Failures In Criminal Investigation

2948 Words6 Pages

In the United States, all over the media are cases of excess force used, or corrupt law enforcement problems in conducting cases or investigations. Mistakes are aired all over, and usually little is done to compensate for these errors. In this country, we have a very small amount of laws directed towards these problems. By taking a look at investigative errors, and previous cases, we can see that torts of negligent investigations should be created to try and stop all of the corruption in a system that is supposed to protect us. Although most officers are fantastic and risk their lives to protect their communities, there are some that need to be weeded out of the system.
According to the article, Failures in Criminal Investigation, (Rossmo …show more content…

Heuristics are often used in situations where uncertainty exists. They involve using short cuts or an educated guess in order to solve a problem. This technique can be useful for picking up on suspicious activity to conduct a stop and frisk, or for other low risk actions, but when they are used for more complicated and serious matters, is when it becomes a problem. Since these hunches are not factual, more based on rule of thumb, they have a higher possibility of being wrong. If an entire case is based off of a misleading hunch, than any work devoted to solving such case is not valid. Facts and evidence that are actually proven true should only be included to avoid this mishap. Tunnel vision is included as one example of heuristics. Tunnel vision occurs when only a specific path is focused on, ignoring other possibilities. Focusing on only one possibility severely limits the possibility of discovering new information that may be crucial to solving a case. It is important to explore and to be aware of all possible …show more content…

Harris (1989) also produced a desirable outcome. In 1978, Geraldine Harris was arrested and brought to the Canton Police station. She was slumped in the backseat of the cruiser upon arrival, and was asked if she required any medical attention. She responded with a statement that was not understood by the officer. Upon being brought inside, she fell to the floor twice. The officers left her on the ground so that she would not fall again. Medical attention was never sought out, and was taken to the ambulance by her family upon her release. Mrs. Harris was hospitalized for about one week, and placed in an outpatient treatment center for a year. She sued under the due process clause in the fourteenth amendment right of receiving medical attention if needed while in custody. The case made it up to the Supreme Court. They ruled that municipalities can be tried with failure to train their officers, but it “requires the evidence of deliberate departure from professional norms.” (Epp 2008) This means that officers either aren’t trained properly, or intentionally have to go out of their way in order to be

More about Failures In Criminal Investigation

Open Document