Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Monopoly market edition
The United States has an abundance of fair practices laws that intend to make things fair, yet competitive. I feel that these laws are absolutely effective in helping to balance our country. Fair practices in business protect the businesses as well as the consumers in many ways including: monopolization protection, conspiring to fix pricing or allocate customers, price gouging, and many other important protections (SBA, 2013).
In 1890 Congress passed the Sherman act with their first attempt at protecting businesses and consumers (FTC, 2008). This act was to touch down on monopolization and unreasonable trade. In order to protect consumers and businesses it was decided that monopolization; or the practice of controlling a single market, was an unfair act. Not only do monopolies have the ability to play with prices, but they can also decrease the quality of their products (Amadeo, 2013). For the consumer it could be unfortunate if, for example, the only supply of baby formula is controlled by a single company and the price increased by 40% after competition has been knocked out.
In some instances however, monopolies could be good and they are not actually illegal in the United States. A monopoly can be good if they are using their power to consistently deliver a product or service. In cases such as electric and water, where the cost is extremely high to supply them, they are controlled by the government which protects the consumer from high prices. The government controls the prices that they set and allows them to recoup and obtain a reasonable profit for their services and products (Amadeo, 2013). In this way it shows that monopolies are not illegal, but they are tightly controlled under the Sherman Anti-Trust Act.
In 1914, yet ...
... middle of paper ...
... Retrieved from http://www.ftc.gov/speeches/other/patman.shtm
Date Referenced on the web: November 15, 2013
Cornell University. (2013). Unfair competition law: an overview.
Retrieved from http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/unfair_competition
Date Referenced on the web: November 15, 2013
Federal Trade Commission. (2008, July 08). Antitrust laws.
Retrieved from http://www.ftc.gov/bc/antitrust/antitrust_laws.shtm
Date Referenced on the web: November 15, 2013
Investopedia. (2013). Hart-scott-rodino antitrust improvements act of 1976.
Retrieved from http://www.investopedia.com/terms/h/hart-scott-rodino-antitrust- improvements-act-of-1976.asp
Date Referenced on the web: November 15, 2013
U.S. Small Business Administration. (2013).Understanding fair practice.
Retrieved from http://www.sba.gov/content/understanding-fair-practice
Date Referenced on the web: November 15, 2013
Unfortunately, these monopolies allowed companies to raise prices without consequence, as there was no other source of product for consumers to buy for cheaper. The more competition, the more a company is forced to appeal to the consumer, but monopolies allowed corporations to treat consumers awfully and still receive their business. Trusts were bad for both the consumers and the workers, but without proper representation, they could do nothing. However, with petitions, citizens got the first anti-trust law passed by the not entirely corrupt Congress, called the Sherman Act of 1890. It prevented companies from trade cooperation of any kind, whether good or bad. Most corporate lawyers were able to find loopholes in the law, and it was largely ineffective. Over time, the Sherman Anti-Trust Act of 1890, and the previously passed Interstate Commerce Act of 1887, which regulated railroad rates, grew more slightly effective, but it would take more to cripple powerful
Since this debate still rages on, many people argue both sides of the story of the pros and cons. Many would argue that not breaking up monopolies actually increase the competition of companies that are attempting to break into some of the market share that the monopoly already has, more so than the free market that exists now. Proponents of the Sherman Anti-Trust act argue that “absolute power corrupts absolutely” (Martin, 1996) as originally quoted by Baron Acton. The idea that no competition within the business world establishes no risk and reward that is all part of the entrepreneur spirit of the U.S. spirit.
Before a series of antitrust acts and laws were instituted by the federal government, it was not illegal for businesses to use any means to eliminate competition in late nineteenth-century America. Production technology was now advanced to the point that supply would surpass product demand. As competition in any given market increased, more and more companies joined together in either trusts or holding companies to bring market dominance under their control (Cengage 2). As President Theodore Roosevelt was sworn into office in 1901, he led America into action with forceful government solutions (“Online” 1). Roosevelt effectively regulated offending business giants by the formation of the Department of Commerce and Labor, the Bureau of Corporations, and antitrust lawsuits.
I have never had a strong opinion on monopolies in Canada. However, I believe that monopolies can stifle innovation, competition, and affect the prices that the consumer has to pay for a product or service. Since we live in a mixed market economy, Canada has very few monopolies such as the health, airspace, and telecommunications industries. Companies within theses industries are notorious for price fixing, lack of innovation, and competition. These problems are prevalent because of the barriers to entry the new players face such government regulation, the cost of doing business, and infrastructure.
