to say is that this essay is not one of the greatest things that I wrote. For the title, I wanted it to sound really eye grabbing and interesting, so I called my essay “A Fault In Our News”. This was based off of a famous book called “The Fault In Our Stars”. Since I found out that the title is not an academic title, I followed the revision guide and I made the revised essay title to “Fake News: Manipulation of Public Opinion”. After writing the title, I worked on introducing the essay. In both essays, I introduce the it with a story of my mom watching a fake video that she thinks is real. In the original essay, I ended the lead-in abruptly. It sounded kind of awkward, so in the revised essay I added a smoother transition …show more content…
Another thing that I changed from the original to the revised essay is the inclusion of a source. In the original essay, I included a basic definition of the term “fake news”. I felt the inclusion to defined the term “fake news” was not necessary because after I defined the term, I stated that fake news is more prevalent than ever. Since that fake news have been a widespread issue, the definition of fake news should be common knowledge by. For this reason, I got rid of the source from the introduction. After revising the introduction, I continue to revised my body paragraphs. There was only one thing I edited in the first body paragraph. In the original essay, there was a sentence where I describe how teenagers are easy target by fake news due to their lack of media literacy skills and emotional appeal. I was told that the sentence was either incomplete or a run on sentence, so I changed it around from saying emotional appeal to easy manipulation. For the …show more content…
I want to say that I made huge changes to these paragraphs. In the original essay, I discuss about how Facebook can fight back against fake news along with the French president promoting a law that deal with reducing fake new too. I didn’t included a source that talks about Facebook’s method of combating fake news, so I included a source along with adding more explanation in the revised essay. For the other con point paragraph, I found a more up to date and better article about the fake news law that Malaysia is trying to promote. I replaced entire paragraph about the fake news law in France with the fake news law in Malaysia. In the refute paragraph, I tried to add a better explanation of why banning fake news was bad because I felt that I did a bad job of explaining it in the original. For the conclusion, I got rid of some unneeded lines so that I can fit more words into my
Through manipulation and lies, media manages to modify objective news into biased news in order to convince the public of what the media wants them to believe. The article, “How the Media Twist the News”, by Sheila Gribben Liaugminas discusses the major influence that news has on readers based on their choice of stories and words. “How the Media Twists the News” has borrowed from multiple other texts such as the books like Public Opinion and Liberty and News, news magazine writers such as Ruderman, and news networks like CBS through Bias, A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News and CNN to make her arguments valid and prove that the news is biased and that it does influence readers significantly because of it.
In his essay, “The Good, The Bad, and The Daily Show,” Jason Zinser explores the vices and virtues of so-called “fake” news programs. “Fake” news, as Zinser explains, are those programs that blend newsworthy events with comedy. By examining The Daily Show, Zinser reveals both positive and negative impacts that “fake” news could have on society. As a result, Zinser concludes that there are benefits as well as potential problems with “fake” news programs but insists that the true challenge is determining the net impact on society. The essay, which first appeared in The Daily Show and Philosophy: Moments of Zen and the Art of Fake News in 2007, challenges experts on both sides of the argument who either claim fake news is for entertainment only or that fake news is an acceptable source for information on current events. On one hand, Zinser uses expert testimonies to support his argument that the end result is a better informed public but on the other, he makes logical arguments enhanced by examples to illustrate the potential impacts “fake” news can have on its viewers and mainstream media.
My Unit 2 was researching academic journals and analyzing the techniques that they used in order to support their claim. But I had to find articles that were pro and con stances for the topic. For my Unit 2 essay, I had laid out a clear plan on how I was going to describe my topic. My topic was African American College dropout rates and I believe it is because of the price of college tuition. After I explained the issue, in my following paragraphs I started with the articles the were “pro” African American struggles to pay for college tuition because of financial struggle. Then I described the journals that were “con” and believe that college expenses are not the reason why African Americans dropout of
Many of the mistakes I would have deemed inconsequential in the past resembles glaring flaws now. The introduction and conclusion paragraphs were where the most work was done. In the introduction, I inserted a hook and blended the paragraph together. I accomplished this by adding transition words and changing the tense to fit the rest of the essay. In the conclusion, I completely started over. The original was bland, boring, and just plain repetitive. In the revised version, I outlined the essay, restated the thesis, and ended by suggestion other applications.
The question was to write a 4 page in which you discuss the impact a on-literacy text has on your reading of “The Lottery,” “Sonny’s Blues,” OR “Hills Like White Elephants.” I chose the story “Sonny’s Blues” because I Understood this story better than others. First of all, since I did not get good grades, I thought I should put more effort on these papers in order to do better in this course. So, I tried to use some higher level words so that my paper may look like a higher writer’s paper. Same as the 1st paper, my thesis statement still was not clear because the way I put the thesis, it seems like my opinion, however, If I try I can make it look like a better thesis statement. For example, “I think you can work on your thesis. Your thesis is like generalized about the story but professor want something that changed or confirmed your view. Definitely, you can work on thesis to make clear idea what this essay is about.” (Peer Review 2- Islam) In other words, as I said, my thesis is more look like a sentence that summarizes the story where in this paper, it should look like a change that after reading a secondary source have made. This was my thesis, “A non literary text impact various way depending on how an individual analyzes the piece.” (Paper 2-page 1). After the peer review, I have changed my thesis statement into something like this “Reading
I am writing this letter in reference to the revisions I made in my rhetorical analysis essay over gender identity. The revisions fall into three major categories: content expansion over the essay’s exigency and ethos, mechanics throughout the essay, and content correction in the discussion over pathos and other areas.
... review the paragraph, it was easy to give some examples by referring to numbered sentences. Moreover, this paper used some sources which are related to academic writing and used widely in that field so that the review will increase its own credibility. After completing this assignment, I learned credibility has an important role in reviewing since the review should be persuasive to explain understand how the paragraph could be better to the writer. Credibility is needed for not only reviewing but also rhetoric as communicator has to illustrate text for audience in rhetorical situations.
I chose to compare paragraphs one and two. Paragraph two is much more effective in giving me pertinent information, in a way that I can understand it. Paragraph two, although it did lack variety in its sentences, was more efficient, and to the point. It was full of facts that can be useful, without too much wordy language. The author of paragraph one would benefit from reading over her work and editing it for content. She jumped around from topic to topic, even within the same sentence. Although paragraph one demonstrated an individuals’ experience with a loved one not developing his end affairs properly, it read as though it was written for a casual audience, perhaps as an e-mail giving advice to a friend. The author of the second paragraph clearly kept an academic audience in mind; this paragraph could also be seen in a business journal and not look out of place. Proper punctuation, spelling and grammar were evident in the second paragraph. The person who wrote paragraph two clearly did his research, and made an effective point in his work.
I read this essay for the analysis of an essayists writing style. Before I took any notes, I read through the whole thing once without taking notes to ensure I understood the basic idea of the text. Then, I took basic notes summarizing each important paragraph of the essay. Finally, I read through the text a third time to identify techniques. There are no notes with question marks are random comments about my own personal experience; there are only notes that will benefit me when I refer back to them. There is also an obvious improvement in the quality of my notes. There were multiple times I was able to identify several different logical fallacies, which I had not heard of before this class. I was able to understand gawker.com and “some dude who works for Slam magazine” are not credible sources, and that the inclusion of the Faulty Use of Authority added to the comical tone of the essay. I also identified and highlighted examples of sarcasm and hyperbole so I could easily find them later
I used plenty of second-hand sources, as the prompt requires, yet I seemed to rely too heavily on the evidence and not enough on how that contributed to my personal argument. I noticed while looking over this essay that I had a small obsession with short sentence structure, as nearly half of all my sentences were short in length, with only one “long” sentence present. My vocabulary was decent, but undeveloped in this essay. My argument about a scholarly issue could be strengthened with stronger diction. My transitions were sound in this essay, and the essay read smoothly. In this essay, my conclusive skills are displayed as I correctly wrap up my argument, and reiterate the main points of the prior
The first thing I would look at is the structure of your essay. The paper feels like it jumps around a lot. There are several places where I think you could split a single paragraph into several, and add more information to both paragraphs. The first time I noticed this was on your first page in your second paragraph. I think it would be much stronger if you ended the second paragraph after you say “made it okay for women to be a part of that industry”. I think the second part about Lydia Thompson stands on its own, especially because it introduces a new topic with burlesque coming to America. I would spilt this paragraph again after “made for a wild spectacle”, because you go into talking about how theatre was predominantly male, and this feels like a whole new topic.
Wolper, Allan. “Ethics Corner: Did Critical Media Send Dean Packing?” Editor & Publisher March 2004: 25.
The Power of the Media in Politics The mass media possesses a great deal of influence in society and politics in the United States. Newspapers, radio, magazines and television. are able to use their own judgment when reporting current events. The The power of the mass media is an asset to the government in some instances and a stumbling block in others. Recent technology and regulations related to The media have improved the means by which the public can get information.
The main aim of this report is to analyze the impacts of changes in the media concerning the societal and individual view of politics and politicians. The report also describes significant milestones in mass media since the year 1960 and examines the impact of mass media on how people think politically. The report then considers the effect of technological advancements in mass media and the effect on the results of elections. The use of mass media has increased over the last fifty years in that it is a primary medium through which supporters of various campaigners share their ideas and views concerning politicians and different political parties. Through social media, behaviors and performance of several activists have brought
In our democratic society, mass media is the driving force of public opinion. Media sources such as Internet, newspaper, news-broadcasts, etc, play significant roles in shaping a person’s understanding and perception about the events occurred in our daily lives. As long as the newspapers, internet, network television, etc, continued to be easily accessible to the public, the media will continue to have an influence in shaping its opinions. Factors such as agenda-setting, framing and priming help shape the public opinions. Agenda-setting is when the media focuses their attention on selected issues on which the public will form opinion on, whereas framing allows the media to select certain aspects about the problem and then make them appear more salient. Similarly, priming works by repeatedly exposing certain issues to public. As the issues get more exposure, the individual will be more likely to recall or retain the information in their minds. This paper will discuss these three factors played out systemically by media and how our opinions are constantly being influence and shape by them.