United States has several laws that ensure that competition among businesses flow rely and new competitors get free access to the market. These laws intend to ensure fair and balanced competitive business practices. However, there are times when some businesses will do anything to gain competitive edge. USA has strong antitrust laws that prohibit fixing market price, price discrimination, conspiring boycott, monopolizing, and adopting unfair business practices. The history of Antitrust laws goes back to 1890 when Congress passed Sherman Act. In 1914, Congress passed two more acts: Federal Trade Commission Act, and Clayton Act. With some revisions, these three acts are still core antitrust acts.
We all hear the term “monopoly” before. If somebody doesn't apprehend a monopoly is outlined as “The exclusive possession or management of the provision or change a artifact or service.” but a natural monopoly could be a little totally different in which means from its counterpart. during this paper we'll be wanting into the question: whether or not the govt. ought to read telephones, cable, or broadcasting as natural monopolies or not; and may they be regulated or not?
Additionally, in an effort to establish and standardize fair trade practices in interstate and international commerce, the government enacted laws that were directed toward labor unions and the labor relations process. These laws have either benefited or were detrimental to labor organizations.
middle of paper ... ... Also, some railroads gave special rates to some shippers in exchange that the shippers continued doing business with the railroad company. In the Clayton Antitrust Act, it said no one in commerce could regulate rates of price between different buyers (Document E). It said that otherwise, this would create a monopoly in any line of commerce. However, the Elkins Act of 1903 pushed heavy fines on the companies that did that.
There are several laws in the United States that are meant to set a standard for fair, balanced, and competitive business practices. These are, by design, a way to ensure that international trade as well as domestic is done in a reputable and progressive fashion. There are many aspects that come into scrutiny in considering whether a business is operating in a way that is fair; one view can be related to The Eagle and The Condor Theory. “There is no universally recognized definition of Fair Trade, but its principles and practices include fair wages, cooperative workplaces, consumer education, environmental sustainability, direct trade with producers, financial and technical support for producers, community development, respect for cultural identity, and public accountability through transparency.” (Stenzel, 2012). Related to this description of fair trade, there are laws in the U.S. that aim to regulate business. One such law is the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914.
By law a monopoly is not allowed to exist in the US. It has been long debated whether Microsoft is a monopoly or not? Among other charges Microsoft was charged with "monopolizing the computer operating system market, integrating the Internet Explorer web browser into the operating system in an attempt to eliminate competition from Netscape, and using its market power to form anticompetitive agreements with producers of related goods" (SWLearning).
Monopolies are when there is only one provider of a specific good, which has no alternatives. Monopolies can be either natural or artificial. Some of the natural monopolies a town will see are business such as utilities or for cities like Clarksville with only one, hospitals. With only one hospital and there not being another one for a two hour drive, Clarksville’s hospital has a monopoly on emergency care, because there is not another option for this type of service in the area. Artificial monopolies are created using a variety of means from allowing others to enter the market. Artificial monopolies are generally rare or absent because of anti-trust laws that were designed to prevent this in legitimate businesses. However, while these two are the ends of the spectrum, the majority of businesses wil...
A Monopoly is a market structure characterised by one firm and many buyers, a lack of substitute products and barriers to entry (Pass et al. 2000). An oligopoly is a market structure characterised by few firms and many buyers, homogenous or differentiated products and also difficult market entry (Pass et al. 2000) an example of an oligopoly would be the fast food industry where there is a few firms such as McDonalds, Burger King and KFC that all compete for a greater market share.
Well the bottom line is that a monopoly is firm that sells almost all the goods or services in a select market. Therefore, without regulations, a company would be able to manipulate the price of their products, because of a lack of competition (Principle of Microeconomics, 2016). Furthermore, if a single company controls the entire market, then there are numerous barriers to entry that discourage competition from entering into it. To truly understand the hold a monopoly firm has on the market; compare the demand curves between a Perfect Competitor and Monopolist firm in Figure
A monopoly is “a single firm in control of both industry output and price” (Review of Market Structure, n.d.). It has a high entry and exit barrier and a perceived heterogeneous product. The firm is the sole provider of the product, substitutes for the product are limited, and high barriers are used to dissuade competitors and leads to a single firm being able to ...
Ethical business practices include assuring that the highest legal and moral standards are observed in your relationships with the people in your business community. This includes the most important person in your business, your customer. Short term profit at the cost of losing a customer is long term death for your business.